[PDF] ESEF Reporting Manual example revenue for a period





Previous PDF Next PDF



Les comparatifs et les superlatifs.pdf

Le comparatif est un groupe de mots formé à partir d'un adverbe de quantité. (plus moins



Comité international des études créoles Vol. XXXVII n°1 & 2 - 2019

En français les comparatifs d'égalité sont aussi et autant



Les comparatifs dinégalité en mauricien

12 mars 2021 ... examples as well as on more formal experimental data. Keywords: Mauritian Creole adverbs



Les degrés de ladjectif

superlatif. Le comparatif. Le comparatif est formé de l'adjectif précédé de l'un des adverbes suivants : plus moins aussi. Il y a trois types de comparatifs :.



1.8. Budgets comparatifs. Comment comparer différentes offres

Par conséquent la comparaison est réalisée au niveau de la partie et pas de la décomposition unitaire. En créant un nouveau budget comparatif



LES COMPARATIFS ET LES SUPERLATIFS

22 nov. 2014 LES COMPARATIFS ET LES SUPERLATIFS. Comparaison des qualités. (adjectifs et adverbes). Comparaison des quantités. (noms et verbes) plus … que ...



SEQUENCE : Be the change !

PR : le comparatif en anglais. Activity 3 : Pick adjectives to compare the 3 islands. Ex : City n°3 is greener than city n°1 because there are a lot of 



LE COMPARATIF

En Anglais le comparatif s'exprime différemment selon la taille de l'adjectif. Pour les adjectifs courts (c'est-à-dire les adjectifs d'une syllabe) : • 



Comparaison de cinq indices alimentaires utilises dans lanalyse

New prey classification : example of Diplodus sargus. • « Valeurs seuils » — Proies a = 3 0 % ; b = 19 % ; c = 10 % ; d = 2 %. Les deux premières proies 



Les comparatifs et les superlatifs.pdf

Le comparatif est un groupe de mots formé à partir d'un adverbe de quantité. (plus moins



LES COMPARATIFS ET LES SUPERLATIFS

LES COMPARATIFS ET LES SUPERLATIFS. Comparaison des qualités. (adjectifs et adverbes). Comparaison des quantités. (noms et verbes).



S0ME MUTILATED ROOTS IN ETHIOPIC n reviewing 1) Marcel

n reviewing 1) Marcel Cohen's Essai comparatif SW le vocabdaire et la @iodtipe The cited examples of Gurage un “stone” and of s24t. “eight” (ib.) ...



ESEF Reporting Manual

example revenue for a period might be reported along with a business financial statements because doing so would



SEQUENCE : Be the change !

Le comparatif. Supports. ? Manuel numérique Piece of Cake 4ème + Workbook (pour certaines activités). PROPOSITIONS pour la réalisation du PROJET FINAL.



Étude sur le résumé comparatif grâce aux plongements de mots 1

8 de jun. de 2020 Le résumé comparatif d'actualités cherche ainsi à comparer une paire de ... In Berlin for example



Exemples de plans comparatifs

plans comparatifs. Le plan comparatif appartient au type du plan par confrontation. Il est constitué de trois parties. Les deux premières explorent deux 



Comparatif des aides à la protection contre les aléas climatiques

-. Promouvoir l'évolution vers des systèmes plus résilients et aptes à atténuer le changement climatique. -. Financer les investissements indispensables pour 



Révisions – Le comparatif de supériorité

Le superlatif sert à dire qu'une personne/une chose est « le plus » b) Il se forme : - Pour les adjectifs d'une seule syllabe en ajoutant la terminaison ...



comparative advantage of the eastern and central africa in the coffee

Les résultats empiriques ont montre que tous les pays membres de la CAE présentent un certain avantage comparatif dans ce secteur café avec le Kenya et l'Uganda 



[PDF] LES COMPARATIFS ET LES SUPERLATIFS - école de français

22 nov 2014 · LES COMPARATIFS ET LES SUPERLATIFS Comparaison des qualités (adjectifs et adverbes) Comparaison des quantités (noms et verbes)



