[PDF] The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI): European





Previous PDF Next PDF



Évaluation(s) des EPI

26 nov. 2015 Les EPI font l'objet d'une évaluation dans les disciplines qui y ... s formatives. Evaluations entre pairs. Evaluations sommatives.



PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 04 EVALUATION

In addition evaluation is a relevant tool for learning and accountability. How many evaluation reports should be assessed for the UN-SWAP EPI reporting ...



UN-SWAP Evaluation Performance Indicator Technical Note

The Evaluation Performance Indicator (EPI) is one of the performance indicators developed as part of the accountability framework of the UN System-wide 



Diagnostic de linsuffisance rénale chronique - Estimer le débit de

L'équation CKD-EPI pour estimer le DFG et la méthode enzymatique té - S ... à partir des rapports d'évaluation et des avis de la commission d'évaluation.



Background Paper - Full Evidence Report on the RTSS/AS01

review of the RTSS/AS01 malaria vaccine by the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts country is being monitored by the EPI programme



Lusage de lEPI (équipement de protection individuelle) pendant les

des choix à propos de l'usage de l'EPI pendant les évaluations en fonction de la tâche d'évaluation des caractéristiques du participant



The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI): European

5 mars 2021 The EU Food-EPI EU study is conducted as part of Work Package (WP) 1 of ... This research is part of the Policy Evaluation Network (PEN)1 ...



Certification et vérification de la qualité des équipements de

équipements de protection individuelle (EPI). Dans le cadre de la riposte à la pandémie L'utilisation des EPI s'appuie sur une évaluation préalable des.



Diapositive 1

2- Sur le cycle les EPI doivent aborder les 3 parcours éducatifs 15- L'évaluation des acquis des élèves durant l'EPI s'effectue durant la restitution.



MPC EPI amiante

L'efficacité des EPC et EPI a-t-elle été évaluée spécifiquement vis-à-vis de l'amiante ? Comment sont réalisées ces évaluations ?



Certification et vérification de la qualité des - WHO

L’utilisation des EPI s’appuie sur une évaluation préalable des risques liés à la sécurité du patient de l’agent de santé (y compris le personnel de nettoyage les ambulanciers entre autres) et de la communauté



Searches related to Évaluations des epi

rationnelle et adaptée des EPI et la coordination des mécanismes de gestion de la chaîne d’approvisionnement en EPI sont des stratégies susceptibles de permettre une disponibilité optimale des EPI (Figure 1) 1 Stratégies pour optimiser la disponibilité des EPI 1 Réduction des besoins en EPI dans les établissements de santé

The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI): European

The Healthy Food

food environments and priority actions to

March 2021

Partners

Ms Sanne K Djojosoeparto

Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, the Netherlands

Dr Carlijn BM Kamphuis

Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, the

Netherlands

Dr Stefanie Vandevijvere

Sciensano, Belgium

Dr Janas M Harrington

School of Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland

Dr Maartje P Poelman

Chair group Consumption and Healthy Lifestyles, Wageningen University &

Research, The

The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI): European healthy food environments in the EU. Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, 2021.

Contact

Any questions regarding this document can be directed to Sanne Djojosoeparto (

Date March 2021

Ζ 978-90-393-7362-0

C&M 9900, Utrecht University

3THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

Content

Executive Summary

5

Appendix 4: Food-EPI Domains and Indicators

48

4THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

5THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

Executive Summary

Overweight, obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are a major public health most European countries socioeconomic inequalities in obesity and dietar y patterns are evident.

environments are the physical (food availability, quality, marketing), economic (food prices), policy

always ensure that the healthy food option is the easiest or default opt ion. national food environment policies in EU Member States. Also, little is known on how the EU could environments;

Approach

This study applied the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI), a tool and process, tool includes seven policy domains that represent key aspects of food environments in total) that encompass the directions necessary to improve the healthiness of food environments process. In step 1 and 2, the Food-

6THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

Expert panel

The EU Food-EPI expert panel consisted of 29 independent experts, specialized in public health, to recommend to the EU to create healthy food environments, improve population nutrition, and

