Residential. Water Demand Management: Lessons from Aurora Colorado. Journal of the American Water Resources Associa- tion (JAWRA) 44(1):192-207.
29 juil. 2020 This Instruction implements Air Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 41-1 ... training quota managers for the Medical Readiness Management Course ...
5.1 A formalism for modeling engineering processes . say that the people around me thought me important lessons about greater things. And I.
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW VOL. 44 NO. 3 SPRING 2002 them energized; entrepreneurs in Engineering companies sometimes seemed to.
Ecole Mohammadia d'Ingénieurs Industrial Engineering Department
of Science and Engineering who have attended “classes préparatoires” may request credit for courses as for transfer students. Each application.
Unit 44: Industrial Power Electronics and Storage *(Unit 35: Professional Engineering Management is also the Pearson-set assignment unit).
Engineering Management Program Curricula Samples. 16. B. Certificate Programs. 19. 2.6. Professional Practice. 22. 2.7. Online and In-Class Parity.
8 mai 2017 General engineering management. ... General systems engineering management . ... 44. Superseded by T MU MD 00009 ST v3.0 08/05/2017 ...
This document is one of a set of standards developed solely and specifically for use on the rail network owned or managed by the NSW
Government and its agencies. It is not suitable for any other purpose. You must not use or adapt it or rely upon it in any way unless you
are authorised in writing to do so by a relevant NSW Government agency.If this document forms part of a contract with, or is a condition of approval by, a NSW Government agency, use of the document is
subject to the terms of the contract or approval.This document may not be current. Current standards are available for download from the Asset Standards Authority website at
www.asa.transport.nsw.gov.au............................................................................ 44 Superseded by T MU MD 00009 ST v3.0, 08/05/2017
and to manage the competence of its staff under its own competence management system. Superseded by T MU MD 00009 ST v3.0, 08/05/2017
TAE10 - Training and Education, Innovation and Business Industry Skills Council Superseded by T MU MD 00009 ST v3.0, 08/05/2017
Sections 8.1 through to Section 8.4 outline the engineering requirements that an organisation is required to demonstrate compliance with.
The objective of engineering management requirements is to have systematic arrangements for managing resources, processes, systems, data and facilities for
undertaking engineering activities. A robust system is requiredto provide assurance that engineering designs are correct, integrated, and able to be constructed in
a manner which is compliant with relevant standards, and which satisfies TfNSW requirements. Req. ID Mandatory/Guidance Requirements ISO 9001
ENM1 Mandatory An AEO shall have arrangements for executing engineering services in a competent and systematic 7.1
way. 7 An AEO shall have engineering management methodologies appropriate to its engineering services N/A Guidance This is a summary requirement covering the entire engineering management section. N/AThe response does not need to cover all the other engineering management requirements in detail, but should
provide a top-level summarised conclusion. It is to be answered last - after the relevant specific requirements have been addressedN/A Guidance Engineering management arrangements should typically be documented in an engineering management plan
(EMP) or manual N/AN/A Guidance Asset life cycle, phase-specific sub-plans or manuals typically support an engineering management plan. The
number and scope of the sub-plans will depend upon the scope of the engineering services offered over the
asset life cycle by an AEO, and the level of assurance required by the AEO. Sub-plans and manuals may
include the following: design management plan construction management plan manufacturing management plan integration, test and commissioning plan maintenance management plan decommissioning management plan N/AN/A An engineering management plan is typically supported by the following asset life cycle cross-phase
sub-plans or manuals depending on the scope of engineering services offered by the Authorised Engineering
N/A Guidance Depending on the scope and complexity of engineering services, an Authorised Engineering Organisation
may incorporate some or all sub-plans within a single engineering management plan. For example, aspecialist supplier of geotechnical or potholing services will have a relatively simple engineering management
plan compared to a supplier of multi-discipline, multi-phase services covering systems integration N/A
ENM2 Mandatory An AEO shall ensure that its engineering services map to relevant phases of the TfNSW asset life
cycle model 7N/A Guidance The TfNSW asset life cycle model is derived from ISO/IEC 15288-2008 and tailored to rail engineering work N/A
ENM3 Mandatory An AEO shall establish and maintain an engineering assurance process that aligns to the range of
engineering services and activities that the organisation intends to provide 7ENM4 Mandatory An AEO shall demonstrate engineering assurance based on progressive stage gateway reviews 7
