Age Differences in Stress, Coping, and Appraisal: Findings From the




Loading...







[PDF] STRESS AND GENERATIONS

Older adults appear to be more attuned to the impact that stress can have on one's health than younger Americans • Three-quarters of Millennials (76 percent) 

[PDF] Understanding PTSD and Aging

Changes that naturally come with getting older can make you feel more vulnerable This can make your PTSD symptoms more noticeable, cause them to come back 

Age Differences in Stress, Coping, and Appraisal: Findings From the

Controversies exist concerning the influence of age on the stress and coping process, in part due to differences in methods across studies We examined age 

[PDF] STRESS AND WELL-BEING

Percentage of population aged 18 or older experiencing stress, which can affect physical and emotional well- To give you information to help you

[PDF] The State of Mental Health and Aging in America

The overwhelming majority of older adults did not experience FMD in fact, in 2006, the prevalence of FMD was only 9 2 among U S adults age 50 or older and 6 5 

[PDF] Facts on Aging Quiz

People 65 years of age and older currently make up about 20 of the U S Older persons take longer to recover from physical and psychological stress

[PDF] Excessive Stress Disrupts the Architecture of the Developing Brain

Neurology, Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences; Senior Research Associate in Neurology, early adverse experiences can help us make bet-

Age Differences in Stress, Coping, and Appraisal: Findings From the 78254_351B_4_P179.pdf

Journal of Gerontology: PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES

1996
, Vol. 5IB. No. 4, PI79-P188Copyright 1996 by The Gerontological Society of America Ag e Difference s i n Stress , Coping , an d Appraisal :

Finding

s Fro m th e Normativ e Agin g Stud y

Caroly

n M . Aldwin, 1 Kare n J . Sutton, 1 Gin a Chiara, 2 an d Avro n Spir o II P 'Departmen t o f Huma n an d Communit y Development , Universit y o f California , Davis . 2

Normativ

e Agin g Study , Departmen t o f Veteran s Affair s Outpatien t Clinic , Boston .

Controversies

exist concerning the influence of age on the stress and coping process, in part due to differences in methods across studies. We examined age differences in stress, appraisal, and coping, using both semistructured interview questions and a coping checklist in middle-aged, young-old, and old-old men. Despite extensive probing, nearly a quarter of the old-old reported having had no problems and they expended less coping effort even when they did have problems. The types of problems reported varied systematically with age. Middle-aged men were more likely to appraise their problems both as challenges and as annoyances than the older men. Different age patterns emerged from the coping interviews vs the checklists, but controlling for type of problem significantly attenuated age differences. However, there were no age differences in perceived stressfulness of the problem, appraisals of harm/loss, or helpless appraisals, number of emotions reported, or coping efficacy. One interpretation of these results is that the nature of stress changes with age, from episodic to chronic, which in turn affects appraisal and coping processes.T H E manne r i n whic h ag e influence s th e stres s an d copin g proces s remain s poorl y understoo d (Folkman , Lazarus ,

Pimley

, & Novacek , 1987)
. I n general , debat e focuse s o n whethe r youn g an d ol d adult s diffe r i n th e way s i n whic h the y experienc e an d cop e wit h stress . I n part , thi s ma y b e du e t o th e fac t tha t ther e ar e differen t component s o f th e stres s an d copin g proces s a s wel l a s differen t way s o f assessin g thes e components . Fo r example , olde r peopl e ma y (o r ma y not ) diffe r fro m younge r peopl e i n eithe r th e amoun t o f stres s the y report , th e type s o f stressor s reported , o r th e appraisa l o f ho w stressfu l a proble m is , dependin g upo n th e typ e o f measur e used . Further , th e us e o f copin g strategie s ha s variousl y bee n viewe d a s decreasin g wit h age , increas - in g wit h age , o r showin g littl e o r n o age-relate d differences , again , dependin g o n th e conceptua l framework s an d meth - odologica l technique s use d (Aldwin , 1991)
. Th e purpos e o f thi s stud y wa s t o examin e ag e difference s i n th e stres s an d copin g process , contrastin g in-dept h interview s wit h mor e standardize d measure s i n par t t o determin e th e exten t o f age - relate d bia s i n self-repor t instruments . Age and the Stress Process Lat e lif e i s ofte n see n a s a tim e o f great , ofte n uncontrolla -ble, stress (Rodin, 1986). Older people are often coping with chroni c illnes s an d disability , th e los s o f friend s an d famil y members , an d thei r ow n impendin g mortality . However , Payke l (1983 ) foun d tha t th e elderl y repor t fewe r stressfu l lif e events tha n d o th e young . Aldwi n (1990 ) argue d tha t mos t lif e even t inventorie s sampl e problem s whic h ar e mor e relevan t t o younge r ag e groups , suc h a s marriage , divorce , startin g ne w jobs , o r havin g children . Inventorie s whic h includ e item s mor e relevan t t o olde r adults , suc h a s retire - men t o r divorce o f children , ten d t o sho w fe w ag e differ - ence s i n th e amoun t o f stres s reported . Thus , olde r peopl e ma y repor t th e sam e numbe r o f lif e events , althoug h th e typ e o f even t ma y var y accordin g t o lif e stag e (se e Murrell ,

Norris

, & Hutchins , 1984
; Ter i & Lewinsohn , 1982)
.The types of hassles, or daily stressors, experienced also var y a s a functio n o f ag e (Lazaru s & DeLongis , 1983)
. Olde r peopl e repor t fewe r hassle s an d rat e thes e hassle s a s les s stressfu l tha n d o younge r adult s (Aldwin , 1990
; Folkma n e tal., 1987). Life events may also be appraised as less stressful i n late r lif e (Aldwin , 1991
; Silverman , Eichler , & Williams , 1987)
.

Hassle

s ar e ofte n a functio n o f involvemen t i n socia l role s (Lazarus , 1991
; Pearlin , 1989)
. Thus , th e decreas e i n th e numbe r o f role s ma y resul t i n fewe r hassle s i n lat e life . Fo r example , relinquishin g activ e parentin g an d wor k role s ma y wel l decreas e th e number s o f dail y stressor s on e experi - ences . However, why older adults appraise both life events an d hassle s a s les s stressfu l i s no t clear . A possibl e reaso n fo r thi s discrepanc y ma y b e a bia s i n th e reportin g o f stress , jus t a s ther e i s a bia s i n th e willingnes s o f olde r adult s t o repor t psychologica l symptom s (Cohen , 1990)
. I n addition , th e elderl y ofte n appea r t o repor t fewe r negativ e emotion s tha n younge r individual s (Labouvie-Vief , Hakim-Larson , & Ho - bart , 1987
; Lawton , Kleban , & Dean , 1993)
. Bot h questionnaire s an d interview s rel y o n th e individ - ual' s accurat e acces s t o episodi c memor y fo r th e event , includin g it s occurrenc e an d degre e o f stressfulness . Ther e i s som e concer n tha t olde r individuals , wit h thei r highe r inci - denc e o f memor y problems , ma y provid e les s accurat e information , particularl y o n questionnaires . However ,

Rodger

s an d Herzo g (1987 ) foun d tha t olde r peopl e provid e informatio n tha t i s jus t a s accurat e (i f no t mor e so ) tha n younge r individual s o n surve y measures . Nonetheless , inter - vie w technique s ma y provid e a mor e thoroug h an d accurat e accoun t o f stres s (Brown , 1989
) an d thu s ma y provid e th e opportunit y fo r mor e accurat e conclusion s abou t th e rol e tha t ag e play s i n stres s reportin g an d appraisal . Thi s ma y b e especiall y relevan t fo r th e elderly . Caserta , Lund , an d Dimon d (1985 ) randoml y assigne d bereave d elderl y subject s t o group s tha t wer e eithe r interviewe d o r aske d t o complet e a maile d questionnair e whic h measure d P17

9Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article/51B/4/P179/650788 by guest on 25 August 2023

P180ALDWINETAL.

depressio n an d lif e satisfaction . Althoug h n o effec t o f grou p assignmen t emerged , thos e wh o wer e interviewe d wer e consistentl y mor e likel y t o provid e complet e information . Thus , interview techniques may yield more accurate infor- matio n i f ther e ar e age-relate d biase s i n th e reportin g o f stress . Ther e ma y als o b e developmenta l reason s wh y olde r adult s apprais e problem s a s les s stressful . Olde r people , throug h thei r greate r rang e o f experience , ma y hav e devel - ope d mor e copin g resource s an d thu s apprais e problem s a s les s stressful . Further , t o th e exten t tha t olde r adult s hav e experience d extremel y stressfu l events , suc h a s th e deat h o f love d ones , everyda y problem s ma y pal e i n compariso n (Aldwin , 1994a
; Aldwin , Levenson , & Spiro , 1994)
. How - ever , th e decreas e i n reserv e capacit y i n ver y lat e lif e (Baltes , 1987
) ma y rende r problem s mor e stressfu l fo r th e old-old . T o ou r knowledge , n o on e ha s compare d stres s betwee n th e young-ol d an d old-old .

Beside

s degre e o f stressfulness , anothe r aspec t o f ap - praisa l concern s th e genera l typ e o f proble m - tha t is , a situatio n ca n b e appraise d a s a threat , a s involvin g har m o r loss , as a challenge, or as benign (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984)
. Given that older people are often coping with be- reavemen t an d chroni c healt h problems , i t i s ofte n assume d tha t the y wil l b e mor e likel y t o apprais e problem s a s involv - in g har m o r los s (Folkma n & Lazarus , 1980
; McCrae , 1982
, 1989
; Rodin, 1986), but, surprisingly, this has not been teste d empirically . Age and the Coping Process A n alternativ e explanatio n fo r ag e difference s i n th e amoun t o f reporte d stres s ma y b e tha t olde r individual s cop e i n a differen t wa y tha n thei r younge r counterparts . Variou s theorist s hav e posite d changes i n copin g wit h age . Fo r instance , Gutman n (1974 ) suggeste d tha t master y style s shif t fro m activ e t o passiv e fro m yout h t o midlife , the n t o "magical " master y i n lat e life . I n contrast , Vaillan t (1977 ) believe d tha t a positiv e chang e occurre d i n th e us e o f defens e mechanisms . H e propose d tha t a n incrementa l developmen - ta l proces s occur s acros s th e lif e span , characterize d b y a decreas e i n th e us e o f neuroti c o r immatur e defensiv e style s couple d wit h a n increas e i n mor e matur e defensiv e style s i n midlife . Alternatively , other s (Folkma n e t al. , 1987
; Mc - Crae , 1982, 1989) have suggested an absence of systematic chang e i n copin g strategie s wit h ag e excep t thos e du e t o situationa l demands .

Empirica

l evidenc e fo r thes e position s appear s t o b e mixed. McCra e (1982 ) foun d tha t olde r adult s use d fewe r escapis t an d hostil e strategie s whe n copin g wit h problems . Yet , fe w difference s i n problem-focuse d strategie s emerge d onc e h e controlle d fo r th e typ e o f problem . Indeed , mos t studie s whic h examin e ag e difference s i n copin g focu s o n specifi c stressfu l episodes , du e t o th e stron g evidenc e o f situationa l effect s o n individua l coping .

Studie

s usin g th e Way s o f Copin g Scal e (Folkma n &

Lazarus

, 1980
, 1985
) an d it s derivative s hav e generall y confirme d McCrae' s (1982 ) findings. Indeed , severa l re - searcher s hav e show n tha t olde r adult s us e les s escapis m o r avoidan t copin g bu t a simila r o r highe r leve l o f problem -focused coping as do younger adults (Blanchard-Fields,

Sulsky

, & Robinson-Whelen , 1991
; Felto n & Revenson , 1987
; Irion & Blanchard-Fields, 1987). An exception to this tren d i s a stud y b y Folkma n e t al . (1987 ) whic h foun d tha t olde r peopl e use d les s planfu l proble m solvin g an d mor e escap e avoidance . However , i n thei r stud y the y examine d th e relativ e us e o f copin g strategies , o r th e rati o o f thes e strategie s t o overal l strategie s used , althoug h Aldwi n (1991 ) wa s unabl e t o replicat e ag e difference s i n thes e copin g ratios . Finally, regardless of the overall pattern of strategies used , olde r individual s d o see m t o us e fewe r strategies , whil e remainin g a s effectiv e a s th e youn g i n thei r abilit y t o cop e (Aldwin , 1991
; Meeks , Carstensen , Tamsky , Wright , & Pellegrini , 1989)
.

Contradictor

y findings ma y als o b e du e t o th e limitation s o f th e measure s bein g used . Fo r instance , standar d copin g inventorie s ma y oversampl e maladaptiv e strategie s whil e undersamplin g adaptiv e ones , a s indicate d b y th e genera l tendenc y o f suc h scale s t o correlat e positivel y wit h poo r outcomes suc h a s psychologica l o r physica l symptom s (Al - dwi n & Revenson , 1987
) rathe r tha n mor e benig n outcome s suc h a s master y o r positiv e affec t (Aldwin , 1994b)
. Further , studie s whic h hav e use d standar d checklist s ma y no t b e sensitiv e t o aspect s o f th e copin g proces s whic h chang e ove r time , especially positive or adaptive coping which may increas e wit h maturit y (Labouvie-Vie f e t al. , 1987)
. Thes e inventorie s hav e no t bee n designe d fo r th e examinatio n o f developmenta l difference s i n copin g and , a s a result , ma y no t b e tappin g appropriat e strategies . Usin g qualitativ e techniques , som e researcher s hav e iden - tifie d copin g processe s tha t appea r t o change . Vaillan t (1977 , 1993) documented age-related increases in mature defense s i n thre e longitudina l samples : th e Gran t men , th e Terma n me n an d women , an d a sampl e o f poo r inner-cit y resident s onc e a t ris k fo r juvenil e delinquency . Thes e find- ing s wer e partiall y confirme d usin g cross-sectiona l dat a fro m a self-repor t inventor y o f defens e mechanism s (Diehl , Coyle , & Labouvie-Vief , i n press) . I t i s als o possibl e tha t ther e ar e qualitativ e (a s oppose d t o quantitative ) difference s i n th e us e o f copin g strategies . Usin g a mixtur e o f qualitativ e an d quantitativ e data ,

Labouvie-Vie

f etal . (1987 ) foun d tha t olde r individual s use d copin g strategie s simila r t o thos e o f younge r individuals , bu t tha t the y di d s o fo r differen t reasons . Fo r example , whil e bot h youn g an d ol d subject s sough t socia l suppor t i n copin g wit h problems , younge r subject s di d s o primaril y fo r self - validation , whil e olde r individual s sough t socia l suppor t a s a wa y t o obtai n feedbac k abou t th e appropriatenes s o f th e strategie s the y wer e using . I n general , qualitativ e procedure s ar e mor e likel y t o revea l age-relate d chang e tha n ar e quanti - tativ e methods . I n summary , i t i s clea r tha t ther e ar e age-relate d change s i n socia l role s an d healt h statu s whic h affec t th e number s an d type s o f stressor s experienced , whic h i n tur n influenc e th e way s i n whic h peopl e ma y cop e wit h stress . However , wh y th e elderl y repor t les s stres s i n th e fac e o f increasin g disabili - tie s an d los s o f famil y an d friend s i s no t clea r an d ma y reflec t reportin g biase s and/o r developmenta l processes . Further , ther e ar e difference s betwee n quantitativ e an d qualitativ e studie s concernin g whethe r ther e ar e direc t age-relate d in

-Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article/51B/4/P179/650788 by guest on 25 August 2023

STRESS, COPING, AND APPRAISALP181

fluences o n copin g processes , i.e. , whethe r o r no t mor e matur e strategie s emerg e wit h age .

