PUBLIC LAW 88-352-JULY 2, 1964 241 Public Law 88-352 - GovInfo www govinfo gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-78/ pdf /STATUTE-78-Pg241 pdf Civil Rights Act of 1964 Operation and enforcement Voting quali- fications Registration, etc Literacy tests
CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 [Public Law 88–352 - GovInfo www govinfo gov/content/pkg/COMPS-342/ pdf /COMPS-342 pdf 10 déc 2015 United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be cited as the ''Civil Rights Act of 1964 '' SEC 101
TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 EDITOR'S NOTE - ILO www ilo org/dyn/travail/docs/1583/CIVIL 20RIGHTS 20ACT pdf Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin The Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Pub L 102-166) (CRA) and
Civil Rights Act of 1964: P L 88-352 - Senate gov www senate gov/artandhistory/history/resources/ pdf /CivilRightsActOf1964 pdf I'nited States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be cited as the "Civil Rights Act of 1964” TITLE I-VOTING RIGHTS SEC 101
The Civil Rights Act of 1964: An Overview sgp fas org/crs/misc/R46534 pdf 21 sept 2020 Although the titles address discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, or sex, the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - CORE core ac uk/download/ pdf /232765299 pdf Unlike previous attempts at civil rights legislation, the constitutionality of the 1964 act held up under examination by the Supreme Court and received
Civil Rights Act of 1964 www lcsd wednet edu/cms/lib/WA01001184/Centricity/Domain/74/Civil_Rights_Act_1964 pdf Civil Rights Act of 1964 By Jane Runyon When John F Kennedy ran for President of the United States in 1960, he told the people of the country that it was
title vii of the civil rights act - NC gov files nc gov/ncoshr/documents/files/Civil_Rights_Act-Title_VII pdf Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, effective March 24, 1972
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wisconsin Historical Society www wisconsinhistory org/ pdf s/lessons/civilrights/CivilRights_lesson16 pdf What did the Civil Rights Act of 1964 say and do? Why did some people oppose it? Background Information Congress had passed various civil right bills for
THE LEGACY OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 - Vanderbilt Law law vanderbilt edu/phd/faculty/joni-hersch/2015_Hersch_and_Shinall_Legacy_of_Civil_Rights_Act_Journal_of_Policy_Analysis_and_Management pdf This paper assesses the legacy of the Civil Rights Act over the past 50 years, reviewing its history, scope, and impact on wage, employment, and segregation
By rephrasing two paragraphs from the act and analyzing a photo and an advertisement, students will learn
about its main provisions and why those were considered controversial in 1964. Activities challenge them to
take a side in the con?ict between civil rights and property rights and explain their stance.Central Questions
What did the Civil Rights Act of 1964 say and do? Why did some people oppose it?Congress had passed various civil right bills for almost a century before the Civil Rights Act of 1964. All
the bills aimed to articulate and guarantee rights that were outlined in the 14th and 15th amendments to
the Constitution. ?ese passed just a?er the Civil War and aimed to ensure equal protection under the law and protect the right to vote for African Americans. ?ey generally failed because they had loopholes and
enforcement was le? to state and local o?cials. A?er the federal government abandoned the South in 1877, many states all over the country passedexplicitly segregationist laws. In 1896, the US Supreme Court held up these laws in its Plessy v. Ferguson de-
cision. For decades, millions of African Americans were denied their basic civil rights.Following World War II, Congress passed bills desegregating the military and interstate transportation.
In 1954, the Supreme Court's unanimous Brown v. Board of Education decision overturned segregation in
public schools. ?e much-publicized Montgomery bus boycott in Alabama launched Martin Luther King Jr. to national prominence, and the use of federal troops to desegregate Little Rock's Central High School in
actions. Photos revealing inequality and violence ?ooded the news media. In a televised address on June 11, 1963, President John F. Kennedy Jr. proposed a new and more explicit
civil rights bill. A?er Kennedy's assassination, President Lyndon B. Johnson continued to lobby for the bill
in Congress, where a cohort of key segregationist senators from the South ?libustered for 75 days to stop it.
?ey relented in June 1964, at the start of Freedom Summer, and Johnson ultimately signed it into law on July 2, 1964. Although strengthened and supplemented in subsequent years, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 o?cially
made racial discrimination and segregation illegal.SEC. 201. (a) All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities,
and privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as de?ned in this
section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin...
[such as] any inn, hotel, motel, ... any restaurant, cafeteria, lunchroom, lunch counter, soda fountain... any
motion picture house, theater, concert hall, sports arena, stadium...SEC. 202. All persons shall be entitled to be free, at any establishment or place, from discrimination or segre-
gation of any kind on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin, [even] if such discrimination or
segregation is or purports to be required by any law, statute, ordinance... Document 2: Restaurant owner Lester Maddox drives a Black customer away at gunpoint.If you can decide who gets to borrow your phone or your jacket, why can't he decide who to serve in his
restaurant? What are some di?erences between these two situations??is ?ier was distributed by mail and as a newspaper ad during the spring of 1964. Don't try to read the small
print. Just focus on the big type that you can make out easily.In a small group, agree on answers to the following questions. Don't try to read the small print. Just focus on
the big type that you can make out easily. 1. Who produced and distributed this advertisement? 2. Were they for or against the Civil Rights Act? What images or words tell you that? 3. What's their main argument? Restate it in a phrase or sentence of your own. 4. Do you agree or disagree with their main point? Explain why. 5.Do you think the constitutional argument against civil rights may have just been a cover for racism?