Defense Planning: Guidance FY 1994-1999 April 16 1992
16 avr. 1992 EX 1994-1992 (U). (U) Th:s Defense Planning Guidance addresses the fundamentally new situation which has been created by the collapse of the ...
The following is an excerpt from the recent Department of Defense
8 mars 1992 release of the February 18 1992 draft Defense Planning Guidance that was leaked to The New York Times. Readers can see the excerpts.
Untitled
SUBJECT: FY 94-99 Defense Planning Guidance Sections for Comment (U) '18 FEB 1992 ... Assistant Secretary of Defense (Reserve Affairs).
Defense Planning: Guidance FY 1994-1999 April 16
https://www.archives.gov/files/declassification/iscap/pdf/2008-003-doc1.pdf
NATIONAL MILITARY STRATEGY UNITED STATES
Publication Date: Jan 01 1992 It implements the Defense Agenda of ... the Defense Planning Guidance and in the Annual Report to the President and the.
Extracts from the February 18 1992 Defense Planning Guidance
26 mars 1992 MEMORANDUM FOR MR. LIBBY. SOBJECT: Extracts from 18 Feb 92 DPG Draft. Attached are two sets of extracts from the 18 February 1992.
Approval Draft of the Defense Planning Guidance-Action
May 5 1992. POI.'CY. MEMORA."lDUM FOR SECRETARY OF DE.FENSE. DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE. SUBJECT: Defense Planning Guidance -- Major Comments Received(U).
1994-1999 Defense Planning Guidance [Draft] May 02
https://www.archives.gov/files/declassification/iscap/pdf/2008-003-doc13.pdf
New Policy Directions Noted in Draft Defense Planning Guidance
Noted in Draft Defense Planninq Guidance. Policy and Strategy Section. • Preclude hostile nondemocratic domination of regions [Europe
MEMO FOR j?-t/: L 1'6i7
SUBJ£CT ;?(7?7" Mr I, DECLASSIFIED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE INTERAGENCY
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION APPEALS PANEL.
E.O. 13526, SECTION 5.3(b)(3) ,.
ISCAP No.
, document 4 us 24 H92
New Policy Directions
Noted in Draft Defense Planninq Guidance
Policy and Strategy Section
Preclude hostile, nondemocratic domination of regions [Europe, East Asia. and the Persian Gulf] critical to our interests, and thereby strengthen the barriers against the reemergence of a global (pp.3 and 12; see also pp.19, 31, and 39) . Lead to a security community that extends to all peace-loving nations, including the new democracies of Eastern Europe and a ? democratic Russia, Ukraine, and other democracies of the former Soviet Union (p.3i see also pp.7, 32 and 33).
It is not in our interest:pr those of tbe otber democracies to return to earlier periods in which multiple military powers balanced one another off in what passed for security structures, while regional, or even global peace hung in the balance (p.B). The demise of the Soviet Union and the increasing strength of our allies permit us to define our regional interests selectively and to safeguard those interests in separate regional contexts and at lower resource levels (p.ll). : A future President will need to have options t:hat will allow him to leaQ or, where prudent and practical, to act to protect critical interests even in cases where very few others are with us. We must plan sufficient forces and programs within current fiscal constraints to provide such options.... (p .12) . A critical task will be to begin preparing for tomorrow's [core) competencies, while gaining an appreciation of those we need no longer emphasize (p.l?). • U.S. forces must continue to be at least a generation ahead in those technologies wbich will be decisive on future battlefields. Future generations must have-.at least the same qualitative advantages over their opponents as our forces did in the Gulf War II ,. ________ • _____ • .(p. 18) . • Our strategic nuclear forces .. ,provide an important deterrent (p. 18) . . hedge against the possibility of an unforeseen global threat (p.20) _ BSeiU!'P;uepeaM
We must. ...examine more innovative ways Of providlng strategic det.er_:. :..__! _'!,f_ __ I c;at J'J,ll _ _ ................................................ _.,... .. -_ ..................................
I I Further, we should find methods of being more effective by-ioing-to lower alert levels fot some portions of the forcE: ... (p.21). [We must explore] _w..a,Y§ _ .-...................... (p. 24.). .. .................................................................. .. _---------- • Our forces must remain able to respond rapidly to a second major. regional crisis or to expand an initial crisis deployment in the event of escalation ... (p.27) . (First time specific guidance on second major regional contingency to be given in unclassified context. ) I <.. "r. ..
I - 1 I • Reconstitution now focuses on a 7-8 year warning time, and drops the focus but still notes the valuable »hedg1ng" opportun1ties now aval1able (p.30). 1, DECLASSIFIED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE INTERAGENCY
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION APPEALS PANEL.
