[PDF] Secure Software Programming and Vulnerability Analysis Race





Previous PDF Next PDF



Secure Software Development and Code Analysis Tools

fdopen() instead of fopen()). File descriptors ensure that a malicious user can't RATS has the ability to find vulnerabilities in C C++



How to Open a File and Not Get Hacked

a vulnerability in the program. fopen internally calls open but O CREAT is always used without O EXCL



Comparative Assessment of Static Analysis Tools for Software

An example of vulnerability information from RATS is shown below. The More specifically for the fopen() function



Testing Guide

fopen (“logfile.log” “a”); fprintf(fd



Buffer Overflow Attacks: Detect Exploit

https://ds.amu.edu.et/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/4597/501073.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y



オープンソース・ソフトウェアの セキュリティ確保に関する調査

fopen 関数に関する警告は特に出力さ. れなかった。RATS をデフォルトの状態で実行すると、危険度(Low)レベルの関数の. 検査は行われない。従って、以下のように 



Challenges of Native Android Applications: Obfuscation and

FILE *file = fopen("/proc/self/maps" "r");. 5 if (file == NULL) return;. 6 char Vulnerability Assessment. Dortmund



Secure Coding in C and C++ Race Conditions

▫ RATS http://www.securesw.com/rats of many well-known file-related vulnerabilities: ▫ symlink vulnerability. ▫ various vulnerabilities related to ...



Race conditions

fd = fopen(“/some_file” "wb+");. /* it t th fil */. /* write to the file ○ Slightly different symlink vulnerability when permissions. ○ Slightly ...



Secure Software Development and Code Analysis Tools

RATS (Rough Auditing Tool for Security) fdopen() instead of fopen()). ... Although RATS doesn't find as many vulnerabilities as Flawfinder for C code



Race conditions

Software defect/vulnerability resulting from unanticipated Open with fopen() ... Flawfinder and RATS – best public domain. ? Extended Static checking.



Assessing Software Vulnerabilities using Naturally Occurring Defects

19 jul 2017 for real security vulnerabilities mined from Github. ... In order to solve those limitations a few automated tools (RATS3



Comparative Assessment of Static Analysis Tools for Software

RATS [3] for their ability to detect vulnerabilities in applications written the C More specifically for the fopen() function



Code Injection in C and C++ : A Survey of Vulnerabilities and

It will prioritize the output in function of the potential risk that it poses. ”Secure Software Inc” (RATS). RATS [106] too is very similar to ITS4



Secure Coding in C and C++ Race Conditions

If the vulnerable program is running with elevated opens the file with fopen(). ? checks to ensure that the file ... RATS http://www.securesw.com/rats ...



Secure Software Programming and Vulnerability Analysis Race

Window of vulnerability can be very short open the file using the file name (e.g.



Race conditions

Software defect/vulnerability resulting from unanticipated Open with fopen() & ... Flawfinder and RATS – best public domain. ? Extended Static checking.



600.643 - Group 2 Report Hiding Code

11 nov 2004 Static-analysis tools (e.g. RATS [6] and ITS4 [7]) scan source code for potential security vulnerabilities. These auditing tools generate a ...



Challenges of native android applications: obfuscation and

10 mar 2021 highlight new obfuscation techniques and software vulnerabilities. Then we propose new analysis techniques ... Access Tool (RAT)

Automation Systems Group

Secure Software Programming

and Vulnerability Analysis

Christopher Kruegel chris@auto.tuwien.ac.at

http://www.auto.tuwien.ac.at/~chris

Secure Software Programming2

Automation Systems Group

Race Conditions

Secure Software Programming3

Automation Systems Group

Overview

•Parallel execution of tasks -multi-process or multi-threaded environment -tasks can interact with each other •Interaction -shared memory (or address space) -file system -signals •Results of tasks depends on relative timing of events !Indeterministic behavior

Secure Software Programming4

Automation Systems Group

Race Conditions

•Race conditions -alternative term for indeterministic behavior -often a robustness issue -but also many important security implications •Assumption needs to hold for some time for correct behavior, but assumption can be violated •Time window when assumption can be violated !window of vulnerability

Secure Software Programming5

Automation Systems Group

Race Conditions

•Window of vulnerability can be very short -race condition problems are difficult to find with testing and difficult to reproduce -attacker can slow down victim machine to extend window and can often launch many attempts •Deadlock -special form of race condition -two processes are preventing each other from accessing a shared resource, resulting in both processes ceasing to function

Secure Software Programming6

Automation Systems Group

Race Conditions

•General assumption -sequence of operations •is not atomic •can be interrupted at any time for arbitrary lengths -use proper countermeasures to ensure deterministic results !Synchronization primitives •Locking -can impose performance penalty -critical section has to be a small as possible

Secure Software Programming7

Automation Systems Group

Race Conditions

•Case study public class Counter extends HttpServlet { int count = 0; public void doGet(HttpServletRequest in,

HttpServletResponse out)

out.setContentType("text/plain");

Printwriter p = out.getWriter();

count++; p.println(count + " hits so far!");

Secure Software Programming8

Automation Systems Group

Race Conditions

•Time-of-Check, Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) -common race condition problem -problem:

Time-Of-Check (t

1 ): validity of assumption A on entity E is checked

Time-Of-Use (t

2 ): assuming A is still valid, E is used

Time-Of-Attack (t

3 ): assumption A is invalidated t 1 t 3 < t 2 •Program has to execute with elevated privilege -otherwise, attacker races for his own privileges

Secure Software Programming9

Automation Systems Group

TOCTOU

•Steps to access a resource

1.obtain reference to resource

2.query resource to obtain characteristics

3.analyze query results

4.if resource is fit, access it

•Often occurs in Unix file system accesses -check permissions for a certain file name (e.g., using access(2)) -open the file, using the file name (e.g., using fopen(3)) -four levels of indirection (symbolic link - hard link - inode - file descriptor) •Windows uses file handles and includes checks in API open call

Secure Software Programming10

Automation Systems Group

Overview

•Case study /* access returns 0 on success */ if(!access(file, W_OK)) { f = fopen(file, "wb+"); write_to_file(f); } else { fprintf(stderr, "Permission denied when trying to open %s.\n", file);quotesdbs_dbs7.pdfusesText_5
[PDF] raw socket python

[PDF] rayon de la terre en km

[PDF] rayon de la terre en m

[PDF] raz and dworkin

[PDF] rb digital canada

[PDF] rbdigital vs flipster

[PDF] rdm 6

[PDF] rdm flexion exercice corrigé pdf

[PDF] rdm flexion poutre

[PDF] rdm6 flexion telecharger

[PDF] reaction acide base exercices corrigés pdf

[PDF] reactions of alkyl halides

[PDF] reactions of alkyl halides pdf

[PDF] reactions of amides pdf

[PDF] read inheritance free online