East Asian miracle
including South Africa but ecduding Mauritius Reunion
EU ANNUAL REPORT ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY IN
05 Jun 2021 EEA/EFTA Countries and non-EU Western European Countries . ... Office and the Ministries of Justice and Home Affairs. The EU
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO
Global Affairs Canada Evaluation Division Democratic Republic of Congo ... health centres health clinics and maternal waiting homes; and focus group ...
Haradinaj Judgement
29 Nov 2012 IT-04-84bis-T. 29 November 2012. I. INTRODUCTION. 1. The Accused Ramush Haradinaj
COLLECTION OF EssAYs RECUEIL D ARTICLES
14 May 1993 Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Director
Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level Réunion du
07 May 2014 Presently serving as Secretary of International Economic Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and. Worship of the Argentine Republic ...
Countries / Economies
29 May 2010 Minister of Finance of the Republic of South Africa from 11 May 2009 ... Ambassador Ministry of Foreign Affairs (EU-internal policies
Improving International Co-operation in Cartel Investigations 2012
30 Nov 2012 underpinning enforcement and the sheer diversity of competition agencies ... 84. 18. US DoJ Press Release Justice Department Asks European ...
Corrigé Corrected
07 Mar 2017 Rights Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
CR 2019/12 corrigé
07 Jun 2019 Ms Katerina Gipenko Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine
UNITED
NATIONS
Case No. IT-04-84bis-T
Date: 29 November 2012
International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English
IN TRIAL CHAMBER II
Before: Judge Bakone Justice Moloto, Presiding
Judge Burton Hall
Judge Guy Delvoie
Registrar: Mr. John Hocking
Judgement: 29 November 2012
PROSECUTOR
v.RAMUSH HARADINAJ
IDRIZ BALAJ
LAHI BRAHIMAJ
PUBLIC JUDGEMENT
WITH CONFIDENTIAL ANNEX
The Office of the Prosecutor:
Mr. Paul Rogers Mr. Aditya Menon
Ms. Daniela Kravetz Ms. Priya Gopalan
Ms. Barbara Goy
Counsel for the Accused:
Mr. Ben Emmerson QC, Mr. Rodney Dixon and Mr. Andrew Strong for Ramush Haradinaj Mr. Gregor Guy-Smith and Ms. Colleen Rohan for Idriz Balaj Mr. Richard Harvey and Mr. Paul Troop for Lahi BrahimajCONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1
II. CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE........................4 III. STRUCTURE AND ORGANISATION OF THE KLA IN THE DUKAGJIN ZONE ........6 A.EMERGENCE AND GENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE KLA..................................................................6
1. KLA General Staff...................................................................................................................6
2. Number of KLA forces in 1998...............................................................................................7
3. The KLA zones of operation in Kosovo..................................................................................9
4. Logistics and organisation of the KLA..................................................................................10
(a) Funding................................................................................................................................... 10
(b) Uniforms................................................................................................................................ 10
(c) Weapons................................................................................................................................. 11
(d) Recruitment............................................................................................................................ 12
(e) Training.................................................................................................................................. 13
(f) Discipline................................................................................................................................ 14
B.THE KLA IN THE DUKAGJIN ZONE..............................................................................................15
1. The village defence organisation...........................................................................................15
2. The designation of the sub-zones and the creation of the Regional Staff on 26 May 1998..20
3. Command and control within the Dukagjin zone until 23 June 1998....................................23
4. Jabllanicë/Jablanica................................................................................................................26
5. Creation of the Dukagjin Operational Zone...........................................................................28
(a) Meeting on 23 June 1998: creation of the Dukagjin Operational Zone and DukagjinOperational Staff................................................................................................................... 28
(b) Command and control in the Dukagjin Operational Zone after 23 June 1998 ...................... 31
6. The creation of the joint command: merging KLA and FARK forces..................................34
7. Relationship between the Dukagjin Operational Zone and the KLA General Staff..............37
8. Change of commander of the Dukagjin Operational Zone....................................................38
9. The Black Eagles...................................................................................................................40
10. KLA military police.............................................................................................................44
IV. EVENTS IN THE TERRITORY OF THE KLA DUKAGJIN ZONE IN THE PERIODMARCH TO SEPTEMBER 1998............................................................................................50
A. EVENTS IN THE TERRITORY OF THE DUKAGJIN ZONE BETWEEN MARCH AND JUNE 1998............501. Territorial control and Serbian forces operations..................................................................50
2. KLA attacks on the police......................................................................................................61
3. Kidnapping, mistreatment and killing of civilians by the KLA.............................................67
(a) Individual incidents of kidnapping, mistreatment and killing of civilians by the KLA......... 67(i) Jah Bushati.......................................................................................................................... 67
(ii) Mijat Stojanovi}, Dragoslav Stojanovi} and Veselin Stijovi}........................................... 71
(iii) Novak Stijovi} and Stani{a Radoševi}............................................................................. 77
(iv) Slobodan Rado{ević, Milo{ Radunović, Milica Radunovi} and the Markovi} family..... 80(v) Dara (Darinka) Kovač (née Vujošević), Vukosava Marković (née Vujošević), Milovan
Vlahovi} and Milka Vlahović........................................................................................... 86
(vi) Other incidents.................................................................................................................. 88
(vii) Conclusion....................................................................................................................... 92
(b) General statements on kidnapping, mistreatment and killing of civilians by the KLA......... 92 B. EVENTS IN THE TERRITORY OF DUKAGJIN OPERATIONAL ZONE BETWEEN JULY ANDSEPTEMBER 1998 .....................................................................................................................97
