1 Equivalence of Finite Automata and Regular Expressions. Finite Automata Recognize Regular Languages. Theorem 1. L is a regular language iff there is a
22 mar. 2009 Two finite automata are considered “equivalent” if they have the same alphabet and accept the same set of strings (i.e. the same language).
The former searches for equivalent states in the whole state space of a finite automaton or the disjoint union of two au- tomata. This works well in practice
For finite tree automata uith coefficients in a field R we give a polynomial time algorithm for deciding ambiguity-equivalence provided R-operations and
Define strings equivalent with respect to a deterministic finite au- finite automaton recognizing L. (It is equal to the number of equivalence classes ...
Clearly the minimization algorithm can be used to test the equivalence of two finite automata by treating them as a single automaton mini- mizing the number of
11 juil. 2012 Equivalence of deterministic finite automata (DFA) can be checked either via minimisation [9 15] or through Hopcroft and.
21 sept. 2011 equivalence of finite automata and monadic second-order logic. We conclude with ... In theoretical computer science the finite automaton is.
minimization of finite automata over semirings. Kety Peeva. Communicated by M. Nivat. Received April 1988. Revised October 1989. Peeva K.
For finite tree automata uith coefficients in a field R we give a polynomial time algorithm for deciding ambiguity-equivalence provided R-operations and