Positive Integer Exponents We can use the properties of exponents to simplify algebraic expressions involving positive exponents as discussed in Example 1
INTEGER EXPONENTS AND SCIENTIFIC NOTATION Objective A: To Divide Monomials Rules: 1 To multiply two monomials with the same base add the exponents
MATH 11011 INTEGER EXPONENTS KSU Definition: • An exponent is a number that tells how many times a factor is repeated in a product For example
Investigate powers that have integer or zero exponents GOAL How can powers be used to represent metric units for negative integer exponents
Algebra of Exponents Mastery of the laws of exponents is essential to succeed in Calculus We begin with the simplest case: Integer Exponents
%2520Exponents%2520and%2520Radicals.pdf
26 sept 2017 · Distributing a power to a power (not in your book) Page 12 September 26 2017 Write in foldable Page 13 September 26 2017 Page 14
Properties of Integer Exponents Lesson 1 In the past you have written and evaluated expressions with exponents such as 53 and x2 + 1
the world of exponents was just the set of all natural numbers zero exponent we will similarly try to define negative integer exponents such as $-
3 Integer Exponents For a non-negative integer n: Multiplying exponents: When multiplying powers of the same base add the exponents because:
Recall what we know about exponentiation thus far. Exponential notation expresses repeated multiplication..Denition: We dene27to denote the factor2multiplied by itself repeatedly, such as
denition exists, however, certain properties are automatically true, and we have no other option but to recognize them as true.
They just fell into our laps..Theorem 1.Ifais any number andm,nare any positive integers, thenanam=an+m
Theorem 2.Ifais any non-zero number andm,nare any positive integers, thenanam=an m Theorem 3.Ifais any number andm,nare any positive integers, then(an)m=anm Theorem 4.Ifa; bare any numbers andnis any positive integer, then(ab)n=anbn Theorem 5.Ifa; bare any numbers,b6= 0, andnis any positive integer, thenabn=anbnAgain, the denition, immediately followed by the theorems. And then there was a quiet. Another opening for a free choice.
Consider the expression2x. The problem is that the denition of exponentiation only allows for a positive integer value ofx.
The expression2xis meaningful forx= 2or9or100, but it is not meaningful for values ofxsuch as 3or35or3:2. In short,
the world of exponents was just the set of all natural numbers. Mathematicians usually don't like that. The best case scenario,
the ultimate hope is that the denition of exponents could be extended to any number forx. That way,2xwould be meaningful,
no matter what the value ofxis.So, one of the issues was the desire to grow our world of exponents beyond the set of all natural numbers. This will be achieved
in several steps. Today, we are only focusing on enlarging the world of exponents fromNtoZ(i.e. from the set of all natural
numbers to the set of all integers).The other issue was that as we enlarge our world, we pay especial attention that the new denitions will not conict with the
mathematics we already have. This principle comes up often in our choices, and it is sometimes called theexpansion principle..Denition: Inmanysituations, mathematiciansattempttoincrease, toenlargeourworld. Theexpansion
principleis that when we enlarge our mathematics by adding new denitions, we do so in such a way that the new denitions never create conicts with the mathematics we already have.c Hidegkuti, Powell, 2008Last revised: October 1, 2018 Lecture NotesInteger Exponentspage 2Part 2 - Integer ExponentsSuppose we want to dene20. The repeated multiplication denition can not be applied to zero, so we have complete freedom
to dene20. As it turns out, if we insist on a denition that does not conict with Rule 2,anam=an m, then we do not have all
that many choices for20. Let us think of zero as the result of the subtraction3 3, and that we would like to dene20so that
This is an expansion principle proof. It did not prove that the value of20is or must be zero. It showed much less; that if we
wanted to dene20without harming Rule 2 in the example given, then the only possible value for20is1. The reader should
imagine a team of mathematicians making rst sure that no part of our good old math is hurt if we dene20= 1. And as it
turned out, this is exactly the case. This computation can be repeated with many different bases. For example, 5The only base that is problematic is0. Indeed, division by zero is not allowed and Rule 2,anam=an mdoes not work with
a= 0. If we try to perform the same computation with zero, we ultimately end up in00which is undened..Theorem 6.Ifais any non-zero number, thena0= 1.
0Now that we have dened zero exponent, we will similarly try to dene negative integer exponents such as2 3.
Again, the original denition can not be applied. We cannot write down the factor two negative three times. So we have a
freedom here to dene2 3in any way we wish. In this decision, we will again use the expansion principle: that we would like
to keep our old rules after having2 3dened.When we discovered this rule, we saw that it was true because of cancellation. In case of a negative exponent, we have the same
cancellation, it's just that we run out of factors in the numerator rst. The computation can be repated with any base except for
zero..Theorem 7.Ifais any non-zero number, andnis any positive integer, thena n=1an. 0 nis undened.c Hidegkuti, Powell, 2008Last revised: October 1, 2018Lecture NotesInteger Exponentspage 3Example 1.Simplify each of the following expressions. Use only positive exponents in your answer.
a)5 2b)a 5c)13 2d)23 3 e)1x 3f)2x 3 Solution:a) Recall our new rule,a n=1an. We apply this rule:5 2=152=125. b) We can use the same rule again:a 5=1a5. c) In this case, the expression with the negative exponent is in the denominator.f) It is a common mistake to interpret2x 3as(2x) 3. Without the parentheses, we perform the exponentiation
before the multiplication. Therefore, the correct computation isLecture NotesInteger Exponentspage 4.Theorem:The following statements are practical applications of the rulea n=1anand frequently
occur in computations.nProof: As the computation shows, we apply the rulea n=1anand then perform the division by multiplying by the reciprocal.
Notice the pattern here. If a factor with a negative exponent is in the numerator, we can re-write it with a positive exponent in
the denominator. Also, if a factor with a negative exponent is in the denominator, we can re-write it with a positive exponent in
the numerator..Theorem:a nbmcpd q=bmdqancpwherea;c;dare any non-zero numbers andn,m,p,qare positive integers.The denitions ofa0anda nwere developed with the intention that the previous rules (1 through 5) will remain true. Keep
that in mind in case of computations with more complex exponential expressions. Example 3.Simplify each of the given expressions. Present your answer using only positive exponents. a) a 2 5b) x 2 3x 6( x) 4c)a 3a 8d)a 2b 3a 5b3e) 2a 4b3 5(3a3b 2)0Solution:a) It is much preferred to rst simplify the exponent. Repeated exponentiation means multiplication in the exponent.