1. Interactions between the FARK and KLA.............................................................................97
(a) Deployment of FARK forces to the Dukagjin Operational Zone........................................... 97
(b) Incident in Gllogjan/Glođane in Deçan/Dečani municipality on 4 July 1998..................... 100
(c) Subsequent interactions between the FARK and KLA........................................................ 104
2. Serbian forces operations between July and September 1998 in the Dukagjin Operational
3. Other incidents between July and September 1998.............................................................112
(a) European Community Monitoring Mission ......................................................................... 112
(b) Sanije Balaj.......................................................................................................................... 115
(c) Other incidents ..................................................................................................................... 119
4. Investigations by Serbian authorities of the canal area near Lake Radoniq/Radonji}, the
road leading to Dashinoc/Da{inovac and Ratish-i-Ulët/Donji Ratiš, and EkonomijaFarm ..................................................................................................................................120
(a) General observations on the forensic examinations and identification of the humanremains found ..................................................................................................................... 121
(b) Canal area at Lake Radoniq/Radonjić.................................................................................. 122
(i) Investigations in canal area at Lake Radoniq/Radonjić.................................................... 125
(ii) Remains at Lake Radoniq/Radonjić and subsequent identification................................. 127
a. Misin Berisha................................................................................................................. 130
b. Zenun Gashi .................................................................................................................. 130
c. Velizar Stošić................................................................................................................. 134
d. Nurije Krasniqi and Istref Krasniqi............................................................................... 134
e. Malush Meha................................................................................................................. 136
f. Ilira Frrokaj.................................................................................................................... 136
g. Kujtim Imeraj................................................................................................................ 138
(c) Road leading to Ratish-i-Ulët/Donji Ratiš and Dashinoc/Dašinovac..................................138
(d) Ekonomija Farm................................................................................................................... 139
(i) Investigations in Ekonomija Farm.................................................................................... 140
(ii) Remains at Ekonomija Farm and subsequent identification............................................ 140
a. Mehmet Rrustemaj ........................................................................................................ 141
b. Tushe Tahiraj and Ramiz Tahiraj................................................................................. 141
V. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE STATUTE...............................143 A.1. The Tadić conditions............................................................................................................143
2. Preliminary requirements of Article 3.................................................................................144
(a) Armed conflict...................................................................................................................... 144
(b) Nexus ................................................................................................................................... 146
(c) Status of victims................................................................................................................... 146
B.1. The Tadić conditions............................................................................................................147
2. Existence of an armed conflict.............................................................................................147
(a) Intensity of conflict.............................................................................................................. 148
(b) Organisation of the KLA...................................................................................................... 150
(c) Conclusion............................................................................................................................ 151
3. Nexus...................................................................................................................................151
4. Status of victims...................................................................................................................152
C.VI. THE CHARGES......................................................................................................................153
A.LAW ON THE CRIMES CHARGED................................................................................................153
1. Law on torture......................................................................................................................153
2. Law on cruel treatment........................................................................................................154
3. Law on murder.....................................................................................................................155
B.1. Preliminary notes.................................................................................................................156
2. Count 1.................................................................................................................................157
(a) Allegations in the Indictment............................................................................................... 157
(b) Findings................................................................................................................................ 158
(c) Conclusion............................................................................................................................ 169
3. Count 2.................................................................................................................................169
(a) Allegations in the Indictment............................................................................................... 169
(b) Findings................................................................................................................................ 170
(c) Conclusion............................................................................................................................ 173
4. Count 3.................................................................................................................................173
(a) Allegations in the Indictment............................................................................................... 173