N/A Guidance The baseline stage gateway reviews defined over the full system or asset life cycle are:
exploratory, pre-feasibility conceptualisation development, including planning and design up to final design production, including manufacturing or fabrication, COTS procurement, installation and assembly post-build, including integration, testing and commissioning validation, including customer acceptance testing handover, including as-built records and defects liability period retirement, including decommissioning and disposal of redundant assets N/AN/A Guidance An AEO should be satisfied at each baseline gateway review that safety risk has been managed SFAIRP N/A
N/A Guidance The baseline stage gateways to apply will depend on the scope of engineering services offered over the asset
life cycle by the AEO N/AN/A Guidance Engineering management methodologies and processes for the full asset or system life cycle include the
following: stakeholder and user needs analysis capability requirements definition and option development feasibility studies system requirements definition and reference design preliminary design detail or critical design manufacture or fabrication construction or installation inspection and testing commissioning operations and maintenance decommissioning and disposal N/A N/A Guidance Systems assurance brings together the elements of: quality assurance verification and validation results reliability, availability and maintainability (RAM) assurance system safety assurance compliance to procedures compliance to standards compliance to appropriate legislation N/AN/A Guidance The engineering methodologies and processes that an AEO applies will depend upon the scope of
engineering services offered over the asset life cycle N/AN/A Guidance AEOs should refer to TS 10504 AEO Guide to Engineering Management for further guidance on engineering
management for TfNSW projects N/AN/A Guidance Engineering services include design, construction, installation, testing, commissioning, maintenance and
disposal N/AN/A Guidance Management of engineering risk across the rail network is a joint responsibility of all parties, including the
N/A Guidance The level of risk associated with an engineering activity is related to technology, novelty, system size and
complexity, amount of stage work, and quantity and type of system interfaces N/AN/A Guidance Design AEOs should have a staged design assurance process, containing the following suggested stages:
system concept review for AEOs involved in pre-feasibility and optioneering work system definition review preliminary design review detailed or final design review system verification review after inspection and test, but before commissioningphysical configuration audit after commissioning, to verify that as built assets match all design data,
documentation and drawings N/Acommissioning stages capability to provide design support during construction, inspection, test and 7.5.1
ENM7 Mandatory Design AEOs shall have 'safety in design' as part of producing engineering designs 7.3
ENM8 Mandatory An AEO shall incorporate sustainability engineering services in design as relevant to the scope of the authorised 7.3 N/AGuidance The objective of sustainability in design is to ensure that all relevant aspects of sustainability are considered in
the engineering activities applied across the full asset life cycle. Sustainability in design should aim to lower
life cycle costs, reduce environmental risks and negative impacts, and improve operational performance N/A
Guidance The application of the sustainability in design process for a specific project would typically be described in a sustainability integration plan (SIP), although for simple projects it may be contained within the engineering
management plan.For specific projects or issues, an AEO will often require sustainability specialist advice. This expertise may be
in-house or contracted N/A N/A Guidance Key considerations for sustainability in design are as follows: identify and record sustainability issues relevant to specific projects include sustainability early in the planning and design processdetermine and justify the amount of sustainability work in line with the risk and complexity of specific
projects analyse, manage and control identified issuesinclude consideration of sustainability in engineering analyses. For example, in requirements definition,
life cycle analysis, operational concepts, or risk assessment provide a mechanism for closing out issues capture and record lessons learnt at the conclusion of projects N/A N/AGuidance The scale of the sustainability work required will vary from 'significant' for novel and complex projects to
'minimal' for 'like for like' substitution of a piece of equipment N/AENM9 Mandatory An AEO shall consider environmental impact as relevant to the scope of the authorised engineering
services 7.3 N/AGuidance The objective is to ensure that the environmental impact of the services is considered and incorporated in
decision-making and option selection N/A N/AGuidance The scale of the environmental impact assessment work required will vary from 'significant' for complex