[PDF] Les comparatifs et les superlatifspdf

Les comparatifs de l'adjectif et de l'adverbe se forment de la même façon: NEL supériorité: plus + adjectif / adverbe + égalité: aussi + adjectif/ adverbe +



[PDF] Comparatifs - CCDMD

Le superlatif relatif exprime avec comparaison le plus haut degré de supériorité ou d'infériorité généralement avec plus et moins précédés d'un déterminant 



[PDF] Exemples de plans comparatifs - CCDMD

Voici deux exemples de plans comparatifs établis pour structurer une argumentation sur le sujet suivant : SUJET : La chevelure engendre des effets qui se 



[PDF] Reconnaître et utiliser le comparatif et le superlatif

23 nov 2010 · 1 – Tu es sans doute capable de reconnaître les comparatifs et superlatifs Exemples : plus lumineux aussi lentement le moins lourd 



[PDF] Fiche de grammaire n° 1 La comparaison

Les adjectifs « bon » et « mauvais » et l'adverbe « bien » se comportent de la même manière qu'avec le comparatif Quelques exemples : a) Jeanne est la 



Cours de français : la comparaison cours pdf

- un verbe: Je lis plus que mes frères Comparatif de supériorité Exemples Plus



[PDF] Jai besoin de faire comparer des éléments 1 Quel besoin pour le

doublement de la consonne finale d'adjectifs mis au comparatif ou superlatif ; Exemples de sélection par rapport au besoin de production



Le comparatif et le superlatif en français - Grammaire - Babla

La comparaison peut porter sur un adjectif un adverbe un nom ou une proposition Comparatif de supériorité Le comparatif de supériorité se forme avec plus

  • Quels sont les types de comparatif ?

    Le comparatif est le premier degré de comparaison. On le construit avec les formules aussi … que (comparatif d'égalité), plus … que (comparatif de supériorité) ou moins … que (comparatif d'infériorité). L'adjectif s'accorde normalement en genre et en nombre avec le nom auquel il se rapporte.
  • Comment faire des phrases au comparatif ?

    Il existe :

    1le comparatif de supériorité (plus) ex : Mon frère est plus grand que moi.2le comparatif d'égalité (aussi) ex : Notre voiture est aussi confortable que la tienne.3le comparatif d'infériorité (moins) ex : Ses cheveux sont moins longs qu'autrefois.
  • Quand utilise le comparatif ?

    Le comparatif permet de rendre compte de : La supériorité : Léo est plus consciencieux qu'Adèle. L'infériorité : Il est moins rigoureux que Marine. L'égalité : Il est aussi rapide que les deux.
  • Degré de comparaison de l'adjectif ou de l'adverbe exprimant une qualité à un degré égal, supérieur ou inférieur soit à une autre qualité, soit à la même qualité considérée chez un autre. (On distingue les comparatifs d'égalité [aussi grand], d'infériorité[moins grand], de supériorité [plus grand].

912 July 20210 | ESMA32-60-254rev

ESEF Reporting Manual

Preparation of Annual Financial Reports in Inline XBRLESEF format 2

1 Table of Contents

I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3

II. Summary table of updates ................................................................................................ 54

III. Glossary ...................................................................................................................... 108

IV. Guidance ................................................................................................................... 1412

1 Guidance for issuers ..................................................................................................... 1412

1.1 Use of languages ................................................................................................... 1412

1.2 Use of elements that are available in the IFRS Taxonomy but are not included in the

ESEF taxonomy ................................................................................................................ 1412

1.3 Selection of appropriate elements to mark up disclosures ................................... 1513

1.4 Anchoring ............................................................................................................... 1714

1.5 Use of line items or domain members................................................................... 1815

1.6 Use of positive and negative values (signage) ..................................................... 1916

1.7 Units of measure.................................................................................................... 2017

1.8 Footnotes ............................................................................................................... 2017

2 Guidance for software firms to ensure technical validity .............................................. 2118

2.1 Contexts ................................................................................................................. 2118

2.2 Facts ...................................................................................................................... 2320

2.3 Footnotes ............................................................................................................... 2522