(b) Findings................................................................................................................................ 174
(c) Conclusion............................................................................................................................ 180
5. Count 4.................................................................................................................................182
(a) Allegations in the Indictment............................................................................................... 182
(b) Findings................................................................................................................................ 183
(c) Conclusion............................................................................................................................ 187
6. Count 5.................................................................................................................................189
(a) Allegations in the Indictment............................................................................................... 189
(b) Findings................................................................................................................................ 190
(i) Detention of Pal Krasniqi, Skender Kuçi and Witness 3.................................................. 190
(ii) Subsequent events............................................................................................................ 202
a. Witness 3....................................................................................................................... 202
b. Skender Kuçi................................................................................................................. 204
c. Pal Krasniqi................................................................................................................... 206
(c) Conclusion............................................................................................................................ 209
7. Count 6.................................................................................................................................211
(a) Allegations in the Indictment............................................................................................... 211
(b) Findings................................................................................................................................ 212
(i) Abduction from Zhabel/@abelj ......................................................................................... 212
(ii) Detention and mistreatment of Naser Lika...................................................................... 216
(c) Conclusion............................................................................................................................ 219
VII. RESPONSIBILITY................................................................................................................220
A.1. Committing..........................................................................................................................220
2. Committing through participation in a joint criminal enterprise.........................................221
3. Planning...............................................................................................................................223
4. Instigating ............................................................................................................................223
5. Ordering...............................................................................................................................224
6. Aiding and abetting..............................................................................................................225
B.1. Joint criminal enterprise.......................................................................................................226
(a) Alleged common purpose..................................................................................................... 226
(i) KLA communiqués........................................................................................................... 226
(ii) KLA military police......................................................................................................... 229
(iii) "KLA blacklists"............................................................................................................ 230
a. Lists found at the Haradinaj compound in Gllogjan/Glođane....................................... 231
b. List in handwritten notes of a meeting on 12 July 1998 ............................................... 232
c. "Blacklists" of Faton Mehmetaj.................................................................................... 234
d. Conclusion..................................................................................................................... 234
(iv) Incidents of mistreatment and killing of civilians by KLA soldiers...............................235
(v) Incidents of mistreatment and killings at the KLA compound in Jabllanicë/Jablanica... 238(b) Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 241
2. Responsibility of Ramush Haradinaj...................................................................................241
3. Responsibility of Idriz Balaj................................................................................................242
4. Responsibility of Lahi Brahimaj..........................................................................................242
C.VIII. DISPOSITION......................................................................................................................244
IX. ANNEX I: PROCEDURAL HISTORY ................................................................................245
A.PROCEEDINGS IN ORIGINAL HARADINAJ ET AL. TRIAL................................................................245
1. Initial indictment, initial appearance and original trial........................................................245
2. The appeal............................................................................................................................245
B. COMMENCEMENT OF PARTIAL RETRIAL PROCEEDINGS AND AMENDED INDICTMENT.................246 C.TRIAL PROCEEDINGS................................................................................................................249
1. Overview..............................................................................................................................249
2. Matters relating to witnesses................................................................................................250
3. Hearing pursuant to Rule 4..................................................................................................250
4. Provisional release of the Accused......................................................................................250
X. ANNEX II: MAP.......................................................................................................................253
XI. ANNEX III: GLOSSARY OF TERMS.................................................................................255
1Case No.: IT-04-84bis-T 29 November 2012
I. INTRODUCTION
1. The Accused, Ramush Haradinaj, Idriz Balaj and Lahi Brahimaj, are charged with crimes
allegedly committed by them, or by other members of the Kosovo Liberation Army ("KLA"), in1998 against Kosovo Serbs, Kosovo Roma and Kosovo Albanian civilians in a KLA detention
facility in the village of Jabllanicë/Jablanica in Gjakovë/\akovica municipality, western Kosovo.
