Note dOrientation sur le processus de consultation : Vers un Cadre
Le Cadre d'Action de Hy?go (CAH) tire à la fin de son calendrier de dix ans (2005-2015). 133 gouvernements ont rapporté par le biais du Moniteur CAH
COMMISSION EUROPÉENNE Bruxelles le 25.9.2015 C(2015
Sep 25 2015 du 25.9.2015. Note d'orientation de la Commission relative à la mise en oeuvre de certaines dispositions du règlement (UE) no 833/2014 ...
Note dorientation des services du FMI sur la mise en œuvre des
May 27 2015 Le rapport préparé par les services du FMI et achevé le 27 mai 2015 a été diffusé. Le rapport des services du FMI a été transmis au Conseil d' ...
note dorientation : - bonnes pratiques pour la participation de
La note d'orientation vise plutôt à aider la société civile à surmonter certains des principaux défis de la 2015 : Le consensus : un équilibre fragile.
Note dorientation stratégique 2015-2019 du disposition de
Note d'orieNtatioN stratégique. 2015 - 2019 du dispositif de validatioN des compéteNces. professioNNelles. Document approuvé par la Commission consultative
note dorientation - bouwmeester
note d'orientation. Kristiaan Borret bouwmeester - maître architecte. En tant que bouwmeester de Bruxelles
Document dorientation à lusage des États membres sur les
Sep 17 2015 La présente note d'orientation est sans préjudice des ... ressources hydriques à l'horizon 2015 grâce à une gestion intégrée basée sur les ...
Synthèse de la Note dOrientation du Plan Stratégique de
Sep 8 2015 Ministère du Développement
Applications juridictionnelles des normes dévaluation au Canada
en anglais de cette note d'orientation aura préséance. En vigueur en juin 2015. © RICS et l'Institut canadien des évaluateurs 2015. À propos de la RICS.
Disability-Inclusive-Disaster-Recovery.pdf
This guidance note is a result of collaboration int/classifications/icf/en/. 5 GFDRR. 2015. “Guide to Developing Disaster Recovery Frameworks: Sendai ...
Disability-Inclusive Disaster RecoveryPublic Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized
© 2020 Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery1818 H Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA
is work is a product of the sta of e World Bank Social Development Global Practice and the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR) with external contributions. e ndings, analysisand conclusions expressed in this document do not necessarily reect the views of any individual partner
organization of e World Bank, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. Although the World Bank and GFDRR make reasonable eorts to ensure all the information presented in thisdocument is correct, its accuracy and integrity cannot be guaranteed. Use of any data or information from
this document is at the user's own risk and under no circumstances shall the World Bank, GFDRR or any
of its partners be liable for any loss, damage, liability or expense incurred or suered which is claimed to
result from reliance on the data contained in this document. e boundaries, colors, denomination, and other information shown in any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of e WorldBank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
e text in this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or nonprot uses, without special permission, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. GFDRR'sSecretariat would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this report as a source. Copies
may be sent to the Secretariat at the above address. No use of this publication may be made for resale or
other commercial purpose without prior written consent of the Secretariat. All images remain the sole
property of the source and may not be used for any purpose without written permission from the source.
Acknowledgments
.... 2 Abbreviations ........................................................................ ................................................................... 2Glossary
...................................................................... 31. Introduction ........................................................................
............................................... 4 2. Key principles ........................................................................ ............................................. 6 3.Data for inclusive post-disaster needs assessment and recovery ...................................... 9
4.Enabling policies and legislation for disability-inclusive recovery ................................... 13
5.Institutional mechanisms for disability inclusive recovery .............................................. 15
6. Financing mechanisms ........................................................................ ............................... 17 7. Implementation arrangements ........................................................................ .................. 19Contents
fiis guidance note is a result of collaboration between the Global Facility for DisasterReduction and Recovery and the Social
Development Global Practice at the World
Bank. fie document was written by Dr.
