[PDF] DESIGN FOR MODULAR CONSTRUCTION: AN INTRODUCTION

View - Download DESIGN FOR MODULAR CONSTRUCTION: AN INTRODUCTION

Previous PDF

Next PDF

DESIGN FOR MODULAR CONSTRUCTION: AN INTRODUCTION FOR ARCHITECTS > INTRODUCTION > 1

DESIGN FOR MODULAR

CONSTRUCTION:

AN INTRODUCTION FOR

ARCHITECTS

DESIGN FOR MODULAR CONSTRUCTION: AN INTRODUCTION FOR ARCHITECTS > INTRODUCTION > 2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................

The modular approach in detail

......................................8

Benefits of modular construction

.................................13

Barriers

.......19 THE MODULAR APPROACH IN PRACTICE ..............................................................23

Pre-design

26

Design

.......29

Post-design

An evolution of practice

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES ........................................................................ ...............................38

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative infor mation in regard to the subject matter covered. It is published and distributed with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. AIA does not sponsor or endorse any enterprise, whether public or privat e, operated for profit. Further, no AIA officer, director, committee member, or employee, or any of its component organizations in his or her official capacity, is permitted to approve, sponsor, endorse, or do anything that may be deemed or construed to be an approval, sponsorship, or endorsement of any material of construction or any method or manner of handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or p roduct. DESIGN FOR MODULAR CONSTRUCTION: AN INTRODUCTION FOR ARCHITECTS > INTRODUCTION > 3

INTRODUCTION

DESIGN FOR MODULAR CONSTRUCTION: AN INTRODUCTION FOR ARCHITECTS > INTRODUCTION > 4 An increasing number of building projects across several markets are usi ng modular construction, the process by which components of a building are prefabricated off-site in a controlled setting and then shipped to the project site and assembled. This approach allows projects to capture the efficiencies gained by integrating the processes and technologies of design, manufact uring, and construction - without having to compromise on aesthetic intent. According to research conducted by McGraw-Hill

Construction

, when implemented effectively this approach has been shown to result in a higher-quality building, delivered in a shorter time frame, with more predictable costs , and fewer environmental impacts - for example, through reduced material use and waste. While a range of factors are driving increased use of modular constructi on, a number of barriers are preventing its wider adoption. And although the planning and design proc ess involved in modular construction is in several ways similar to that of traditional on-site c onstruction, there are some significant differences and a number of considerations that project team s unfamiliar with the modular approach must understand before committing to it. For example, with modu lar construction many decisions have to be made much earlier in the process. And because a lar ge amount of work is performed off-site, a much higher level of coordination between the vari ous parties involved - on such matters as construction tolerances and scheduling - becomes critical.

An evolving strategy

Although modular construction has become increasingly popular in recent years, it is not a completely novel approach. In the 19th century, as large portions of the population began to move west - as during the 1849 California Gold Rush - prefabricated houses were transported f rom New York to California. Prefabricated housing was also popular in the first half of the 20th cen tury, especially during times of high demand, such as the years immediately following World War II. In the late 1950s, modular construction began to be used for a broader range of project types, incl uding schools and healthcare facilities, and in the '60s and '70s modular construction began to be used to build large-scale hotel projects. Now, as technology has advanced and the industry has gained experience w ith it, the modular construction approach has become increasingly versatile and is used for a wide range of project types, including - in addition to housing, education, healthcare, and h ospitality - commercial office, government, and retail.

According to

a report published by the Modular Building Institute , an analysis of the market share of permanent modular construction in the North American building industry f ound that from 2014 to 2016 it expanded across several sectors. In 2016 its market share was largest in the office and administrative (4.86 percent), commercial and retail (3.53 percent), and education (3.50 percent) sectors.