2.4 Restrictions on Inline XBRL and other constructs ................................................ 2622

2.5 Other content of Inline XBRL documents .............................................................. 2824

2.6 Report packages.................................................................................................... 3128

2.7 Technical validity of reports ................................................................................... 3329

3 Technical guidance for issuers and software firms on extension taxonomies and other

topics .................................................................................................................................... 3429

3.1 Extension taxonomy .............................................................................................. 3429

3.2 Extension taxonomy elements .............................................................................. 3631

3.3 Extension taxonomy anchoring ............................................................................. 3833

3.4 Extension taxonomy linkbases .............................................................................. 4136

3.5 Other issues ........................................................................................................... 4741

I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3

II. Summary table of updates ................................................................................................ 54

III. Glossary ...................................................................................................................... 109

3

IV. Guidance ................................................................................................................... 1413

2 Guidance for issuers ..................................................................................................... 1413

2.1 Use of languages ................................................................................................... 1413

2.2 Use of elements that are available in the IFRS Taxonomy but are not included in the

ESEF taxonomy ................................................................................................................ 1413

2.3 Selection of appropriate elements to mark up disclosures ................................... 1514

2.4 Anchoring ............................................................................................................... 1716

2.5 Use of line items or domain members................................................................... 1817

2.6 Use of positive and negative values (signage) ..................................................... 1918

2.7 Units of measure.................................................................................................... 2019

2.8 Footnotes ............................................................................................................... 2019

3 Guidance for software firms to ensure technical validity .............................................. 2120

3.1 Contexts ................................................................................................................. 2120

3.2 Facts ...................................................................................................................... 2322

3.3 Footnotes ............................................................................................................... 2524

3.4 Restrictions on Inline XBRL and other constructs ................................................ 2625

3.5 Other content of Inline XBRL documents .............................................................. 2826

3.6 Report packages.................................................................................................... 3130

3.7 Technical validity of reports ................................................................................... 3331

4 Technical guidance for issuers and software firms on extension taxonomies and other

topics .................................................................................................................................... 3432

4.1 Extension taxonomy .............................................................................................. 3432

4.2 Extension taxonomy elements .............................................................................. 3635

4.3 Extension taxonomy anchoring ............................................................................. 3836

4.4 Extension taxonomy linkbases .............................................................................. 4139

4.5 Other issues ........................................................................................................... 4745

5 Guidance for preparers of ESEF reports not subject to tagging obligations ............... 4745

4.1 Additional guidance for XHTML stand-alone files ...................................................... 4745

I. Introduction

[Last updated: July 20202021]

Background

4

1. The RTS on ESEF1 specifies that all issuers subject to the requirements contained in the

Transparency Directive to make public Annual Financial Reports shall prepare annual financial reports in the Extensible Hypertext Markup Language (XHTML) format. Where the issuer prepares IFRS consolidated financial statements, it shall mark up these IFRS consolidated financial statements using the XBRL markup language. The markups shall be embedded in the XHTML document version of the annual financial report using the Inline

XBRL format.

Purpose

2. This document has been produced by ESMA to assist issuers and software vendors in

creating Inline XBRLESEF documents that are compliant with the RTS on ESEF. It provides guidance on common issues that may be encountered when creating Inline XBRLESEF documents and explains how to resolve them. The purpose of this document is to promote a harmonised and consistent approach for the preparation of annual financial reports in the format specified in the RTS on ESEF.

3. The content of this document is aimed at issuers who are required to prepare annual

financial reports in Inline XBRLESEF format in accordance with Article 4(7) of the Transparency Directive (TD)2 and the RTS on ESEF, and at software firms developing software used for the preparation of annual financial reports in Inline XBRL. The aim of the guidelines defined in this document is to facilitate the analysis and comparison of the XBRL data contained in Inline XBRL documents by investors and other users. In particular, this document provides guidance on the expected syntax and structure of Inline XBRL documents and XBRL extension taxonomies. This document contains parts that are of a highly technical nature, especially sections IV.2 and IV.3. These sections are intended for a technical audience and assume that the reader has a working knowledge of the XBRL 2.1, XBRL Dimensions 1.0, Inline XBRL 1.1 and other XBRL specifications3, is familiar with the IFRS Taxonomy and has a basic understanding of XML, Namespaces and

XML Schema.