Present

Study I n thi s study , ag e difference s i n severa l aspect s o f th e stres s an d copin g proces s wer e examined , usin g bot h quali - tativ e an d quantitativ e dat a fro m olde r men , rangin g fro m th e middle-age d t o th e old-old . W e aske d fo r th e mos t stressfu l proble m i n th e prio r wee k an d ho w the y cope d wit h thi s specifi c problem , usin g bot h open-ende d an d close-ende d formats , t o examin e a numbe r o f questions . (1 ) Give n prio r wor k (Aldwin , 1991)
, i t i s likel y tha t w e wil l se e age-relate d difference s i n th e type s o f problem s experienced , wit h work - an d parenting-relate d stressor s re - porte d mor e b y thos e i n mid-lif e an d health-relate d stressor s reporte d mor e frequentl y i n lat e life . (2 ) T o th e exten t tha t th e ag e difference s i n stres s report - in g an d appraisa l ar e a functio n o f respons e bias , w e hypoth - esiz e tha t th e us e o f interview s wil l minimiz e thi s age-relate d respons e bia s i n th e reportin g an d appraisa l o f stress , a s wel l a s negativ e emotions . However , i f ther e ar e developmental / maturationa l effect s o n th e appraisa l o f stress , the n ag e difference s shoul d emerg e eve n wit h extensiv e probing . (3 ) W e hypothesiz e tha t th e pattern s o f ag e difference s i n copin g strategie s typicall y foun d wit h self-repor t question - naire s wil l b e attenuate d whe n copin g strategie s ar e elicite d usin g semi-structure d intervie w question s fo r som e prob - lems . In other words, probing should decrease the tendency o f th e elderl y t o repor t fewe r strategies , unles s ther e ar e direc t age-relate d influence s o n th e copin g process . (4 ) I f th e age-related influences on coping are indirect and mediate d b y change s i n th e typ e o f problem s experience d (McCrae , 1982
, 1989)
, w e woul d expec t tha t controllin g fo r type s o f problem s reporte d woul d attenuat e an y age-relate d difference s i n coping . (5 ) Conversely , base d o n wor k b y Vaillan t (1993) , w e hypothesiz e tha t copin g interview s ma y sho w tha t th e elderl y us e mor e adaptiv e strategie s tha n middle-age d individuals . A t th e ver y least , ther e shoul d b e n o difference s i n self-rate d copin g efficac y betwee n th e tw o groups . (6 ) Finally , w e wil l explore stres s an d copin g processe s amon g th e old-old , an d hypothesiz e tha t som e o f th e age - relate d decrement s hypothesize d i n copin g wil l primaril y b e see n i n tha t group . METHO D

Sample

and Procedure Th e Normativ e Agin g Stud y (NAS ) i s a longitudina l stud y o f biomedica l an d psychosocia l factor s i n norma l agin g tha t ha s followe d 2,28 0 me n fo r ove r 3 0 years . Al l me n wer e screene d fo r th e absenc e o f seriou s chroni c disease , a s wel l a s bloo d pressur e greate r tha n 140/9
0 befor e participatin g i n th e study . I n addition , me n wer e selecte d wh o wer e likel y t o b e geographicall y stable , assesse d b y th e exten t o f famil y ties . As such, they reflect the demographics of the Boston populatio n o f male s i n th e lat e 1950
s an d earl y 1960s
, an d ar e primaril y Whit e an d ar e equall y divide d betwee n blue - an d white-colla r workers . (Fo r mor e informatio n o n NA Ssample characteristics, see Bosse, Ekerdt, & Silbert, 1984; Spiro , Aldwin, Ward, & Mroczek, 1995.) Th e presen t sampl e consiste d o f 1,06 5 me n wh o reporte d fo r thei r triennia l physica l examinatio n betwee n th e year s 198
9 an d 1991
. Onl y 1 3 me n refuse d t o participat e i n th e interview , leavin g a sampl e o f 1,05 2 me n an d a respons e rat e o f 98.8%
. The N varies slightly across analyses, due to missin g data . Th e me n range d i n ag e fro m 4 8 t o 9 1 a t th e tim e o f th e interview , wit h a n averag e ag e o f 65.6

3 (SD = 7.68). Since

th e NA S disproportionatel y sample d middle-age d subject s a t th e beginnin g o f th e study , w e divide d th e me n int o fou r ag e groups : earl y mid-lif e (45-54 , n = 76)
; late r mid-lif e (55 - 64
, n = 405); young-old (65-74, n = 438); and old-old (7 5 + , n = 132)
. Thi s als o allowe d u s t o investigat e nonlin - ea r ag e differences .

Measures

Th e me n wer e administere d th e Stres s an d Copin g Inter - vie w o n th e da y o f thei r medica l examination . Th e origina l desig n calle d fo r self-administere d questionnaire s t o b e com - plete d throughou t th e cours e o f th e day . However , pilo t testin g o f th e instrumen t indicate d tha t ove r a quarte r o f th e me n di d no t repor t havin g ha d a proble m i n th e pas t wee k o n th e self-administere d questionnaires . Confirmator y inter - view s wit h thes e me n suggeste d tha t som e wh o di d no t repor t havin g a proble m o n th e questionnair e actuall y ha d ha d problem s i n th e pas t week , whic h wer e ofte n quit e serious . Fo r example , tw o o f th e me n wh o participate d i n pilo t interview s wer e primar y caretaker s fo r dyin g wives . Ther e ha d bee n n o flare-ups i n th e wives ' medica l condition s durin g th e prio r week , s o the y di d no t repor t problem s o n th e questionnaire . Nonetheless , i t wa s clea r fro m th e interview s tha t thi s wa s a ver y stressfu l tim e fo r them . W e als o observe d tha t man y o f th e oldes t me n denie d havin g "problems, " pe r se . On e 84-year-ol
d ma n explaine d tha t h e ha d "concerns " bu t tha t h e wa s no t "th e sor t o f perso n wh o ha d problems ." (H e explaine d that , durin g hi s formativ e year s durin g th e Depression , on e simpl y di d no t admi t t o "havin g problems." ) Hi s "concern " tha t wee k wa s tha t h e wa s tryin g t o convinc e hi s 91-year-ol
d siste r t o ente r a nursin g home . Sh e live d alon e i n a majo r metropoli - ta n are a an d ha d falle n severa l times . H e wa s ver y worrie d abou t he r an d trouble d b y hi s inabilit y t o convinc e he r t o ente r a nursin g home . Thi s "concern " seeme d t o b e ver y stressfu l fo r him . Thus , w e aske d fo r "concerns " a s wel l a s problem s i n ou r interviews . Usin g th e intervie w format , w e aske d participant s t o identif y th e mos t seriou s proble m o r concer n the y ha d ha d i n th e pas t wee k an d t o describ e i t briefly . W e aske d respon - dent s fo r a specifi c proble m i n th e pas t week , fo r severa l reasons . First , w e wer e concerne d abou t memor y problem s an d wante d t o elici t a ver y recen t episod e t o minimiz e this .