E.O. 13526, SECTION 5.3(b)(3) ,.
ISCAP No.
, document 4 us24 H92
New Policy Directions
Noted in Draft Defense Planninq Guidance
Policy and Strategy Section
Preclude hostile, nondemocratic domination of regions [Europe, East Asia. and the Persian Gulf] critical to our interests, and thereby strengthen the barriers against the reemergence of a global (pp.3 and 12; see also pp.19, 31, and 39) . Lead to a security community that extends to all peace-loving nations, including the new democracies of Eastern Europe and a ? democratic Russia, Ukraine, and other democracies of the formerSoviet Union (p.3i see also pp.7, 32 and 33).
It is not in our interest:pr those of tbe otber democracies to return to earlier periods in which multiple military powers balanced one another off in what passed for security structures, while regional, or even global peace hung in the balance (p.B). The demise of the Soviet Union and the increasing strength of our allies permit us to define our regional interests selectively and to safeguard those interests in separate regional contexts and at lower resource levels (p.ll). : A future President will need to have options t:hat will allow him to leaQ or, where prudent and practical, to act to protect critical interests even in cases where very few others are with us. We must plan sufficient forces and programs within current fiscal constraints to provide such options.... (p .12) . A critical task will be to begin preparing for tomorrow's [core) competencies, while gaining an appreciation of those we need no longer emphasize (p.l?). • U.S. forces must continue to be at least a generation ahead in those technologies wbich will be decisive on future battlefields. Future generations must have-.at least the same qualitative advantages over their opponents as our forces did in the Gulf War II ,. ________ • _____ • .(p. 18) . • Our strategic nuclear forces .. ,provide an important deterrent (p. 18) . . hedge against the possibility of an unforeseen global threat (p.20) _BSeiU!'P;uepeaM
We must. ...examine more innovative ways Of providlng strategic det.er_:. :..__! _'!,f_ __I c;at J'J,ll _ _ ................................................ _.,... .. -_ ..................................
I I Further, we should find methods of being more effective by-ioing-to lower alert levels fot some portions of the forcE: ... (p.21). [We must explore] _w..a,Y§ _ .-...................... (p. 24.). .. .................................................................. .. _---------- • Our forces must remain able to respond rapidly to a second major. regional crisis or to expand an initial crisis deployment in the event of escalation ... (p.27) . (First time specific guidance on second major regional contingency to be given in unclassified context. )1------------------I
• Our ha ...enge.'-__________________ ! lS to malntaln our collect1ve to defend against an aggressive regime in such way that we do not disrupt future cooperation with a democratic state or weaken the chances of successful reform (p.33). Our policy should encourage the broadening of European institutions to include the aemocracies of Eastern Europe (p.35) • I I I I1 ____ -••• -•• __ 1
S!!eM!/lforOP:M •• CLOSE !!OLO
_______________________8Bea!l!jUep6ftlf etJe!l! 1I6tJB
1While continuing also have
the In enforce the .. _____________ .. __ .. provlde II. ____ .! wl.th modernl.zed armaments to be used in its defense (p.3?).SectiQD
Strategic forces guidance requires and addendum to the ServicePOMs detailing the changes that would be required
accepts PNI II proposals (p.2). Forward presence guidance adjusts the levels approved last summer to retain more robust CentCom presence, and requires a of naval presence requirements (pp.4-5; and p.3) Prepositioning guidance requires Army to retain another brigades of ... recorrunended by .. ______ .. _____ .. _. __ .-. _..... _______________ .. __ .1 guidance requires, for each of the two most demanding Major Regional _S....,_.J.! .. ..at-2 oriented" munitions to kill t. __ • __ ......................................_.. t _______________________I "level of effort" sustainmenOf operations (p.10). Reconstitution guidance sets levels of reconstitution capability for the Services to provide at low cost through equipment stockpiles or production capability (pp.22-23). Prepdred by: Andr@w Hoehn and Rod fabrycxy. xiS41BSEGU!/nOPORN CzOBE HO!:;I:')
quotesdbs_dbs12.pdfusesText_18[PDF] defile du 14 juillet 1919
[PDF] defilé du 30 juin 2010 rdc
[PDF] défilé militaire 14 juillet 1989
[PDF] define r5
[PDF] definicion de auditoria de gestion segun autores
[PDF] definicion de las nociones bac
[PDF] definicion de mision vision y objetivos pdf
[PDF] definicion de mision y vision en administracion
[PDF] definicion de vision pdf
[PDF] definicion de vision segun autores
[PDF] definicion lugares y formas de poder
[PDF] définir l'équivalence d'un titrage
[PDF] definition adn
[PDF] définition arts plastiques collège