Factor price equilisation argues that goods trade acts as substitute for factor; ? The increasing demand for capital intensive commodity increase the
This paper examines the status of factor price equalization (FPE) as a scienrific hypothesis Every college :etu&nt af inlemational economics is exposed to
This paper examines the status of factor price equalization (FPE) as a The formal proof of FPE is based on a neoclassical production structure with two
This paper extends the technique of integrated equilibrium analysis to con sider a trading world with unemployment due to a wage floor Unlike previous
This paper provides a formal proof of the Factor Price Equalization Theorem within the Heckscher Ohlin model derived by Ronald W Jones in “The Structure of
The Heckscher-Ohlin theorem, for many years one of the most important in international trade theory, states that countries f tend to export commodities
In view of constant returns assumption, Ram Singh: (DSE) Factor Price Equalization Lecture 13 2 / 16 Page 3 International Trade: Basic Set-up II the
This theorem describes how regions can absorb endowment shocks via changes in output mix without any changes in relative regional factor prices Treating U S
The Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem 4 The Factor-Price-Equalization Theorem 5 The Stolper-Samuelson Theorem 6 The Rybczynski Theorem 7 Policy Implications
FULL OR PARTIAL FACTOR PRICE EQUALISATION? The present paper is concerned primarily with one aspect of this theorem-namely, the assertion that, while free
101351_6phdnts6.pdf 22
Table 8.1 Measures of Factor Intensity for US Manufacturing Industries
Industry Value Added Production Capital Exp. Nonproduction Value Added Production Capital Exp. Nonproduction Evident
($ millions) Labor (000) per PL labor per PL ($ millions) Labor (000) per PL labor per PL Intensity Petroleum and coal products $ 45,748
67 74,624$ 0.51 117,541$ 65 169,501$ 0.58 Capital, Skill
Chemical products $ 235,614
508 41,112$ 0.75 328,440$ 433 38,971$ 0.76 Capital, Skill
Computer & electronic products $ 291,125
848 33,227$ 0.94 226,319$ 465 33,972$ 1.16 Capital, Skill
Mineral products $ 55,722
408 14,820$ 0.28 64,545$ 360 14,334$ 0.29 Capital
Transportation equipment $ 240,989
1,349 12,529$ 0.36 254,665$ 1,104 13,842$ 0.41 Capital, Skill
Food, beverages & tobacco $ 255,245
1,244 11,714$ 0.35 316,389$ 1,177 13,090$ 0.34 Capital, Skill
Wood & paper products $ 114,260
914 12,234$ 0.24 120,651$ 765 11,268$ 0.27 Capital
Miscellaneous products $ 70,621
501 8,219$ 0.49 92,974$ 422 11,044$ 0.61 Skill
Plastic & rubber products $ 92,333
862 10,086$ 0.26 96,348$ 688 10,127$ 0.29 Capital
Machinery $ 148,798
920 10,116$ 0.52 142,488$ 683 9,947$ 0.56 Skill
Printing $ 63,446
597 7,398$ 0.39 58,930$ 457 9,510$ 0.41 Skill
Metal products $ 215,545
1,839 8,729$ 0.30 232,106$ 1,418 8,545$ 0.33 Skill
Electrical equipment &
appliances $ 62,991 431 9,069$ 0.37 54,318$ 294 6,551$ 0.43 Skill
Textile products $ 35,225
475
5,130$ 0.20 32,395$ 285 4,633$ 0.23 Labor
Leather products $ 4,510
55 2,813$ 0.25 2,865$ 29 3,527$ 0.29 Labor
Furniture & related products $ 42,267
515 4,011$ 0.25 46,801$ 414 3,404$ 0.29 Labor
Apparel $ 28,210
423 2,302$ 0.24 16,319$ 171 2,882$ 0.31 Labor2000
Source: Compiled by authors from US Department of Commerce,
Annual Survey of Manufactures2005
23
Sources: computed by authors with data available from World Bank, World Development Indicators; Food and Agricultural Organization, FAO-StatDatabase; and Penn World Tables version 6.2.
