Global Financial Crisis: How was India Impacted
The sudden withdrawal of FIIs from the Indian stock market brought about a tumble from end-April 2008 to November 2008 by about 20 per cent (Chart 4).
The Stock Market Crash of 2008 Caused the Great Recession
This paper argues that the stock market crash of 2008 triggered by a collapse in house prices
The information content of option prices during the financial crisis
See the box entitled “Abnormal volatility in stock markets”. 6. Monthly Bulletin
The impact of the global economic and financial crisis on central
On this issue see inter alia Égert and Martin (2008)
Some lessons from the financial crisis for the economic analysis
reinforcing the negative dynamics associated with increased perceptions of risk and higher. Chart 1 Financial market spreads. (in basis points).
2008 Commodities Bubble 090204
4 févr. 2009 bubble and financial crisis making them much worse and ... Chart 6 shows the price of crude oil graphed against Index Speculators? ...
Precautionary Savings in the Great Recession - Ashoka Mody
Consistent with the model investment risk—measured by the volatility of the stock market—does not have a significant impact on the saving rate. 3 The question
Rise and Fall of the KLCI Index (1984 - 2014)
Black Monday refers to Monday October 19
WHY DID THE CHINESE STOCK MARKET PERFORM SO BADLY
22 janv. 2009 bubble after the US financial crisis took shape in late 2007. ... Dismal Performance of the Shanghai Stock Exchange in 2008.
Monthly Labor Review: Employment in financial activities: double
12 avr. 2011 The housing market crash followed by the financial crisis ... (See chart 1.) In stark ... sharply in September 2008
![Some lessons from the financial crisis for the economic analysis Some lessons from the financial crisis for the economic analysis](https://pdfprof.com/Listes/27/19546-27ecbocp130.pdf.pdf.jpg)
OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES
NO 130 / OCTOBER 2011
by Geoff Kenny and Julian MorganSOME LESSONS
FROM THE FINANCIAL
CRISIS FOR THE
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES
NO 130 / OCTOBER 2011
by Geoff Kenny and Julian MorganSOME LESSONSFROM THE FINANCIAL
CRISIS FOR THE
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
11 This paper has benefited from discussions with a large number of colleagues within the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Eurosystem.
We have received substantial contributions and input from ECB staff in DG-Economics, DG-Research and DG-Statistics, especially K. Christoffel,
M. Ciccarelli, G. De Bondt, S. Dees, F. Fornari, E. Hahn, K. Hubrich, M. Lenza, L. Maurin, A. Meyler, F. Skudelny and O. Tristani. We would
H. Pill and F. Smets for their comments. This paper has further benefited from the contributions of C. Marchini, F. Masera,
L. Kezbere and M. Santoianni. In addition, some very helpful comments were received from members of the
Monetary Policy Committee of the European System of Central Banks and its Working Group on Forecasting at the seminars on this topic held in 2010. Please note that the views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the ECB. This paper can be downloaded without charge from http://www.ecb.europa.eu or from the Social ScienceResearch Network electronic library at http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=1791644.NOTE: This Occasional Paper should not be reported as representing
the views of the European Central Bank (ECB).The views expressed are those of the authors
and do not necessarily reflect those of the ECB. In 2011 all ECBpublicationsfeature a motiftaken fromthe €100 banknote.© European Central Bank, 2011
Address
Kaiserstrasse 29
60311 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Postal address
Postfach 16 03 19
60066 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Telephone
+49 69 1344 0Internet
http://www.ecb.europa.eu Fax +49 69 1344 6000All rights reserved.
Any reproduction, publication and
reprint in the form of a different publication, whether printed or produced electronically, in whole or in part, is permitted only with the explicit written authorisation of the ECB or the authors.Information on all of the papers
published in the ECB Occasional PaperSeries can be found on the ECB's
website, http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/ scientific/ops/date/html/index.en.html.Unless otherwise indicated, hard copies
can be obtained or subscribed to free of charge, stock permitting, by contacting info@ecb.europa.euISSN 1607-1484 (print)
ISSN 1725-6534 (online)
3 ECBOccasional Paper No 130
October 2011
CONTENTS
ABSTRACT 4
NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY 5
1 INTRODUCTION 6
2 UNDERSTANDING THE KEY DRIVERS
OF THE CRISIS 8
3 HOW DID THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
FARE DURING THE CRISIS?
