second test machine both for JDK 8 and 11 [10] are doing research on the DaCapo benchmark suite, Project must be compatible with Java 8 or 11
FULLTEXT01.pdf
OpenJDK and OracleJDK, using both Java 8 and Java 11 We use the DaCapo bench- 2 1 Performance comparison of system implementations using benchmarks 6
FULLTEXT01.pdf
JDK 8: Lambda Performance study Sergey Kuksenko capture vs Anonymous Class class loading instantiation Slide 4/55 Non-capture lambda: benchmarks
jvmls2013kuksen-2014088.pdf
12x and 57x less pause time compared to Shenandoah [8] and G1 [7] GCs, respec- These two Java-based benchmark suites allow us to disable/enable mul-
stavakolisomeh-nik21.pdf
Adjusted from [19] Compared to previous Java version, there is one essential change in a Java 8 memory management There is not Permanent space anymore
mt_text.pdf
22 avr 2017 · crash on Java 8 (because they rely on internal classes that Compared to the DaCapo benchmark suite and the Da- 11,231 9
p3.pdf
1 avr 2013 · VS MICROSOFT WINDOWS SERVER 2012 AND ORACLE JAVA HOTSPOT on the SPECjbb2013 benchmark when using a large heap 4
RHEL6_jbb_0613.pdf
Most comparisons are hardly fair: e g AOT vs JIT http://openjdk java net/projects/code-tools/jmh/ Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment , 1 8 0-b132
jvmls-July2014-benchmarking.pdf