Searches related to conservative dentistry notes filetype:pdf

63222_7quality_assurance_initiatives.pdf

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 1

DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY AND ENDODONTICS

STUDENT FEEDBACK FORM-2018-19

DR.BALAGOPAL MDS-VICE PRINCIPAL-HOD

POSITIVE NOTES

Has an excellent knowledge base and communication skill. very punctual, sincere and committee to work. Has excellent ability to integrate course material with environment/ other issues to provide a broader prospective, to generate interest towards the subject among students.Regarding various methods to evaluate the students, activities like quizzes/tests/assignment/examination/projects are being regularly conducted by the teacher. For the feedback, provision of sufficient is being given. Proper utilization of the teaching aids like PowerPoint etc by the teacher.very good in encouraging the students and giving advice for the better performance. The approach of the teacher was also excellent. Internal assessment is unbiased. Often the teacher provides feedback on your performance and helps in guiding them in the proper way. Overall rating is excellent. DEFICIENCY AND ACTION TAKEN ON: On analyzing all the above discussed parameters there was no deficiencies, but still expected to improve the performance and effort for the benefit of the students. 82
84
86
88
90
92
94

96DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY

AND ENDODONTICS

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 2

DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY AND ENDODONTICS

STUDENT FEEDBACK FORM-2018-19

DR.HEMASATHYA .MDS-READER

POSITIVE NOTES

Has an excellent knowledge base and communication skill. very punctual, sincere and committee to work. Has excellent ability to integrate course material with environment/ other issues to provide a broader prospective, to generate interest towards the subject among students. Regarding various methods to evaluate the students, activities like quizzes/tests/assignment/examination/projects are being regularly conducted by the teacher. For the feedback, provision of sufficient is being given. Proper utilization of the teaching aids like powerpoint etc by the teacher .very good in encouraging the students and giving advice for the better performance. The approach of the teacher was also excellent. Internal assessment is unbiased. Often the teacher provides feedback on your performance and helps in guiding them in the proper way. Overall rating is excellent. DEFICIENCY AND ACTION TAKEN ON: On analyzing all the above discussed parameters there was no deficiencies, but still expected to improve the performance and effort for the benefit of the students. 82
84
86
88
90
92
94

Series 1

Series 1

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 3

DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY AND ENDODONTICS

STUDENT FEEDBACK FORM-2018-19

DR.OMAR FAROOQ -MDS-SENIOR LECTURER

POSITIVE NOTES

Has an excellent knowledge base and communication skill.very punctual,sincere and committee to work. Has excellent ability to integrate course material with environment/ other issues to provide a broader prospective, to generate interest towards the subject among students.Regarding various methods to evaluate the students, activities like quizzes/tests/assignment/examination/projects are being regularly conducted by the teacher. For the feedback, provision of sufficient is being given. Proper utilization of the teaching aids like powerpoint etc by the teacher.very good in encouraging the students and giving advice for the better performance. The approach of the teacher was also excellent. Internal assessment is unbiased. often the teacher provides feedback on your performance and helps in guiding them in the proper way. Overall rating is excellent. DEFICIENCY AND ACTION TAKEN ON: On analyzing all the above discussed parameters there was no deficiencies, but still expected to improve the performance and effort for the benefit of the students. 81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91

Series 1

Series 1

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 5

DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY AND ENDODONTICS

STUDENT FEEDBACK FORM-2018-19

DR.BEJOY MONY-MDS-READER

POSITIVE NOTES

Has an excellent knowledge base and communication skill.very punctual,sincere and committee to work. Has excellent ability to integrate course material with environment/ other issues to provide a broader prospective, to generate interest towards the subject among students.Regarding various methods to evaluate the students, activities like quizzes/tests/assignment/examination/projects are being regularly conducted by the teacher. For the feedback, provision of sufficient is being given. Proper utilization of the teaching aids like powerpoint etc by the teacher.very good in encouraging the students and giving advice for the better performance. The approach of the teacher was also excellent. Internal assessment is unbiased. often the teacher provides feedback on your performance and helps in guiding them in the proper way. Overall rating is excellent. DEFICIENCY AND ACTION TAKEN ON: On analyzing all the above discussed parameters there was no deficiencies, but still expected to improve the performance and effort for the benefit of the students. 78
80
82
84
86
88
90

