9 déc. 2019 Cases T-760/15. Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Netherlands and Others v Commission. (Cases T-760/15 and T-636/16) (1).
24 sept. 2019 Arrêt dans les affaires jointes T-760/15 Pays Bas/Commission et T-636/16 Starbucks et Starbucks Manufacturing Emea/Commission.
24 sept. 2019 Judgment in Cases T-760/15 Netherlands v Commission and T-636/16 Starbucks and Starbucks Manufacturing Emea v Commission.
General Court 24 September 2019
8 mars 2002 No 760 15. ... Web: www.itu.int/itu-t/bulletin/index.html ... international des télégrammes (Selon la Recommandation UIT-T F.1 (03/98)).
28 janv. 2020 decisions of 24 September 2019 in Cases C-760/15 & T-. 636/16
Starbucks Ruling (Joint Cases T-760/15 e T-636/16): the Application of the Arm's Length Principle as a. Criterion for Assessing Economic Advantage under.
T-760/15: Nederländerna mot Kommissionen Kommissionens beslut C(2004) 929; Dom i de förenade målen T-211/04 och T-215/04; Dom i de.
21 oct. 2019 Source: Judgment of the General Court (2019) 'Cases T-760/15 and T-636/16'
Cases T-755/15 T-759/15 – Luxembourg v Commission. 25. Cases T-760/15
This prohibition, like all others under part 760, applies only with respect to a U.S. person's activities in the interstate or foreign commerce of the United States and only when such activities are undertaken with intent to comply with, further, or support an unsanctioned foreign boycott. ( § 760.2 (d) (5) of this part .)
§ 760.4 Evasion. ( a) No United States person may engage in any transaction or take any other action, either independently or through any other person, with intent to evade the provisions of this part. Nor may any United States person assist another United States person to violate or evade the provisions of this part.
( b) The exceptions set forth in § 760.3 (a) through (i) do not permit activities or agreements (express or implied by a course of conduct, including a pattern of responses) which are otherwise prohibited by this part and which are not within the intent of such exceptions.
Under § 760.5 (a) (4) of this part, the invitation is regarded as not reportable if the U.S. person receiving it does not respond. The Department has determined that a simple acknowledgment of the invitation does not constitute a response for purposes of this rule.