projects where there may be a significant environmental or social impact, to 'minimal' for 'like for like'
substitution of a piece of equipment. Compliance with the NSW Environmental Planning and Assessment Act
Guidance The application of the environmental impact assessment process for a large project would typically be
described in an environmental impact assessment report (EIA). Often, the EIA will be done as a separate
task. In this case the AEO would be expected to provide input into the project EIA.For simple projects, the impact assessment may be contained within the engineering management plan or
option selection report N/A N/A Guidance Key elements for environmental impact assessment are as follows: identify and assess environmental impacts and risks identify any mitigation measures make recommendations for any further environmental impact assessment include environmental impact consideration in engineering analyses (for example in requirements definition, option selection, operational concepts, risk assessment) provide a mechanism for closing out issues capture and record lessons learnt at the conclusion of projects N/AThe objective of asset management is to ensure that all management activities associated with acquisition, operation and maintenance of assets will maintain
asset integrity at a level that satisfies the original business requirements over the planned asset life. Req. ID Mandatory/Guidance Requirements ISO 9001
ENM10 Mandatory An AEO shall have management arrangements in place that align with the requirements of
ISO 55001: 2014 Asset management - Management systems - Requirements, or PAS 55-1:2008 Asset Management, as applicable to the scope of engineering services provided 4.1. 7.1.N/A Guidance Not all AEOs will be required to have all asset management arrangements specified in ISO 55001, or PAS 55 in
place. An AEO that is responsible for the planning, acquisition, operation and maintenance of rail assets will
have to demonstrate that the asset management arrangements do align with ISO 55001 or PAS 55. An example of an organisation without direct asset management responsibility would be a design AEO operating in the acquisition and delivery phase of the asset life cycle N/AN/A Guidance While ISO 55001: 2014 or PAS 55-1: 2008 focuses on asset management from the perspective of asset
owners, operators and maintainers, it also contains requirements that apply to AEOs that provide engineering
services associated with the acquisition and disposal of assets, which are usually under the control of a project.
An AEO providing engineering services during the project life cycle should therefore ensure that it complies
with ISO 55001: 2014 or PAS 55-1: 2008 requirements associated with asset acquisition and disposal. N/A
N/A Guidance Rail infrastructure managers (RIM) and rolling stock operators (RSO) are the primary organisations that will
need to have asset management arrangements in place that comply with ISO 55001: 2014, or PAS 55-1, or an
equivalent relevant standard N/AStandards management ensures that AEOs are working to the latest approved versions of engineering standards that are relevant to engineering services
provided. Req. ID Mandatory/Requirements ISO 9001ENM11 Mandatory An AEO shall establish and maintain a repository of the latest relevant engineering standards, guidance,
codes of practice, and similar documents that are applicable to the engineering service areas anddisciplines for which it seeks and obtains authorisation. Standards relevant to TfNSW include: 4.2.3.
TfNSW standards (including legacy RailCorp standards) Australian standards (referred to indirectly in TfNSW standards, or in their own right) international standards (ISO, IEC, EN, and similar) other standards that may be appropriate to the transport industryN/A Guidance The engineering standards repository may take the form of a register with references to the latest versions of the N/A
relevant standards and where they are maintained, to ensure that the AEO is working to the latest standards
ENM12 Mandatory An AEO shall establish arrangements for assessing the significance of proposed engineering changes
arising from the delivery of its engineering services 4.2.3.N/A Guidance This judgment of significance (JOS) should assess complexity and effects, including safety risk, of the change N/A
ENM13 Mandatory An AEO shall ensure that a competent person has accountability for assessing and approving the
engineering change 6.2.2(a) N/AGuidance Where the significance is judged to be beyond the authority of the AEO, the AEO should escalate it via the
normal contractual reporting arrangements to TfNSW for decision and approval of the change N/AN/A Guidance The attributes of a suitable judgement of significance related to a proposed engineering change include:
assessment of the need for the change risk level including safety risk RAM impacts updates to the configuration and technical data N/AN/A Guidance The JOS arrangements should be considered in relation to configuration management, risk management,
requests for information, and engineering standards 'concessions' processes N/ASections 9.1 through to Section 9.9 outline the systems engineering requirements that an organisation is required to demonstrate compliance with.
