Unclear for take-off? F-35 Procurement
Dec 19 2017 technical data gathered by ALIS in relation to the UK's F-35 ... The F-35 has clearly experienced a number of software and hardware problems.
f–35 program update: sustainment production
https://www.congress.gov/116/chrg/CHRG-116hhrg39806/CHRG-116hhrg39806.pdf
A Review of Selected International Aircraft Spares Pooling Programs
the United Kingdom) shared in the system's development and procurement.1 In in the F-35 Global Spares Pool: Advantages and Risks unpublished RAND ...
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program
May 2 2022 the Air Force
F-35 AIRCRAFT SUSTAINMENT DOD Needs to Address
Oct 26 2017 Table: Key Department of Defense (DOD) Challenges for F-35 Aircraft Sustainment. Key challenge. Description. Limited repair capacity.
The UK and the Joint Strike Fighter: The trials and tribulations of
policy options and problems facing the UK if it wants to remain one of the The JSF (or F-35 Lightning II) program was set up with a difficult mandate -.
A new systems engineering structured assurance methodology for
in legacy systems the MAA informed the TAA that the UK's F-35B aircraft would Understanding such complex systems required an awareness of the problems ...
Global Defense Procurement and the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter
Accessed August 15 2018; and Jeremiah Gertler
GAO-20-316 WEAPON SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT: DOD Needs a
Mar 6 2020 Examples of Challenges Identified by Personnel Who Use the F-35 Autonomic Logistics. Information System (ALIS). The Department of Defense ...
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program
Mar 19 2020 the Air Force
Global Defense
Procurement and the
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter
BERT CHAPMAN
Global Defense Procurement and the F-35
Joint Strike Fighter
Bert?Chapman
Global Defense
Procurement and the
F-35 Joint Strike
Fighter
ISBN 978-3-030-01366-0 ISBN 978-3-030-01367-7 (eBook)Library of Congress Control Number: 2018962977
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer NatureSwitzerland AG 2019
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microlms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specic statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional afliations. Cover image: © Colin Anderson / Photodisc / Getty Images This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer NatureSwitzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, SwitzerlandBertChapman
Purdue University
West Lafayette, IN, USA
In Memoriam: Albert T.?Chapman, Jr. (1920-2010)
Mildred S.?Chapman (1926-2017).
vii Writing a book of this detail has been a time-consuming endeavor. Working at Purdue University Libraries, I am truly grateful to have supportive and collegial colleagues who understand the complexities and frustrations involved in writing a scholarly book. It is a blessing to work at a research library with a strong and enduring commitment to providing scholars from all disciplines with access to so many research and data resources. I want to give particular thanks to my supervisor Professor Erla Heyns and Professor J.P.?Herubel who have encouraged me to keep "plugging away" at this endeavor and reassuring me it would eventually be accom- plished. Additional gratitude goes to Purdue History Professor Michael Smith, who was a constant source of support and encouraged me to tryPalgrave Macmillan as a publisher.
Anca Pusca, Katelyn Zingg, Hemalatha Arumugam, Vinoth Kuppan, Dana De siena, and Leoselvakumar Periyanayagam have been consum- mate professionals in guiding me through Palgrave's publishing policies and procedures and making constructive suggestions for enhancing manu- script quality. This work has also been enhanced by the suggestions of its peer reviewers. I appreciate the permissions granted by the American Enterprise Institute, Center for Strategic and International Studies, and Lockheed Martin to use maps and photographs in this work. Sarah Reifel of Purdue's Roland Parrish Library provided very helpful graphic design input.?Colin Anderson deserves credit for the powerful cover image. I am also grateful for the encouragement of family and friends. My brother Brent and brother-in-law Mark Gick are always interested in my scholarly investigations, with Mark being particularly enthusiastic aboutACKNOWLEDGMENTS
viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS aviation matters. The love and understanding of my wife Becky is an eter- nal source of blessing and joy. She has traveled with me to sites such as the Royal Air Force Museum and National Museum of the US Air Force to share my infatuation with the JSF and endured my seemingly incessant talk about this aircraft and its impact. I'm sorry my parents did not live long enough to see this project reach completion. Albert T.?Chapman was a Marion, IN, high school chemistry teacher whose interests went far beyond science and who positively impacted family, students, colleagues, fellow church members, and a wide network of individuals. My mother Dr. Mildred S.?Chapman died on September 20, 2017. She heard me talk about this project often and I wish she could have lived long enough to see its culmination. She served as a Taylor University Education and English Professor, and was acutely inter- ested in my writing, and helped endow me with a commitment to detail and presenting the highest-quality professional work and personal con- duct. This work is dedicated to both of?my parents and honoring their enduring legacy. ix1 Introduction 1