The Indictment alleges specific incidents of abduction of a total of 16 Kosovo Serbs, Kosovo Roma and Kosovo Albanian civilians, who, it is alleged, were detained and subjected to torture and crueltreatment at the KLA headquarters and detention facility in Jabllanicë/Jablanica. It is further
alleged that eight of these individuals were killed while in KLA custody. These allegations support six counts of violations of the laws or customs of war, namely cruel treatment, torture, and murder, as recognised by Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, charged under Article 3 of theStatute.
2. Throughout the Judgement the Chamber will refer to locations by their names in both the
Albanian and the Serbian language. Where these names are different in the two languages, the name of each location appears in the text in Albanian/Serbian. Where a name of a location is the same in both languages, it only appears once.3. This case is a partial retrial. The three Accused were charged initially in the case of
Prosecutor v. Ramush Haradinaj, Idriz Balaj, and Lahi Brahimaj, Case No. IT-04-84("Haradinaj") on 4 March 2005 with 16 counts of crimes against humanity and 19 counts of
violations of the laws or customs of war. Ramush Haradinaj was also charged with one further count of crimes against humanity and one further count of violations of the laws or customs of war. 1 On 3 April 2008, the Trial Chamber acquitted Ramush Haradinaj and Idriz Balaj of all charges in the indictment, found Lahi Brahimaj guilty of two counts, sentenced him to six years" imprisonment, and acquitted him of all other charges.2 The Prosecution appealed the trial
judgement, alleging, inter alia, that the Trial Chamber breached its right to a fair trial by not
allowing it additional time to secure the evidence of two critical witnesses, and asked for a retrial.
4. On 21 July 2010, the Appeals Chamber, Judge Robinson dissenting, granted in part the
Prosecution"s appeal and quashed the Trial Chamber"s decisions to acquit the Accused of certain counts in the indictment related to crimes alleged to have been committed at the KLA headquartersand the prison in Jabllanicë/Jablanica. The Appeals Chamber ordered a partial retrial with respect to
1 See infra, para. 686.
2 See infra, para. 687.
2Case No.: IT-04-84bis-T 29 November 2012
these counts.3 The partial retrial was assigned to this Chamber on 21 July 2010. The trial
commenced on 18 August 2011. The Chamber received evidence from 56 witnesses, including the two witnesses with respect to whom the retrial was ordered.5. The Indictment, as ultimately amended, alleges that the Accused are criminally responsible
for the crimes charged as participants in a JCE,4 the common purpose of which was to consolidate
the total control of the KLA over the Dukagjin Operational Zone, encompassing the municipalitiesof Pejë/Pe}, Deçan/De~ani, Gjakovë/\akovica, including the Lake Radoniq/Radonji} canal area,
and parts of the municipalities of Istog/Istok and Klinë/Klina. It further alleges that this
consolidation was undertaken by the unlawful removal and mistreatment of Kosovo Serb civilians and by the mistreatment of Kosovo Albanian and Kosovo Roma/Egyptian civilians, and othercivilians, who were, or were perceived to have been, collaborators with the Serbian forces or
otherwise not supporting the KLA. It is alleged that the JCE included the establishment and
operation of KLA detention facilities and the mistreatment of detained persons at these facilities, including at the KLA headquarters at Jabllanicë/Jablanica, Gllogjan/Glo|ane, and Irzniq/Rznić. 5 Itis alleged that this JCE began on or around March 1998 and continued at least until late
September 1998.
66. It is alleged in the Indictment that Ramush Haradinaj was one of the most senior KLA
leaders in Kosovo. It is further alleged that, from at least 1 March 1998 until mid-June 1998, he was a de facto commander in the KLA, from mid-June 1998, he was appointed a de jure commander, and that as a commander Ramush Haradinaj had overall command of the KLA forces in the Dukagjin Operational Zone.7 Ramush Haradinaj is charged with individual criminal
responsibility under Article 7(1) of the Statute for allegedly having committed, as part of the JCE,the crimes outlined in the six counts of the Indictment. In the alternative, he is charged for having
committed, or aided and abetted the commission of the crimes charged in Count 1, and for allegedly having ordered, instigated, or aided and abetted the commission of the crimes charged in Count 6.7. The Indictment alleges that, throughout the Indictment period, Idriz Balaj (aka
"Toger/Togeri" meaning "Lieutenant") was a member of the KLA and a direct subordinate to Ramush Haradinaj. It further alleges that Idriz Balaj was the commander of a rapid intervention special unit known as the "Black Eagles", which it is alleged was created with the approval of3 See infra, para. 689.