Second

, ther e i s a fai r amoun t o f evidenc e tha t copin g varie s greatl y b y situation , an d littl e ca n b e inferre d fro m question s abou t genera l copin g style s (se e Aldwin , 1994a
, fo r a re - view) . Third, most studies which have examined coping in th e elderl y hav e focuse d o n a specifi c problem , an d w e wishe d ou r result s t o b e comparable . I f a responden t di d no t immediatel y respon d wit h a prob

-Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article/51B/4/P179/650788 by guest on 25 August 2023

P182ALDWINETAL.

lem , w e assure d the m tha t th e proble m di d no t hav e t o b e "major, " bu t coul d b e anythin g tha t ha d bothere d the m i n th e pas t week . I f thi s di d no t elici t a problem , w e the n sai d tha t the y coul d tal k abou t problem s a t wor k o r a t home , wit h thei r famil y o r thei r health , o r wit h hom e o r ca r mainte - nance . Thi s migh t elici t severa l problems , an d w e woul d as k th e me n t o pic k th e on e tha t the y foun d th e mos t troubling . Th e men' s response s wer e recorde d verbati m b y th e inter - viewer . Respondents wer e give n a 0 i f the y di d no t repor t a problem , an d th e res t o f th e appraisa l an d copin g section s wer e no t completed . Fo r th e proble m selected , respondent s wer e the n aske d t o rat e thi s proble m accordin g t o it s stressfulness , compare d t o othe r problem s the y ma y hav e ha d i n th e past . Th e standar d

7-poin

t scal e wa s used , wit h 1 = "not troubled at all" and 7 = "th e mos t trouble d I'v e eve r been. "

Respondent

s wer e the n presente d a lis t o f appraisal s o r "feeling s abou t th e problem, " an d aske d t o indicat e whic h wer e appropriat e t o th e proble m jus t described . W e ex - pande d o n Folkma n an d Lazarus ' (1980 ) origina l thre e stres s appraisal s o f threat , harm/loss , o r challenge , becaus e pilo t interview s indicate d tha t thes e appraisal s di d no t cove r al l o f th e way s i n whic h th e me n appraise d thei r problems . Th e ne w appraisal s were: a t a los s fo r wha t t o d o nex t (i.e. , helpless) , annoyed , and/o r worrie d abou t others . Further , th e respondent s ofte n fel t strongl y tha t mor e tha n on e ap - praisa l fi t th e problem , s o w e allowe d the m t o indicat e multipl e appraisals . Fo r example , a ma n caregivin g fo r a terminall y il l wif e migh t simultaneousl y fee l threatene d a t th e prospectiv e los s o f hi s wife , worrie d abou t he r comfor t an d well-being , an d challenge d i n hi s caretakin g tasks . Th e mea n numbe r o f appraisal s reporte d wa s 2. 2 (SD = 1.33) . Whe n w e asked , i n th e pilo t interviews , ho w the y ha d cope d wit h th e problem , w e foun d tha t thes e olde r me n ha d a tendenc y t o disregar d ho w the y cope d wit h thei r feelings , instea d tellin g u s ho w the y manage d th e situation . Thus , w e firs t asked , "Ca n yo u tel l u s ho w yo u cope d wit h o r trie d t o manag e thi s problem?, " usin g genera l probe s suc h a s "Di d yo u d o anythin g else? " t o elici t a s man y strategie s a s possible . W e the n aske d specificall y abou t emotion s tha t the y ha d experienced . I f the y ha d mentione d a n emotio n i n th e previou s question , w e prompte d thei r recal l b y th e phrase , "Yo u sai d yo u wer e 'X ' [e.g. , frustrated] . Ca n yo u tel l m e a littl e bi t mor e abou t that? " I f th e me n wer e no t forthcomin g abou t thei r emotions , w e asked , "Wer e yo u angr y o r frustrated , sa d o r a littl e blue? "

Finally

, w e aske d specifically , "Ho w di d yo u tr y t o cop e wit h o r manag e you r feelings?' ' I f th e me n wer e to o vagu e o r general , th e interviewe r woul d tr y t o ge t mor e specifi c information , fo r example , b y mentionin g a n emotio n elicite d b y th e previou s questio n an d askin g ho w the y deal t wit h tha t specifi c emotion . Al l informatio n o n copin g strategie s an d emotion s wa s recorde d verbati m b y th e interviewer . Th e Brie f Way s o f Copin g (BWOC ; Folkma n & Lazarus , 1988
) questionnair e wa s the n administere d orall y regardin g th e sam e problem . Th e BWO C i s a lis t o f 2 5 copin g strate - gie s rate d fro m 0 t o 3 , i n whic h 0 indicate s tha t th e respon - den t di d no t us e thi s strateg y a t al l an d 3 indicate s tha t h e use d i t a lot . Th e scal e wa s derive d b y selectin g th e to p item s fro m th e eigh t factor s o f th e revise d BWO C (se e DeLongis , 1986)
. Unlike the interview questions, the BWOC was not administere d separatel y fo r problem s an d emotions . W e factore d th e item s usin g principa l axi s analysi s wit h bot h varima x an d obliqu e rotations . Th e scre e tes t indicate d tha t ther e wer e betwee n five an d eigh t factors ; w e opte d fo r th e eight-facto r solutio n wit h varima x rotatio n t o enhanc e bot h interpretabilit y an d comparabilit y t o othe r samples . Thi s solutio n accounte d fo r 60.1
% o f th e variance . Sub - scale s wer e compute d b y summin g item s scores , usin g uni t weights , an d include : instrumenta l action , escap e avoid - ance , social support, self-blame, cognitive reframing, interpersonal/hostile , threa t minimization , an d self - isolation . Onl y tw o o f th e item s differe d fro m th e DeLongi s (1986 ) facto r solution : praye r loade d o n escap e avoidanc e rathe r tha n cognitiv e reframing , an d th e ite m "Di d yo u tr y no t t o ac t to o hastily . . . " di d no t loa d o n an y factor . Thi s make s sense , give n th e restricte d natur e o f ou r sampl e (olde r males) . Coping effort scores were created by summing the numbe r o f strategie s reporte d bot h i n th e interview s an d o n th e BWOC .

Finally

, th e participant s wer e aske d t o indicat e ho w effec - tiv e the y believe d the y wer e i n managin g th e problem , usin g a scal e fro m 1 t o 5 , wit h 1 = "no t wel l a t all " an d 5 = "ver y well " (Aldwi n & Revenson , 1987)
, an d als o rate d ho w effectiv e the y though t the y woul d b e wit h a simila r proble m i n th e future .

Content

Analyses

Conten

t analyse s wer e use d t o identif y type s o f problems , copin g strategies , an d emotions . Al l interview s wer e code d b y th e first an d thir d authors , an d agreemen t rate s fo r th e tota l sampl e range d fro m .7 5 t o .97 . Nonetheless , al l differ - ence s wer e reconciled . Te n majo r type s o f problem s wer e identified . Thes e in - clude d healt h problem s (sel f an d others) , marita l relation s an d wife' s problems , childre n an d grandchildren , social , work , retirement , finances, bereavement , an d genera l has - sle s (e.g. , ca r repair , hom e maintenance , gettin g lost , etc.) . I n addition , w e include d a "multipl e problems " category .

Althoug

h w e wer e successfu l i n gettin g th e me n t o focu s o n a particula r episode , som e problem s cu t acros s domain s an d i t wa s occasionall y impossibl e t o disentangl e them . Fo r exam - ple , one respondent's son-in-law was believed to have mo- leste d a grandchild , an d h e wa s simultaneousl y helpin g hi s daughte r cop e wit h th e divorce an d th e molestatio n trial , a s wel l a s helpin g th e grandchildren . W e als o conten t analyze d th e copin g strategie s reporte d fo r bot h th e problem - an d emotion-focuse d questions , iden - tifyin g 11 9 differen t copin g strategie s tha t wer e groupe d int o 1 0 majo r categories . (W e ha d hope d t o identif y strategie s whic h w e considere d mor e developmentall y mature , suc h a s transformationa l copin g - e.g. , th e abilit y t o transfor m negativ e situation s int o positiv e ones . However , spontane - ou s reportin g o f thes e type s o f strategie s wa s s o rar e tha t w e opte d t o us e a groupin g schem e tha t mor e closel y resemble d tha t normall y foun d wit h copin g inventories , whic h woul d als o b e mor e usefu l i n thi s comparativ e study. ) Th e problem-focuse d copin g strategie s include d instru - menta l action , interpersona l action , an d restraine d action .

