OECD 2019 » PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. 16. Executive Summary. • There were large differences between individual countries
Korea with a country mean of 546 score points
Programme for International Student Assessment. PISA 2012 Results: Excellence through Equity. GIvInG EvERy StudEnt thE ChAnCE to SuCCEEd. volumE II
OECD (2010) PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Reading
OECD 2019 » PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed PISA has consistently found that girls outperform boys in reading and ...
The PISA 2018 reading assessment which was delivered on computer in most of the 79 countries and economies that participated included new text and assessment formats made possible through digital delivery
PISA is an ongoing programme that offers insights for education policy and practice and that helps monitor trends in students’ acquisition of knowledge and skills across countries and in different demographic subgroups within each country PISA results reveal what is possible in education by showing what
Dec 3 2019 · In PISA 2009 the performance gap related to socio-economic status was 107 score points in the United States (and 87 score points on average across OECD countries) Some 27 of advantaged students in the United States but only 4 of disadvantaged students were top performers in reading in PISA 2018
The results of the PISA assessments are estimates because they are obtained from samples of students rather than from a census of all students and because they are obtained using a limited set of assessment tasks not the universe of all possible assessment tasks
Results from the PISA 2009 assessment show that nurturing high performance and tackling low performance need not be mutually exclusive the countries with the very highest overall reading performance in PISA 2009 inland f and Korea as well as the partner economies hong Kong-china and Shanghai-china also have among the lowest
PISA SocioStatesthe-economic background has asignificant impact on student performance in the Unitedstudents inStudentssow less OECD withengagement average some 15 Although of the thisvariation impact indrive motivation and self-beliefs hasstudentweakened performanceover time explained disadvantaged by thissimilar students to