Jun 20, 2021In conclusion, we found framing genetic testing decisions increases the likelihood of individuals opting for genetic testing. We believe these IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussion
Mar 16, 2020Genetic testing decision-making for cancer predisposition is inherently complex. Understanding the mechanisms and influencing factors of the
Are genetic testing decisions in non-Western cultures an opportunity for intergenerational decision-making?
Genetic testing decisions in non-western cultures:
- an opportunity for intergenerational decision making
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30(4):391. doi:10.1038/s41431-021-01008-3PubMedGoogle Scholar 77.
,
Considering Gene Therapy Clinical Trials
Understanding as much as possible about the process of gene therapy and the trial protocol will help you be confident in your decision.
Health Impact.
1) Is there evidence about safety or efficacy of the treatment and the vector from this— or other similar trials?.
2) Will there be a placebo arm or different treatment arms with different dosages? 3. .
,
How does genetic testing affect clinical management?
Genetic testing can increase the precision and accuracy of diagnosis and thus affect clinicians and their clinical management decisions directly.
For example, genetic testing can differentiate types of long-QT syndrome, which can be indistinguishable in electrocardiography, clinical symptoms, and family history ( Napolitano et al., 2015 ).
,
Introduction
When healthcare providers work together with patients and caregivers to make decisions about tests, treatments, and procedures, the process they use is called shared decision-making.
Making decisions together helps ensure that your healthcare choices are based on clinical evidence about risks and benefits, your own personal preferences, and your va.
,
Is genetic counseling uptake based on decision aid?
Findings In this randomized clinical trial of 187 women and 67 clinicians, genetic counseling uptake was 19.8% for patients who received the decision aid vs 11.6% patients who did not, although this was not a statistically significant difference.
,
Understanding Shared Decision-Making
There was a time when physicians made most healthcare decisions with little input from patients.
But over time, we learned that patients do better if they have more of a voice in the process.
Making healthcare decisions comes naturally to some people. “My body, my decision,” makes sense to them.
Other people, especially those from varied cultural b.
,
What is the clinical utility of a genetic test?
The clinical utility of a genetic test is the evidence that it improves clinical outcomes measurably and that it adds value for patient management decision making compared with current management without genetic testing ( Teutsch et al., 2009 ).
,
What to Think About When Considering Gene Therapy Clinical Trials
Decision-making in rare disease is complex.
There are often no clinical practice guidelines or standards of care that have been established.
There are few recognized experts.
And only 5 percent of the more than 7000 rare diseases have approved treatments.
As a result, the only interventions many rare disease patients have to choose from are those t.
,
What to Think About When Considering Genetic Testing
Genetic testing often leads to a life-changing diagnosis.
Having a genetic diagnosis helps individuals receive appropriate care and helps communities grow their registries and natural history studies, advancing knowledge of the disease and accelerating the search for treatment.
Even if there is no treatment available, having a diagnosis may help yo.
Testing Women, Testing the Fetus by Rayna Rapp is a book, published in 1999, about analysis of the social repercussions of prenatal genetic testing.
Rapp combines the data she collected herself with historical context of amniocentesis and genetic counseling to argue that amniocentesis and those abortions following positive test results is a social decision as much as an individual one.
