[PDF] PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE PARADIGMS & THE MAIN





Previous PDF Next PDF



Advantages and Disadvantages of Object-Oriented Programming

Two examples of popular object-oriented programming languages are Java and C++. Some other well-known object-oriented programming languages include Objective C 



Untitled

PRINCIPLES OF OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING. Learning Scope. Introduction Low level languages



Advantages and Disadvantages of C++ language

COBOL and Pascal are called as procedural oriented programming languages. In this approach instruction organized according to their operations by dividing into 



PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE PARADIGMS & THE MAIN

Many object oriented programming languages are characterised on the style and Although there are many advantages and disadvantages of using various ...



Object oriented programming: Concepts limitations and application

24-Sept-2021 applications of object-oriented programming languages. A ... 3: Important advantages and disadvantages of C++ Python and Java programming ...



Computer optics software construction using multi-paradigm design

24-Feb-2021 The advantages and disadvantages ... Most modern programming languages support the procedural paradigm [7]. As a refinement of the.



Chapter-6 BASIC CONCE BASIC CONCEPT OF OOP OF OOP

rogramming approach provides advantages in creation and devel ife application. of object oriented programming is the data.



Bjarne Stroustrup

Disadvantages of Conventional programming Concepts of OOP



DEPARTMENT OF B.COM (COMPUTER APPLICATION) ABOUT

Course Name – Programming in C. Course code -1T4. CO1: Students will be able to define the characteristics of Procedure Oriented Programming. Languages.



FYBSc. (IT) SEMESTER - II OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING

1.6 Benefits of OOP. 1.7 Advantages of OOPs. 1.8 Object Oriented Languages. 1.9 Applications of OOPS. 1.10 Question. 1.0 Program and Programming.

77

CRIS Bulletin 2013/02

PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE PARADIGMS & THE MAIN PRINCIPLES OF OBJECT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING

PROGRAMMING

LANGUAGE PARADIGMS

& THE MAIN PRINCIPLES

OF OBJECT-ORIENTED

PROGRAMMING

NIKOLETTA MINAROVA

10.2478/cris-2013-0011

78

CRIS Bulletin 2013/02

PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE PARADIGMS & THE MAIN PRINCIPLES OF OBJECT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING

FIRST GENERATION LANGUAGE

1SPDFTTJOH6OJU

DBOPOMZVOEFSTUBOEPOFUZQFPGMBOHVBHF

LOPXOBTNBDIJOFMBOHVBHF%BWJT

Q %BWJT Q

WJSUVBMMZJODPNQSFIFOTJCMFUPIVNBOT

SECOND GENERATION LANGUAGE

FSSPSTXIJDISFRVJSFTEFCVHHJOH

BOEBTBSFTVMU

Q 8V Q

HVBHFFRVJWBMFOU

THIRD GENERATION LANGUAGES

CBTJOHUIFJSHSBNNBSPOIVNBOMBOHVBHF

XJUIUIFVTFPGDPNNBOEXPSET%BWJT

Q

SFDPHOJTFECZUIF$16

PARADIGMS

UIJSEHFOFSBUJPOMBOHVBHFT#SPPLTIFBS

Q

4PNFPGUIFTF

JODMVEJOHUIFQSPDFEVSBMQBSBEJHN

XJMMCFEJTDVTTFEJOUIJTQBQFSBOEGVSUIFSPO

XJMMCFDPNQBSF

EBHBJOTUUIFPCKFDUPSJFOUFEQBSBEJHN

INTRODUCTION

1. THE PROCEDURAL PARADIGM

One of the most common and understood paradigms

in use today is procedural programming, which is also known as imperative programming (Deirbach, 2013, p. 17). Brookshear (2012, p. 244) even goes so far as to say that the procedural paradigm “represents the traditional approach to the programming process".

1.1 DESCRIPTION

GPMMPXFE

GPSFYBNQMFUIFDIBOHFPGB

WBMVFPGBMPDBUJPOJOJUTNFNPSZ#SPPLTIFBS

Q 79

CRIS Bulletin 2013/02

PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE PARADIGMS & THE MAIN PRINCIPLES OF OBJECT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING

1.1.1 CHARACTERISTICS AND PRINCIPLES

Q "OFYBNQMFPGUIJT Q 5IF

XIFSFUIFMPHJDBMPXPGB

Q

1.2 HISTORY

HQVSQPTFT#SPPLTIFBS

Q

1.3 MODERN EXAMPLES OF PROCEDURAL PROGRAMMING

Q #FO"SJ Q

UIFQSPDFEVSBMQBSBEJHNJODMVEJOH$

XIJDIJTCBTFEPO$#SPPLTIFBS

Q

5IBUCFJOHTBJE

QSPHSBNNF8FJTGFME

Q

1.4 STRUCTURED PROGRAMMING

.BSUJOJ Q

SPO(BCCSJFMMJBOE.BSUJOJ

Q

8FJTGFME

Q

2.1 DESCRIPTION

NBJOUBJOBCMF(BCCSJFMMJBOE.BSUJOJ

Q

NPEVMBSJUZ

MZDPNQSFIFOEFE4USPVTUSVQ

Q

2.1.1 CHARACTERISTICS AND PRINCIPLES

8FJTGFME

Q

HNT-JQNBOOFUBM

0CKFDUPSJFOUFE

8V

QSPDFTTJOHFOUSJFTBOE

EFUFDUJOHJOGPSNBUJPO4USPVTUSVQ

Q

2. THE OBJECT-ORIENTED PARADIGM

80

CRIS Bulletin 2013/02

PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE PARADIGMS & THE MAIN PRINCIPLES OF OBJECT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING Q NBOZ Q