Series 1

Series 1

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 6

DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY AND ENDODONTICS

STUDENT FEEDBACK FORM-2018-19

DR.ANISHA-MDS-SENIOR LECTURER

POSITIVE NOTES

Has an excellent knowledge base and communication skill. very punctual, sincere and committee to work. Has excellent ability to integrate course material with environment/ other issues to provide a broader prospective, to generate interest towards the subject among students. Regarding various methods to evaluate the students, activities like quizzes/tests/assignment/examination/projects are being regularly conducted by the teacher. For the feedback, provision of sufficient is being given. Proper utilization of the teaching aids like powerpoint etc by the teacher. very good in encouraging the students and giving advice for the better performance. The approach of the teacher was also excellent. Internal assessment is unbiased. Often the teacher provides feedback on your performance and helps in guiding them in the proper way. Overall rating is excellent. DEFICIENCY AND ACTION TAKEN ON: On analyzing all the above discussed parameters there was no deficiencies, but still expected to improve the performance and effort for the benefit of the students. 79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89

Series 1

Series 1

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 7

DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY AND ENDODONTICS

STUDENT FEEDBACK FORM-2018-19

DR.OHM NIJANDHAN-MDS-SENIOR LECTURER

POSITIVE NOTES

Has an excellent knowledge base and communication skill.very punctual,sincere and committee to work. Has excellent ability to integrate course material with environment/ other issues to provide a broader prospective, to generate interest towards the subject among students.Regarding various methods to evaluate the students, activities like quizzes/tests/assignment/examination/projects are being regularly conducted by the teacher. For the feedback, provision of sufficient is being given. Proper utilization of the teaching aids like powerpoint etc by the teacher.very good in encouraging the students and giving advice for the better performance. The approach of the teacher was also excellent. Internal assessment is unbiased. often the teacher provides feedback on your performance and helps in guiding them in the proper way. Overall rating is excellent. DEFICIENCY AND ACTION TAKEN ON: On analyzing all the above discussed parameters there was no deficiencies, but still expected to improve the performance and effort for the benefit of the students. 0 10 20 30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100

Series 1

Series 1

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 8

Figure 1-Student Feedback 2018-19

Dr. S. Jimson, (Professor and Head of the Department)

Positive points reported:

After analysing the feedback, 80% and above were considered to be the positive points and below 80% were considered to be deficiencies. Students reported that the faculty member has exceptional and outstanding communication skills, Knowledge base, is very punctual, Sincere and committed to the work and teaching. Regarding various methods to evaluate the students, the teacher is regularly conducting tests/ Assignments and examinations and also use of Google classrooms and Discussions aided in accessing and evaluating the students. Sufficient time is given to collect feedback from the students. Proper utilization of teaching aids like Power points etc aided in integrating the subjects with other topics. Internal assessment was unbiased and the teacher is easily accessible to students and counsels them in academic and personal matters whenever needed.

Overall rating is very good.

0 20 40
60
80
100
120

Knowledge base of the teacher

Communication SkillsSincerity of the teacher

Interest generated by the teacherAbility to integrate course material

Teaching Aids

Accessibility of the teacher in and͙

Ability to design͙

Proǀision of sufficient time for͙How well teacher encourages͙How helpful was the teacher in͙

Teachers approach can explained as

Internal assessment

How often did teacher proǀide͙

Overall Rating

Dr. S. Jimson

Dr Parthiban

Dr. Lokesh

Dr. Anandh

Dr. Bharathi

Dr. Bala Jagannath Gupta

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 9

Deficiencies and Actions Taken:

On analysing all the parameters, there were no deficiencies, but still expected to improve performance and effort for the benefit of the students.

Dr. J. Parthiban, (Reader)

Positive points reported:

After analysing the feedback, 80% and above were considered to be the positive points and below 80% were considered to be the deficiencies. The students reported that the teacher has excellent knowledge base, they also appreciated the sincerity of the teacher towards work and teaching. The use of various teaching aids and various methods used by the teacher to impart knowledge like visual aids and power points were appreciated. Internal assessment was unbiased and the teacher is easily accessible to the students.

Overall rating is very good.

Deficiencies and Actions Taken:

On analysing all the parameters, it was analysed that the communication skill of the teacher was not that effective. To improve, a lot of practice lectures and small group discussions were conducted and was able to achieve positive feedback from the students.