And according to

Modular Building Institute's 2018 annual industry statistical report , based on a survey of 252 modular manufacturing firms, in 2017 the permanent modular construction industry drove about $7 billion in construction activity, and the estimated overall mar ket share for permanent modular construction in North America rose to about 3.27 percent, up from 3.18 p ercent in 2016. DESIGN FOR MODULAR CONSTRUCTION: AN INTRODUCTION FOR ARCHITECTS > INTRODUCTION > 5

CASE STUDY

LINKS nARCHITECTS:

Carmel Place

Architecture Player: Video,

Making Carmel Place

PROJECT: Caramel Place

ARCHITECT: nARCHITECTS / Monadnock Development

OFF-SITE FABRICATION AND TRANSPORT: Capsys

ON-SITE ASSEMBLY: Monadnock Construction

SIZE: 35,000 square feet

LOCATION: New York City

YEAR COMPLETED: 2017

TIME TO COMPLETE: 22 months

TOTAL COST: $300-$400 per square foot

USE TYPE: Residential

The proposal for Carmel Place, New York City"s first micro-apartment building, won the adAPT NYC Competition, part of the NYC Department of Housing Preservation and Deve lopment"s initiative to provide housing for the city"s growing number of small households. Th e nine-story building includes

55 micro-units (between 250 and 370 square feet, 40 percent of which ar

e reserved for affordable housing), as well as a gym, lounge, roof terrace, and garden, and was t he first multi-unit building in Manhattan to be built entirely out of modular components constructed off -site. The building"s design is meant to serve as a new prototype for a repe atable system of housing that can be easily adapted according to different requirements for height and floor area ratio, and thus be deployable across a range of urban contexts. The building is made up of 65 individual self-supporting, steel-framed m odules. Of these, 55 are apartment units and 10 serve as the building"s core. MEP systems were pre-installed off-site by the modular manufacturer. Appliances and interior finishes were installe d after the modules were assembled on-site. The project"s New York-based design team reported that it was a si gnificant benefit to have the factory located nearby. This allowed for weekly visits during the manufacturing process. Along with giving the team the ability to catch and prevent potentially costly mistakes, the v isits allowed them to develop a valuable rapport with the manufacturer that supported the communicatio n and coordination that"s critical for modular construction projects. DESIGN FOR MODULAR CONSTRUCTION: AN INTRODUCTION FOR ARCHITECTS > INTRODUCTION > 6

CASE STUDY

LINKS

City of Vancouver:

Temporary Modular

Housing

VAHA: Vancouver's First

Temporary Modular

Housing

Horizon North: Temporary

Modular Housing Project

MBI: Award, VAHA 220

Terminal Avenue

Urban YVR: Article,

Modular housing for the

homeless is coming to

Olympic Village

PROJECT: Vancouver Affordable Housing Agency 220 Terminal Avenue

ARCHITECT: Horizon North

OFF-SITE FABRICATION AND TRANSPORT: Horizon North

ON-SITE ASSEMBLY: Horizon North

SIZE: 14,785 square feet

LOCATION: Vancouver, British Columbia

YEAR COMPLETED: 2017

TIME TO COMPLETE: 100 days

TOTAL COST: $3 million

USE TYPE: Residential

The Vancouver Affordable Housing Agency (VAHA) has developed a strateg y of using modular construction to rapidly respond to the urgent need for affordable housin g in the city. The city provides the agency use of currently vacant and unused public land for t emporary modular housing developments. These projects are guaranteed use of the land for at least three years, after which time they can be disassembled and relocated when the land is needed for a more permanent use. The tenants of these transitional modular housing projects are moved into pe rmanent affordable housing units as they become available. The initial demonstration of this concep t, 220 Terminal Avenue, includes 40 units, each with a bathroom and kitchen. The building also i ncludes a shared laundry facility, and shared indoor and outdoor amenity space. The building is designed to be entirely adaptable so that it can be plac ed in a range of different sites when it comes time for relocation. If need be, modules can be added, rem oved, or reconfigured with minimal alterations to the exterior. The building"s above grade, mult i-point foundation system is also designed to be easily reusable at different sites. And because this syst em requires minimum ground disturbance, it is appropriate for temporary use on previously developed sites that may contain environmental contaminants that would require extensive remediation work before construction of more permanent projects. This ability to build without digging up the gr ound allowed for the safe temporary use of the 220 Terminal Avenue site. VAHA reported that the development approvals process was overly complex and time-consuming on this initial project, eroding some of the benefit provided by modular constru ction and acting as a barrier to the goal of expediting the creation of affordable housing. To address the is sue, the agency has recommended that city staff be authorized to work with project teams on variances fo r relevant zoning and development regulations. DESIGN FOR MODULAR CONSTRUCTION: AN INTRODUCTION FOR ARCHITECTS > INTRODUCTION > 7

