Audubon society jobs

National Audubon Society v.
Superior Court was a key case in California highlighting the conflict between the public trust doctrine and appropriative water rights.
The Public Trust Doctrine is based on the principle that certain resources are too valuable to be privately owned and must remain available for public use.
In National Audubon Society v.
Superior Court, the court held that the public trust doctrine restricts the amount of water that can be withdrawn from navigable waterways.
The basis for the Public Trust Doctrine goes back to Roman law.
Under Roman law, the air, the rivers, the sea and the seashore were incapable of private ownership; they were dedicated to the use of the public.
In essence, the public trust doctrine establishes the role of the state as having trustee environmental duties owed to the public that are subsequently enforceable by the public.
There is judicial recognition of this, dictating that certain rights of the public are key to individual common law rights.
Judicial recognition of the public trust doctrine has been established for tidelands and non-navigable waterways, submerged land and the waters above them, and preservation of a public interest.