Table 8.2 Measures of Relative Factor Endowments
Country Capital Stock Arable land R&D Scientists Capital Stock Arable land R&D Scientists Evident per worker per worker (HA) per 1000 people per worker per worker (HA) per 1000 people Abundance Singapore 239,044$ 0.00 8.08 247,608$ 0.00 10.45 Capital, R&D Japan 182,196$ 0.07 9.55 194,375$ 0.07 10.55 Capital, R&D USA 153,689$ 1.19 8.64 181,856$ 1.13 8.97 Capital, R&D Australia 149,347$ 4.91 6.86 169,374$ 4.68 6.76 Capital, Land Germany 160,918$ 0.29 6.38 162,214$ 0.29 6.71 Capital, R&D Canada 142,345$ 2.82 6.69 156,814$ 2.55 6.55 Capital, Land Finland 149,338$ 0.84 13.42 155,699$ 0.85 15.00 Capital, R&D Rep. of Korea 102,235$ 0.08 4.80 123,959$ 0.07 7.56 Capital, R&D UK 102,447$ 0.20 5.43 117,232$ 0.19 5.86 R&D Mexico 48,140$ 0.64 1.12 50,827$ 0.58 1.11 Labor Brazil 39,311$ 0.70 0.77 37,885$ 0.63 0.77 Labor South Africa 31,060$ 0.95 0.96 30,532$ 0.86 0.99 Labor China 13,183$ 0.18 0.95 20,090$ 0.18 1.44 Labor India 7,556$ 0.42 0.29 9,465$ 0.37 0.31 Labor2000 2005 24
Sources: computed by authors with data available from World Bank, World Development Indicators; Food and Agricultural Organization, FAO-StatDatabase; and Penn World Tables version 6.2. Figures for GDP are measured with PPP exchange rates at constant 2005 $US.
Table 8.3 Proportions of World GDP and World Factor Endowments, 2000 Primary Secondary Post-secondary R&D Research GDP Capital Stock Arable Land School School School Scientists USA 27.10% 23.89% 19.42% 2.25% 11.96% 30.22% 29.20%
Canada 2.45% 2.43% 5.07% 0.80% 0.76% 1.65% 2.49%
Germany 6.18% 6.83% 1.31% 2.15% 4.13% 3.69% 5.89%
UK 4.22% 3.20% 0.65% 2.02% 1.54% 2.43% 3.69%
Australia 1.36% 1.51% 5.24% 0.48% 0.74% 1.19% 1.51%
Japan 8.91% 12.97% 0.50% 3.29% 4.92% 7.63% 14.78%
Rep. of Korea 2.16% 2.44% 0.19% 1.29% 3.10% 3.10% 2.49%
Mexico 2.90% 2.00% 2.78% 2.61% 1.98% 1.77% 1.01%
Brazil 3.39% 3.42% 6.39% 2.87% 1.49% 2.84% 1.46%
China 8.26% 10.11% 14.75% 32.62% 33.33% 9.79% 15.80%
India 4.29% 3.11% 18.02% 16.93% 9.84% 9.00% 2.57%
Countries 43434343434336
25
Source: Davis and Weinstein (2001).
Table 8.4 Results of Statistical Testing in Davis-Weinstein
HOV HOV
HOV HOV-HN non-FPE non-FPE & gravit
y
Statistic H1H2H3H4
Slope -0.002 -0.05 0.43 0.82
Standard Error 0.005 0.02 0.02 0.03
R 2
0.01 0.31 0.96 0.98
Sign Test 32% 50% 86% 91%
Observations 22 22 22 22
Figure 8.1
V 2 V 1 F H1f X 1h X 2f X 2h X
Figure 8.2
X 2X 1 DA h A f T f T h 1 fX 1h X 2f X 2h X
Figure 8.3DH
F country hcountr y f 1 2ppp= 1 2 X X a f p a h p
Figure 8.4
p* FH -M h1 M f1 a f p a h p 1 2 p p p =
Figure 8.5
V 1 V 2 $1 of X 2 $1 of X 1 EE 2 E 1 V V 22
21
a a 12 11 a a
Figure 8.6
V 1 V 2 OO E 12 11 a a 22
21
a a
Figure 8.7
V 1 V 2 O 1 ǻV 1 O 2 O' 2 A 0 A 1
Figure 8.8
X 2 X 1 A 0 A 1
Figure 8.9
V 1 V 2 O 1 O 2 A 0 A 1 22
21
a a 12 11 a a
Figure 8.10
V 2 V 1 A 1 A 0 0 1 2 w w 1 1 2 w w
Figure 8.11
V 2 V 1 $1 of X 2 $1 of X 1 E f E h