The objective of systems engineering requirements is to use a scalable methodology that can manage the engineering of systems with high levels of complexity,
novelty and risk, in a manner which satisfies customer requirements over the full asset or system life cycle. Reqt. ID Mandatory/Guidance Requirements ISO 9001
SEM1 Mandatory An AEO shall have a systems engineering approach to the planning and delivery of its engineering services or products 7.
N/AThe response does not need to cover all the other relevant requirements in detail, but should provide a
top-level summary. It is to be answered last - after the relevant specific requirements have been addressed N/AN/A Guidance An AEO should perform systems engineering activities in accordance with the requirements of
ISO/IEC 15288: 2008 or ISO/IEC 26702: 2007, formerly IEEE 1220: 2005, or equivalent N/AN/A Guidance An AEO that provides multi-disciplinary services should document its systems engineering approach in a
systems engineering management plan or manual N/AN/A Guidance An AEO may choose to establish an enterprise level systems engineering management plan (SEMP), which is
tailored and applied to each project, rather than developing project-specific SEMPs without reference to an
overarching 'standard' SEMP N/AN/A Guidance An AEO may choose to embed systems engineering principles and processes within an engineering
management plan rather than write a dedicated systems engineering management plan. This choice will depend on the complexity and range of services offered by the AEO. Smaller AEOs may choose this approach N/AN/A Guidance An AEO may choose to scale the level of systems engineering relevant to the level of complexity, novelty and
risk associated with its services. AEOs may prepare a relatively simple engineering management plan for
standard, single discipline engineering projects, whereas AEOs engaged in complex, multi-discipline,
multi-phase projects with significant levels of systems integration will likely need to prepare an systems
engineering management plan that covers all systems engineering areas N/AN/A Guidance AEOs should refer to TS 10504 AEO Guide to Engineering Management for further guidance on systems
engineering as a methodology for engineering management on TfNSW projects N/AThe objective of requirements management is to have a systematic process for eliciting, defining, analysing, and allocating client and stakeholder requirements,
then managing traceability and compliance with those requirements over the full asset life cycle. Reqt. ID Mandatory/
SEM2 Mandatory An AEO shall have requirements management arrangements that set out process, responsibilities,
structure, tools and deliverables for management of stakeholder requirements applicable to the scope of
engineering services provided across the system life cycle 7.2. N/AGuidance The response does not need to cover all the other relevant requirements in details, but should provide a top level
summarised conclusion. N/A It is to be answered last - after the relevant specific requirements have been addressedN/A Guidance Requirements management arrangements should be documented in a requirements management plan, but may
be included as a section within an overall systems engineering management plan, depending on the scope and
complexity of engineering services provided N/A N/A Guidance An AEO should have a process for identifying system and managed safety requirements, which should be specifically identified N/ASEM3 Mandatory An AEO shall establish and maintain a requirements management tool or system that is capable of
managing the categorisation, allocation, changes, traceability and verification of all requirements within
its scope of control 4.2.4.SEM4 Mandatory The requirements management tool or system shall be able to easily exchange all requirements
information using a common interchange format with other organisations 7.2.1(a)N/A Guidance A common requirements interchange format is the Object Management Group requirements interchange format
(ReqIF), specified at www.omg.org N/AN/A Guidance It is not always necessary to implement a complex proprietary requirements management tool for simple projects.