Instrumenta

l actio n include d strategie s suc h a s "Mad e a pla

nDownloaded from https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article/51B/4/P179/650788 by guest on 25 August 2023

STRESS, COPING, AND APPRAISALP183

o f actio n an d followe d it, " whil e interpersona l actio n wa s directe d specificall y a t individual s withi n th e situation , e.g. , "Trie d t o ge t th e othe r perso n t o se e you r poin t o f view. "

Restraine

d actio n include d strategie s suc h as , "Decide d t o defe r actio n o n problem, " an d wa s ofte n use d whil e await - in g result s fro m medica l tests . Th e emotion-focuse d strategie s included : threa t minimi - zation/acceptance , redefinitio n o f th e problem , anxiet y re - duction , distraction , escapism , an d emotiona l expression . I n addition , th e socia l suppor t categor y include d bot h provid - in g an d receivin g socia l suppor t (th e codin g schem e i s availabl e o n reques t fro m th e first author) . Threa t minimiza - tio n include d strategie s suc h a s "Accepte d situatio n o r wa s resigne d t o it" ; anxiet y reductio n include d usin g medica - tions , alcohol, food, or exercise to reduce stress; distraction include d strategie s suc h a s watchin g televisio n o r playin g wit h grandchildren , specificall y t o avoi d thinkin g abou t th e problem . Escapis m include d strategie s suc h a s "Fantasize d abou t unrealisti c solution s t o problems " o r goin g o n vaca - tion , whil e expresse d emotio n include d ventin g emotion s t o others , swearing , crying , an d s o on . Ther e wer e individua l difference s i n th e numbe r o f copin g strategie s elicited ; however , mos t peopl e reporte d five o r fewe r strategie s fo r eac h o f th e copin g questions . Thus , fo r eac h person , w e code d u p t o five strategie s fo r th e problem - focuse d question s an d five fo r th e emotion-focuse d ques - tions . The number of strategies were summed within each of th e 1 0 majo r copin g categorie s separatel y fo r bot h th e problem - an d th e emotion-focuse d questions . W e compare d th e abilit y o f th e question s abou t managin g th e proble m v s managin g th e emotion s t o differentiall y elici t problem - an d emotion-focuse d coping . Paire d /-test s o n th e copin g strategie s elicite d b y thes e tw o question s confirme d tha t score s o n th e problem-focuse d an d socia l suppor t sub - scale s wer e highe r fo r th e questio n abou t managin g th e proble m (/' s range d fro m 2.4 0 t o 19.18) , whil e th e emotion - focuse d subscal e score s wer e highe r fo r th e question , "Ho w di d yo u cop e wit h you r emotions? " (f' s range d fro m -5.1 6 t o -16.16) . Interestingly , escapis m wa s th e onl y strateg y tha t wa s use d equall y a s (in)frequentl y fo r bot h questions .

Negativ

e an d positiv e emotion s wer e als o coded . Rathe r tha n groupin g th e emotions , w e use d conten t analysi s base

dupon the exact emotion terms used. Thus, we coded for themention of specific emotion terms, such as sad, blue, miser-

able , angry, etc. We identified 89 negative terms and 23 positiv e terms . Th e numbe r o f emotion s wer e summe d fo r bot h th e positiv e an d negativ e dimensions .

RESULT

S

Stress

Analyses Usin g extensiv e probing , 90
% (n = 952
) o f th e me n reporte d a proble m i n th e pas t week , compare d t o th e typica l 70-80
% of community residents who typically report prob- lem s o n self-repor t questionnaire s (e.g. , Aldwi n & Reven - son , 1987)
. Nonetheless , th e old-ol d subject s wer e stil l les s likel y t o repor t havin g ha d a proble m i n th e pas t week , x 2 ( N = 1,052) = 17.69, p<. 001. Nearly one fifth of the old-old me n (17.4% ) sai d the y ha d ha d n o problem s i n th e pas t week , compare d t o onl y tw o me n (2.6% ) i n th e earl y mid - lif e group . Percentage s fo r th e tw o othe r group s wer e 6.9 % an d 10.7% , respectively . A s expected , ther e wer e ag e difference s i n th e type s o f problem s me n reported , x 2 (n = 952
) = 121.18
, p < .0001. A s Tabl e 1 indicates , th e oldest-ol d wer e mos t likel y t o repor t healt h problem s (27.5% ) an d genera l hassle s (27.5%) , while the early mid-life group were most likely to repor t problem s a t wor k (43.2% ) an d wit h children , wh o wer e ofte n adolescent s o r youn g adult s (20.3%) . I n term s o f th e type s o f problem s reported , th e tw o oldes t group s wer e mos t simila r t o eac h other , whil e th e middle-age d group s wer e als o wrestlin g wit h simila r problems . Consisten t wit h ou r earlie r wor k o n retiremen t stress , ver y fe w o f th e NA S me n reporte d problem s wit h retiremen t (fo r a revie w se e Bosse , Levenson , Spiro , Aldwin , & Mroczek , 1992
; Bosse , Spiro , & Levenson, in press). Note that the problems re- ferre d t o a s "wife " coul d includ e th e wife' s healt h problem s a s well , whic h i s probabl y wh y thi s i s reporte d slightl y mor e frequentl y i n th e olde r groups . Amon g th e me n wh o reporte d havin g a problem , w e foun d tha t ther e wa s onl y a tren d fo r th e olde r group s t o rat e thei r problem s a s les s stressfu l [F(3,947 ) = 2.19 , p = .09] ; th e tw o middle-age d group s ha d mean s o f 3. 9 an d 4.1 , an d th e tw o olde r group s ha d mean s o f 3.8 . We investigated whether thi s relationshi p wa s linea r o r nonlinear . A margina l cubi c Tabl e 1 . Ag e Difference s i n th e Type s o f Problem s Reporte d (Percentages ) Typ e o f Proble m Healt h Wil e

Childre

n Socia l Wor k

Retiremen

t

Finance

s

Genera

l hassle s

Bereavemen

t

Multipl

e problem sEarly Mid-Life 45-5
4 (n = 74
) 5.4 % 6. 8 20. 3 5. 4 43.
2 0. 0 0. 0 14. 9 1. 4 2. 7 Lat e Mid-Lif e 55-6
4 (n = 377
) 15.1 % 9. 8 13. 0 10. 3 23.
9 1. 6 5. 6 15. 9 1. 3 3.

4Young-Old

65-7
4 ( n = 392
) 21.2
% 11. 5 13. 3 11. 0 7. 1 1. 5 4. 3 25.
0 2. 8 2.

3Old-Old

7 5 + (n = 109
) 27.5
% 11. 9 9. 2 10. 1 3. 7 0. 9 4. 6 27.
5 1. 8 2. 8

Note.,

X2 (l,n = 952
) = 121.18,/
?

< .0001.Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article/51B/4/P179/650788 by guest on 25 August 2023

P184ALDWINETAL.

ter m [F( 1,947) = 2.96, p = .09] indicated a nonlinear trend . However , thes e difference s appea r t o b e trivial .