Dr. Lokesh, (Reader)

Positive points reported:

After analysing the feedback, 80% and above were considered to be the positive points and below 80% were considered to be the deficiencies. The students reported that the teacher has excellent knowledge base; they also appreciated the sincerity of the teacher towards work and teaching. The use of various teaching aids and various methods used by the teacher to impart knowledge like visual aids and power points were appreciated. Internal assessment was unbiased and the teacher is easily accessible to the students.

Overall rating is very good.

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 10

Deficiencies and Actions Taken:

After analysing the parameters, there was no major deficiencies noted, but improvements were made by the use of various teaching aids like small group discussions and case discussions.

Dr. Anandh, (Reader)

Positive points reported:

After analysing the feedback, 80% and above was considered to be positive points and below 80% were considered to be deficiencies. Knowledge, communication skills, Accessibility of teacher, sincerity and commitment to work were reported in the affirmative. Students also appreciated the use of various teaching aids like power point presentations and case discussions used by the teacher. Overall rating was very good.

Deficiencies and Actions Taken:

After evaluating the parameters, there was no major deficiencies found, but measures were taken to improve the methods of assessment of students by incorporating online discussions like Google discussion Classrooms.

Dr. Bharathi, (Senior Lecturer)

Positive points reported:

After analysing the feedback, 80% and above was considered to be positive points and

below 80% were considered to be deficiencies. Students app"‡...‹ƒ-‡† -Š‡ -‡ƒ...Š‡"ǯ•

knowledge base, communication skills, sincerity towards work. Internal assessment was unbiased and various teaching methods adopted by the teacher for teaching were applauded. Overall rating was good.

Deficiencies and Actions Taken:

After evaluating the parameters, there was no major deficiencies found, but measures were taken to improve the methods of assessment of students by incorporating online discussions like Google discussion Classrooms.

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 11

Dr. Bala Jagannath Gupta, (Senior Lecturer)

Positive points reported:

After analysing the feedback, 80% and above were considered to be positive feedback points and below 80% were considered to be deficiencies. Knowledge, Communication skills, Sincerity of the teacher towards work, and interest taken by the teacher in imparting knowledge to the students, all were appreciated by the students. The teacher also took keen interest in taking feedback from the students after every lecture and he was readily available for the students to approach for any query. Overall rating was very good.

Deficiencies and Actions Taken:

After analysing the feedback, no major deficiencies were noted, but improvements were made by the addition of small group discussions and Google class discussions for imparting knowledge to the students.

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 12

DEPARTMENT OF ORALMEDICINE AND RADIOLOGY

34DB4ǯ3 AĄ C2 --ͳͺ-19

DR.ASOKAN.,MDS

[HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT]

POSITIVE POINTS:

Has extremely outstanding knowledge base, and communication skills. Very punctual, sincere and dedicated to work. Has aberrant ability to integrate with institutional environment and has efficient perspective towards subject to the students. It has been shown that the faculty had provided sufficient time to the students for their proper feedback about the subject. Adequate utilization of teaching aids power point, presentation was used by teacher. Highly motivating and encouraging the students and proper handling and advice for the better performance in subject. Unbiased internal assessment. It is seen that teacher also provides proper guidance and feedback on their performance frequently. The overall feedback is found to be excellent. 89%
78%
92%

80%81%75%77%72%

80%83%87%85%87%84%87%

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 13

DEFICIENCY AND ACTION TAKEN ON:

On the detailed analysis of all above parameters, there was no deficiencies and inadequateness, but still expected to interrogate with the students regularly by evaluating them through quizzes/ tests/ assignments and projects for the benefit of the students.

DR.BALAJI.,MDS

[READER]

POSITIVE POINTS:-

Has an excellent knowledge base and communication skill. Very punctual, sincere and committed to the work. Has excellent ability to integrate course material with environment/ other issues to provide a broader perspective, to generate interest towards the subjects among students. Regarding various methods to evaluate the students, activities like quizzes/ tests/ assignment/examinations/ projects are being regularly conducted by the teacher. For the feedback, provision of sufficient is being given. Proper utilization of the teaching aids like power point etc by the teacher. Very good in encouraging the students and giving advice for the better performance. The approach of the teacher was also excellent. Internal assessment is unbiased. Often the teacher provides feedback on your performance and helps in guiding them in the proper way. Overall rating is excellent.

94%91%88%

76%

87%87%83%80%87%85%87%81%87%84%85%

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 14

DEFICENCY AND ACTION TAKEN ON:

On analyzing all the above discussed parameters there was no deficiencies, but still expected to improve the performance and effort for the benefit of the students.