123.1 The near-term outlook 12
3.2 Medium-term projections 13
3.3 Analysis of uncertainty
and risks 153.4 Macroeconomic models 17
4 THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT:
WHAT SHOULD WE HAVE PAID
MORE ATTENTION TO? 19
4.1 Financial factors 19
4.2 Non-linearities 20
4.3 Confi dence, expectations
and uncertainty 204.4 Judgement 22
4.5 International linkages 23
5 WHAT IS THE WAY FORWARD? 24
5.1 Extend existing tools
and develop new ones 245.2 Develop ways to better
handle complexity 245.3 Develop further the risk analysis 25
6 CONCLUSIONS 26
REFERENCES 27
CONTENTS
4 ECBOccasional Paper No 130
October 2011
ABSTRACT
The economics profession in general, and
economic forecasters in particular, have faced some understandable criticism for their failure to predict the timing and severity of the recent economic crisis. In this paper, we offer some assessment of the performance of the EconomicAnalysis conducted at the ECB both in the run up
to and since the onset of the crisis. Drawing on this assessment, we then offer some indications of how the analysis of economic developments could be improved looking forward. The key priorities identifi ed include the need to: i) extend existing tools and/or develop new tools to account for important feedback mechanisms, for instance, improved real-fi nancial linkages and non-linear dynamics; ii) develop ways to handle the complexity arising from the presence of multiple models and alternative economic paradigms; and iii) given the limitations of point forecasts, to further develop risk and scenario analysis around baseline projections.KEY WORDS: EURO AREA, FINANCIAL
CRISIS, MACRO ECONOMIC FORECASTING
JEL CLASSIFICATION: E02, E30, E2, C53
5 ECBOccasional Paper No 130
October 2011
NON-TECHNICAL
SUMMARYNON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY
This paper draws on the experiences during
the run up to, and since the onset of, the recent fi nancial crisis to offer some indications of how the analysis of economic developments could be improved. In the fi rst section, the paper recalls the key economic and fi nancial drivers of the crisis, highlighting the role of fi nancial shocks linked to the re-pricing of risk, asset prices and fi nancing costs. A number of important non-fi nancial elements are also emphasised, such as confi dence and uncertainty shocks and deepening international linkages.In Section 2, the predictive failure of
macroeconomic tools and expert judgement widely shared by institutional and private forecasters alike (as refl ected in the macroeconomic projections in specifi c periods strongly impacted by the crisis) is documented for both short and medium-term horizons.One of the main conclusions to be drawn from
the analysis here is that the errors made by forecasters largely relate to the size of the shocks impacting the economy. Nevertheless, economic tools and models as well as expert judgement also failed to identify the importance and strength of key transmission and amplifi cation channels, especially those linked to fi nancial markets and uncertainty.Hence, the third section of our paper identifi es
a number of factors which, with the benefi t of hindsight, could have received more attention from those conducting economic analysis during the period of crisis. These include the leading indicator properties of various fi nancial variables, the prevalence of the non- linear dynamics often neglected in economic tools and the signalling aspect of confi dence and uncertainty indicators. In addition, there would appear to be a case for relying more on judgement than on the results of mechanical tools, particularly in the immediate aftermath of unprecedented events (such as the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008). Lastly, in the fi nal section of the paper, we identify a possible way forward, particularly in respect of the main priorities for developing the economic analysis. The key priorities identifi ed include the need to: i) extend existing tools and/ or develop new tools to account for important aspects, for instance, improved real-fi nancial linkages and non-linear dynamics; ii) develop ways to handle the complexity arising from the presence of multiple models and alternative economic paradigms; and iii) given the limitations of point forecasts, to further develop risk and scenario analysis around baseline projections. 6 ECBOccasional Paper No 130
October 2011
1 INTRODUCTION
Economists, both those inside and outside
policy institutions, pay considerable attention to analysing conjunctural economic developments.This helps them to better understand the current
state of the economy and to make predictions about future developments. The analysis of economic developments forms a key element of the stability-oriented monetary policy strategy of the European Central Bank (ECB) aimed at achieving price stability. 1More specifi cally,
