[PDF] F E D E R A L B U R E A U O F IN V E S T IG A T IO N



Previous PDF Next PDF







F O R W A R D : T H E W A Y

s u m m e r , t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s i s s t i l l e x p e r i e n c i n g t e n s o f t h o u s a n d s o f n e w c a s e s While the overall number of COVID-19 diagnostic tests in our nation has expanded,



E X E C U T I V E S U M M A RY R e p o r t o f t h e I C O L

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A RY i n cl u d e s a p p r o xi m a t e l y 2 0 0 l i b r a r y co n so r t i a f r o m a r o u n d t h e w o r l d



A C a p i t a l M i s t a k e f o r N Y C

M o r e d i l ap i d at e d i n f r ast r u c t u r e : C u ts of $ 3 7 6 m f or b r i d g e m a i n ten a n c e, $ 1 6 0 m i n r oa d r esu r f a c i n g , a n d $ 2 8 0 m f or p i er m a i n ten a n c e w ou l d l ea v e ou r i n f r a str u c tu r e i n m or e p r ec a r i ou s sh a p e



F E D E R A L B U R E A U O F IN V E S T IG A T IO N

(U ) # S EsCbRi^E' T T o : R e : G e n e ra l C o u n se l F ro m : C h a rlo tte ($ ) 2 7 8 -H Q -C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 -V IO , 0 2 /2 1 /2 0 0 7 b l b 6 b 7 C



N e w Recording in Fall 2021 St r in g s , a n d d rum m er K

Mar 26, 2021 · C u rre n t l y, S IR I U S X M R e a l J az z C hannel 67 presents the w e ekly “S FJAZZ Collective R a d i o ” a nd “L ive F ro m The S F JA Z Z C enter” pro gram s featuring co ncerts, them atic s e l e c ti o n s f ro m th e S FJ A Z Z C o lle c tive’s v ast archiv e



R o b o ti c s C l u b P r o p o s a l F o r m P a r ti c i p

p ro mo t i n g S T E M i n t h e co mmu n i t y, a cq u i ri n g e ve n t sp o n so rs a n d e n g i n e e ri n g d a y a ct i vi t i e s Da te a n d T i me o f Me e ti n g s : P ra ct i ce : S u n d a y’ s, 1 2 p m-4 p m i n t h e t e ch h o u se g a ra g e



A P R I L 2 0 2 1 V O L 2 1 : 0 4 C i t r u s f r o m t h

e v e n t w i l l b e a l i v e v i r t u a l Z o o m w e b i n a r f r o m 8 : 3 0 a m - 1 2 p m i s a n d o t h e r U F / I F A S C i t r u s E x t e n s i o



FILED B E F O R E T H E P U B LI C U TI LI TI E S C O M MI S

P R O C E E DI N G: R 1 8 1 2 0 0 5 - C P U C - OI R T O E X A MI N FI L E R: C P U C LI S T N A M E: LI S T L A S T C H A N G E D: M A R C H 2 6, 2 0 2 1 D o w nl o a d t h e C o m m a- d eli mit e d Fil e A b o ut C o m m a- d eli mit e d Fil e s B a c k t o S er vi c e Li st s I n d e x P a rti e s



I n t r o d u c t i o n t o P y t h o n f o r A c t u a r i e s

E s t i m a t or s a r e obj e c t s w hi c h ha v e a c om m on f u n c t i on i n t e r f a c e 2 I c a n t r a n s f or m m y d a t a t o m a k e i t r e a d y t o f i t



o n - North Carolina

S u p p ly W il so n Li b e r t M c Co l l O x fo rd K e lu m S to va ll Ma co n G r ve r Ma rb l e S h e b y N a ki n a n v i le M m e s F O d l if F o r t H a

[PDF] Marché à procédure adaptée pour la fourniture d azote liquide pour l Unité 563 et la location et maintenance d un réservoir

[PDF] CONTRAT DE PRESTATIONS DE SERVICES ET DE FOURNITURES ACTE D'ENGAGEMENT ET ANNEXES

[PDF] MARCHE DE PETITES FOURNITURES ET DE MATERIAUX POUR LES SERVICES TECHNIQUES

[PDF] Concepteur Développeur Informatique Option Nomade

[PDF] des droits de l enfant

[PDF] CAHIER DES CHARGES. Côte-d Or Tourisme. Agence de développement touristique 19, rue Ferdinand de Lesseps BP 1601 21035 DIJON cedex

[PDF] Fourniture de linge pour cure thermale

[PDF] Laissez exploser la créativité! Osez les services rafraîchissants de Création Roxxy.

