Comments were received during two 45-day public comment periods following the announcement of the draft scope documents for the risk evaluations to be conducted for 13 of 20 High-Priority Substances under TSCA (85 FR 19941 (April 9, 2020)) and the remaining 7 of 20 High-Priority Substances under TSCA (85 FR 22733 (April 23, 2020))
The 2,803 comments received have been parsed into sixty three thousand independent quotes representing unique ideas within the comments Those quotes then have been key-worded for sorting purposes All calculations can be found in the appendices Results indicate that the comments received during the commenting process stem froms a broad cross
Overview of comments received on the "Reflection paper on antimicrobials in the environment: considerations for current and future risk assessment of veterinary
Compilation of Comments Received Draft Model Legislation Update : Request for Public Comments August 25, 2020 Comments were received from the following (listed in alphabetical order): *Links work best with the Google Chrome browser 1 3M 2 American Chemistry Council (ACC) 3 American Chemistry Council High Phthalates Panel (ACC HPP) 4
to public comments received on the draft WaterSense Labeled Homes Program, Version 2, which includes: the WaterSense Draft Home Certification System, Version 2 0; the WaterSense Draft Specification for Homes, Version 2 0; and the WaterSense Draft Technical Evaluation Process for Approving Home Certification Methods For the
Overview of comments received on 'Reflection paper on the use of aminopenicillins and their beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations in animals in the European Union: development of resistance and impact on human and animal health'
COMMENTS RECEIVED SMP COMMENT MATRIX # COMMENT SUBMITTED BY 1 Brian and Donna Mandak (View Blockage) 2 John Read (Updated Master Plan) 3 Betsy Cooper : 4
Comments received on or before April 20, 2021, will be provided to the committee Comments received after that date will be taken into consideration by FDA In the event that the meeting is cancelled, FDA will continue to evaluate any relevant applications or information, and consider any comments submitted to the docket, as appropriate
[PDF]
Overview of comments received RP antimicrobials in environment
Overview of comments received on the "Reflection paper on antimicrobials in the environment: considerations for current and future risk assessment of veterinary
[PDF]
Overview of comments received on RP on aminopenicillins
Overview of comments received on 'Reflection paper on the use of aminopenicillins and their beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations in animals in the European Union: development of resistance and impact on human and animal health' (EMA/CVMP/AWP/842786/2015) EMA/CVMP/AWP/902538/2019 Page 2/45 1 General comments – overview Stakeholder no
[PDF]
Comments Received on the Request for Input - OECD
Justice Network, Christian Aid, Action Aid, Oxfam, and Tax Research UK These comments have not been approved in advance by these organisations, which do not necessarily accept every detail or specific point made here, but they support the work of the BMG and endorse its general perspectives They have been drafted by Sol Picciotto, with contributions and
[PDF]
Scoping of the future revisions of VII intra-group
received is rarer still and harder to demonstrate to the satisfaction of often overly sceptical tax inspectors Specific guidelines as to the nature and extent of the documentation that should suffice as evidence for the existence of a service, for the delivery of the service and for the demonstration of the benefit would be very helpful Section D 3 of Chapter VII currently
[PDF]
Comments Received from the Public Posting of the IDA18
Finance: We are pleased to learn that IDA has received a AAA credit rating and is successfully raising money on capital markets; expanding IDA’s capacity this way will benefit all IDA countries -- We also
[PDF]
Compilation of Comments Received - Toxics in Packaging
Compilation of Comments Received Draft Model Legislation Update : Request for Public Comments August 25, 2020 Comments were received from the following (listed in alphabetical order): *Links work best with the Google Chrome browser 1 3M 2 American Chemistry Council (ACC) 3 American Chemistry Council High Phthalates Panel (ACC HPP) 4
[PDF]
I-49 Technical Work Group – Roll Plot Comments
Comments Location of Comment 1 12/5/17 TWG Group #1 1-1 Post it Pad Review the geology at the river - 2 12/5/17 TWG Group #1 1-2 Post it Pad Review existing H Street, access needs - 3 12/5/17 TWG Group #1 1-3 Post it Pad : Existing levee near the river Clearance is ‘404 Avoid the levee 10 foot vertical clearance required above levee road for maintenance - 4 12/5/17 TWG Group #1 1
Draft Model Legislation Update: Request for Public Comments August 25, 2020 Comments were received from the following (listed in alphabetical order):
TPCH Compilation of Public Comments Received
2 The purpose of this consultation was to seek stakeholders' comments and views on the updated approach and guidance for managing the interests of external
Consultation responses
Written Comments Received for October 28, 2011, Judicial Council Business Meeting Name and Title Affiliation Topic Date of Receipt Page No s 1
written comments