Comparative law study
How do you do a comparative study?
The main methods (or approaches) of comparative law researches are the following: legislative method, descriptive method, evolutionary approach, conceptual method, functional method, factual method, textual approach v..
What are the methods of comparative law?
For comparative studies, the design options are experimental versus observational and prospective versus retrospective..
What kind of methodologies are used in comparative studies?
Functionalist comparative law shares its emphasis on generalities that transcend national boundaries with the Natural law tradition, and indeed finds one of its origins there.
Kant, while positing a strict separation between 'is' and 'ought,' had conceived the possibility of universal law based on reason..
- We offer more than 100 courses and reading groups that focus on international, foreign, or comparative law, and students can engage in supervised projects spanning the globe through HLS clinical offerings.
Every J.D. student takes an international or comparative law class during their time at HLS.
In the United States, the study of comparative law was pioneered by Rudolf Schlesinger. His Comparative law: cases, text, materials, first published in 1950, is Comparative Law, Conflict of Research Guides to Foreign
×Comparative law is the study of differences and similarities between the legal systems of different countries. It involves the comparison of legal systems, including the common law, civil law, socialist law, Canon law, Jewish Law, Islamic law, Hindu law, and Chinese law. Comparative law is a method for analyzing and comparing laws on different bases. Major issues in comparative law include intellectual property protection, human rights, the environment, criminal law and procedure, tax policies, and labor relations. The study of other legal systems helps to understand our own law and to provide solutions for legal issues that have become more and more global. Comparative law is a modern expression that first appeared in the 19th century when it became clear that the comparison of legal institutions deserved a systematic approach.