Priority recommendations

The assessment of the strength of EU-level policies and infrastructure support by the independent, ZDV UDWHGDV VWURQJUHODWHG WRSXEOLF DFFHVVWR QXWULWLRQLQIRUPDWLRQ ZDV UDWHGWR EH

PRGHUDWHDQGZDVUDWHGWREHZHDN

Based on our study, we recommend the EU to take immediate action ȴ policy actions which were prioritised highest on a combination of importance and achievability and

1 Food-EPI

Adaptation6 Prioritisation

• Food-EPI adaptation to

EU context:

Feb-May 20192 Collection of

EU-level policies

• Collecting information on EU- level policies:

Feb-Sep 2019

• Describing EU-level policies in ‘evidence document':

Oct-Dec 20193 Online rating

• Online survey to rate the strength of EU-level policies and formulate actions:

Feb-May 20204 Online

workshops • Online workshops with selected group of experts to discuss actions formulated in the online rating survey:

July 2020ȴ

selecting actions a. Reformulating actions:

July-Aug 2020

b.Survey to investigate which actions to recommend:

Sep 2020• Online

prioritisation by experts:

Oct 2020

Figure 1 Steps of the EU Food-EPI 2019-2020 process

7THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

(also depicted in summary in Figure 2) are: we also recommend the EU to take immediate action ȴ recommended infrastructure support actions which were prioritised highest on a combination of

ȴ (also depicted in

I ȴ

added sugars, salt, and saturated fat for all food categories (including processed and ultra- II III IV V I II III IV V

8THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

Figure 2 Priority policy and infrastructure support actions to create healthy fo od environments in the EU I

Set mandatory, ambitious,

comprehensive and time- categories.II III V

POLICY ACTIONS

I

NCDs Prevention Strategy.IV

Harmonise the promotion

protection. IV

Set mandatory, ambitious

and comprehensive III V to set up a monitoring system to assess the II and support and coordinate the

INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ACTIONS

9THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

Acknowledgments

Many people have contributed to the development of this EU Food-EPI repo rt. XVHGIRUWKHDVVHVVPHQWRI(8OHYHOSROLFLHVLQ5XHQFLQJIRRGHQYLURQPHQWVevidence document We would like to thank all experts who participated in the EU Food-EPI expert panel and rated the for an overview of the expert panel). The Netherlands: The Netherlands Organisation for Health ; Norway: The Research Council of Norway (RCN); Poland: The

10THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

1

Introduction

1.1 Why do we need to improve food environments in the EU? Overweight, obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs) pose a major public health by the food environment. nutritional status. There is growing concern about the level of socioeconomic health inequalities worldwide. In most

11THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

observed in most European countries and increase socioeconomic health inequalities. of fruit and vegetables also rises with increasing income.

by high intake of foods such as fast food, savoury pastries, sweetened drinks, biscuits, ice cream or

1.3 Who can help to create healthy food environments and improve Government policies have the potential to support healthy diets and reduce levels of overweight, interests have been allowed to prevail over public health. capacity and conscious action of individuals to change food consumption themselves. Interventions population nutrition by supporting individuals to make spontaneous healthy food choices. most vulnerable groups. Article 168 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union prescribes that a high level of and activities. policy and for the organization and delivery of health services and medical care. (8 FRXQWULHVWKURXJK YDULRXVPHDQV LQFOXGLQJSURSRVLQJ OHJLVODWLRQSURYLGLQJ 4QDQFLDOVXSSRUW coordinating and facilitating the exchange of best practices between EU countries and health to prevent NCDs and promoting good health and cooperation measures.

12THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

improve its policies to support improvement of Member State food environments. Therefore, this 1.5

Aims of this research

The aims of this research, applying the EU Healthy Food Environment Poli cy Index (Food-EPI), are: environments;

13THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

2

Methods: How were EU-level policies and

environments assessed? The Food-EPI includes seven policy domains that represent key aspects of food environments (food 37
Figure 3 The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI)

INDEXINDICATORS

Good Practice

Statements

DOMAINS

Food Composition

Food Labelling

Food Promotion

Food Prices

Food Provision

Food Retail

Food Trade & Investment

COMPONENTS

Policies

14THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

Figure 4 The Food-EPI Policy Domains

POLICY DOMAINS

FOOD COMPOSITION: This domain concerns the extent to which the EU stimulated/ FOOD LABELLING: This domain concerns the extent to which the EU proposed/ FOOD PROMOTION: This domain concerns the extent to which the EU has set/ FOOD PRICES: This domain concerns the extent to which food pricing policies (e.g., FOOD PROVISION: This domain concerns the extent to which the EU ensures that there FOOD RETAIL: This domain concerns the extent to which the EU has the power to set/ FOOD TRADE & INVESTMENT: This domain concerns the extent to which the EU

15THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

Figure 5 The Food-EPI Infrastructure Support Domains

INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT DOMAINS

LEADERSHIP: This domain concerns the extent to which political leadership ensures GOVERNANCE: This domain concerns the extent to which the EU has structures in

MONITORING & INTELLIGENCE: ȇ

monitoring and intelligence systems (surveillance, evaluation, research and reporting) FUNDING & RESOURCES: This domain concerns the extent to which the EU has investments in population promotion of healthy eating and healthy food e nvironments food environments, improve population nutrition, and reduce obesity, die t-related NCDs PLATFORMS FOR INTERACTION: This domain concerns the extent to which there are environments, population nutrition, diet-related NCDs and their related inequalities. HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES: This domain concerns the processes that are in place to

16THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

As outlined in Figure 6, the overall EU Food-EPI process was conducted over the period 2019-2020. 2.2

The expert panel

At the end of 2019 and the beginning of 2020, 62 invitations were sent to independent, non- interest. Representatives from industry were not included in the Food-EPI process. Appendix 2 2.3

Step 1: Adaptation of the tool

Before using the Food-EPI in the European context, a group of researchers (PEN WP1 partners) the indicators was conducted between February and May 2019. For each of the 50 good practice indicators, evidence for the existence and degree of implementation Portugal, Estonia, Finland) plan to complete the Food EPI by 2024.

1 Food-EPI

Adaptation6 Prioritisation

• Food-EPI adaptation to

EU context:

Feb-May 20192 Collection of

EU-level policies

• Collecting information on EU- level policies:

Feb-Sep 2019

• Describing EU-level policies in ‘evidence document':

Oct-Dec 20193 Online rating

• Online survey to rate the strength of EU-level policies and formulate actions:

Feb-May 20204 Online

workshops • Online workshops with selected group of experts to discuss actions formulated in the online rating survey:

July 2020ȴ

selecting actions a. Reformulating actions:

July-Aug 2020

b.Survey to investigate which actions to recommend:

Sep 2020• Online

prioritisation by experts:

Oct 2020

Figure 6 Steps of the EU Food-EPI 2019-2020 process

17THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

DG SANTE, the Joint Research Centre (JRC), Eurostat, the OECD, and the European Food and Safety The strength of EU-level policies was assessed during an online rating survey in February-March experts partly completed the survey. WKH\LQGLFDWHGZKHWKHU7KH(8KDVSXWIRUZDUG DYHU\ZHDNSROLF\ DZHDNSROLF\ D PRGHUDWHSROLF\ DVWURQJSROLF\ DYHU\VWURQJSROLF\7KHUHZDVDOVRDFDQQRWUDWHRSWLRQ7KLV implementation of EU-level policies against international best practices of countries. The rationale the European Union on the policy and infrastructure support domains that, in turn, would improve 2.6 Step 4 to Step 6: Process to identify and prioritise actions to create and infrastructure support actions to create healthy food environments i n the EU: Step 4 Online workshops: Due to the 2020 Covid-19 restrictions on travel and social distancing, formulated by the experts in the online rating survey were discussed to narrow down and

18THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

ȴ: Based on the online workshops, we adjusted the formulation of the

Appendix 5) were proposed for the next round.

survey (September 2020) how much they would agree or disagree with recommending each disagree 3) neutral 4) agree 5) very much agree. A total of 16 experts participated in this survey. by ranking the 19 policy actions on relative importance, achievability and equity, and by ranking #1 to #18) twice: on importance and on achievability (infrastructure support actions were not of policy and infrastructure support actions. The lower the sum core, the higher the action actions which ranked highest on importance and achievability are also recommended for

19THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

Table 1

Importance

Need

The size of the implementation

Feasibility

How easy or hard the action is to

on reducing food/diet-related

Impact

on improving food environments

Acceptability

The level of support from

Structures vs. Individuals

Extent to which a given policy

΍ (e.g. on

The cost of implementing the

΍ (e.g.

income, infringement of personal action.

20THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

3

Results: Strength of EU-level policies and

environments in the EU on each of the Food-EPI indicators (Step 3). It can be observed that none of the EU-level policies

Policy domains

None of the EU-level policies with respect to the Food-EPI policy domain s were rated as (very) Food and Ȇȇ

© Vecteezy

21THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

EU-level policies with respect to the majority of the policy indicators (17 of the 26 policy indicators;

Food Promotion, Food Prices, Food in Retail domains) were rated very weak or as non- ratings showed that there are no or very weak 'EU zoning laws and policies limiting the density or

or has very weak support systems to 'promote and encourage the relative availability of healthy foods

Infrastructure support domains

None of the EU-level policies with respect to the Food-EPI infrastructure support domains were

ȆȇGovernance). The majority of the

Leadership domain, namely that the EU has weak infrastructure FRPSUHKHQVLYH LPSOHPHQWDWLRQSODQIRU QXWULWLRQDQG SULRULWLHVIRU UHGXFLQJKHDOWK LQHTXDOLWLHV RU SURWHFWLQJYXOQHUDEOH SRSXODWLRQV$OVR (8OHYHOLQIUDVWUXFWXUH VXSSRUWZLWK UHVSHFWWR WZR indicators in the Platforms for Interaction domain were rated weak including 'platforms between the support with respect to the two indicators in the Health-in-all policies domain ('assessing and considered to be weak. In contrast to the policy domains, no infrastructure support indicators were

22THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

Figure 7ȇȵ

environments in the EU

POLICY DOMAINS

Domain

Food composition targets industrially processed foods

Food Labelling

Ingredient lists and nutrient declarations

Food Promotion

Restricting unhealthy food promotion to children (broadcast media)

Food Prices

Minimizing taxes or levies on healthy foods

Food Provision

Policies in schools and early childhood education services provide and p romote

Food Retail

Zoning laws and policies limit quick service restaurants or other outlet s selling

Food Trade

Risk impact assessments trade and investment agreements

23THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT DOMAINS

Domain

Strong visible political support

Governance

Monitoring & Intelligence

Monitoring food environments

Funding &

Population nutrition budget

Platforms for

Coordination mechanisms (across departments and levels of governments)

Health

Assessing and considering public health impacts of food-related policies

24THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

4

Results: Priority policy and infrastructure

4.1

Recommended and priority policy actions

The 19 policy actions recommended by the experts are detailed in Table 2. Experts have ranked combination of importance and achievability in Table 2 EU-level policy actions to create healthy food environments in the EU, recommended by the Food-

Domain

1 composition targets for added sugars, salt, and saturated fat for all fo od prevent the use of nutrition and health claims (including function clai ms)

25THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

8 up to 19 years old in all digital (including up to 19 years old. (including online marketing) of processed and ultra-processed foods

European Football Associations (UEFA)).

the current provision about food support in the European Social Fund where appropriate the choice of food products to be distributed of the most deprived persons" to "ensure the choice of food products to be healthy diet of the most deprived persons". standards). relate to the provision and promotion of nutritious foods supporting

26THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

18

The top 10 priority policy actions

The top 10 priority policy actions include three actions in the domain, one action in Food Prices domain, three actions in the Food Composition domain and three actions in the Food domain. Each top 10 action is described in more detail below.