DR.PARVATHI.,MDS

[SENIOR LECTURER]

POSITIVE POINTS:-

Has extremely outstanding knowledge base, and communication skills. Very punctual, sincere and dedicated to work. Has aberrant ability to integrate with institutional environment and has efficient perspective towards subject to the students. It has been shown that the faculty had provided sufficient time to the students for their proper feedback about the subject. Adequate utilization of teaching aids power point, presentation was used by teacher. Highly motivating and encouraging the students and proper handling and advice for the better performance in subject. Unbiased internal assessment. The overall feedback is found to be excellent.

DEFICIENCY AND ACTION TAKEN ON:

All the parameters were analyzed carefully, there was no deficiencies but still

‡š"‡...-‡† -‘ ""‘˜‹†‡ ˆ‡‡†"ƒ... ƒ"‘—- -Š‡ •-—†‡-ǯ• "‡"ˆ‘"ƒ...‡ ˆ"‡“—‡-Ž›Ǥ

94%

86%89%86%84%81%

85%82%

88%

82%82%

88%
83%
79%
86%

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 15

DEPARTMENT OF ORAL PATHOLOGY - 2018

DR.P.SAI KRISHNA: professor & HOD

Positive points reported :

After analyzing the feedback , a cut off value of 73% and above was considered to be positive points and below that was considered to be deficiencies Knowledge base of teacher, communication skills, sincerity and commitment and accessibility of teacher, effective use of teaching aids thereby generating interest in the subject and integrating the course with environment and other courses for broader perspective and wholesome understanding were well appreciated by the students. Teacher was always enthusiastic in counselling the students and to bring out the best in them and internal assessment was unbiased. Knowing the significance of feedback, teacher also provided sufficient time before collecting feedback from students. Overall rating of the teacher was reported to be very good. 0 20 40
60
80
100
120
QUS 1QUS 2QUS 3QUS 4QUS 5QUS 6QUS 7QUS 8QUS 9QUS 10QUS 11QUS 12QUS 13QUS 14QUS 15

STUDENT FEEDBACK REPORT

DEPARTMENT OF ORAL PATHOLOGY

2018-19

SAI KRISHNAMAKESH RAJPRASANNAJAI SANTHOSH

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 16

DEFICIENCIES REPORTED:

Ability of design quizzes, tests, assignments, examinations and projects to evaluate students.

REMEDIAL ACTION TAKEN:

Quizzes, tests, assignments, examinations and projects related to subjects are given to evaluate students.

DR.MAKESH RAJ : READER

Positive points reported:

After analyzing the feedback , a cut value of 91% and above was considered to be positive points and below that were considered to be deficiencies. Sincerity and commitment of the teacher to teaching , communication skills, good knowledge base resulting in integration of the subject with other specialties and environment for good understanding thus igniting interest among the students who very enthusiastically participated in the class were well commended by the students . Teaching aids used, evaluation of students through assignments and seminars and discussing their performance in the same were well appreciated. Sufficient time was provided for feedback and internal assessment was fair. Teacher was easily accessible to the students for counselling purposes in academic and personal matters. Overall rating was reported to be good. Deficiencies reported: No deficiencies were reported but the teacher is continuing to take extra efforts to improve his teaching skills.

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 17

DR.JAI SANTHOSH MANIKANDAN : Senior lecturer

Positive points reported:

After analyzing the feedback , a cut off value of 92 % was taken and above that were considered to be positive points and below that was deficiencies. Knowledge base, communication skills, sincerity and commitment , accessibility of the teacher were highly appreciated. The teacher conducted seminars regularly and ignited interest towards the subject through effective use teaching aids and ensured students active participation in class. With the motto of bringing out the best , the teacher counselled and advised the students and discussed their performance in the terminal exams so as to help them overcome their mistakes . Internal assessment was fair and overall rating was good.

DEFICIENCIES REPORTED:

Ability of design quizzes, tests, assignments, examinations and projects to evaluate students. No sufficient time given feedback

REMEDIAL ACTION TAKEN:

Quizzes, tests, assignments, examinations and projects related to subjects are given to evaluate students. Sufficient time given for getting feedback

DR. PRASANNA: senior lecturer

Positive points reported:

After analyzing the feedback, a cut off value of 73 % was taken and above that were considered to be positive points and below that as deficiencies. Communication skills , knowledge, sincerity and commitment of the teacher, teaching aids used , encouraging student participation in class, counselling students whenever needed, conducting seminars and allotting assignments and providing feedback on students performance , giving adequate time to students for collecting feedback were reported in the affirmative. Overall rating was good

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 18

Deficiencies reported:

Inadequate teaching aids

Remedial action taken:

Teacher is using adequate audio-visual aids.