4. This document is fully aligned with the technical rules and constraints defined in the

referenced XBRL technical specifications. Some guidelines may however be more restrictive and precise to address the specifics of the ESEF format. Therefore, this Manual contains some additional validation rules that ESMA recommends for software vendors to implement within their solutions used to produce ESEF inline XBRL reports. In case no specific guidance is provided in this Manual, XBRL specifications must be followed. Furthermore, if any aspect or mechanism covered by the XBRL specifications is not

1 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 of 17 December 2018 supplementing Directive 2004/109/EC of the

European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on the specification of a single electronic

reporting format

2 Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmonisation of

transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated

market and amending Directive 2001/34/EC, as amended by Directive 2013/50/EU

3 https://specifications.xbrl.org/

5 specifically mentioned in this Manual, it does not mean that such aspect or mechanism cannot be used in the ESEF inline XBRL report.

5. Each guidance item presented in this document is provided with an indication of criticality.

consumption and comparability of an ESEF inline XBRL document. Items marked as do not generally impact the overall usability of an ESEF file, although this may need to be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

5.6. The content of this document is not exhaustive and it does not constitute new policy.

This document is intended to be continually edited and updated as and when the need to do so arises.

Providing feedback on the Reporting Manual

6.7. Stakeholders wishing to provide feedback or raise questions / concerns with regards to

the content of the ESEF Reporting Manual or any of the materials published by ESMA on ESEF are invited to direct such queries to the ESEF support mailbox: esef@esma.europa.eu. Depending on the nature of such queries, ESMA will assess whether it is relevant and/or necessary to provide further clarity or guidance to the public and whether a further revision of the Reporting Manual and/or to other ESEF-related material is deemed appropriate.

II. Summary table of updates

[Last updated: July 20202021]

Guidance

number / section

Topic of the Question Last update

Glossary July 2020

Guidance 1.1.1 Language of labels December 2017

Guidance 1.1.2 Multi-language reports July 2021 [new] Guidance 1.2.1 Issuers incorporated in third countries that apply IFRS standards or interpretations that are not yet adopted in the EU

July 2019

Guidance 1.2.2 Use of elements available in the IFRS Taxonomy that were not yet included in the ESEF taxonomy

July 2020

6 Guidance 1.3.1 Use of labels to select appropriate elements

December

2017July 2021

Guidance 1.3.2 Markup of disclosures if the ESEF taxonomy only contains an element that is wider in scope or meaning

December 2017

Guidance 1.3.3

Markup of notes to financial statements Tagging

elements of Table 1 and 2 of Annex II

July 20202021

Guidance 1.4.1 Anchoring of extension elements to elements in the

ESEF taxonomy that are wider in scope or meaning

July 2019

Guidance 1.4.2 Anchoring of extension elements that are combinations

July 20192021

Guidance 1.5.1 Determination of whether a disclosure should be marked up with a line item or a domain member

July 20202021

Guidance 1.6.1 Use of positive and negative values July 20192021 Guidance 1.7.1 Use of standard units of measure July 2019

Guidance 1.8.1 Marking up footnotes July 2019

Guidance 2.1.1 Use of the LEI to identify the issuer July 20192021 Guidance 2.1.2 Formatting of the period element in the context of the Inline XBRL document

July 2019

Guidance 2.1.3 Use of segment and scenario containers in the context elements of Inline XBRL documents

July 20192021

Guidance 2.1.4 The Inline XBRL document shouldshall only contain data of the issuer

July 20192021

Guidance 2.2.1 Attributes to define the accuracy of numeric facts July 20192021 Guidance 2.2.2 Representation of rates, percentages and ratios July 2019 Guidance 2.2.3 Transformation of facts July 20202021

Guidance 2.2.4 Facts duplication July 2019

Guidance 2.3.1 Appropriate use of XBRL footnotes in the reports July 20202021 7 Guidance 2.4.1 Inline XBRL constructs that shouldshall be avoided July 20202021 Guidance 2.4.2 Other constructs that shouldshall be avoided July 20192021 Guidance 2.5.1 Inclusion of other content other than XHTML and

