c bac jpm gs
Investment Banking
1 Ranked #1 in Announced M&A 17 of 21 years since GS’ IPO and #1 in Completed M&A 20 of 21 years 2 Source: Company filings; GS Investment Research 4Q19 estimates used for Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse who have not yet reported FY2019 results; all revenues and estimates converted to USD 3 Activism market share per Factset SharkWatch |
Investor Day: Global Banking & Markets
includes GS MS JPM BAC C BARC CS DB UBS Slide 17: 1 Peers include MS (Institutional Securities segment) JPM (Corporate & Investment Bank segment) BAC (Global Banking and Global Markets segments) ROE for GS MS and JPM as reported ROE for BAC calculated as net income / allocated capital |
From shrinking risk to risk of shrinking: remove BAC from CL |
Which is better GS or JPM?
When the food price falls, one should choose GS. In the case of food price growth, JPM looks better. The BEN model contains a different defining CPI (O) which has a quite specific shape with a high-amplitude step between February and April 2009.
Are BAC shares correlated?
There are highly correlated series and not correlating ones. Not surprisingly, the cross correlation coefficient between BAC and MS, which both have been suffering most after 2007, is 0.92. At the same time, the BAC share price series does not correlate with the series from other three banks.
How sensitive is JPM to food prices?
The ratio of coefficients is -1.23 and -1.87, respectively. According to the ratio of share price to b1, JPM is less sensitive to food prices, i.e. one unit change in F forces a fall by about $14 in GS (~11%) and only $2 or 4% in JPM.
Firm Overview
Feb 26 2019 JPM. C. BAC. GS. WFC. MS. Overhead ratio – managed1 |
2015 Firm Overview_2.22.15_FINAL
Feb 22 2015 JPM. WFC. C. BAC. GS. MS. FY2014 net capital distribution ($B). 1 See note 1 in slide 48. For GS and MS |
Goldman Sachs Presentation to Deutsche Bank Global Financial
May 31 2016 1 FICC and Equities exclude DVA for GS. 2 JPM |
The Decline of Too Big to Fail
5-year CDS rates of five U.S. banks (JPM Citi |
The Decline of Too Big to Fail
Is this consistent with improved capitalization of big banks? GS. MS. C. BAC. JPM. WFC. T angib le equity to assets (percent). |
European Banks
Sep 16 2016 pressure or the need to build capital ratios |
Cross comparison and modelling of Goldman Sachs Morgan
The evolution of JPM MS |
Goldman Sachs Compensation Practices
Mar 19 2010 1 Please see www.gs.com/shareholders for our compensation principles. ... 1 Peer average comprised of BAC |
Firm Overview
Feb 25 2020 JPM C BAC WFC GS MS. 19%. 15%. 13%. 12% 12%. 11%. JPM BAC MS WFC C. GS. Revenue growth YoY. Net income growth YoY. |
Firm Overview - JPMorgan Chase
JPM WFC C BAC GS MS FY2015 Net capital distribution ($B) 3 $97 $87 $78 $83 |
2015 Firm Overview_22215_FINAL - JPMorgan Chase
F PDF |
View the Presentation as a PDF - Goldman Sachs
archived |
Investment Banking - Goldman Sachs
in PDF |
Financial network systemic risk contributions - econstor
2013 · Cité 341 fois — Figure 9 shows that BAC's systemic risk beta has been Stanley, JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs |
No Longer Too Big to Fail
risk-day › DuffiePDF |