Depending on the project or system complexity, the AEO could manage requirements using a spreadsheet tool N/A
N/A Guidance Proprietary requirements management tools are available N/A N/A Guidance Further guidance is provided in TS 10505 Guide to Requirements Definition and AnalysisThe objective of interface management requirements is to have a systematic process for identifying all interfaces, defining and analysing safety, functional and
performance requirements of relevant interfaces, agreeing on primary and secondary owners of such interfaces, and managing those interfaces over the full
system life cycle. Reqt. ID Mandatory/SEM5 Mandatory An AEO shall have interface management arrangements that set out the process, responsibilities,
structure, tools and deliverables 7.2.1(a) N/AGuidance The response does not need to cover all the other relevant requirements in details, but should provide a top level N/A
summary. It is to be answered last - after the relevant specific requirements have been addressedN/A Guidance Interface management arrangements should be documented in an interface management plan, but may be
included as a section within an overall systems engineering management plan or engineering management plan,
depending on the scope and complexity of the engineering services provided N/ASEM6 Mandatory An AEO shall ensure that all interface requirements under the control of its engineering services are
identified, captured and managed 7.2.1(a)N/A Guidance An AEO which intends to offer multi-discipline engineering services including systems integration on engineering
projects with multiple complex systems and interfaces should establish and maintain interface control documents
and interface requirements specifications N/AN/A Guidance For low complexity projects, an AEO may establish a simple interface matrix with evidence of which party has primary responsibility for defining each interface, and how this will be managed N/A
SEM7 Mandatory An AEO shall ensure that interface design reviews and checks are conducted at appropriate stages of the
design process by competent subject matter experts 7.2.1(a)N/A Guidance An AEO may develop and use standard interface checklists and templates and an interface register for typical
interfaces to support the development and management of these interfaces over the system life cycle stages for
which the AEO is authorised N/ASEM8 Mandatory An AEO shall identify and manage interface risks and outcomes that may undesired impact have a safety or other 7.3.
SEM9 Mandatory An AEO that intends to offer rail systems integration services shall demonstrate that it has suitable
management arrangements to plan and carry out the integration of all the declared systems 7.2.1.N/A Guidance Not all AEOs will be required to offer or demonstrate systems integration capability N/A
N/A Guidance Further guidance on interface management is provided in TS 10507 Guide to Systems Integration
© State of NSW through Transport for NSW Page 24 of 44 Superseded by T MU MD 00009 ST v3.0, 08/05/2017
The objective of system architecture management requirements is to synthesise or translate system-level functional and performance requirements into a
framework architecture that provides a range of perspectives, which are then used for design decision-making and detailed system design development.
Guidance Requirements ISO 9001 SEM10 Mandatory A design AEO shall demonstrate that it has arrangements to manage the synthesis and development of
system level requirements into a credible system architecture 7.3.2. N/A Guidance System architecture development and management is typically done by AEOs during the concept and
development stages of the system or asset life cycle in conjunction with system modelling and analysis N/A N/A Guidance System architecture management arrangements are typically documented in a system architecture management
plan, but may be included as a section within an overall systems engineering management plan or engineering
management plan, depending on the scope and complexity of engineering services provided on a project N/A N/A Guidance Depending on the nature of the systems, the asset types involved, and the level of detail abstraction, the system
architecture may be defined in standards and general arrangement drawings N/A N/A Guidance Depending on the scope and nature of systems and elements involved, typical architectural viewpoints may
include the following:functional architecture, a representation of each function and its embedding or relationship to other functions
within and outside the systemlogical architecture, representing logical relationships between functional elements of the system
physical architecture, representing the physical hardware that actually contains the functions defined in the
functional architecture geographic architecture, allocation of physical hardware assets to geographic locationsoperational architecture, operational processes and interactions with internal and external users N/A N/A Guidance For complex software programmable communications and control systems, evolving known best practice is to
use the Unified Modelling Language (UML) or Systems Modelling Language (SysML) to define these systems
using a range of standard architectural viewpoints and models N/A N/A Guidance An AEO may choose to procure established, validated, commercial architecture development and modelling tools
to support this service. Generally this is used for modelling complex systems N/AThe objective of reliability, availability and maintainability (RAM) management is to ensure that the target RAM properties of the system can be achieved by the
evolving system architecture and design.Guidance Requirements ISO 9001 SEM11 Mandatory An AEO shall demonstrate that it has RAM management arrangements in place, relevant to the
engineering services or products provided 7.3.5.availability and maintainability management. An AEO offering system design or systems integration services
should have RAM management arrangements N/A N/A Guidance Where an AEO can be demonstrate that a new system to be developed and implemented is using standard type-