Figure 2-Student Feedback 2018-19

0 20 40
60
80
100
120

DR. K. BALAJI

DR. JOB JACOB ANISON

DR. SUNIL CHANDY VARGHESE

DR. K. MAHALAKSHMI

DR. R. RAJESH

DR. G. PREETHI

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 19

Dr. K. BALAJI

PROFESSOR AND HEAD

STUDENTS FEEDBACK ON TEACHERS FOR THE YEAR 2018-19

FINAL YEAR

Positive points reported by the students:

By analyzing the feedback obtained from the students for the year 2018, it was understood that knowledge base of the teacher was at its best. The communication skills of the staff were highly appreciated, the commitment of the staff towards teaching was commendable, and sincerity of the staff and teaching aids used was the best. The accessibility of the staff in and out of the class and evaluation of students by conducting assignments is satisfactory. The staff also provides sufficient time for feedback and also encouraged students to actively participate in the class. The staff also gives counseling

ˆ‘" -Š‡ •-—†‡-•ǯ ‹""‘˜‡‡-Ǥ 4Š‡ ‘˜‡"ƒŽŽ "ƒ-‹‰ ‘ˆ -Š‡ •-ƒˆˆ "› -Š‡ •-—†‡-• ‹• ͻ-ΨǤ

Deficiencies reported by the students:

The deficiency reported by the students was encouragement of students participation was less and integration of the course material with the environment is intermediate.

Action taken on the deficiencies:

Steps have been taken to generate interest by conducting quiz programs, group

discussions, and seminars. Also •-‡"• Šƒ˜‡ "‡‡ -ƒ‡ -‘ ""‘˜‹†‡ ˆ‡‡†"ƒ... ‘ •-—†‡-ǯ•

performance.

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 20

Dr. JOB ANISON

Reader

STUDENTS FEEDBACK ON TEACHERS FOR THE YEAR 2018-19

Final year

Positive points reported by the students:

From the analysis done for the year 2018, it could be understood that the knowledge base of the teacher was appreciated; communication skills, commitment of the staff towards teaching, sincerity of the staff and teaching aids used was good. Few students felt that the accessibility of the staff in and out of the class was difficult and evaluation of students by conducting quiz, assignments was satisfactory. The students felt that the staff also provided sufficient time for feedback and encouraged students to

ƒ...-‹˜‡Ž› "ƒ"-‹...‹"ƒ-‡ ‹ -Š‡ ...Žƒ••Ǥ 4Š‡ -‡ƒ...Š‡"ǯ• ƒ"""oach was good. The staff also gives

...‘—•‡Ž‹‰ ˆ‘" -Š‡ •-—†‡-•ǯ ‹""‘˜‡‡-Ǥ 4Š‡ ‘˜‡"ƒŽŽ "ƒ-‹‰ ‘ˆ -Š‡ •-ƒˆˆ "› -Š‡ •-—†‡-•

is 97%.

Deficiencies reported by the students:

The deficiency reported by the students was that the ability to design quizzes could have been more often and the presentations by staff could be more pictures oriented.

Action taken on the deficiencies:

Steps have been taken to improve concentration on designing quiz programs. The doctor had decided to add more clinical images to make the students understand easy.

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 41

Deficiencies Reported:

Deficiencies reported included lack of student participation in class and accessibility of the teacher. Provision of sufficient time for feedback and provision of feedback on student performance was also mentioned to be inadequate.

Remedial Action taken:

The teacher is also available during the college hours in the department for the students to clarify their doubts. The teacher was asked to encourage the students to ask any doubts without any fear and started with open discussions during the class hours to encourage student participation in class. The teacher was asked to allot time at the end of each class to encourage student feedback.

DR.RATHINAVEL PANDIAN, MDS, Senior Lecturer

Positive points reported:

Knowledge base of the teacher, encouraging participation of students in the proceedings of the class, generating interest in the subject by effective use of various teaching aids and accessibility of the teacher were reported in the affirmative. Also students reported that the staff was well prepared for the class and provided sufficient time for feedback

ƒ† ""‘˜‹•‹‘ ‘ˆ ˆ‡‡†"ƒ... ‘ •-—†‡-ǯ• "‡"ˆ‘"ƒ...‡Ǥ A......‡••‹"‹Ž‹-› ‘ˆ -Š‡ -‡ƒ...Š‡" "› -Š‡

students was reported to be good.