Separat

e chi-square s wer e use d t o examin e age-grou p difference s fo r eac h appraisa l item . Ther e wer e n o ag e difference s i n appraisal s commonl y though t t o increas e wit h age , such as threat, harm/loss, or at a loss for what to do next , no r wer e ther e an y difference s i n bein g worrie d abou t other s (se e Tabl e 2) . However , ther e wer e significan t ag e difference s i n tw o appraisals : feelin g challenged , x 2 (3 , n = 949
) = 20.77
, p < .001 , an d annoyed , x 2 (3 , n = 935
) = 15.65 , p = .001. The early mid-life group was most likely t o conside r th e proble m a challeng e (64.9%) ; bu t 40.6
% o f thos e i n lat e lif e als o reporte d bein g challenge d b y th e problem . Thos e i n earl y mid-lif e wer e nearl y universall y annoye d b y th e proble m (87.5%) , bu t two-third s (67.0% ) o f th e old-ol d wer e als o annoye d b y th e problem . Finally , olde r individual s als o endorse d fewe r appraisal s [F(3,946 ) = 6.05 , p< .001]; mean number of appraisals endorsed ranged fro m 1.9 7 fo r th e old-ol d t o 2.6 6 fo r thos e i n earl y mid-life . I n explorator y analyses , w e foun d tha t al l o f th e appraisals varie d significantl y b y proble m type , wit h chi-square s rang - in g fro m 30.8
3 t o 105.2
9 (ally' s < .001) . However , thi s di d no t totall y explai n th e ag e difference s foun d i n th e previou s analysis . A s woul d b e expected , wor k problem s wer e mos t likel y t o elici t bot h challenge d (74% ) an d annoye d appraisal s (85.2%) ; the absence of work problems in late life would explai n wh y thes e appraisal s decrease . I n contrast , healt h problem s wer e mos t likel y t o elici t bot h threa t (28.1% ) an d harm/los s appraisal s (22.5%) , an d ag e increase d th e likeli - hoo d tha t th e proble m reporte d wa s a healt h problem . How - ever , thi s environmenta l "pull " wa s apparentl y no t stron g enoug h t o resul t i n ag e difference s i n threa t an d harm/los s appraisals . Amon g al l ag e groups , wif e problem s univer - sall y elicite d annoyanc e (92.8%) . I n summary , som e interestin g ag e difference s emerge d i n th e propensit y t o repor t stressor s an d i n th e type s o f problem s tha t occurred , whic h i n tur n affec t appraisal s o f challeng e an d annoyance . Despit e repeate d probing , olde r adults , espe - ciall y th e old-old , wer e les s likel y t o repor t havin g ha d a proble m i n th e pas t week . Ther e wer e als o clea r ag e differ - ence s i n type s o f problem s reported , wit h th e middle-age d grapplin g wit h childre n an d work , an d olde r adult s facin g healt h problem s an d genera l problem s o f everyda y living . Whil e n o significan t ag e difference s appeare d i n th e stressful - nes s ratings , ther e wer e difference s i n th e specifi c appraisals . Olde r me n wer e les s likel y t o fee l challenge d o r annoyed , probabl y du e t o th e lac k o f a wor k role . However , the y wer enot more likely to feel threatened, harmed, that they had suffere d a loss , o r wer e a t a los s a s t o wha t t o d o next .

Coping

Analyses Ag e difference s i n copin g strategie s wer e analyze d usin g th e multivariat e analysi s o f varianc e (MANOVA ) progra m i n SPS S (SPSS, 1986)
, whic h compensate s fo r unequa l cel l sizes . Analyses on the semi-structured interview questions reveale d tha t onl y wea k ag e difference s emerge d i n th e type s o f strategie s use d t o dea l wit h th e problem , Wilks ' lambd a = .955,F(30,2757 ) = 1.46 , p = .05 . N o significan t difference s betwee n ag e group s emerge d fo r strategie s use d t o dea l wit h emotions , Wilks ' lambd a = .959 , F(30,2757 ) = 1.34 , n.s .

Inspectio

n o f th e univariate Fs for the strategies elicited by th e problem-focuse d questio n reveale d tha t onl y tw o strate - gie s differed , interpersonal , F(3,948 ) = .273 , p < .05 , an d escapism , F(3,948 ) = 4.53 , p < .01 . Whil e a Scheffe' s post-ho c rang e tes t showe d n o group s differe d significantl y a t th e .0 5 leve l fo r interpersona l strategies , a significan t weighte d linea r relationship , F(l,948 ) = 6.033 , p < .01 , indicate d tha t olde r individual s appeare d t o us e fewe r inter - persona l strategies . A s expected , olde r peopl e di d us e les s escapism , an d examinatio n fo r nonlinea r trend s usin g a one - wa y analysi s o f varianc e showe d a significan t cubi c relation - shi p [F ( 1,948) = 8.25, p < .01]. Only a few of the early mid-lif e grou p reporte d thes e strategies ; virtuall y non e o f th e othe r thre e group s did . (Th e mea n fo r th e old-ol d grou p wa s .000 , indicating that none of the 97 men over the age of 74 reporte d usin g an y for m o f escapis m t o dea l wit h thei r problems. ) A MANOV A examinin g ag e difference s i n th e BWO C subscale s reveale d a differen t patter n o f results . There was a significan t overal l effec t o f ag e fo r copin g strategies , Wilks ' lambd a = .954 , F(24,2715 ) = 1.88 , p< .01 . A s Tabl e 3 indicates , fou r o f th e eigh t subscale s showe d ag e differ - ences : instrumental action, social support, cognitive refram- ing , an d interpersona l hostil e strategies . Whil e al l showe d linea r decrease s wit h age , Scheffe' s post-ho c rang e test s suggeste d tha t th e middle-age d group s wer e significantl y differen t fro m th e old-old . A s indicate d b y paire d subscript s o n Tabl e 3 , th e old-ol d wer e significantl y differen t fro m bot h middle-age d group s o n th e instrumenta l action , cognitiv e reframing , an d interpersona l hostil e subscales . Th e young - ol d grou p wa s als o significantl y differen t fro m th e lat e mid - lif e grou p o n th e latte r strategy .

However

, th e strategie s use d b y differen t ag e group s migh t b e influence d b y th e type s o f problem s the y encountered . A s Tabl e 2. Age Differences in the Appraisals of Problems Reported (Percentages) Typ e o f

Appraisa

lEarly Mid-Life ( " = 74
)Late Mid-Life ( n = 377
)Young-Old ( n = 392
)Old-Old (n = 109
) Threa t

Harm/los

s

Challenge

d A t a los s

Annoye

d

Worrie

d18.9 24.
3 64.
9 21.
6 87.
5 51.
414.3
24.
2 58.
9 24.
7 80.
0 39.
314.0
20. 4 47.
4 24.
7 72.
6 37.
815.0
16. 8 40.
6 20. 6 67.
0 38.
7 1.2 4 3.5 4 20.77
* 1.1 5 15.65 * 4.8 9 .001

.Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article/51B/4/P179/650788 by guest on 25 August 2023

STRESS, COPING, AND APPRAISALP185

Tabl e 3 . Ag e Difference s i n Copin g Strategie s Usin g th e Brie f Way s o f Copin g Copin g Strateg y

Instrumenta

l actio n Escap e avoidanc e Socia l suppor t Blam e sel f

Cognitiv

e reframin g

Interpersona

l hostil e Threa t minimizatio n Sel f isolatio nEarly Mid-Life ( n = 74
) 5.51 " 3.2 1 3.8 8 2.3 0 2.53 ° 2.62 ° 3.1 1 1.9

1Late Mid-Life

( " = 376
) 5.32 ° 3.5 8 3.8 7 2.0 4 2.81 °

2.46°

c 3.0 2 1.8

5Young-Old

(n = 390
) 4.8 5 3.4 5 3.3 5 2.0 9 2.2 9 1.97 d 2.9 9 1.8

3Old-Old

(n = 107
) 4.35 " 3.1 5 3.3 2 1.5 7 2.00 " 1.81 " 2.8 9 1.5

6Univariate

F(3,943

) 4.90* * 0.8 4 2.77 * 1.7 9 4.73* *

7 29***

0.1 7 0.9 2 Note. Superscript s denot e pair s whic h ar e differen t fro m eac h other , i.e. , as ar e differen t fro m bs, an d c s diffe r fro m ds. *p < .05 ; **p < .01 ; ***p < .001 . indicate d earlier , th e group s differe d mos t o n problem s wit h wor k an d children ; no t surprisingly , th e tw o ol d groups , wh o wer e mos t likel y t o hav e relinquishe d bot h wor k an d activ e parentin g roles , wer e leas t likel y t o repor t thes e type s o f problems . Thus , w e create d tw o dumm y indicato r variable s fo r thes e tw o proble m type s i n orde r t o contro l fo r proble m type . MANCOVAs revealed that, once we controlled for problem s wit h childre n an d work , th e multivariat e F fo r th e effec t o f ag e grou p o n copin g strategie s elicite d b y th e proble m questio n intervie w dat a wa s n o longe r significant , Wilks ' lambd a = .959 , F(30,2751 ) = 1.31 , p = .12 .

