Blandin suggests that biodiversity is just a new incarnation of nature, and has become “aussi indéfinissable que l’est la nature [as indefinable as nature]” ( 2014 :51). Similarly, others have suggested that biodiversity is interpreted flexibly, with each interpreter using the vagueness of the term to read into whatever it is they value in nature.
Biodiversity also has an inclusive scope, allowing us to argue for the conservation of species and populations which might fall through the cracks were we to prioritize a different indicator of ecological value. For all these reasons, biodiversity makes sense as a conservation target.
An earlier concept, natural diversity, fits the role better. Natural diversity is broader than biodiversity not only in moving beyond taxonomic categories to encompass other patterns in the tapestry of life, but also in including abiotic, but valuable, aspects of nature.
As a broader concept, natural diversity could be operationalized even more flexibly, for instance in measures of abiotic soil components, as diversity of human experience of landscapes (measured through psychological or economic methods), or as measures of geological composition, 5 to give a few examples.