Attracting international students, intellectuals, and technicians from different nations is of pivotal form of soft power within higher education context. Increasing number of foreign students also can promote the soft power of nations.
2. Education as an Effective Soft Power Instrument Culture and education come to be one of the most effective soft power instruments. In line with this, soft power is contrasted with 'hard power', which implies using of military force and coercion.
In the conceptualized soft power conversion model of HE, the idea of the integrated behaviors includes three major components, including the educational and finance resources, education policy process, and education policy outcomes in higher education system.
Soft power is the ability to get what you want through attraction rather than through coercion or payments. Joseph Nye, who coined the term "soft power", explains why it is becoming more important, largely due to globalization and the communication revolution. EDUCAUSE Comments: Dept. of Ed. Guidance on Third-Party Servicers (TPSs)
The idea of the internal soft power is identified as the political attractiveness and cultural attractiveness at the international, national, institutional, and individual levels in the interplay of the internationalization and globalization of the higher education worldwide. In the conceptualized soft power conversion model of higher education, bo
In the higher education system, the external regime refers to the international regime that is the favorable international system structure of higher education. The independency and complexity of the internationalization and globalization of higher education serve as external regimes for shaping soft power of higher education fundamentally. In the
The implicit pathway of conceptualizing soft power conversion model of higher education involves advocating global learning, global competence, and global citizenship at international, national, and institutional individual levels. Advocating global citizenship is essential to cultivate global competence through offering global learning. In additio
The Association of American Colleges and Universities identified the term global learning as a focus on what students are actually expected to learn through curriculum and educational experiences. The Liberal Education and America’s Promise (LEAP) Essential Learning Outcomes identified global learning as comprised of four cross-cultural learning ou
Hovland (2014a, b) described students as becoming informed, open-minded, responsible people through global learning, who are seeking to understand how their behavior impacts both local and global communities and who can address pressing and enduring issues collaboratively and equitably. In this sense, the rationale of global learning involves offer
In earlier work, Hovland’s definition of global learning focused on the objective of cultivating a global learner in postsecondary education. He pointed out that a global learner should be able to (1) articulate their own values and ideas in the context of personal identities and recognize diversified and conflicting social and civic problems and i
Hunter’s conceptualization of global learning focuses on the institutional perspective. At an institutional level, faculty and institutional leaders should actively participate in the conversation on what the core idea of global learning means at their specific institutions. In this sense, each specific institution is expected to develop their defi
AAC&U’s Valid Assessment of Learning in Understanding Education (VALUE) program involved faculty experts in defining a rubric for global competency, which requires the identification of different dimensions of the learning outcome that can be then characterized according to levels of proficiency. In the global learning VALUE rubric, the global lear
In parallel with identifying the definitions and critiques of global learning, LEAP includes some strategies for advocating global learning, including improving learning outcomes to guide curriculum development pedagogical approaches; offering sequential progression to improve students’ global capabilities rather than specific course content; invol
Stuart Hunter and White (2004) viewed the idea of global competency as an interaction between “student’s adaptation” and “cross-cultural environmental change.” Student’s adaptation is a student’s tendency to be a global learner through performing different specific skills directed toward engaging in a cross-cultural environment. A cross-cultural en