approved products in standard configurations, then it is likely that the level of reliability availability and
maintainability management required will be negligible N/A N/A Guidance However, if an AEO intends to engage in design or systems integration services involving development and
delivery of systems in configurations that are not covered by existing standards, then the AEO will be expected to
demonstrate that it does have reliability, availability and maintainability management arrangements N/A N/A Guidance RAM management arrangements should be documented in a RAM plan or manual, but may be included as a
section within an overall systems engineering management plan or engineering management plan, depending on
the scope and complexity of engineering services provided N/A N/A Guidance An AEO may choose to procure established and validated commercial reliability, availability and maintainability
modelling tools to support this service N/A N/A Guidance An AEO may choose to develop in-house reliability, availability and maintainability assurance tools, but their
outputs must be validated against known satisfaction benchmarks N/AThe objective of verification and validation requirements is to ensure that the all requirements are proven to have been satisfactorily met, including compliance with
standards.Guidance Requirements ISO 9001 SEM12 Mandatory An AEO shall have arrangements for verification and validation management of the engineering services
or products provided 7.3.5.tools N/A N/A Guidance Verification and validation management arrangements are typically documented in a verification and validation
plan. However, they may form a section of a systems engineering management plan or overall engineering
management plan, depending on the scope and complexity of engineering services provided N/A N/A Guidance An AEO should provide appropriate verification and validation activities for safety requirements, depending on the
required integrity of the implemented safety functions N/A N/A Guidance An AEO may choose to procure established and validated commercial verification and validation management
tools to support this service N/A N/A Guidance An AEO may choose to develop in-house systems verification and validation tools N/A N/A Guidance Further guidance on the management of verification and validation is provided in TS 10506 Guide to Verification
and Validation N/AThe objective of human factors integration is to ensure that all relevant aspects of the human interaction within the system are considered in the engineering
activities applied across the full asset life cycle. The practical application of human factors knowledge contributes to enhanced design solutions and improved
operational and safety performance. Reqt. ID Mandatory/SEM13 Mandatory An Authorised Engineering Organisation shall manage all human factors relevant to the scope of the
authorised engineering services 7.2.1(a)N/A Guidance Human factors integration is the process by which the application of human factors is managed. An Authorised
Engineering Organisation is expected to have such a process.The application of the human factors integration process for a specific project would typically be described in a
human factors integration plan (HFIP), although for simple projects it may be contained within the engineering
management plan.N/A Guidance Human factors integration should be a structured and documented process which as a minimum:
identifies the various user groups, their attributes and requirements identifies and records human factors issues relevant to specific projectsdetermines and justifies the level of human factors work in line with the risk and complexity of specific
projects analyses, manages and controls identified issuesincludes human factors consideration in engineering analyses (for example in requirements definition,
operational concepts, hazard identification, risk assessment, FMECA, FTA etc) provides a mechanism for closing out issues captures and records lessons learnt at the conclusion of projects N/AN/A Guidance Application of the human factors integration process should identify human factors issues - physical, cognitive
and organisational - including the opportunities for human error and their consequences N/AN/A Guidance The scale of the human factors work required will vary from significant for novel and complex projects to minimal
for 'like for like' substitution of a piece of equipment N/AN/A Guidance Further guidance on human factors integration is provided in the T MU HF 00001 GU AEO Guide to Human
SEM14 Mandatory Human factors integration tasks shall be done by a competent resource. The competency requirements
of the resource shall be determined by the needs of the specific project 6.2.N/A Guidance For simpler projects, an Authorised Engineering Organisation may describe the manner in which it manages
human factors in an overall engineering management plan N/AN/A Guidance For competence management human factors expertise is classified as part of the engineering resources of an
All electrical or electronic systems that are not correctly designed, manufactured or installed can cause electromagnetic interference (EMI) to other equipment or
services, or to be susceptible to EMI from a range of sources in the operational environment. The NSW railway operational environment consists of a large
number of critical, electromagnetically emissive and sensitive systems co-located in close proximity, including systems used by other rail operators and external
organisations. It is essential to manage electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) throughout the system life cycle, from concept to commissioning and ongoing
maintenance, to achieve and maintain total system functionality, performance and safety. Reqt. ID Mandatory/
integration or testing of electrical or electronic systems involving electromagnetic interference emitters
(threats) or receivers (victims) shall have arrangements for managing electromagnetic compatibility 7.3.
