[PDF] Untitled





Previous PDF Next PDF



Debating SA

This is wrong because (During the debate you will write a reason why what your Third Negative Speaker Template. 6. INTRODUCTION. 1. Good afternoon Mr/Madam.



PDF Sample

Our third speaker will rebut the negative team and sum up our team case. Rebuttal. There is no rebuttal for the first affirmative speaker. Arguments. 1. I am 



NZ-Schools-Debating-How-to-Debate-Guide.pdf

In debating there are two teams of three speakers – the affirmative team and the negative team



THE DEBATING CHEAT SHEET

First Speaker (Negative): The first negative does not need to provide a definition UNLESS the affirmative fails to do so or if you disagree with a fundamental 



Helpsheet

• Third Affirmative Speaker. And correspondingly



Speaker Roles

hand in this debate.” Third Prop — 8 mins. Third Opp — 8 mins. To give the third speech you can choose one of two strategies: point by point rebuttal



PDF Sample

3rd speaker mentioned about the benefit of study abroad which is employment rate. Also



Oxford-style Debate

III. Case line a. State all your arguments first b. Go back then strengthen each one c. Always give transition. IV. Conclusion. Outline of Negative Speech. I 



Debating-A-Brief-Introduction-for-Beginners.pdf

Structure is the organisation and order of a speaker's speech (see debating template). Definition and Interpretation. The definition of the topic consists in 



First Affirmative Speaker Template

The topic for our debate is. “That… DEFINITION Our third speaker will rebut and ... First Negative Speaker Template. 2. INTRODUCTION.



THE DEBATING CHEAT SHEET

Debating is all about three things – Matter Manner and Method. First Speaker (Negative): The first negative does not need to provide a definition



PDF Sample

Our third speaker will rebut the negative team and sum up our team case. Rebuttal. There is no rebuttal for the first affirmative speaker. Arguments. 1.



How to Debate Guide

In debating there are two teams of three speakers – the affirmative team A second negative speech should be split roughly 50/50 between rebuttal of the.



Helpsheet

specific debate. Participants. In formal debating there are two teams: affirmative and negative. There are usually three main speakers on each team:.



Speech Structure Templates

First Affirmative Speaker Template The topic for our debate is ... Our third speaker will rebut and sum up our team case. DEFINITION.



Moneysmart teaching resource

You will research the financial and environmental sustainability of smartphones and compose a speech for the second affirmative/negative speaker. The debate 



text pages

(g) New matter from third negative speakers. 11. (h) The 'invalid' case speeches points of information and two-a-side debates. The handbook became the.



DEBATING TOPICS

Manner refers to the way in which speakers deliver their speeches and use their For example is it fair to include pre-schools in the debate? Is it fair.



Debating-A-Brief-Introduction-for-Beginners.pdf

a Negative – the team that disagrees with the topic. Each side consists of three members; first second and third speakers. The First Affirmative speaker 



EFFECTIVE DEBATING - Library

In formal debating there are two teams: affirmative and negative There are usually three main speakers on each team: • First Affirmative Speaker • Second Affirmative Speaker • Third Affirmative Speaker And correspondingly First Negative Speaker and so on The Adjudicator your teacher is addressed as: Mr/Ms/Mrs Adjudicator



An Introduction To Debate NSDC Bantul PDF

Third Speaker: The third speaker has to do four things Firstly they REBUT Secondly they REBUT Thirdly they REBUT And fourthly they SUM UP Rebutting should take up most of the third speaker’s time They must rebut the WHOLE of the other team’s argument ideally by grouping together similar arguments and picking them apart all at once



Template for debate speeches

3 Our third speaker will rebut the negative team and sum up our team case Rebuttal There is no rebuttal for the first affirmative speaker Arguments 1 I am going to discuss (insert the number of points There are usually 2 or 3 points) points 2 My first point is ( Insert your first point/argument )



Rebut - cpb-ap-se2wpmucdncom

Third Speaker NEGATIVE: 1) Firstly I’d like to look at whether or not the storage of nuclear waste will be safe for either the Australian people or the environment 2) Secondly our opposition have argued that Australia owes an obligation to the rest of the world to support nuclear power and to accept the waste from the uranium that it exports



Searches related to third speaker negative debate speech example PDF

Our third s peaker will rebut the negative team and sum up our team case Rebuttal There is no rebuttal for the first affirmative speaker Arguments 1 I am going to discuss ( insert the number of points There are usually 2 or 3 points ) points 2 My first point is ( Insert your first point/argument This is because/the reason for this is (

What should the 3rd speaker do in a debate?

Third Speaker: 1. Rebut Oppositions arguments, prioritizing the strong/important ones 2. Rebuild the teams case 3. Summarize the issues of the debate Note: It is not advisable for 3rd Government to bring new arguments.

Should a third negative speaker rebut the Third Affirmative Speaker?

The third negative speaker ends the round of debate, allowing them to have the literal last word. Therefore, they shall not squander this opportunity. Instead, the third negative speaker should rebut the third affirmative speaker’s points and succinctly summarize the arguments that their peers have put forth.

How do you rebut a negative statement in a speech?

After defining the motion and outlining the negative team’s case, they should develop an argument of their own and defend it with relevant facts and figures before concluding their speech. The second affirmative speaker is mainly responsible for rebutting the first negative speaker’s points and stating their own points.

How to write a debate speech?

