Alpha B--Bravo C--Charlie D--Delta E--Echo F
A--Alpha. B--Bravo. C--Charlie. D--Delta. E--Echo. F--Foxtrot. G--Golf. H--Hotel. I--India. J--Juliett. K--Kilo. L--Lima. M--Mike. N--November. O--Oscar.
ALFA FORMATIONS
et de l'École d'architecture de Nancy. Alfa est déclaré en tant qu'organisme de formation sous le numéro 41540281054. Nos missions sont les suivantes :.
O B I K A
ALFA Nancy. 2002. Diplôme d'architecte de l'U.E équivalent architecte dplg. Ecole d'architecture de l'Université polytechnique de Slovaquie.
Document Title
Nancy Yang is the founder and CIO of CloudAlpha Capital a leading China Specialized research-driven long/short equity global TMT fund.
2020 HONORS OF EPSILON PI RECIPIENTS
Alpha Tau–Edinboro University of Pennsylvania. Nancy Zdarko Svoboda. Alpha Upsilon–Central Michigan University. Kristen Alters. Alpha Chi–Thiel College.
CME Disclosure
Pat DeGagne Nancy Olson Michelle Alfa Zhong W Alfa M
Evaluation of Alfa grass soda lignin as a filler for novolak molding
2LERMAB UMR INRA ENGREF UHP 1093
Untitled
Call Alfa.®. Beth Alexander. (205) 988-8898 balexander@alfains.com. Nancy Armstrong. (205) 699-3191 narmstrong@alfains.com. Terry Bagwell. (205) 979-8391.
THE AVIATION PHONETIC ALPHABET A • Alfa B • • • Bravo C
Your guide has listed the letters and their corresponding words for you. CHARACTER MORSE CODE. TELEPHONY. PHONIC (PRONUNCIATION). A. • ?. Alfa. (AL-FAH).
Jury de concours - 1 jour soit 7 heures de formation
ALFA FORMATIONS – Association Lorraine de Formation des Architectes et des Acteurs du Cadre Bâti - 24 rue du Haut Bourgeois - 54000 Nancy.
DR. MICHELLE ALFA
DEPT OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY,
UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA, WINNIPEG, MB
Biofilm: Wet & Dry Surfaces and
Instruments
CME Disclosure
Consultant & Advisory board: 3M, Olympus and J&J ASP. Consulting services: Ofstead Associates, KARL STORZ, Novaflux Royalties:University of Manitoba for patent license to HealthmarkSponsored Speaker: 3M, Ruhof, Ambu, Olympus
Acknowledgement:
The research funding for some of the data in this presentation was provided by ASGE (American Society for Gastroenterology).St Boniface Research Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada
Pat DeGagne Nancy Olson Michelle Alfa
Overview
yHow does biofilm form? yTraditional vs N0n-traditional biofilm yBiofilm in Healthcare; What are the issues? ySummary All images in this presentation are from Google Free images unless stated otherwise Comparison: Traditional to Non-traditional BiofilmZhongW, Alfa M, Howie R, Zelenitksy S.
Simulation of cyclic reprocessing buildup on reused medical devices. Comput Biol Med 2009 Jun; 39(6): 568-577.
Biofilm in Healthcare
Wounds, Implants. Taps & SinksHigh touch surfacesMedical devices Protection of S. aureus by Bacillus biofilm resistant to PAA Bridier et al Biofilms of a Bacillus subtilis Hospital Isolate Protect Staphylococcus aureus from Biocide Action. PLoSONE 2012 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044506
Bacillus subtilis 168:
Genetic Stock Centre
JOINT BIOFILM
S.aureus (RED) &
B. subtilis-ND (GREEN)
Bacillus subtilis ND:
Isolated from AER
Take Home Messages:
Once biofilm is present:
other bacteria can integrate into it and be protected from disinfectant activity yPREVENT Biofilm formationNon-Traditional Biofilm in Healthcare
Alfa MJ et al A novel polytetrafluoroethylene-channel model, which simulates low levels of culturable bacteria in buildup biofilm after repeated endoscope reprocessing.Gastrointest Endosc 2017;86:442-51
Almtroudi et al A new dry-surface biofilm model: An essential tool for efficacy testing of hospital surface decontamination procedures. J Microbiological Methods 2015;117:171-176Build-up BiofilmDry-surface Biofilm
Build-up Biofilm in Endoscope Channels
yExpectation:Biofilm SHOULD NOT form inside
dryendoscope channels yReality:Build-up biofilm does form!
2004: Air/Water channel of GI
flexible endoscopes Pajkos et alJ Hosp Infect 2004;58:224-9
2014: SEM showed biofilm in:
-54.6% of 66 Biopsy channels -76.9% of 13 Air/water channelsRen-Pei W AJIC 2014; 42:1203-6
FDA Mandated Clinical study of Duodenoscope
contamination; Preliminary report April 2019FDA/CDC/ASM Duodenoscopeculture method: Feb 2018
(validated by manufacturers) yAssumption: rightafter HLD < 0.4% contamination yData to date (April 12, 21019 FDA report): -3.6% showed > 100 CFU low concern organisms -5.4% showed High concern organisms (E.coli, Pseudomonas etc) -BP to distal end; Flush-brush-flush -Elevator lever recess: Flush-brush-fllush -Neutralizer added -Concentration for culture (filtration method) instructions eliminate traditional biofilm?Alfa MJ, et al Simulated-use polytetrafluorethylene biofilm model: repeated rounds of complete reprocessing lead
to accumulation of organic debris and viable bacteria. ICHE 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.014
PTFE Biofilm Model (ISO 15883-2005 AnnexF)
yBiofilm allowed to form overnight in PTFE channel cleaning combined with liquid chemical sterilization (SS1E) yProcess repeated for 5 times (i.e. 5 consecutive days) yOptimal culture methodAlfa MJ, et al Simulated-use polytetrafluorethylene biofilm model: repeated rounds of complete reprocessing lead
to accumulation of organic debris and viable bacteria. ICHE 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.014
Five Repeated Rounds of Reprocessing
Test ConditionE.faecalis
Log10CFU/cm2P.aeruginosa
Log10CFU/cm2Protein
ug/cm21.Positive control
No cleaning
No AER
7.72 (0.09)9.10 (0.09)172.31
(13.30)2. Enzymatic Det.