[PDF] UN PARTENARIAT EXCLUSIF AVEC GROUPM, SONY MOBILE ET LAND ROVER, AUTOUR DES FORMATS PUBLICITAIRES INEDITS DE LA NOUVELLE APPLI LE MONDE

[PDF] L option mobilité de votre logiciel MédiClick 5

[PDF] Mandat de protection future

[PDF] ACHAT DE FOURNITURES DE BUREAU

[PDF] Votre pharmacie à portée de main!

[PDF] Institut Départemental de l Enfance, de la Famille et du Handicap pour l Insertion

[PDF] TRAITEMENT DU SURENDETTEMENT. Évolutions résultant de la loi portant réforme du crédit à la consommation

(Rev. 01-31-2003)

SECRET

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

b2 Precedence!

PRIORITY

Date: 02/21/2007

To: General Counsel

Inspection

Charlotte

Attn: Attn: Attn: b6 b7C b2

From: Charlotte

Raleigh Rpsirtent- in^rv

Contact: SA

Approved By:

(U) (UJ

Drafted By:

Case ID #

(^ 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO "^(Pending

Titlei

(V INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT BOARD (IOB) VIOLATION /\ FBIHQ - CHARLOTTE DIVISION Synopsis: (U) Report of a potential Intelligence Oversight

Board (IOB) matter.

a (U) bl b2 b7E b6 b7C

Reference:

Derived Frfcajr : G-3

Declassify/tin: 02/21/2032

(S) (S) Enclosure(s): (U) Enclosed for NSLB and IIS are the following- One copy of a gfiriPB of e-mails (3 pages) fg include an e-mail from

FBIHQ, CTD, dallefl LW/21/2005.

to ASC , et al, bl b6 b7C b2 b7E

Details: (R'

sclLaiLxi CfcS> b6 b7C ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED EXCEPT

WHERE SHOW OTHERWISE

SECRET

DATE: 05-29-2007

CLASSIFIED BY 65179 DHH/KSR/JTJ

REASON: 1.4 (C)

DECLASSIFY ON: 05-29-2032

(U) To: Re: sfecp: ET

General Counsel From: Charlotte

t) 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/21/2007 X bl (S) (S) , ; &.

07/07/2005,|

As a result of

nvpsr.ioflUnn bl b6 b7C ()*f On or about 07/13/2005, RAI (SJ with United States Attorney's Office (USAO),

North Carolina (EDNC) Chief of Criminal. I

a Grand Jury subpoenal

Eastern

coordinated

District of

"1 t- r> oHt- a i n iSl 1 - 57T[

Jwent to

Arter receiving the subpoena,

with Associate General Counsel some records b6 b7C bl _, served the subpoena and had in hand when he received a call from SSRA SSRA that must ITT had been notified by FBIHQ, ITOS I, CONUS II, team we were not to utilize a Grand Jury subpoena and that we obtain a National Security Letter (NSL). Therefore, SA returned the records to 6, SSRA advised FBIHQ that our SAC,[ ] yH SSKA| | advised FBIHQ that our SAC,| , 1 was TDY out of the Division and therefore we would need (S) 5° com P lete an EC addressed to General Counsel requesting an NSL be annmvpH *r FRTwn CCDS I I was then i nstr ucted by FBIHQ, be approved at FBIHQ. SSRA , .._ __ ^ ol .±^w " y ca±n ITOS I, CONUS II, that Charlotte would be required to draft the NSL, due to time constraints, and then obtain approval from a neighboring division'a.SAC. fiAl J then drafted an NSL to obtain the student records bl b6 b7C (SI

SSRflf

to SAC

J for reyjew. I

-X

IH IU.M, UTTTT

and forwarded the NSL to then forwarded by SSRA

Division, for approval

served the NSL at|~ Agent does not recall

SECRET

(U) sbi^'.