2 History of Jet Fighters 11
3 Emerging Military Aviation Trends and Potential US
Aerospace Adversaries 45
4 JSF and the United States 89
5 JSF and Australia 165
6 JSF and Canada 199
7 JSF and the United Kingdom 235
8 JSF and Denmark, Israel, Italy, and Japan 271
9 JSF and the Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, South
Korea, Taiwan, and Turkey 305
CONTENTS
x CONTENTS10 Conclusion 345
Glossary 371
Index 379
xi Fig. 3.1 China air and naval assets by region. Source: U.S. Department of Defense 2015 54 Fig. 3.2 China conventional strike capabilities or maximum missile range. Source: U.S. Department of Defense 2016 55 Fig. 3.3 Known Iranian nuclear sites. Source: Hassan, CongressionalResearch Service 57
Fig. 3.4 North Korean air forces. Source: U.S.?Department of Defense, "Military and Security Developments," 2015 61 Fig. 3.5 Russia oil and gas operations. Source: Davies and Mugg,American Enterprise Institute 63
Fig. 3.6 Russian strategic rocket forces. Source: Defense IntelligenceAgency 65
Fig. 3.7 Russian air forces air bases. Source: Defense Intelligence Agency. Note: Moscow maintains aviation units in Armenia and Kyrgyzstan, represented on the map by the two ghter base symbols outside Russia's borders 65 Fig. 6.1 Map of Russian Military Bases and SAR Centers in the Artic.Source: Conley and Rohloff, CSIS 214
Fig. 8.1 Israel's Minister of Defense Avigdor Liberman in the cockpit of the F-35A Lighting II, June 22, 2016. Source: LockheedMartin 2016 283
Fig. 10.1 Joint strike ghter budgeted development and procurement costs by service. Source: U.S.?Government AccountabilityOf ce 2017 346
LIST OF FIGURES
xiiiTable 2.1 Historical jet ghter development 13
Table 2.2 US jet ghters deployed between 1946 and 1958 14 Table 2.3 US jet ghters purchased during the 1960s and 1970s 15 Table 2.4 US jet ghters purchased in the 1980s and 1990s 17 Table 2.5 RAAF jet ghters purchased during the jet age 19 Table 2.6 Historic and recent RAF jet ghter purchases 20Table 2.7 RCAF jet ghter purchases 22
Table 2.8 Chinese Air Force and Navy jet ghters 23Table 2.9 Soviet/Russian jet ghters 24
Table 3.1 Predator UAV operational capabilities 48Table 3.2 Reaper UAV operational capabilities 49
Table 3.3 Global Hawk operational capabilities 49
Table 3.4 2015 China aircraft within range of Taiwan 52 Table 3.5 North Korean short-range ballistic missile (SRBM) capabilities 58 Table 3.6 North Korean intermediate/medium-range ballistic missile (IR/MRBM) capabilities 59 Table 3.7 North Korean intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capabilities 60Table 3.8 Russian SRBM capabilities 64
Table 3.9 Russian ICBM capabilities 64
Table 4.1 JSF capabilities 91
Table 4.2 JSF management reserves 2004-2007 104
Table 4.3 JSF manufacturing delays 105
Table 4.4 Projected Block 4 development costs 121
Table 4.5 JSF software block test progress 121
Table 4.6 October 2017 JSF sustainment challenges 123LIST OF TABLES
xiv LIST OF TABLES Table 4.7 JSF supplier locations/economic impact 127Table 4.8 Selected JSF US contractors 129
Table 4.9 Selected aerospace industry and labor union congressional campaign contributions 130 Table 4.10 Selected aerospace industry US Senate campaign contributions 133Table 5.1 Australian JSF contractors 172
Table 5.2 Asia-Paci c per capita defense spending 174Table 5.3 Asia-Paci c defense spending by GDP 174
Table 5.4 Asia-Paci c defense spending (US dollars) 174Table 5.5 Global aerospace arms transfers 175
Table 5.6 Asia-Paci c aerospace defense transfers 175Table 5.7 Aging RAAF F/A-18 A/B ghters 178
Table 6.1 2011 Parliamentary Budget Of ce JSF purchase projections 205Table 6.2 Canadian JSF contractors 211
Table 6.3 2011 Canadian aerospace export percentages 212Table 7.1 Selected British JSF contractors 244
Table 8.1 Rafale technical capabilities 272
Table 8.2 Euro ghter Typhoon national distribution 273Table 8.3 Typhoon technical capabilities 274
Table 8.4 Additional Typhoon technical capabilities 274 Table 8.5 Typhoon technical capabilities with full air-to-air missile t 274Table 8.6 Hourly ghter operational costs 275
Table 8.7 Gripen technical capabilities 276
Table 8.8 Danish JSF contractors 279
Table 8.9 Israeli JSF contractors 282
Table 8.10 Italian JSF contractors 286
Table 8.11 Japanese JSF contractors 289
Table 9.1 Dutch JSF contractors 309
Table 9.2 Norwegian JSF contractors 312
Table 9.3 Potential South Korean JSF contractors 317 Table 9.4 China-Taiwan cross-strait airpower balance 318Table 9.5 Potential Taiwanese JSF contractors 321
Table 9.6 Turkish JSF contractor 324
Table 10.1 Selected JSF international workforce and contract statistics 347 Table 10.2 Pilot survey of JSF performance versus other combat aircraft 3541© The Author(s) 2019
B. Chapman, Global Defense Procurement
and the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter,CHAPTER 1
Introduction
The US Department of Defense (DOD) is responsible for a global array ofquotesdbs_dbs4.pdfusesText_7[PDF] f 35 program failure
[PDF] f 35 program office
[PDF] f 35 program overview
[PDF] f 35 program total cost
[PDF] f 35 program upsc
[PDF] f 35 programme
[PDF] f 35 programme cost
[PDF] f 35 sar 2019
[PDF] f 35 selected acquisition report
[PDF] f 35 selected acquisition report 2018
[PDF] f 35 selected acquisition report 2019
[PDF] f 35 stovl engine
[PDF] f 35 stovl fighter
[PDF] f 35 stovl landing