eu13

4 mars 2018 rates of the EU-13 countries in FP7 and Horizon 2020 to be tested empirically an online survey among public research institutions

between EU13 and. EU15 Member States. The research and innovation framework programmes of the European. Union (EU) are the largest programmes in the world 

Therefore there is no “one-size fits all” solution for increasing participation of EU13 Member. States in the EU Framework programmes. The solutions require 

In fact the EU13 country group finances. 22–24 percent and the EU15 country group 1–13 per- cent of R&D expenditure from abroad (and within the funding-from- 

looking for organisations to take on the role of a “Digital Innovation Hub” (DIH) in EU13 Member. States . At least 30 DIHs from 8 countries will be 

23 avr. 2014 Annex 5 Beneficiaries of FP7 collaborative projects from EU13: Bulgaria ... The EU contribution received shows that EU13 countries capture ...

18 juil. 2019 Compared to the EU15 the EU13 receive less EFSI financing on a per capita basis

FDI AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN EU13. COUNTRIES: COINTEGRATION AND CAUSALITY. TESTS. ? Vlatka Bilas. Abstract. Foreign direct investments are seen as a 

Reminder: EU13 countries represent 20%+ of EU's population and territory legitimate to request matching participation in some calls.

Some EU13 countries perform better than some EU15 countries in the. 2018 European Innovation Scoreboard; and/or have a relatively high number of applications 

- The quality of proposals involving EU13 participants is lower than those t hat do not involve them 3 Quantity of pro posals from EU13 participants and alternative funding Hypothesis 4 - EU13 organisations submit fewer proposals than EU15 organisations Hypothesis 5 - Participants in the EU13 have greater means of accessing alternative

EU13 Member States (e g Malta Estonia Latvia Cyprus but also Slovenia or Bulgaria) are placed ahead of the most EU15 Member States and the geographical bias of the Horizon2020 distribution against the EU13 region completely disappears These two perspectives clearly show that lower participation of the EU13 Member States on the Horizon

the sample of the 13 “new” European Union countries (EU13) all of which began EU member-ship in 2004 The paper is organized in five sections The Theoretical background gives an overview of previ-ous international researches The part Methodology introduces research data and methodology used for their processing

EU13 can be considered in the analysis as a minority group comprising 13 percent from EU28 by HRST (‘human resources in science and technology’) indicator which is relatively stable across the years under analysis 2007–2016 4 4 The data of H2020 participation have the cut-off date of 28 Febru-ary 2017 The share of EU13 participations is

Standard European Filter Classification Typically a EU3 filter would be used for pre-filtering coupled to an EU6 or EU7 main filter This gives approximately 97 efficiency down to 2 5 mm and between 44 (EU6) and 55 (EU7) at 0 1mm