SECRET

To: Re:

General Counsel From: Charlotte

($) 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/21/2007 bl b6 b7C bl b6 b7C (S)- (S) (S) bl b2 b7E b7C bl b6 b7C b2 b7E b3 FGJ J advisee receive TFA the individual s name to whom the NSL was given. that the NSIj. was not;: the annppri^fp documentation to declined to honor the NSL. was records

£H$ SSRA

sll£ ,,_", , .then contacted CDC Charlotte Division, for guidance concerning V.he mar-t-er *nrl FT^ questioned legality of the NSLl then conferred with legal counse _caoc£xnix;g the matter. SSRA

Charlotte Division,

CDC OGC_ with FBIHQ who land FBIHQ, _"

J aiso contacted ASAC

in turn was also in contact (X) Subsequently, SSRA waa advised hv FRTHn r-har- a Grand Jnrv .gnhnnena unniH be obtained

Jwhich was the office ot origin on the

•L |WIIJ.^I waa t-iie uj.j-iue OL origin on cne fatter, and the GranH Jnrv anhnnona would be forwarded to the Raleigh RA for service or i#( '•' the Grand Jury subpoena

1 served f Iwihh t->ia nvai-.^

~SA~[ •u uumpiy, bAJ" SSRA[ aavisea s

Jury subpoenal f

and SA

T J was in contact wii.^ |auvismg ox

relni-tance to hnnnr the Grand Jn-r-ir cubpoena and at this time I i After[ |resistance lthat he had been served. advising of (S) contacted

Approximately one nour later I

concerning the matter, contacted the Raleigh RA and advised that the records were waiting for our retrieval

SE (?RET

SE' &RET (U) To: General Counsel From: Charlotte

Re: • hfi 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/21/2007

LEAD(s):

Set Lead 1: (Discretionary)

GENERAL COUNSEL

AT WASHINGTON, DC

(U) NSLB; For information and action deemed appropriate.

Set Lead 2: (Discretionary)

INSPECTION

AT WASHINGTON, DC

(U) IIS; For information and action deemed appropriate. SEC^T 4

H(^)(FBI)

SEfcR^T

b2 b6 b7C bl (SJ (S)

From: | |(CTD)(FBI)

Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 5:23 PM

To: I IfCFUFRh

needed re Subject; RE: Facts or >1SL letter ASAP

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED EXCEPT

TOHERE SHOOT OTHERWISE

b6 b7C

Thanks for the rapid response.

•nrininal Mpccar

DATE: 05-29-2007

CLASSIFIED BY 65179 DHH/KSR/JW

PEASON: 1.4 (C)

DECLASSIFY ON: 05-29-2032

From: ICE) (FBI)

fiBnfiThnroiw iniw7i 7pm; 5:17 p bo b7C bl (S) |(CTD /V

JICTD) (FBI)

1:17 PM-

0(FBI)[

Subject." RE: Fads en

UNCLASSIFIED

If CTD) (FBI);

Irgp) (FBH

(CTD) (FBlf (CTDXFBI); needed re (CTD) (FBI); (CE)