Further

, th e multivariat e F fo r th e effec t o f ag e grou p o n th e BWO C subscale s als o becam e nonsignificant , Wilks ' lambd a = .966 , F(24,2710 ) = 1.37,/ ? = .11. W e als o examine d whethe r ther e wer e ag e difference s i n copin g effort , i.e. , th e numbe r o f strategie s reported . Fo r th e intervie w data , ther e wer e n o difference s i n th e numbe r o f strategie s elicite d b y eithe r th e problem-focuse d questio n

F(3,948

) = 2.00 , n.s. , o r th e emotion-focuse d question ,

F(3,948

) = 1.15 , n.s . Th e mean s fo r th e problem-focuse d an d emotion-focuse d strategie s wer e 2.6 0 an d 2.27 , respec - tively . However , ther e wer e highl y significan t difference s fo r th e numbe r o f item s reporte d o n th e BWOC , F(3,944 ) = 9.05 , p < .0001. The weighted linear term was significant, F( 1,945 ) = 25.02, p < .001, but a Scheffe's post-hoc range tes t (p < .05 ) showe d tha t thos e i n th e old-ol d grou p ( M = 11.00 ) wer e mos t differen t fro m thos e i n th e middle-age d group s (M s = 13.2 4 an d 13.39 , respectively) , whil e th e young-ol d wer e intermediat e (M = 11.99) . Not e tha t thi s remaine d significan t eve n afte r controllin g fo r typ e o f prob - lem , F(3,946 ) = 6.27 , p< .001 .

Emotions

and Efficacy Analyses I n thes e interviews , ther e wa s n o significan t effec t o f ag e grou p o n th e reportin g o f eithe r negativ e emotions , F(3,926 ) = 1.22 , n.s. , o r positiv e emotions , F(3,923 ) = 0.31 , n.s .

Finally

, a s expected , th e elderl y fel t the y wer e jus t a s effectiv e i n dealin g wit h th e proble m a s di d th e middle-age d men , F(3,923 ) = .77 , n.s. , an d fel t the y woul d b e jus t a s effectiv e i n dealin g wit h simila r problem s i n th e future ,

F(3,923

) = 0.57 , n.s .

DISCUSSIO

N Thi s stud y provide d a n in-dept h examinatio n o f th e type s o f stressor s experience d b y olde r men , ho w the y ar e ap -praised, and the coping strategies used in dealing with everyda y problems . Give n th e complexit y o f th e results , w e wil l divid e th e discussio n int o tw o sections , on e o n stres s an d th e othe r o n coping .

Stress

A s note d i n th e introduction , ther e i s a discrepanc y be - twee n th e widesprea d assumption s abou t th e severit y an d type s o f stressor s though t t o b e commo n i n lat e lif e an d empirica l studies , whic h typicall y find tha t olde r peopl e repor t fewe r stressors . W e hypothesize d tha t thi s findin g migh t b e a n artifac t reflectin g a reportin g bia s amon g th e elderly , whic h woul d b e attenuate d b y th e us e o f intensiv e intervie w techniques . T o a certai n extent , th e hypothesi s o f a reportin g bia s wa s supported . B y usin g extensiv e probing , 90
% o f th e NA S me n reporte d havin g ha d a proble m i n th e pas t week . Thi s contrast s wit h 25-30
% wh o d o no t repor t problems , eve n ove r th e pas t month , i n mos t communit y survey s (e.g. , Ai d wi n & Revenson , 1987)
. Amon g thos e tha t di d repor t a problem , ther e wer e n o significan t ag e difference s i n th e stres s rating s o f th e problem .

Nonetheless

, w e di d observ e age-relate d difference s i n man y aspect s o f th e stres s process . Despit e extensiv e prob - ing , th e old-ol d wer e stil l les s likel y t o repor t havin g ha d a proble m i n th e pas t wee k (17.4 % a s oppose d t o 2.6 % i n mid - life) . In addition, the type of problem did vary by age, as expected . Th e middle-age d me n wer e mos t likel y t o repor t problem s a t wor k an d wit h thei r children , wh o wer e primar - il y adolescent s an d youn g adults . A t thi s lif e stage , man y o f th e me n reporte d problem s wit h thei r childre n usin g drug s an d alcohol , gettin g int o troubl e wit h th e law , o r ha d con - cern s abou t launchin g the m int o adulthood . I n addition , man y o f th e NA S me n hel d fairl y responsibl e position s an d ha d t o supervis e employee s o r subordinates , placat e thei r ow n supervisors , dea l wit h th e declinin g economy , lawsuits , an d s o on . T o a certai n extent , th e olde r me n substitute d variou s project s fo r thei r work-relate d roles , suc h a s mainte - nanc e an d repai r tasks , voluntee r work , an d participatio n i n th e communit y o r churc h governance . Thes e type s o f task s wer e code d a s "genera l hassles, " whic h i s wh y these , and , a s expected , healt h problems , wer e reporte d mor e frequentl y i n lat e life . Ther e wer e als o ag e difference s i n ho w stres s wa s ap - praised . Th e old-ol d wer e les s likel y t o apprais e thei r prob

-Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article/51B/4/P179/650788 by guest on 25 August 2023

P186ALDW1NETAL.

le m a s a challeng e (althoug h som e 40
% stil l di d so) , an d the y wer e les s likel y t o repor t bein g annoye d b y thei r proble m (althoug h two-third s wer e annoyed) . A s thes e appraisal s wer e largel y associate d wit h wor k problems , thi s age-relate d findin g wa s largel y du e t o difference s i n th e typ e o f proble m bein g faced . I n man y ways , th e lac k o f difference s i n som e appraisal s wa s mor e interesting . Contrar y t o commo n opinion , olde r me n wer e no t mor e likel y t o apprais e problem s i n term s o f los s o r threat , despit e th e fac t tha t the y wer e dealin g wit h healt h problems . Thus , althoug h w e kno w tha t olde r peopl e ar e mor e likel y t o experienc e losse s throug h bereavemen t an d healt h problem s (Aldwin , 1990)
, thei r everyda y live s ar e no t characterize d i n thes e terms . Wh y th e old-ol d reporte d fewe r problems , despit e exten - siv e probing , i s no t clear . I n part , thi s decreas e ca n b e attribute d t o a declinin g involvemen t i n som e socia l role s suc h a s wor k an d activ e parenting . Fewe r problem s i n th e old-ol d migh t reflec t a narrowin g o r constrictio n o f everyda y life . A s

Johnso

n an d Bare r (1993 ) pointe d out , th e live s o f th e oldes t ol d ofte n hav e muc h narrowe r foci , a s activitie s whic h ar e n o longe r possibl e o r physicall y to o taxin g ar e eliminated .

Baltes

' (1987 ) construc t o f selectiv e optimizatio n implie s tha t th e ol d narro w thei r rang e o f activitie s t o thos e whic h ar e mos t possibl e an d rewarding . Further , i t shoul d b e emphasize d tha t w e wer e examinin g problem s i n th e pas t week . Majo r lif e event s ma y no t decreas e wit h age , a s lon g a s th e samplin g o f item s i s age-appropriat e (Aldwin , 1990)
. I n addition , th e natur e o f th e sampl e mus t b e considered . Th e NA S sampl e consist s largel y o f White , middle-clas s men , mos t o f who m ar e marrie d an d ha d job s wit h pensions .