ACTION 1

The highest prioritised action is the development of an EU easy-to-understand front-of-pack all product categories and that it has to be displayed on prepacked foods as propose a FOP label for Member States to be implemented, but to give Member States the Front-Of-Pack (FOP) Label is the number one priority policy action. Also in the Farm to 14

ACTION 2

Prioritised second, is the recommended action to allow Member States to implement a VAT

ACTION 3

composition targets for added sugars, salt, and saturated fat for all food categories (including

27THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

ACTION 4ȴ

nutrition and health claims (including function claims) on foods and meals high in saturated fat, However, this has not happened. In the Farm to Fork Strategy it is inclu ded that the Commission in fat, sugars and salt (Q4 2022). implemented in other parts of the world and can be used as examples for EU developments. For a food is suitable to make a health claim. health or nutrition claims.

ACTION 5

instead of the current maximum limit of 2 grams per 100 grams of fat). In April 2019, the Commission

ACTION 6

The sixth priority action is to adjust existing regulations on food labelling (e.g. food information to

ACTION 7

Composition)

With the seventh priority action, experts recommend the EU to set mandatory, ambitious and

ACTION 8

DGGHGVXJDUVWRFKLOGUHQ)RRG3URPRWLRQ

Prioritised eight, is the recommended action to introduce a new Directiv e, (amending the Audiovisual up to 19 years old in all digital up to 19 years old.

28THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

recommended Directive will lead to a reduction in the exposure of children (including adolescents)

ACTION 9

Promotion)

The ninth priority action in the list, which -like action 8- also concerns restricting food marketing to

cooperation and EU harmonisation could avoid weakening national marketing restrictions of foods

ACTION 10ȴ

DGGHGVXJDUVWRFKLOGUHQ)RRG3URPRWLRQ

marketing to children. This action recommends the EU to develop and use a clear and evidence- 67
to determine what foods should not be marketed to children.

In the Farm to Fork Strategy, setting

14 marketing restrictions.

29THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

actions on a combination of importance and achievability are shown (in green) in Table 3. In Figure 8,

Experts indicated that food composition actions, such as setting food composition and reformulation

POLICY ACTIONS

achievability most achievable least achievable least importantmost important importance 5

Figure 8Ζ

UHFRPPHQGHGSROLF\DFWLRQVIRUWKH(8

socioeconomic inequalities in diet (i.e. pro-equity); see Table 2 for descriptions of the 19 actions.

30THE HEALTHY FOOD ENVIRONMENT POLICY INDEX (FOOD-EPI): EUROPEAN UNION

Table 3ȴ

Nr. 1 composition targets for added sugars, salt, and saturated fat for allquotesdbs_dbs28.pdfusesText_34
[PDF] Pourquoi et comment évaluer les compétences des élèves?

[PDF] un exemple d 'evaluation par competences en lettres - Académie d

[PDF] Évaluation des salariés : un outil au service du management

[PDF] FICHE INDIVIDUELLE d 'ÉVALUATION de FORMATEUR SST Test d

[PDF] L 'évaluation des productions écrites et la créativité - Dumas - CNRS

[PDF] Thème : L 'ÉVANGÉLISATION - Enrichment Journal

[PDF] Thème : L ÉVANGÉLISATION - Enrichment Journal

[PDF] Ségrégation du béton frais - E-Periodica

[PDF] comment economiser de l 'energie en cuisine - Foster France

[PDF] Corrigé Obligatoire + Spécialité - Apses

[PDF] Progrès technique et croissance - Studyrama

[PDF] DISSERTATION Comment le progrès technique contribue-t-il ? la

[PDF] COMMENT EXPLIQUER L 'INSTABILITÉ DE LA CROISSANCE EC1

[PDF] ch 2: comment expliquer l 'instabilité de la croissance - Cours Seko

[PDF] Fiche 12 : Comment expliquer l 'instabilité de la croissance