LEAVING THE HART-DWORKIN DEBATE 369 In his recent 'General and Particular Jurisprudence,' for example, William Twining identifies Hart's theory of law
6 Compare Ronald Dworkin, “Judicial Discretion,” Journal of Philosophy 60 ( 1963): 624–638 and “Model of Rules I” with Hart's Concept of Law, Ch 7 7 Compare
SSRN ID code
In arguing that legal positivism can make room for the possibility of legally valid "principles" (in Dworkin's sense), Hart made two claims: (1) that some principles are, contra Dworkin, legally valid in virtue of their pedigree (e g , principles of the common law like "no man shall profit from his own wrongdo- ing"
ajj
A DISPUTE BETWEEN HART AND DWORKIN Petrus CKL Bello1 Abstract Does the law merely contain rules? Or does it also include morality? The debate
EN the controversy about the essence of law a dispute between hart and dworkin
' 2 What for our purposes is interesting in this debate is the kind of argu- ments these disputants gave
Hart's theory of legal positivism countless books and articles have been written either defending Hart against Dworkin's objections or defending. Dworkin
9 oct. 2014 The debate waged between Ronald Dworkin and H.L.A. Hart over the concept of law looms large over the literature on legal theory.
LEAVING THE HART-DWORKIN DEBATE 369. In his recent 'General and Particular Jurisprudence' for example
BEYOND THE HART/DWORKIN DEBATE: THE. METHODOLOGY PROBLEM IN JURISPRUDENCE. BRIAN LEITER*. For three decades now much of the Anglo-American legal philosophy.
Studies 459. Keywords: Hart-Dworkin debate. Hart's 'Postscript'. 1. History. The publication of an English translation of HLA Hart's lecture 'El nuevo.
The Hart-Dworkin Debate. 6 d. Baedeker. 8. 2. The Concept of Law. 9 a. The Term “Law”. 10 b. Austin's Picture of the Law. 12 i. The Habit of Obedience.
Hart's positivism and Ronald Dworkin's early theory of law.2 Contrary to Leiter's assertion that “on the particulars of the Hart/Dworkin debate
1 mars 2019 already voluminous literature on the long-running and much-discussed “Hart-Dworkin debate.” General Jurisprudence and Philosophy.
BEYOND THE HART/DWORKIN DEBATE: THE METHODOLOGY PROBLEM IN JURISPRUDENCE. Brian Leiter*. For three decades now much of the Anglo-American legal philosophy
Since the appearance in 1967 of “The Model of Rules I” Ronald Dworkin's seminal critique of H. L. A. Hart's theory of legal positivism
THE “HART-DWORKIN” DEBATE: A SHORT GUIDE FOR THE