Alex Robinson (Independent Consultant)
under the coordination of a team includingAlice Mortlock (Disaster Risk Management
Specialist), Charlotte McClain-Nhlapo (Global Disability Adviser), Mari Helena Koistinen (Senior Social Development Specialist), DeeptiSamant Raja (Disability and Development
Consultant), Mare Lo (Senior Disaster Risk
Management Specialist), Nadia Islam (Program
Analyst) and Elad Shenfeld (Senior Disaster
Risk Management Specialist). Editing of the
document was done by Cheryl Toksoz. Graphic design was by ULTRA Designs, Inc. CRPD DPO DRF GFDRR ISO NRA NSO PDNA UNUNICEF
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
Accessibility
Disaster Recovery Framework
Disaster risk
Disabled persons' organization
1Based on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Article 9. https://www.un.org/disabilities/
documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf 2Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR). 2015. Guide to Developing Disaster Recovery Frameworks:
Sendai Conference Version." World Bank, Washington, DC. https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/ffiles/publication/DRF-Guide.pdf
3United Nations Oce for Disaster Risk Reduction terminology. https://www.undrr.org/terminology/disaster-risk
4Based on the World Health Organization"s International Classiffication of Functioning, Disability and Health. https://www.who.
int/classiffications/icf/en/ 5GFDRR. 2015. Guide to Developing Disaster Recovery Frameworks: Sendai Conference Version." World Bank, Washington,
DC. https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/ffiles/publication/DRF-Guide.pdf 6Based on United Nations Oce for Disaster Risk Reduction terminology. https://www.undrr.org/terminology/underlying-
disaster-risk-driversFunctioning
Post-Disaster Needs Assessment
Reasonable accommodation
Underlying risk factors
Universal design
Glossary
1. Introduction
a.Background
7World Health Organization and World Bank. 2011. World Report on Disability." World Health Organization, Geneva. http://
www. who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/ report.pdf 8UN. 2005. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities." Article 1. https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/
convention/convoptprot-e.pdf 9World Health Organization and World Bank. 2011. World Report on Disability. World Health Organization, Geneva. http://
www. who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/ report.pdf 10Mitra, Sophie, Michael Palmer, Hoolda Kim, Daniel Mont, and Nora Groce. 2017. Extra Costs of Living with A Disability: A
Systematized Review and Agenda for Research." Disability and Health Journal, 10 (4): 475-84. 11Fujii, Katsunori. 2015. fie Great East Japan Earthquake and Persons with Disabilities Affected by the EarthquakeWhy Is the
Mortality Rate so High?" Interim Report on JDF Support Activities and Proposals. Japan Disability Forum, Tokyo. http://www.
12Sudaryo, Mondrasrti K., Besral, Ajeng Tias Endarti, Ronnie Rivany, Revati Phalkey, Michael Marx, and Debarati Guha-
Sapir. 2012. Injury, Disability, and Quality of Life aer the 2009 Earthquake in Padang, Indonesia: A Prospective
Cohort Study of Adult Survivors." Global Health Action, 5 (4). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/gha.
v5i0.11816%40zgha20.2012.5.issue-s4Long-term physical, mental, intellectual, or
sensory impairments, which, in interaction with various barriers, may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others. 8 fie CRPD places emphasis on the barriers persons with disabilities face that contribute to exclusion from all aspects of life. In comparison to persons without disabilities, persons with disabilities frequently experience lower educational attainment; fewer work opportunities and lower household incomes; higher unmet health needs; and higher household expenditures on transportation and health. 9,10Barriers also contribute to higher
rates of death and injury in disasters among persons with disabilities. 11Disasters also
contribute new long-term injuries and increase disability in populations. 12Post-disaster recovery presents the
opportunity to build back better" and to reduce the underlying factors that contribute to disproportionate risk. Importantly, recovery and reconstruction processes that actively engage with and include persons with disabilities contribute to building more inclusive and resilient societies for all. b. PurposeDisaster impacts are dependent on pre-existing conditions and underlying risk factors, including access to resources. A boy using crutches walking
in the Dadaab refugee camp in Somalia. Photo: Shutterstock.com2. Key principles
a.Disability-inclusive recovery as
opportunity 13Hallegatte, Stephane, Jun Rentschler, and Brian Walsh. 2018. Building Back Better: Achieving Resilience through Stronger,