Factors driving use

Participants in a

2017 survey

of property owners conducted by FMI in partnership with Construction Users Roundtable and the Construction Industry Institute stated that a s hortage of skilled labor available for on-site work and increased pressure on project costs and s chedules are primary reasons for the increasing popularity of off-site construction. In addition, imp roved technology allowing for greater applicability and customization, heightened concerns regardi ng safety and risk, and an increasing demand for higher quality were also stated as factors contrib uting to the growing interest in off-site approaches. Increasingly urgent demand in the housing, hospitality, and healthcare m arkets is also driving more projects to use modular construction. As many cities across the country are experiencing severe housing shortages, modular construction - with its potential to signifi cantly increase the speed of delivery while also providing opportunities for cost savings - is seen as a strategy that's particularly well-suited to address the issue. For example, to address the severe lack of affordable housing in London, the city announced in

2017 that it would dedicate $32 million to construct a minimum of 1,059 aff

ordably priced modular apartments by the year 2021. (In a study of the UK construction industry , KPMG found that by using off-site construction "financial net savings of 7% were possible as a consequence of the shortened construction period.") In the spring of 2018, the New York City Depa rtment of Housing Preservation and Development released a request for proposals for an affordable housi ng project in Brooklyn that requires modular construction methods. And according to Modular Building

Institute, urban areas such

as San Francisco, Seattle, and Vancouver are now considering modular con struction as a means to address homelessness as well as to provide affordable housing for lower- and middle-income families. DESIGN FOR MODULAR CONSTRUCTION: AN INTRODUCTION FOR ARCHITECTS > INTRODUCTION > 8

THE MODULAR APPROACH IN DETAIL

In general, modular building elements prefabricated off-site are either constructed as non-volumetric components or as volumetric units. Volumetric modular construction involves the off-site prefabrication of individual three-dimensional units of enclosed space that are then connected on-site to form a single building. For example, volumetric modular construction is often used for multiunit residential projects like hotels, dormitories, and apartment buildings. Each unit, depending on its size, may be made u p of one or more modules. Other examples of volumetric elements include patient rooms, bathroom po ds, and sections of elevator or stair cores. Non-volumetric modular construction involves the off-site prefabrication of building elements (commonly referred to as sub-assemblies) that are then connected once on-site. Common examples of

Volumetric

ConstructionNon-volumetric

Construction

non-volumetric modular building elements include: >Structural elements such as frames, beams and columns >Sections of building façade and cladding >Wall panels and interior partitions >Floor cassettes and planks >Roof trusses FIGURE 1: VOLUMETRIC VS. NON?VOLUMETRIC CONSTRUCTION DESIGN FOR MODULAR CONSTRUCTION: AN INTRODUCTION FOR ARCHITECTS > INTRODUCTION > 9 Modular projects may be composed of a combination of volumetric and non- volumetric components, and projects may utilize a combination of off-site and on-site construct ion, depending on the specific requirements of the design, program, and/or site. For example, component s needed to form large openings or spans, which may be difficult to manufacture in an off-site facility, are commonly built on-site. Although non-volumetric elements may be transported more compactly than volumetric units, potentially reducing transport costs, they require additional assembly a nd sealing work on-site, the cost of which may offset any transport savings gained. However, it should be noted that the total time and labor cost for non-volumetric modular construction is generally still si gnificantly lower than traditional on-site construction. While this guide will focus primarily on volumetric modular construction , many of the principles will also apply to other off-site fabrication technologies, including non-volumetr ic panelized construction. Although small-scale modular buildings are often used in non-permanent i nstallations for such purposes as temporary offices, classrooms, and emergency relief housing, this guide will focus on permanent modular construction, which can be used at all scales, from si ngle-family homes up to high- rise buildings. It should be noted that while a majority of modular proj ects are four stories or less, in recent years an increasing number have exceeded 10 stories, and modular construction can be used to build structures up to any height, unless otherwise restricted by the lo cal code.