4 Ramush Haradinaj and Idriz Balaj for all six counts and Lahi Brahimaj for Counts 1, 2, 4, and 6 charged in the
Indictment.
5 Indictment, para. 24.
6 Indictment, para. 25.
7 Indictment, para. 2.
3Case No.: IT-04-84bis-T 29 November 2012
Ramush Haradinaj in April 1998.8 Idriz Balaj is charged with individual criminal responsibility under Article 7(1) of the Statute for allegedly having committed, as part of the JCE, the six countsof violations of the laws or customs of war charged in the Indictment. In the alternative, he is also
charged for having committed, or aided and abetted the commission of the crimes charged in
Count 1, and for allegedly having committed, or planned or aided and abetted the commission of the crimes charged in Count 6.8. It is alleged in the Indictment that throughout the Indictment period Lahi Brahimaj (aka
"Maxhup") was a member of the KLA stationed at Jabllanicë/Jablanica and a subordinate to
Ramush Haradinaj.
9 It is further alleged that, from 23 June 1998 to 5 July 1998, Lahi Brahimaj was
the deputy commander of the Dukagjin Operational Staff, after which time he continued to serve as the finance director of the KLA General Staff.10 Lahi Brahimaj is charged with individual criminal
responsibility under Article 7(1) of the Statute for allegedly having committed, as part of the JCE,the crimes charged in Counts 1, 2, 4 and 6. In the alternative, he is also charged for having ordered,
instigated, or aided and abetted the commission of the crimes charged in Counts 1 and 2, and for having committed, planned, or aided and abetted the commission of the crimes charged in Count 6.9. The Chamber received evidence that forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia ("FRY")
including the forces of the Army of Yugoslavia ("VJ"), and forces of the Ministry of the Interior ("MUP") of the Republic of Serbia were engaged in Kosovo in 1998. The Chamber will refer to the specific forces involved in a particular event when the identity of these forces is known from theevidence. However, in the absence of such evidence, the Chamber will refer to these forces,
generally, as Serbian forces. This should be understood as meaning Serbian or FRY forces.8 Indictment, paras 8-9.
9 Indictment, para. 12.
10 Indictment, para. 12.
4Case No.: IT-04-84bis-T 29 November 2012
II. CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE10. Article 21(3) of the Statute enshrines the presumption of innocence to which all accused
before the Tribunal are entitled. This presumption places on the Prosecution the burden of
establishing the guilt of the Accused. In respect of each count charged against each of the Accused the standard to be met for conviction is that of proof beyond reasonable doubt.11 The Chamber,
therefore, determined in respect of each of the counts charged against each of the Accused, whether it is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt on the basis of the whole of the evidence, whether every element of the crime and every form of liability charged in the Indictment have been established. Where more than one inference was reasonably open from the facts established by the evidence, theChamber considered whether any of these inferences was inconsistent with the guilt of the
Accused.
12 In such cases, the onus and the standard of proof require that an acquittal be entered in
respect of that count. 1311. A noteworthy feature of this trial is the large amount of evidence, which was admitted in
written form, without the witnesses appearing before the Chamber, whether by explicit agreementof the Parties or after the Accused waived their right to cross-examine the witnesses. In such cases
the Chamber also admitted into evidence the audio and video recordings of the witnesses" prior testimony before the Tribunal. It should be noted, however, that not all evidence presented in the original Haradinaj trial was tendered in the present case.12. Measures to protect the identity of many witnesses were ordered in the original Haradinaj
trial and continued to apply in this trial. Out of concern for their personal safety, many witnesses
are referred to in this Judgement by a number. Their names and other details which might lead to their identification have been omitted. Where the Chamber considered that in the context of the specific evidence, citing the pseudonym of a witness may reveal the identity of the witness, the Chamber omitted the references to this evidence from the public Judgement. These references are included in the Confidential Annex to the Judgement.13. The Chamber received a large amount of written evidence originating from the Serbian
MUP, a participant in the conflict, which includes written reports, notes, or other documents. The sources relied on in this written evidence were not always identified, neither were the means by which information recorded in these documents was collected and processed. In many cases, these documents were not signed. In some cases where these documents were signed, the authors did not11 Rule 87(A) of the Rules, provides in so far as relevant: "A finding of guilt may be reached only when a majority of
the Trial Chamber is satisfied that guilt has been proved beyond reasonable doubt".12 See Mrk{i} Trial Judgement, para. 11; \or|evi} Trial Judgement, para. 10.
