PDFprof.com Search Engine



Pharmacist and Patient Conversations February 2015

PDF
Images
List Docs
  • How many pharmacist-patient conversations were conducted?

    Observational notes and reflexive note taking were conducted throughout. Twelve pharmacists each engaged four individual patients for a total of 48 pharmacist–patient conversations (resulting in 48 separate interviews with pharmacists and patients).

  • Do Hospital Pharmacists use communication strategies during patient medication counselling?

    To invoke CAT to investigate communication strategies used by hospital pharmacists during patient medication counselling. This was a theory‐based, qualitative study using transcribed audiorecordings of patients and hospital pharmacists engaged in medication counselling. Recruited pharmacists practised in inpatient or outpatient settings.

  • Who initiates a conversation with a pharmacist?

    Based on the in-depth phone interviews with independent pharmacists conducted for this research, patients are the primary initiator of conversations with their pharmacist.

  • How do patient-identified preferences affect pharmacist-patient exchanges?

    Patient-identified preferences for pharmacist-patient exchanges may help guide pharmacy students and practitioners to engage patients in effective conversations. Keywords: Communication Accommodation Theory; communication; hospital pharmacist; patient.

Introduction

Effective conversations between patients and healthcare professionals are necessary for patients to have a good understanding of their medications and be able to manage their medication after discharge.[1,2] Understanding what patients need from a conversation with a hospital pharmacist about their medications may assist pharmacists in preparing pa

Methods

Study type and design This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews to gather details about how pharmacists and patients perceive effective pharmacist–patient conversations. Research ethics approval was received from Human Research Ethics Committees of the participating hospital (HREC/15/QRBW/433) and university (2015/13). Participant inclusion criteria, recruitment and data collection This study took place at a 1000 bed hospital with multiple specialties and service delivery to inpatient wards and outpatient clinics. Further details about methods used can be found in the first part of the study involving audio-recorded pharmacist–patient exchanges.[22] Qualitative analysis and data coding Audio recordings of the semi-structured interviews were transcribed verbatim and verified by comparing transcripts with original audio recordings to reconcile any discrepancies. Pharmacists’ and patients’ opinions of effective pharmacist–patient exchanges were analysed using a process of inductive thematic analysis[23] and then mapped to the CAT strategies. Samples of transcripts coded by BC were checked by co-researchers (BW and WNC) to ensure appropriate and consistent interpretation. NVivo

Results

Medication counselling sessions Twelve pharmacists engaged four patients each for a total of 48 medication counselling interactions, resulting in 48 separate pharmacist and patient semi-structured interviews. The study took place between November 2015 and April 2016. Participant demographic information has been described in Table 1. Pharmacists’ and patients’ opinions about what constitutes an effective conversation While several themes contributing to effective pharmacist–patient conversations were described by participants (Table 2), the overarching goal for pharmacists and patients was a shared confidence in patients being able to manage their medications after leaving hospital. See full list on academic.oup.com

Discussion

Pharmacists and patients were asked their opinions about what made pharmacist–patient conversations effective, and they provided valuable insight about their preferences and goals for these exchanges. The overarching theme or shared goal resonating from the participants’ interviews was that patients need to be confident in managing their medication

Conclusion

Hospital pharmacists and patients provided valuable insights about what makes pharmacist–patient interactions effective. Participants’ shared goal was to ensure patient confidence in managing their medications at home. Pharmacists based patient confidence on patients’ understanding and level of engagement in conversations, while patients emphasised

Declarations

Conflict of interest The Author(s) declare(s) that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Authors’ contributions BC was involved in all aspects of this research project including study planning, design, data collection and analysis as well as writing the manuscript. As one of BC's PhD Advisors, BW participated in many stages of this project including planning, analysis (verification of codes), and reviewing and editing the manuscript. As one of BC's PhD Advisors, MB participated in the planning of the project as well as reviewing and editing the manuscript. As BC's Principal PhD Advisor, WNC participate

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support provided by Metro North Hospital and Health Services in the conduct of this research. See full list on academic.oup.com


Communication Strategies in Pharmacy
DIAOGE44PARMAIE4AND4PRERIPTIN
INGÉNIEUR SPÉCIALITÉ GÉNIE INDUSTRIEL & MATÉRIAUX
Master orienté Recherche® Génie Industriel – MTI3D
L'approche Psychologique du stress
611 L'approche par compétences en psychologie
Incision-pour-la-chirurgie-par-laparotomiepdf
INCISION ET DRAINAGE DES LESIONS SUPERFICIELLES
GISMI-QHSE
L’ANGLAIS À L’OFFICINE
Next PDF List

Pharmacist and Patient Conversations February 2015