CASE STUDY

PROJECT: Miami Valley Hospital Heart and Orthopedic Center

ARCHITECT: NBBJ

OFF-SITE FABRICATION AND TRANSPORT: Skanska

ON-SITE ASSEMBLY: Skanska

SIZE: 480,000 square feet

LOCATION: Dayton, Ohio

YEAR COMPLETED: 2010

PERCENTAGE OF PROJECT PREFABRICATED: ~35 percent

TIME TO COMPLETE: ~28 months

TOTAL COST: $137 million

USE TYPE: Healthcare

DESIGN FOR MODULAR CONSTRUCTION: AN INTRODUCTION FOR ARCHITECTS > INTRODUCTION > 10 The 178-bed Heart and Orthopedic Center at the Miami Valley Hospital - which includes surgery facilities, a library, a café, and an outdoor garden space - was the first major healthcare project in the U.S. to make substantial use of prefabricated components as a strategy t o control construction costs and minimize waste. After initially considering prefabricating entire patient rooms as compl ete volumetric modules, the project team determined that it would be more efficient and cost-eff ective to prefabricate the components of each room as four individual modules: bathroom, headwall/f ootwall, casework, and overhead MEP racks. The design of these components was driven by a motivation to reorganize the traditional hospital floorplan and room layout to provide greater flexibility as well as incr eased safety and comfort for

patients and staff. Once a scheme was developed that would achieve this, the project team's task was to

figure out how prefabrication could be used without compromising the des ign intent. This resulted in a more customized set of components. Due to this need for customized components, and because the project team was unable to find off-the- shelf components that would meet their spec, it was decided that the con tractor would manufacture them. A vacant warehouse located about three miles from the project sit e was rented for the purpose. Once the warehouse was prepared for the job, a mock-up of the bathroom m odule was built to give hospital staff the opportunity to critique the design before production started. This resulted, for ex ample, in the repositioning of certain fixtures to make patient care and maintenance tasks easier. Once manufactured, the bathroom pods and dividing-wall components were a ssembled into single patient room "blades" configured so several would fit compactly onquotesdbs_dbs23.pdfusesText_29

[PDF] bts électrotechnique - Eduscol

[PDF] Cours de construction mécanique - livres ebooks gratuits au format pdf

[PDF] Contrôle d 'accès - Cedric/CNAM

[PDF] Contrôle d 'accès

[PDF] introduction au controle interne - IBR

[PDF] introduction au controle interne - IBR

[PDF] Principes de la conversion d 'énergie - IUP GEII d 'Amiens

[PDF] LA CORRESPONDANCE COMMERCIALE - cloudfrontnet

[PDF] cap - esthétique cosmetique - Bankexam

[PDF] Introduction ? la cosmétologie

[PDF] cours gestion financiere seance 9 credits bancaires et emprunts

[PDF] Chapitre I L 'état solide cristallin - Faculté des Sciences de Rabat

[PDF] cristallographie - Chimie - PCSI

[PDF] CSS avancées - Vers HTML 5 et CSS3 - Academie pro

[PDF] Culture Entrepreneuriale Khémiri A - issepkef