13 ^elebi}i Appeal Judgement, para. 458.
5Case No.: IT-04-84bis-T 29 November 2012
appear to give evidence during this trial. Considering the issues highlighted above, the Chamber treated such evidence with caution.14. The Chamber also received evidence from witnesses who were, at the material time,
members of the KLA. The Chamber was left with the impression that their evidence on matters concerning the organisation of the KLA or other matters of relevance to this Indictment may have been influenced by their allegiance to the organisation or by their loyalty to the Accused, who were at the time prominent members of the organisation. The Chamber approached this evidence with these considerations in mind.15. In some cases only one witness gave evidence on a fact material to the case. The testimony
of a single witness on a material fact does not, as a matter of law, require corroboration.14 In such
cases, however, the Chamber satisfied itself fully of the reliability of the evidence before it placed
reliance upon it.16. Despite the various issues affecting the evaluation of evidence in this case, having carefully
reviewed and weighed all the evidence, the Chamber was able to make findings on the facts of this case to determine the guilt or innocence of each of the Accused in respect of all charges in the Indictment. These findings and the Chamber"s more detailed reasons for accepting or rejecting certain evidence are recorded below.14 Aleksovski Appeal Judgement, para. 62.
6Case No.: IT-04-84bis-T 29 November 2012
III. STRUCTURE AND ORGANISATION OF THE KLA IN THE DUKAGJIN ZONEA. Emergence and general structure of the KLA
17. The first "public appearance" of the KLA occurred on 28 November 1997.
15 The occasion
was the funeral of a teacher, Halit Geci, who was allegedly killed by Serbian forces.16 It was
reported that three men in KLA uniforms-two of whom wore masks-gave a speech urging the people of Kosovo to join the "fight".17 Witness 17 later learned that these men were Daut
Haradinaj, Rexhep Selimi and a person known as Kapuçi.18 The Serbian authorities referred to the
KLA as a "terrorist" group.
191. KLA General Staff
18. Around late 1996, early 1997, the KLA General Staff
20 consisted of
approximately 10 members operating in three different areas - underground in Kosovo; in Albania; and in western countries such as Switzerland, Germany, the United States of America, France, and throughout Scandinavia.21 By the spring of 1998, the KLA General Staff members included Sokol
Bashota, Raif Gashi, Xhemajl Fetahu, Adem Grabovci, Xhavit Haliti, Illir Konjushevci, Jakup
Krasniqi, Azem Syla (Sula), Rexhep Selimi, Hashim Thaçi, Kadri Veseli, and Xhavid Zeka.22 Not
all members of the General Staff knew all the other members and they did not all communicate with each other. 2319. Adem Jashari was the commander of the KLA until March 1998.
quotesdbs_dbs27.pdfusesText_33[PDF] Bi-carburation GPL
[PDF] Bi-composant Epoxy
[PDF] Bi-Diamir - Nervures
[PDF] Bi-gel Make-Up Remover - Anciens Et Réunions
[PDF] Bi-grammaire mandingue-français - ELAN - France
[PDF] Bi-jonction - Maison Energy
[PDF] BI-Les débuts de la micro-2k3 - Page d`accueil Formation CHU - Travail
[PDF] BI-LICENCE PHILOSOPHIE - Université Paris - Gestion De Projet
[PDF] bi-peglyte
[PDF] Bi-Peglyte - CSSS des Sommets
[PDF] Bi-profil Nervesco 3.45.1000 TS
[PDF] BI-SPLIT - Carrera | La maîtrise du chaud et du froid - Anciens Et Réunions
[PDF] Bi-weekly press review 1-15 March 2016 - Terrorisme
[PDF] Bi-weekly Press Review 16 – 31 January 2015 - France