NSL letter ASAP

(S) (SI (S) ecords along ib stupped at the (S) We originally were in the process of obtaining a subpoena in the EDNC for the with a sealed court order to be issued by Judge Boyle, (EDNC). This process w direction of FBIHQ. CTD. and I was told that we needed to serve an NSL. We prepared the NSL and it was e-mailed to SAC| J Atlanta Division, signed and returned. Our SACP " lis nd their legal counsel advised that L currently TDY at FBIHQ. The NSL was then served on hfi would nnt arv-pnt/fwjnr thp NSL because the NSL was only tor] We had our CDC and FBIHQ involved in in IS mroUghbut the process lDivisiori would be forwarding us a GJ subpoena toaej^fi. (S) bl , b3 FGJ f-BIHQ, IIOSJ, then advisecf b6 b7C b2 b7E obtained the GJ subpoenaf jlate Friday afternoon and served it on the attorney initially declined to honor the subpoena because he stated that we should have presented hjrjQjMh We He (S) court order under the Patriot Act and also that he wanted each individual who had record^

be named in the subpoena. He also made some additional remarks that I will not go into at tnis time'.

Bottom line is we told him to consider himself served and provided him with the subpoena. A/SAC lalso contactedj [concerning the matter at this point. About one hour later thX attorney canea our office and advised the documents were ready to be picked up. This process delayed us approximately one day in obtaining the records. However, it occupied a great deal of my time and more importantly the time of two agents who could have been focusing on the investigation at hand. I would agree with the obvious, that administrative subpoena power in the field involving CT matters may be the single most important tool that the agents could use to improve/expedite their investigations. If you require any additional info please let me know.

2/19/2006

b6 b7C

Thanks

SECRET

bo b'7C bl (SJ Fromf Sen T

°t-r

Orininal Messaoe-

SECr^T

CTD)(FBI)

JCTD'J (HjLU

i fCTDUFBT Cc:(_ 5ubi ]CTD) (FBI) •E) (FBI) iject: FW: Facts 01

Importance: High

UNJ^SSIFIED

NOM-RSCORD

needed re

CTD) (FBI);

(CTD)(FBI);

NSL letter ASAP

(CE) b6 b7C b2 bo b7C bl (SJ (S) (s: bo b7C bl (S) Is the below true? Did we go NSL first and then GJS? Pis respond by e-mail.

Anyone with full knowledge to get this back to

International Terrorism Ops Section 1

CTD/FBIHQ

-Orininal Mp^nP-

From[_

Sent: Thursday. July 2

To Cc ](CTD) (FBI)

2.005 3:10 Ph

|(P0), fFRHl suDject: i-acts on] 3

005 3:10 PM-

(CTD)(FBI);L rCTP)fFBnr

Importance: Hig

UNCLASSIFIED

needed n

Ifcrm (FBD

NSL letter ASAP

D)(FBI)

(FBI); q-D)(F JCTD)

NON-RfiCORD

I just got a call frorrf

by e-mail? |of OCA. The Director has rennpRtPri a write unpn the circumstances surrounding the NSL letter issued to| uxor It is the Director's understanding that an NSL letter was issued tol | Jn connection with the London bombing! Iwould not honor the NSL letter and because of this the FBI had to issue them a Grand Jury subpoena. The Director would like to use this as an example tomorrow as to why we need administrative subpoenas's to fight the war on terror. In particular, he would like to know how much extra time was spent having to get the Grand Jury subpoena. Please provide me with an e-mail regarding the particular facts of this incident. Just one paragraph in e-mail form will be sufficient.

12/19/2006 SECRET

b6 b7C From: Sent: To: Cc:

Subject:

Sk 2j hB JL

SEbRET

JlNSD) (FBI)

C

Tfrnrcrlow January 04, 7007 ?4? PM

Kb: Charlotte Nil Issue

CE) (FBI)

ZZl(INSD) (FBI)

UNCLASSIFIED

NON^JtEfcORD

b6

Yes] |can calll I We have no problem with that at all. The OIG can call anyone directly, just keep us

b7c in the loop as to what transpires. Would it be helpful to send you a copy of what we sent the OIG? bl b9 ' g \Just to give you alittle information, we sent the following: b7E •••• -

1) E-mail dated 12/19/06 k

(S) ASAP. from

2) 7/15/05 EC from Charlotte to CTD|_

e: FW: Facts on needed re > e \ 3) 7/14/05 EC from Charlotte toCTD and QGHquotesdbs_dbs8.pdfusesText_14