Bristle brush,
AER: SS1E
< LD< LD4.60 (0.58)3. Enzymatic Det
Pull-through
AER: SS1E
< LD < LD2.13 (2.07)4.Non Enzymatic
Bristle brush
AER: SS1E
2.24 (0.00) 2.24 (0.00) 5.18 (1.50)5.Non Enzymatic
Pull-through
AER: SS1E
0.008 (0.08) 0.026 (0.44) 4.31 (3.14)Bristle brush
Pull-through cleaner
Enzymatic detergent
Non -Enzymatic detergentPositive ControlNo cleaning
Bristle brush Pull-through cleaner
Bristle brush Pull-through cleaner
Positive Control
Biofilm Removal: PTFE channels
yMIFU Cleaning:Friction and detergent affect ability of biofilm
bacteria to survive full reprocessing yChannel surface contact:Bristle brush not as effective as pull-through
cleaner. Debris in fully reprocessed patient-used Endoscope channelsOfstead et al AJIC 2017
Gradual accumulation of residual material
? Inadequate friction during cleaning on innerPTFE channel surface
Alfa et al GIE 2017
PTFE-BBF; Bristle brush
& flush with waterPatient-used Instrument channelsPTFE-BBF channel stored at room temperature
E.faecalis
P.aeruginosa
Alfa et al GIE 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.014Viable but non-culturable (VBNC) bacteria
Li et al Frontiers Microbiol2014
yVBNC bacteria: physical and chemical resistance due to reduced metabolic rate & strengthened cell wall yRevivability: varies for different bacteria yVariability of clinical culture results: -immediately after HLD AEno growth -after storage AEMicrobes grow on cultureTake Home Messages:
yEffective Cleaning is still an UNMET NEED for Endoscope channels: -Bristle brushes may leave traces of debris -No friction to clean smaller channels [ e.g. Air-water channel] yProlonged survival of VBNC inBuild-up Biofilm
Drying Endoscope channels for Storage
-all state endoscopes MUST be dried prior to storage. -ALL channels: alcohol flush & forced air drying2.Automated Endoscope Reprocessors (AER)
-many have alcohol flush and drying cycle (1 to 3 mins) -they do NOTclaim this sufficiently dries all channels sufficiently3.Endoscopy clinic staff:
-Widespread believe that AER cycle adequately dries endoscopes for storage. (SGNA 2015; AER cycle ±alcohol & drying)Inspect inner channel of endoscopes
Borescope use for endoscopes recommended by:
AAMI ST91 2015, AORN 2017, IAHCSSM 2017
Large Hospital system:
Visible fluid in 49%
channels site 1: 0% site 2: 85% site 3: 85% [Ofsteadet al AJIC 2018;45:e26-e33 doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2018.03.002]GastroscopeColonoscopeCystoscope
GastroscopeDuodenoscopeEUS Radial endoscope
Ambulatory Clinics: Visible Fluid in 95% Channels
[Ofsteadet al AJIC 2017;45:e26-e33 doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.10.017] After AER; alcohol flush, 6 min air flush & storage ONAutomated Air flush of channels
Channel-purge storage cabinets
Air-Time Channel dryer
Tri-Core Systems Inc
Automated vs Manual Drying:
Barakat et al GIE 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.033After AER alcohol flush
and 1 min air dryAfter AER alcohol flush
and 1 min air dry and;10 min manual dry
with forced airAfter AER alcohol flush
and 1 min air dry and;5 min DriScope drying
Virtually no retained fluid after 10 min DriScope drying Impact of Simethicone on fluid residuals AFTER full reprocessing & manual drying 10 minsBarakat et al GIE 2018.
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.012
Conclusions:
Simethicone is not removed
by MIFU cleaningSimethicone at 1% & 3%
impedes drying efficacy vs0.5% & water only
Impact on HLD or
sterilization is not knownInjected; working channel
not via water bottleTake Home Message:
Fluid & Simethicone residuals:
in instrument & Water jet channels (Ofstead 2016, 2018, van Stiphout 2016, Barakat 2018Moisture in channels:
allows bacterial replication AEBIOFILMDry channels:
NO bacterial replication
What can you do???
yWhat is the situation in your facility?? ySpecific Audit with Data: -Test: compliance of manual cleaning -Test: Dry Storage -Test: Culture of endoscopesquotesdbs_dbs48.pdfusesText_48[PDF] alfredo quinones md
[PDF] algebra pdf
[PDF] algebraic chess notation pdf
[PDF] algèbre 1 cours et 600 exercices corrigés pdf
[PDF] algebre 4
[PDF] algebre 5 sma pdf
[PDF] algebre exercices corrigés
[PDF] algebre exercices corrigés pdf
[PDF] alger avant 1962 photos
[PDF] alger bab el oued photos
[PDF] alger news
[PDF] algeria - wikipedia the free encyclopedia
[PDF] algeria wiki
[PDF] algeria wikipedia