Faster, and More Inclusive Post-Disaster Recovery." World Bank, Washington, DC. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/
reconstruction 14Banks, Lena Morgon, Hannah Kuper, and Sarah Polack. 2017. Poverty and Disability in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A
Systematic Review." PLoS One 12(12). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0189996
15Hallegatte, Stephane, Jun Rentschler, and Brian Walsh. 2018. Building Back Better: Achieving Resilience through Stronger,
Faster, and More Inclusive Post-Disaster Recovery. World Bank, Washington, DC. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/
reconstruction 16Ditchman, Nicole, Kristin Kosyluk, Eun-Jeong Lee, and Nev Jones. 2016. How Stigma Affects the Lives of People with
Intellectual Disabilities: An Overview" in Intellectual Disability and Stigma: Stepping Out from the Margins, edited by K. Scior
and S. Werner, 31-47. London: Palgrave MacMillan. b. Understanding disability c.Intersectionalities
d.Accessibility
17Astbury, Jill, and Fareen Walji. 2013. Triple Jeopardy: Gender-Based Violence and Human Rights Violations Experienced by
Women with Disabilities in Cambodia. Research Working Paper1, AusAid, Canberra. https://iwda.org.au/assets/ffiles/20130204_
TripleJeopardyReport.pdf
18 Pers. Coms. Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne. Publication forthcoming. 19UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Article 2. https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/
convoptprot-e.pdf 20UN. 2015. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030." UN, New York. https://www.preventionweb.net/
ffiles/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf creating further barriers for persons with disabilities. Addressing barriers during recovery and reconstruction requires a holistic approach. fiis means that barriers are not addressed in isolation and the aim of removing barriers is clear; that is, to contribute to closing the gap between persons with and without disabilities. For example, building a ramp to improve physical access at a government oce is not enough.Information in the oce needs to be accessible
and communicated appropriately. Likewise, staff need to be sensitive to the requirements of persons with diverse disabilities. All are needed if the services the oce provides are to be accessible. fie CRPD sets out two key accessibility principles:Reasonable accommodation
Universal design
infrastructure as unimpeded access for people of all ages and abilities in different situations and under various circumstances." 21e. DPOs 21
World Bank. 2017. fie World Bank Environmental and Social Framework," page 46 World Bank, Washington DC. pubdocs.
identiffied by national-level DPO networks or departments of social affairs. Where DPOs are not present in a working area, persons with disabilities should be engaged in the recovery process with consideration to diversity, including gender, age, and disability type.Summary and action points
Post-disaster recovery provides the
opportunity to create more inclusive and resilient societies.Lived experiences of disability are diverse
and will vary according to type(s) of disabilities, gender, age, indigeneity, and household income.Disability-inclusive recovery is
primarily concerned with creating equal opportunities for persons with disabilities through the removal of barriers.Barriers are not just physical and should
be addressed holistically.DPOs are key allies for ensuring
disability inclusion and should be engaged throughout the recovery and reconstruction process. Growing awareness of disability inclusion is increasing demand for DPO engagement. These pressures may be amplied in a post-disaster context. It is essential that persons with disabilities, and their representative organizations, are consulted andinvolved in all stages of recovery. However, disability inclusion is a responsibility shared by all recovery
stakeholders. Accountability for disability inclusion must not be placed on the shoulders of DPOs alon
e.During a recovery process, DPOs may be operating outside their normal area of work. The ways in which
DPOs can be resourced to contribute to recovery and reconstruction require consideration. The role of DPOs in recovery and reconstruction will depend on available DPO capacities and capabil ities. DPO roles may include facilitation, training of recovery personnel, technical guidance and support, monitoring and accessibility audits, and direct implementation of recovery programming.Box 1. Considerations: DPO engagement
a.Disability data and sources
22UNESCAP. 2019. Disability at a Glance 2019: Investing in Accessibility in Asia and the Paciffic." Bangkok, United Nations
Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Paciffic. https://www.unescap.org/publications/disability-glance-2019
23Berghs, Maria. 2015. Radicalising Disability" in Conict and Post-Conict Situations." Disability & Society 30(5): 743-58.
