Marlene BELILOS against SWITZERLAND REPORT OF THE COIMISSION ( adopted on 7 Below is a summary of the facts of the case as presented to the
pdf?library=ECHR&id= &filename=BELILOS against SWITZERLAND
The case was concemed inter aUa with the access of the applicant, a Cypriot 1 Belilos v Switzerland, judgment of 29 April 1988, Series A no 132 2 On this
bfm A F
26 juil 2007 · 3 Ibid , vol ii (Part two), para 398, footnote 572 4 Belilos v Switzerland ( European Court of Human Rights,
a cn
The ECHR has on two occasions, in the cases of Belilos v Switzerland and Loizidou v Turkey,50 severed reservations found to be incompatible with the
Moloney
Swiss Government, the European Commission of Human Rights, and the Court's judgement in the Belilos case from the perspective of its contribu tion to the and obligations or any criminal charge against the person in question is intended
RBDI . pp. C A R. Macdonald
'The Belilos Case: New Light on Reservations to Multilateral Treaties', the Court's case law ' Belilos v Switzerland, ECHR (1988) Series A, No 132, at 24
(c) In cases not falling under sub-paragraphs (a) and (b), the reservation is incompatible Switzerlandthat 12 European Court of Human Rights, Belilos v
SSRN ID code
The judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in 1988 in the case of. Belilos v. Switzerland' is of major significance to the issue of reservations and.
cases taking a severability approach would strengthen the modern international The ECHR has on two occasions
See Temeltasch v. Switzerland (1983) 5 E.H.R. Rep. 417. 6. See E. Court H.R. Ettl and Ors.
10328/83. Marlene BELILOS against. SWITZERLAND. REPORT OF THE COMMISSION In the light especially of the Court's judgment in the cases.
case in this regard was the Belilos v. Switzerland case.24 Here the European Court of. Human Rights considered an interpretative declaration made by
The European Court of Human Rights in the Belilos Case (Belilos v. Switzerland) decided in 1988
See Belilos v. Switzerland 132 Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) (1988)
The ECtHR has also dealt with the issue of severing incompatible reservations on two occasions. First in Belilos v. Switzerland and later in. Loizidou v.
Sep 1 2001 previous decision anterior
(c) In cases not falling under sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) the reservation is Switzerland?that ... 12 European Court of Human Rights