XBRL in the Inline XBRL document

July 20202021

Guidance 2.5.2 Indication of the language used in textual mark ups July 2019 Guidance 2.5.3 Use of more than one target XBRL document for an Inline XBRL Document Set (IXDS)

July 2020

Guidance 2.5.4 Use of the Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) language to style Inline XBRL documents

July 20202021

Guidance 2.5.5 Application of ix:continuation and ix:exclude elements

July 2019

Guidance 2.6.1 Including Inline XBRL document in taxonomy packages

July 20202021

Guidance 2.6.2 Including multi-html Inline XBRL documents and multiple Inline XBRL document sets in taxonomy packages

July 2019 2021

Guidance 2.6.3 Naming convention for report packages July 20202021 Guidance 2.7.1 Ensuring report validity against XBRL specifications

July 2020

Guidance 3.1.1 Required components of extension taxonomies and reference to the taxonomy files prepared by ESMA

December

2017July 2021

Guidance 3.1.2 Taxonomy files published by ESMA July 20192021

Guidance 3.1.3 Taxonomy packages July 2019

Guidance 3.1.4 Ensuring taxonomy validity against XBRL specifications

July 2020

Guidance 3.1.5 Naming conventions for extension taxonomy files July 2020 [new]2021 Guidance 3.2.1 Naming conventions for extension taxonomy elements

July 2019

8

Guidance 3.2.2

Data types to be used on extension concepts December

2017July 2021

Guidance 3.2.3

taxonomies

December

2017July 2021

Guidance 3.2.4

Identification of extension taxonomy element July 2020 Guidance 3.2.5 Definition of abstract concepts in extension taxonomies

December 2017

Guidance 3.3.1

Relationships to anchor extension taxonomy

elements to elements in the ESEF taxonomy

July 2020

Guidance 3.3.2 Where to define the anchoring relationship July 2020

Guidance 3.4.1

linkbases

December 2017

Guidance 3.4.2 Defining the dimensional validity of line items in the definition linkbase

July 20202021

Guidance 3.4.3

Definition of default members of extension

taxonomy dimensions

July 2020

Guidance 3.4.4 Use of preferred labels on presentation links in extension taxonomies

July 2019

Guidance 3.4.5 Use of labels on elements in extension taxonomies July 20192021

Guidance 3.4.6

Restrictions on taxonomy relationships July 20202021 Guidance 3.4.7 Definition of extended link roles in extension taxonomies

July 2020 [new]

Guidance 3.5.1

References pointing to resources outside the

reporting package

July 20202021

Guidance 4.1.1 Reporting of stand-alone of xHTML files July 2021 [new] Guidance 4.1.2 Tagging obligations for Investment Entities exempted from consolidation

July 2021 [new]

9 Guidance 4.1.3 Inclusion of content other than XHTML in a stand- alone XHTML file

July 2021 [new]

Guidance 4.1.4 Use of the Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) language to style XHTML stand-alone documents

July 2021 [new]

Guidance 4.1.5 Naming convention for stand-alone XHTMLquotesdbs_dbs10.pdfusesText_16
[PDF] Le comparatif exercices

[PDF] Le comparatif exercices pdf

[PDF] le comparatif french

[PDF] Le comparatif in French

[PDF] le complément d'agent

[PDF] le complément d'objet indirect

[PDF] le complément d'objet second

[PDF] Le complément d'objet : A. ne peut pas être supprimé sans changer le sens de la phrase. B. donne une information sur le sujet du verbe qu'il complète.

[PDF] Le complément du nom est souvent un autre nom ou un verbe à l'infinitif. Page 3. 1) Individuel : vous sortez votre ardoise et vous devez essayer d'ent

[PDF] le complément du nom exemple

[PDF] le complément du verbe exercices

[PDF] Le Comte

[PDF] Le concept de la mort dans Antigone de. Jean Anouilh. Ahmad Hassan Jarjisse. (*). A la différence des dramaturges grecs

[PDF] le conditionnel present emploi

[PDF] le conditionnel présent emploi et formation