Further

, the y ha d t o b e health y enoug h t o mak e a tri p int o downtow n Boston . Som e o f them , especiall y thos e wit h dementia , wer e accompanie d b y thei r wives , bu t al l o f the m wer e ambulatory . Thus , ou r old-ol d mus t b e considere d a s relativel y healthy , althoug h mos t di d hav e chroni c illnesse s o f som e sort , suc h a s arthritis , hypertension , an d diabetes .

Nonetheless

, i f ou r sampl e ha d bee n elderl y Africa n Ameri - ca n widows , 80
% o f who m fal l belo w th e povert y lin e (Smeeding , 1990)
, ou r finding s migh t hav e bee n ver y differ - ent . However , th e fac t tha t Africa n America n elder s typi - call y repor t highe r satisfactio n level s tha n d o Whit e elder s (Jackson , Antonucci , & Gibson , 1990
) suggest s tha t simila r processe s ma y b e occurrin g i n othe r demographi c group s a s well . I n contrast , a developmenta l interpretatio n i s tha t th e old-ol d ma y simpl y hav e develope d a mor e "philosophical " outloo k i n late r life , whic h mean t tha t the y wer e les s likel y t o regar d situation s a s problematic . T o th e exten t tha t Erikson' s (1950 ) eg o integrit y involve s acceptanc e o f lif e a s i t is , th e ol d ma y becom e d e fact o stoics .

However

, thi s "philosophical " outloo k ca n als o b e attrib - ute d t o a shif t i n th e tempora l characteristic s o f stres s fro m middl e t o lat e lif e - tha t is , whethe r stres s i s episodi c o r chronic . T o a larg e extent , th e middle-age d me n wer e dealin g primaril y wit h episodi c stressor s - a particula r proble m a t wor k whic h neede d resolvin g o r specifi c inci - dent s wit h thei r children , whic h immediatel y cam e t o min d whe n aske d abou t a proble m i n th e pas t week . Healt h problem s i n lat e life , o n th e othe r hand , ten d t o b e chronic , an d thu s thei r managemen t become s par t o f th e fabri c o fdaily living. To the extent that consistent management strat- egie s ar e develope d whic h bot h forestal l problem s an d miti - gat e th e negativ e impac t o f a chroni c stressor , the n tha t chroni c stresso r n o longe r i s a n immediat e proble m pe r se . Fo r example , diet , exercise , an d medication s ar e typicall y use d t o manag e chroni c illnesse s suc h a s hypertensio n an d diabetes . Unles s ther e wa s a n episod e i n whic h metaboli c contro l wa s lost , suc h a s a faintin g spel l i n diabetes , chance s ar e quit e likel y tha t peopl e wit h chroni c illnesse s ma y no t perceiv e havin g ha d a proble m i n th e pas t week . Fo r exam - ple , we suspect that hypertension was only cited as a prob- le m i f i t wa s a recen t diagnosi s o r i f ther e wa s a sudde n chang e i n status , eve n thoug h nearl y 40
% o f th e NA S me n ar e hypertensive . (Fo r mor e discussio n o f thi s issue , se e Aldwi n & Brustrom , i n press. ) I n summary , th e result s supporte d a respons e bias , i n tha t ag e difference s wer e attenuate d b y th e intervie w process .

However

, age-relate d difference s di d emerge , primaril y i n th e typ e o f proble m reported , whic h i n tur n affecte d ho w problem s wer e appraised . However , th e old-ol d wer e stil l les s likel y t o repor t problems , whic h w e attribute d i n par t t o a shif t fro m episodi c t o chroni c stressors . I t mus t b e empha - sized , however , tha t al l o f th e difference s reporte d her e wer e cross-sectional , whic h mean s tha t w e canno t distinguis h ag e fro m cohor t effects .

Coping

W e hypothesize d tha t interview s woul d attenuat e th e usua l age-relate d pattern s see n i n copin g strategie s an d tha t an y difference s whic h di d occu r woul d reflec t age-relate d difference s i n th e type s o f problem s bein g faced . Further , an y residua l ag e effec t woul d b e see n primaril y i n th e copin g interview s rathe r tha n th e checklist . Th e expecte d ag e difference s di d emerg e i n bot h th e intervie w an d BWO C copin g subscale s bu t wer e stronge r fo r th e checklis t tha n fo r th e interviews , contrar y t o expecta - tions . On the interviews, older men were less likely to report usin g interpersona l hostilit y an d escapism . Th e us e o f thi s latte r strateg y wa s rare , eve n amon g thos e i n earl y mid-life , an d nonexisten t i n th e old-old . Thi s support s simila r findings i n othe r population s (se e Aldwin , 1991
, fo r a review) .

Escapis

m i s a strateg y whic h i s probabl y th e leas t effica - cious , and includes using drugs, alcohol, and wishful think- ing . Hopefully , b y mid-lif e mos t hav e learne d tha t thes e ar e ineffectiv e strategies ; thos e wh o hav e no t ar e probabl y functionin g fairl y poorl y (se e als o Vaillant , 1993)
. O n th e BWOC , ag e difference s wer e see n i n fou r o f th e eigh t subscales : instrumenta l action , socia l support , cognitiv e reframing , an d interpersona l hostile . Th e old-ol d wer e mos t differen t fro m th e othe r group s i n thei r coping . Their decrease i n us e o f interpersona l hostil e strategie s i s consisten t wit h th e abandonmen t o f escapis m a s copin g strategie s - bot h strategie s ten d t o b e rathe r ineffective . The y als o reporte d fewe r instrumenta l actions , ye t rate d thei r efficac y a s hig h a s th e middle-age d adults . I t i s interestin g t o not e tha t the y als o use d slightl y les s copin g effort - the y average d tw o strategie s les s tha n th e middle-age d o n th e BWOC , althoug h th e inter - vie w question s di d no t revea l ag e differences . I n part , thi s differenc e betwee n th e intervie w an d th e BWO C ma y b e du e t o th e fac t that , despit e repeate d probing

,Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article/51B/4/P179/650788 by guest on 25 August 2023

STRESS, COPING, AND APPRAISALP187

th e me n reporte d ove r twic e a s man y copin g strategie s usin g th e checklis t (M = 12.49 ) tha n i n th e interview s ( M = 4.88 ) fo r th e combine d problem - an d emotion-focuse d questions . I n part , th e checklist s ma y serv e t o jog people's memories as t o wha t the y di d an d though t durin g th e event , an d thu s ma y provid e mor e complet e reporting , contrar y t o th e usua l expec - tation s abou t interview s v s checklists . Often , peopl e ma y b e s o use d t o ho w the y cop e wit h problem s tha t i t doe s no t occu r t o the m t o repor t th e strateg y unles s the y ar e reminde d o f it .

Sometime

s th e checklist s ma y overcom e reluctanc e t o tal k o r eve n lo w self-esteem . Fo r example , one interview with one of th e fe w inne r cit y elderl y i n th e stud y wa s mos t instructive . H e wa s dealin g wit h a particularl y troublesom e long-standin g problem . I n th e semi-structure d interview , h e kep t insistin g tha t h e di d littl e o r nothing , becaus e ther e wa s ver y littl e tha t h e coul d d o excep t tr y no t t o thin k abou t th e problem . Wit h th e checklist , however , h e wa s abl e t o repor t fou r o r five strategie s tha t h e ha d actuall y used .

However

, thi s ma y als o reflec t a semanti c shift . Th e middle-age d me n immediatel y kne w wha t w e mean t b y stres s an d coping , bu t th e term s seeme d mor e foreig n t o th e olde r men . W e ha d t o defin e stres s i n term s o f bein g "bothered " o r "troub
Politique de confidentialité -Privacy policy