Template for debate speeches, page 2 First speaker, negative team Introduction 1 Good morning/afternoon/evening Mr/Madam Chairman, distinguished guests, teachers and students. 2 The topic for our debate is ‘ that (Insert the topic of the debate.) ’ 3 We agree with the definition given by t he affirmative team. OR We disagree

Rebut

RebutRebut

Never raise new material.

Respond to the other team's case.

You are not a second speaker -

you have a very defined role.

This is at the core of what a third speaker is

expected to do: Are you responding to the debate you EXPECTED to get, or are you responding to the debate that HAPPENED?

How to do this:

1.Always respond to the actual arguments that

the other team puts forward.

2.Focus most of your rebuttal on their strongest,

most important arguments.

3.Finish each rebuttal point to linkingthese back

to your own team's arguments to show why your arguments are better.

Preparation

Think about what arguments the opposition is

likely to make. You can go into the debate with general lines of argument already prepared (just remember to link it to the actual arguments that the other team presents!)

Have brief, one-card-maximum dot-point versions

of your team's arguments so that you can refer to them. The strongest rebuttals will end by showing how your arguments are better.

Focus on rebuttal

Write down (in shorthand if you can!) the

arguments made by the other team when they are speaking. Focus on getting their arguments - not writing our detailed rebuttals of your own - at this stage.

Use the time when your own speakers are

speaking to go back oǀer the opposition's arguments and pick out flaws. Never write out a speech in full -brief dot points are all you will have time for.

Thematic Rebuttal is where you structure your

rebuttal aroundKEY THEMES or QUESTIONS from the debate, rather than working through a series of smaller points.

Themes can include:

Economic arguments

Environmental arguments

Social arguments (i.e. the effect on society or a community)

Education arguments

Health arguments

Law and order arguments

The rights of individuals

The practicality of the model

Etc., etc., etc. (there is no set list!)

E.g. That we should permit fracking.

͞Tonight the opposition's case has reǀolǀed around three key themes: the environmental effects, social effects and economic effects of fracking. I will not discuss these three areas one at a time.

E.g. That we should permit fracking.

1.Does fracking have an overall positive or negative effect

on the environment?

2.Does fracking bring economic benefits?

3.Does fracking have a positive or negative effect on

society/communities? Let's deal with the first of these questions: What effect does fracking have on the environment? The opposition has

Key things with thematic rebuttal:

Signpost clearly that you are doing thematic rebuttal.

Signpost clearly when you are moving between

themes/questions.

Always state what the argument is that you're

responding to. Try to use the oppositions own wording/terms where possible.

When referring to arguments, don't speak to the

Key things with thematic rebuttal:

A good team will identify their broad

arguments/ideas/themes near the start of the first speaker's speech in their TEAM SPLIT. Always write it down and pass to third speaker. This can often for the basis for a thematic split. Always focus on the strongest/most important points that the opposition has put forward.

Rebut the idea and analysis that lies behind and

argument -rebutting edžamples don't gain you much. These are used to get you over the time limit if you run out of rebuttal before the first knock has sounded.

Otherwise they are not needed.

When choosing between rebutting and summarising,

choose rebutting.

Long summaries can lose you marks in method.

You do not gain matter marks for your summary.

NEVER summarise after the second knock.

NEVER summarise for more than 30 seconds after the first knock (this will be the equivalent of giving your team split). If you'ǀe done your job well, you will haǀe referred to your team's key arguments already in your rebuttal.

͞That Australia should accept

radioactiǀe waste"

First Speaker (Affirmative):

1)Outlines a model for how and where the waste will be kept in Australia.

2)Current technology means that nuclear waste can be kept and transported safely, hence there is no reason why we should fear accepting it.

3)Australia is the most suitable location for the storage of waste due to its isolated areas and stable geology.

4)Nuclear power is good for the environment as there are no greenhouse emissions -and by accepting waste we are encouraging other nations to take up this option.

Second Speaker (Affirmative):

1)Australia is an exporter of uranium for use in nuclear power plants, hence we have an obligation to accept some of the waste that is produced by nuclear power plants

2)The waste dump will provide jobs and will be a boost to Australia's economy as it will bring in foreign investment and create jobs

3)The Australian government will receive revenue from the waste dump through licensing fees and royalties.

4)It is better for the waste to be kept in remote areas of Australia than in other parts of the world

͞That Australia should accept

radioactiǀe waste"

Third Speaker NEGATIVE:

1)Firstly, I'd like to look at whether or not the storage of nuclear waste will be safe for either the Australian people or the environment.

2)Secondly, our opposition have argued that Australia owes an obligation to the rest of the world to support nuclear power and to accept the waste from the uranium that it exports.

3)Finally, I'd like to look at the affirmatiǀe's argument that we should accept nuclear waste because it is good for our economy"

quotesdbs_dbs14.pdfusesText_20
[PDF] thirteen reasons why book website

[PDF] thirteen reasons why cast diego

[PDF] thirteen reasons why cast winston

[PDF] thirteen reasons why discussion

[PDF] thirteen reasons why discussion questions and answers

[PDF] thirteen reasons why impact

[PDF] thirteenth amendment summary

[PDF] this app is not available for your country

[PDF] this getfield fieldname value

[PDF] this illustration suggests that the european feudal system was

[PDF] this is a part of an argument that is flawed

[PDF] this is not available in your country

[PDF] this is the common endpoint of two rays that form an angle

[PDF] this item is not available for your country

[PDF] this location is not available for subscription