24Robles, Cindy Patricia Quijada, and Melody Benvidez. 2018. Gender Equality and Women"s Empowerment in Disaster
Recovery: Disaster Recovery Guidance Note." GFDRR, Washington, DC. https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/ffiles/publication/
gender-equality-disaster-recovery.PDF 25World Health Organization Model Disability Survey. https://www.who.int/disabilities/data/mds/en/ 26
World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. https://www.who.int/classiffications/icf/whodasii/en/
27UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys. https://mics.unicef.org/
If disability data has not been collected in
the PDNA, a rapid survey may need to be conducted to establish a baseline. National or local, statistical oces may be appointed as the lead agency and should be appropriately resourced. Departments of health and social affairs may have access to community workers that can assist in data collection. Data on the number of persons with disabilities may also be available from existing sources; however, each has limitations.Population and household surveys
Administrative data
3.Data for inclusive post-disaster needs assessment
and recovery management information systems or be available for persons with disabilities receiving disability beneffits or social insurance. fiis data may contain identiffiable information, including addresses. However, there may be legal restrictions and privacy considerations on what data can be shared. Administrative data only includes individuals with disabilities who are accessing a service and not the wider population of persons with disabilities.Key informants
28See: http://www.washingtongroup-disability.com/about/history/#note-808-1 29
Washington Group Extended Set, see: http://www.washingtongroup-disability.com/washington-group-question-sets/extended-
set-of-disability-questions/ 30UNICEF Module on Child Functioning, see: https://data.unicef.org/resources/module-child-functioning/ 31
Inter-Agency Standing Committee. 2019. Guidelines: Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Humanitarian Action."
Inter-Agency Standing Committee, New York. https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/iasc-task-team-inclusion-persons-
32Government of Sri Lanka. 2017. Post-Disaster Recovery Plan: Sri Lanka Floods and Landslides." May. https://reliefweb.int/sites/
33See: http://www.washingtongroup-disability.com/
34Tiberti, Marco, and Valentina Costa. 2020. Disability Measurement in Household Surveys: A Guidebook for Designing
Household Survey Questionnaires." World Bank, Washington DC. http://surveys.worldbank.org/publications/disability-
b.Measurement tools: the
Washington Group Questions
The Washington Group short set of questions
on disabilityDo you have diculty seeing, even if wearing
glasses?Do you have diculty hearing, even if using a
hearing aid?Do you have diculty walking or climbing
steps?Do you have diculty remembering or concen
trating?Do you have diculty (with self-care such as)
washing all over or dressing?Using your usual (customary) language, do you
have diculty communicating, for example understanding or being understood?Responses to the above questions
No diculty
Yes, some diculty
Yes, a lot of diculty
Cannot do at all
The Washington Group questions are
not designed to identify all persons with disabilities . The identication of persons with disabilities should be ongoing throughout the recovery process.The Washington Group Short Set will identify
some persons with intellectual disabilities. The extended set of questions has additional questions to improve the identication of persons with intellectual disabilities or cognitive diculties. The Extended Set is available from the Washington Group website.The Washington Group questions d
o not identify impairments or health conditions.However, the questions can be used as
a screening tool for referral for medical assessment to ensure specic health needs are met.The Washington Group recommends a lot of
quotesdbs_dbs33.pdfusesText_39[PDF] Note de présentation relative au Projet de Décret portant création du Conseil Consultatif Supérieur de la Consommation
[PDF] Note de présentation. Observatoire DE L ETHIQUE DOUANE/SECTEUR PRIVE
[PDF] NOTE DE RESTITUTION FINALE
[PDF] NOTE DE SERVICE RELATIVE AUX CONGES ET AUX AUTORISATIONS D ABSENCES
[PDF] Note de suivi et d actualisation. du programme local de l habitat de Caen la mer 2010-2015. Bilan annuel 2011
[PDF] Note du Haut conseil pour l avenir de l assurance maladie adoptée à l unanimité lors de sa séance du 24 janvier 2013
[PDF] NOTE INTRODUCTIVE AU PROJET DE LOI COMPLETANT ET MODIFIANT LA LOI NO 52-05 PORTANT SUR LE CODE DE LA ROUTE
[PDF] Note Simplifiée. UNION ECONOMIQUE ET MONETAIRE OUEST AFRICAINE ---------------- La Commission ------------
[PDF] NOTE STAGE PRATIQUE BAFA - BAFD
[PDF] Note technique. Recrutement Les étudiants ont du talent Concours 2012-2013 Date : 04/10/2012. Thème... 2
[PDF] NOTE. Une approche structurée pour comprendre les besoins en services financiers des personnes pauvres au Mexique. Segmentation du marché de masse
[PDF] NOTICE D INFORMATION RELATIVE :. aux conditions d admission.. à la formation
[PDF] NOTICE EXPLICATIVE : AIDE DU CONSEIL REGIONAL MIDI PYRENEES POUR LES DEMANDEURS D EMPLOI
[PDF] Notice explicative relative à l utilisation de l outil pour la production du