BMTPJEFOUJFTBOPUIFSNFDIBOJTN

JODMVEJOHTVQFSDMBTTFTBOE

Q

5IFQPMZ-

Q

XIJDIJTB

PVUTJEFUIFDMBTT#SPPLTIFBS

Q

2.2 HISTORY

+PIO%BIMBOE,SJTUFO/ZHBBSEGSPN/PSXBZ

BOEXFSFDBMMFE4*.6-"BOE4JNVMB1VSEVN

Q

PCKFDUPSJFOUFEQSPHSBNNJOHEJEOPUCFDPNF

QSPDFEVSBMQSPHSBNNJOH4USPVTUSVQ

Q

2.3 MODERN EXAMPLES OF OBJECT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING

Q +BWBXBTCBTFE Q +BWBJTDPN- 8V Q

2.4 VON NEUMANN ARCHITECTURE

E#FO"SJ

Q

CVUPOBNPEFMPGDPN-

3.1 DESCRIPTION

GVODUJPOBMGPSNT5VSOFS

Q

3.1.1 CHARACTERISTICS AND PRINCIPLES

Q

PVUQVUSFMBUJPOTIJQJTDSFBUFE#SPPLTIFBS

Q $PNNPOGFBUVSFTGPVOEJOGVODUJPOBMMBOHVBHFT

JODMVEFSTUDMBTTGVODUJPOT

QVSFGVODUJPOT

SFDVSTJPO

BOEQBUUFSONBUDIJOH#FO"SJ

Q 4NJUI QYW

UIFQSPHSBNNFJTNFBOUUPXPSLPWFSBMM

3. THE FUNCTIONAL PARADIGM

81

CRIS Bulletin 2013/02

PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE PARADIGMS & THE MAIN PRINCIPLES OF OBJECT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING

3.2 HISTORY

"SJ Q

DBMDVMVTNPEFM#FO"SJ

Q

JUVTFT

NBOZGFBUVSFTGSPNPUIFSQBSBEJHNT#FO"SJ

Q

3.3 MULTI-PARADIGM PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES

4NJUI QYW

4. COMPARISON OF PARADIGMS

4.1 THE OBJECT-ORIENTED PARADIGM

4.1.1 ADVANTAGES

IJEEFO#FO"SJ

Q

FYJTUJOHTPVSDFDPEFT8V

Q

GPSGBTUFSEFWFMPQNFOU8V

Q

UIFPCKFDUPSJFOUFEQBSBEJHN#SPPLTIFBS

Q

4.1.2 DISADVANTAGES

BTJUJODMVEFTNPSFMJOFTPGDPEFBOEQMBOOJOH

XIJDI

BMPOHXJUIUIFEFNBOEGPSNPSFTZTUFNSFTPVSDFT

DBOTMPXUIFQSPHSBNNFEPXO$IFO

Q 'PSTPNFQSPHSBNNFST

8FJTGFME

Q

4.2 THE PROCEDURAL PARADIGM

4.2.1 ADVANTAGES

TFQBSBUFMZ

XIJDINFBOTJGUIFSFJTBOFSSPSJOUIFDPEF

UIFQSPCMFNBSFBDBOCFRVJDLMZJTPMBUFEBOE

SFQBJSFE$IFO

Q Q

4JODFJUJTVTFEGPS

TQFDJDVTFT

UIFQSPHSBNNFTUFOEUPCFWFSZFGDJFOU$IFO

Q 82

CRIS Bulletin 2013/02

PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE PARADIGMS & THE MAIN PRINCIPLES OF OBJECT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING

4.2.2 DISADVANTAGES

Q

5IJTDBOCFDPNFQBSUJDV-

(BCCSJFMMJBOE.BSUJOJ Q Q

4.2.3 COMPARISON WITH THE OBJECT-ORIENTED PARADIGM

XIJMTUUIFPCKFDUPSJFOUFEQBSBEJHN

Q

8IFSFBTPCKFDUPSJFOUFE

NBOZQPSUJPOTPGQSPDFEVSBMDPEFBSFTPJOUFS-

Q )PXFWFS Q

4.3 THE FUNCTIONAL PARADIGM

4.3.1 ADVANTAGES

TBOEMB[ZFWBMVBUJPOquotesdbs_dbs12.pdfusesText_18

[PDF] advantages and disadvantages of round robin scheduling

[PDF] advantages and disadvantages of techniques used for wastewater treatment

[PDF] advantages and disadvantages of water treatment

[PDF] advantages of 3 tier architecture in .net

[PDF] advantages of 3 tier architecture in asp.net

[PDF] advantages of 3 tier architecture in c#.net

[PDF] advantages of 3 tier architecture in dbms

[PDF] advantages of 3 tier architecture in java

[PDF] advantages of 3 tier network architecture

[PDF] advantages of administrative law

[PDF] advantages of asexual reproduction in plants

[PDF] advantages of borrowing in foreign currency

[PDF] advantages of community dialogue

[PDF] advantages of conflict theory in sociology of education

[PDF] advantages of distance education