Deficiencies Reported:

Deficiencies reported include lack of student knowledge evaluation by quizzes/ viva at

-Š‡ ‡† ‘ˆ -Š‡ Ž‡...-—"‡Ǥ 4Š‡ ˆƒ...—Ž-› ‡"‡"ǯ• ...‘—‹...ƒ-‹‘ •‹ŽŽ•ǡ ‹-‡"‡•- ‰‡‡"ƒ-‡† ‹

the topic and approachability were found to be inadequate.

Remedial Measures Taken:

The teacher was asked to interact better with the students to improve subject articulation and comprehensibility of the students. Consistent evaluation by designing quizzes at the end of the class was encouraged.

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 42

DR.HELEN MARY ABRAHAM, MDS, Senior Lecturer

Positive points reported:

Also students reported that the staff was well prepared for the class and provided

•—ˆˆ‹...‹‡- -‹‡ ˆ‘" ˆ‡‡†"ƒ... ƒ† ""‘˜‹•‹‘ ‘ˆ ˆ‡‡†"ƒ... ‘ •-—†‡-ǯ• "‡"ˆ‘"ƒ...‡Ǥ

Knowledge base of the teacher, encouraging participation of students in the proceedings of the class, generating interest in the subject by effective use of various teaching aids and accessibility of the teacher were reported in the affirmative. Accessibility of the teacher by the students was reported to be good.

Deficiencies Reported:

Deficiencies reported include lack of student knowledge evaluation by quizzes/ viva at

-Š‡ ‡† ‘ˆ -Š‡ Ž‡...-—"‡Ǥ 4Š‡ ˆƒ...—Ž-› ‡"‡"ǯ• ...‘—‹...ƒ-‹‘ •‹ŽŽ•ǡ ‹-‡"‡•- ‰‡‡"ƒ-‡† ‹

the topic and approachability were found to be inadequate.

Remedial Measures Taken:

The teacher was asked to interact better with the students to improve subject articulation and comprehensibility of the students. Consistent evaluation by designing quizzes at the end of the class was encouraged.

DR.VIVEK RAJASIMHA, MDS, SENIOR LECTURER

Positive points reported:

Evaluation of students through quizzes, seminars and assignments and internal assessment were reported to be satisfactory and the teacher provided feedback to the students on their performance. Knowledge base, communication skills, commitment of teacher towards teaching, accessibility and interest generated by the teacher were reported to be good. The teacher was able to integrate the course material with the environment and other courses well and also provided sufficient time for feedback from the students.

Student Feedback Manual 2018-19 Page 43

Deficiencies reported:

Lack of active student participation in class and lack of sufficient teaching aids and were the main deficiencies reported by the students.

Remedial Action taken:

The faculty member is preparing slides and including more media to make the lecture classes more interactive and interesting. The teacher is asked to spend few minutes of the class in asking viva and discussions to ensure student participation during the class

DR.NITHYARAJAN, MDS, Senior Lecturer

Positive points reported:

Accessibility of the teacher by the students was reported to be good. Knowledge base of the teacher, encouraging participation of students in the proceedings of the class, generating interest in the subject by effective use of various teaching aids and accessibility of the teacher were reported in the affirmative. Also students reported that the staff was well prepared for the class and provided sufficient time for feedback

ƒ† ""‘˜‹•‹‘ ‘ˆ ˆ‡‡†"ƒ... ‘ •-—†‡-ǯ• "‡"ˆ‘"ƒ...‡Ǥ

Deficiencies Reported:

Deficiencies reported include lack of student knowledge evaluation by quizzes/ viva at

-Š‡ ‡† ‘ˆ -Š‡ Ž‡...-—"‡Ǥ 4Š‡ ˆƒ...—Ž-› ‡"‡"ǯ• ...‘—‹...ƒ-‹‘ •‹ŽŽ•ǡ ‹-‡"‡•- ‰‡‡"ƒ-‡† ‹

the topic and approachability were found to be inadequate.

Remedial Measures Taken:

The teacher was asked to interact better with the students to improve subject articulation and comprehensibility of the students. Consistent evaluation by designing quizzes at the end of the class was encouraged.