the economic analysis provides a forward- looking perspective on the outlook for and risks to price stability over the short to medium-term and therefore complements, and can be cross- checked with, an analysis of monetary developments that is particularly suited to explaining the evolution of price developments in the medium to long run. 2In this paper, we focus on the approaches
adopted for analysing the economic conjuncture and attempt to draw out some key lessons from the experiences made during the fi nancial crisis. Although we concentrate on the methods widely used in central banks and international organisations, the conclusions reached are also likely to be relevant for all those engaged in conjunctural analysis.In contrast to monetary analysis, economic
analysis can be characterised as focusing largely on models that are based on an assessment of economic variables and, in particular, the interplay between demand and supply in goods and labour markets. In the context of the ECB, an important part of the insights emerging from the economic analysis is summarised in the regular macroeconomic projections ofEurosystem and ECB staff which are published
each year in June and December and in March and September, respectively.The economic analysis also incorporates
fi nancial information to the extent that it is relevant for this assessment. Needless to say, such information proved to be a key part of the economic analysis during the crisis, where there was a clear tendency for fi nancial shocks to have an impact on the "real" demand and supply for goods and services and also for additional feedback effects from developments in the real economy to the fi nancial sector.Given the important challenges posed by the
fi nancial crisis to the economic analysis, it now seems timely to take a step back and try to assess what possible insight can be gleaned from the performance of the economic analysis during the run-up to and since the onset of the crisis, and to already offer some indications as to how it may be improved in the light of our recent experience.The paper is structured as follows. In the fi rst
section, we recall the key economic and fi nancial drivers of the crisis, highlighting the role of fi nancial shocks linked to risk re-pricing, asset prices and fi nancing costs for both fi rms and households. In addition, a number of important non-fi nancial elements are also emphasised, such as confi dence and uncertainty shocks, inventory adjustment as well as more intensive international linkages generated via trade.In Section 2, the poor performance of
macroeconomic tools and expert judgement, as refl ected in the macroeconomic projections of the crisis period, is documented for both short and medium-term horizons. More importantly, we note that the large deterioration in the accuracy of macroeconomic forecasts was This two-pillar approach has proved very successful, both as 1 a device for processing and introducing a large set of complex and diverse information and for structuring the presentation of the factors underpinning the monetary policy decisions of the Governing Council. In particular, the information extracted from the two pillars is regularly presented to the public at the press conference that immediately follows the meeting in which the Governing Council takes its monetary policy decision for the euro area. It is also subsequently explained in the Monthly Bulletin of the ECB. Given the possibility of differing and even confl icting messages emerging from the analysis based on these pillars, a careful cross-checking of monetary and economic developments ensures the robustness of the analysis behind monetary policy decisions. In a recent contribution, Papademos and Stark (2010) consider 2 the possible enhancement of the monetary analysis while drawing on the lessons learnt from the fi nancial crisis of 2007-10. For the rapidly expanding fi eld of fi nancial stability analysis, Trichet (2011) discusses the intellectual challenges ahead. 7 ECBOccasional Paper No 130
October 2011
1 INTRODUCTION
widely shared by institutional and private sector forecasters alike, including the ECB and theEurosystem. One of the main conclusions to be
drawn from the analysis here is that the errors made by forecasters largely relate to the large size of the shocks impacting the economy.quotesdbs_dbs31.pdfusesText_37[PDF] 2008 recession unemployment
[PDF] 2008 recession unemployment rate
[PDF] 2008 recession unemployment rate usa
[PDF] 2008 voter turnout demographics
[PDF] 2009 chevrolet silverado stabilitrak problems
[PDF] 2009 chevy silverado 1500 towing capacity
[PDF] 2009 chevy silverado 2500 towing capacity
[PDF] 2009 chevy silverado cost
[PDF] 2009 chevy silverado driver information center
[PDF] 2009 chevy silverado for sale craigslist
[PDF] 2009 chevy silverado headlights and taillights
[PDF] 2009 chevy silverado z71 for sale
[PDF] 2009 flu pandemic country of origin
[PDF] 2009 flu pandemic deaths by country