Loading...
The composition of a case in tort is more complex than has been generally supposed The assumption by courts and legal writers that a tort is made up only
Does disparate treatment law in fact prohibit all “disparate treatment,” (i e , all decisions in which the outcome would have been different “but for” race, sex
For example, if a legal rule simply says the defendant is liable if he causes harm, the courts will want to be able to limit liability in particular cases for
fact, but rather, under the misleading label of "proximate cause" or "legal cause," served as a smokescreen for policy judgments on whether
has an excuse for not fulfilling his promise under B law but not under C or A law breach of contract, but under B law it involves tort liability
Abstract—This article explores the question of what character relations must have before the orthodox law of obligations will describe them as 'causal'
law principles applied in negligence to limit liability arising from personal injury and death, including: (a) the formulation of standards of care; (b) causation;