SEM16 Mandatory An AEO engaged by TfNSW to undertake engineering activities involving the specification, design, build,
integration or modification of electrically conductive or magnetically permeative structures shall ensure
that arrangements are in place for managing electromagnetic interference and electromagnetic compatibility 7.3.N/A Guidance An AEO providing fabrication, construction or installation services for non-electrical or electronic systems will not
need to demonstrate full electromagnetic compatibility management arrangements.An AEO offering system design or systems integration services, either as a technical advisor during the
development of the reference design, or as part of a design and construct contract during project implementation,
should have electromagnetic compatibility management arrangements. N/A N/A Guidance Electromagnetic interference can typically occur via four coupling mechanisms: conductive interference, for example, stray earth currents from the traction earth return circuit inductive, for example, currents induced by near-field alternating current power circuitscapacitive, for example, static discharge from high voltage circuits and coupling to lineside fences
radiative, for example, radiated electromagnetic waves N/AN/A Guidance The level of electromagnetic compatibility management is expected to be negligible where it can be demonstrated
that a new system will be designed and implemented using type-approved products in standard configurations N/A
N/A Guidance An AEO that intends to engage in design or systems integration services on projects involving development and
delivery of novel electrical and electronic systems in novel configurations that are not covered by existing standards should demonstrate electromagnetic compatibility management. N/AN/A Guidance The system design or systems integrator AEO may choose to sub-contract a specialist electromagnetic
compatibility consultant to support its electromagnetic compatibility management arrangements N/AN/A Guidance Any electrically conductive or magnetically permeative structure near electrical or electronic equipment can
excessively couple (transfer) EMI, if it is not correctly designed, manufactured, modified, or installed. These
structures typically include buried metal pipes, fences, towers, steel reinforced concrete structures of appreciable
length such as viaducts, bridges, tunnels, platforms and concourses N/AN/A Guidance An AEO responsible for design and construction of these electrically conductive or magnetically permeative
structures, usually civil engineers, should consult with the designers and installers of the electrical or electronic
systems that may transfer EMI via these structures N/AN/A Guidance These arrangements should enable the planning, analysis, execution, assurance and reporting of all
electromagnetic compatibility-related activities on a project or system and document this in an electromagnetic
compatibility management plan N/AN/A Guidance Electromagnetic compatibility is typically achieved on most TfNSW rail projects through the following:
compliance to established standards and standard drawings for the configuration and relative positioning of
electrical high voltage (HV) power feeders, overhead wiring (OHW) systems, low voltage (LV) power circuits,
and various signalling, telecommunication and control systems use of type-approved electrical and electronic systems and productscompliance with established earthing, bonding, screening, segregation, immunisation and electrolysis
standards and codes of practice N/AN/A Guidance An AEO should demonstrate that it has systematically analysed the electromagnetic impact of any deviation from
standard practice if is engaged to design, develop or introduce a new product or non-standard configuration N/A
N/A Guidance Engineering design and specification activities associated with electromagnetic compatibility on railway assets
include: N/A earthing and bonding design for protection of both equipment and people electromagnetic radiation analysis and design electrolysis effects and their mitigation lightning and other surge protectionThe objective of system safety assurance is to ensure that the operational safety risks associated with the system are identified, managed and reduced to so far
as is reasonably practical (SFAIRP) in all engineering activities and disciplines over the full asset life cycle. Reqt. ID Mandatory/
SEM17 Mandatory The AEO shall have system safety assurance arrangements in place, relevant to the engineering services
or products provided. These arrangements must include suitable planning activities and deliverables.
They must also demonstrate suitable and sufficient integration into the engineering services 4.1. N/AGuidance The scope and depth of safety assurance arrangements should be scaled according to the range of engineering
services and associated risk. A large multi-disciplinary en