OECD
7 thg 2 2013 Competition Issues in Electronic Commerce (2000). The digital economy enables and executes the trade of goods and services through ...
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels 11.1.2012 SEC(2011) 1640
11 thg 1 2012 report is based on a consumer market study on the functioning of e-commerce in goods in the EU and other recent studies.
Information Bulletin CRTC 2012-548
Ottawa 10 October 2012. Guidelines on the interpretation of the Electronic Commerce. Protection Regulations (CRTC). In this information bulletin
Electronic Commerce Protection Regulations (CRTC) Règlement
15 thg 1 2015 Electronic Commerce Protection. Regulations (CRTC). CODIFICATION. Règlement sur la protection du commerce électronique (CRTC). SOR/2012-36.
Telecom Decision CRTC 2012-183
Ottawa 28 March 2012. Electronic Commerce Protection Regulations (CRTC). File number: 8665-C12-201109851. The Commission announces that
Barriers to E-Commerce Adoption in Egyptian SMEs
2 thg 3 2012 I.J. Information Engineering and Electronic Business
A Pan-European Trustmark for E-Commerce: Possibilities and
4 thg 7 2012 Policy options for introducing an EU trustmark for e- commerce ... ANNEX 3: TRUSTMARKS IDENTIFIED IN 2006 AND 2012.
Factors influencing Internet shopping value and customer
a customer's perception of shopping value as well as satisfaction. C. Kim et al. / Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 11 (2012) 374–387.
Act 658 - Electronic Commerce Act 2006.pdf
1 thg 11 2012 UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION OF LAWS ACT 1968. 2012 ... (1) This Act may be cited as the Electronic Commerce Act. 2006.
MARKT-2011-80072-02-00-EN-TRA-00 (FR)
11 thg 1 2012 The Directive on Electronic Commerce removed a series of obstacles to ... In 2012 the European Commission will present a European Consumer.
Compliance and Enforcement Information Bulletin
CRTC 2012-548
PDF version
Additional reference: Telecom Regulatory Policy 2012-183Ottawa, 10 October 2012
Guidelines on the interpretation of the Electronic CommerceProtection Regulations (CRTC)
In this information bulletin, the Commission sets out guidelines on the interpretation of several provisions of the Electronic Commerce Protection Regulations (CRTC) and provides examples of what it considers to be compliant behaviour.Introduction
1. On 15 December 2010, Royal Assent was given to An Act to promote the efficiency
and adaptability of the Canadian economy by regulating certain activities that discourage reliance on electronic means of carrying out commercial activities, and to amend the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Act, the Competition Act, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and the Telecommunications Act, S.C. 2010, c. 23 (the Act).2. The Act gives the Commission the authority to regulate certain forms of electronic
contact, consisting of, the sending of commercial electronic messages (CEMs), the alteration of transmission data in electronic messages, and the installation of commercial activity. The fundamental underlying principle is that such activities may only be carried out with consent.3. Under subsection 64(2) of the Act, the Commission may make regulations, among
other things, prescribing the form and certain information to be included in CEMs, and requests for consent with respect to the sending of CEMs, the alteration of transmission data in electronic messages, and the installation of computer programs.4. In Telecom Regulatory Policy 2012-183, the Commission made the Electronic
Commerce Protection Regulations (CRTC) [the Regulations]. The Regulations prescribe the form and certain information to be included in CEMs and requests for consent with respect to the sending of CEMs, the alteration of transmission data in electronic messages, and the installation of computer programs. The Regulations will come into force on the day on which sections 6 to 11 and subsection 64(2) of the Act come into force. Information to be included in CEMs (section 2 of the Regulations) a. Whom to identify5. Section 2 of the Regulations requires that each CEM set out information that
identifies the sender of the message and, if applicable, the person on whose behalf the message is sent, and include contact information for such persons.6. The Commission considers that section 2 of the Regulations does not require that
persons situated between the person sending the message and the person on whose behalf the message is sent need necessarily be identified. For example, persons so situated may facilitate the distribution of a CEM but have no role in its content or choice of the recipients. In that event, the Commission considers that they do not need to be identified.7. However, the Commission emphasizes that when a CEM is sent on behalf of
multiple persons, such as affiliates, all of these persons must be identified in a CEM. b. Mailing addresses8. The Regulations require that a CEM set out, among other things, the mailing address
of the person sending the message or, if different, the mailing address of the person on whose behalf the message is sent [paragraph 2(1)(d)]. This contact information is also to be included in a request for consent [paragraph 4(d)].9. The Commission considers that, for the purposes of the above-noted paragraphs of
the Regulations, DGGUHVVquotesdbs_dbs4.pdfusesText_7[PDF] electronic commerce 2012 turban
[PDF] electronic commerce pdf
[PDF] element de gymnastique au sol
[PDF] element gymnastique
[PDF] eléments d'épistémologie de la géographie
[PDF] elements de chimie physique atkins pdf
[PDF] elements de logique exercices corrigés
[PDF] elevage bulldog anglais france
[PDF] élevage canin
[PDF] elevage de vers de terre classe maternelle
[PDF] elevage poisson avec vers de terre
[PDF] élevage vers de terre maternelle
[PDF] eleve libre english subtitles
[PDF] elie saab 2017 haute couture
