Cognitive linguistics (CL) is often regarded as a continuation of Saussurean structuralism. This paper explores the relationship between the two paradigms, focussing on the connection between semantics and views on the language-thought relationship. As it turns out, the similarity in this respect is, in fact, only partial.
The study demonstrates that Saussure has had a greater impact on modern linguistics than pointed out in the literature, considering that his thought on language underlies cognitive linguistics theories which can be described as representing a return to the pre-Saussurean notion of the non-arbitrariness of the linguistic sign. 1. Introduction
However, many scholars agree that de Saussure's structuralism was not purely original and that he borrowed concepts from previous schools of linguistics (Hussein & Abushihab, 2014;Moghaddas & Dekhnich, 2015; Muhammadi, 2016).
Saussure explicitly rejects linguistic relativism (LR) ; his purely differential view of meaning actually allows for only a weak variety of LR. Stronger varieties of LR are defended in CL, in agreement with a very “ rich” conception of meaning, which can be shown to build on 19th century Humboldtian views rather than Saussurean structuralism.