[PDF] Repealing Breed-Specific Legislation

View - Download Repealing Breed-Specific Legislation

Previous PDF

Next PDF

Repealing

Breed-Speciffic Legislation

Moving beyond breed to save dogs

and strengthen communities FOREWORD ........................................................................ LEARN THE FACTS ABOUT BREEDffiSPECIFIC LEGISLATION Putting dog bites in perspective: Most dogs never bite ..............5

Bad laws have high costs

The mixed breed dog: What it means and why it matters ..........8

Experts don"t support breed-based policies

..............................10

BSL on the decline—where is BSL?

Is BSL about dogs, or is it really about people?

..........................14

REPEAL A BREEDffiSPECIFIC ORDINANCE

............15 Assess the ordinance"s history and research the issue ............15

Mobilize within your community

Get to know your elected ocials

Identify ordinances changes

Advocate for your proposal

After the vote

.............21

FINAL THOUGHTS

CAMPAIGN MATERIALS

Talking points

.............25

Fact sheet

...................26

Testimony

..................26

Letters to the editor

.27

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

....................................29

Links found throughout the document

Citations

......................30 Notes ...........................32

CONTENTS

Breed-speciffic Legislation Toolkit 1 4 Breed-speciffic Legislation Toolkit Ask a hundred dierent Americans to dene what a “pit bull" is, however, and you will get a hundred dierent answers. Over the past two decades, the category has swelled to include mixed-breed dogs that possess supposed “pit bull characteristics," such as blocky heads, white chest markings, or brindle coats. Those same characteristics can be found in more than twenty breeds of dog, and the latest genetic research indicates that many mixed-breed dogs identied as “pit mixes" actually aren"t. “Pit bull," as it is most commonly used, has become a slap-dash shorthand for a general shape of dog— a medium-sized, smooth-coated mutt— or a “dog not otherwise specied." Most of the seventy-seven million dogs thought to be living in the United States are not registered with kennel clubs, and many are not even licensed, so it is impossible to know how many dogs from pit bull breeds live, die, or enter the

American shelter system each year.

We do know that there are a lot of them. Between 1995 and 2005 (the most recent time frame for which data are available), a rela tively small specialty registry called the American Dog Breeders As- sociation (ADBA) registered more than 700,000 American pit bull terrier puppies. In that same decade, the American Kennel Club (AKC) registered a little more than 25,000 AmStas and Staords. The American Bully Kennel Club (ABKC), another niche organiza

tion, currently registers almost 40,000 American bullies each year, as well as roughly 60,000 dogs from similar bulldog breeds. If the

UKC were to make its statistics public, those numbers would add considerably to the total. Combined, these gures still don"t account for the untold thou sands of purebred dogs whelped in backyards across the United States, or the much higher number of mixed-breed animals who may have one or more pit bull “characteristics." In 2011, when the rst “mutt census" was conducted by Mars Veterinary, a research division of the consumer brand Mars Incorporated that sells dog DNA tests, the American Staordshire terrier was the seventh most common breed identied in America"s mixed-breed dog pop ulation, despite being seventieth in AKC popularity. The number of Americans who self-identify as pit bull owners is increasing as well. Baneld pet hospitals, the largest chain of veterinary clinics in the country, reports that the number of their pit-bull-owning clients rose 47 percent between 2003 and 2013. A separate analysis of national veterinary records lists the American pit bull terrier among the top three most popular breeds in twen ty-eight states and among the top ve in thirty-four. Once again, we can"t know which of these animals are pedigreed pit bulls and which are simply mixed breeds, but this does tell us that the “pit bull" label is prolic and that many pet owners are quite proud of it.

COVER MARY SHANNON JOHNSTONE PREVIOUS PAGE MARK MAKELA/FOR THE HSUS OPPOSITE PAGE MARY SHANNON JOHNSTONE

Foreword

Breed-speciffic Legislation Toolkit 3

Introduction

The pet-keeping culture in this country has changed dramatically over the past decade. From the rise of daycare for dogs to easily available pet health insurance, Americans are investing a tremen dous amount of time, energy and love in their four legged compan- ions. Nearly two-thirds of American households have pets—that"s

77 million pet dogs (APPA, 2015)! What"s more, 95 percent of all

pet owners consider their pets to be members of the family (Harris Poll, 2015). Indicators like the number of dogs sleeping in their human"s bed—more than half (Harris Poll, 2015)—and the amount spent annually on pets—nearly $61 billion in 2015 (APPA, 2015)— illustrate that the majority of Americans love and care for pets appropriately and successfully. Most companion animals in the U.S. are safe and loved. That said, there are still huge systematic threats causing animals to lose their homes, six to eight million of whom end up in our nation"s animal shelters every year. For dogs, perhaps the worst threat is breed-speci c legislation. BSL restricts dog ownership by breed, creating obstacles and hardship for many dogs and dog owners. Thankfully, no state still regulates dogs based on breed, but an extensive patchwork of cities, counties and municipalities have bans and restrictions. Despite strong evidence that the vast majority of people with dogs are managing them well, making sure their behavior is in line with social expectations, an unacceptable number of ordinances across the country ban, regulate or place additional restrictions on certain breeds or types of dogs. Rather than basing public policy on the facts and pet-keeping trends, BSL is based on fear and myth. In recent years many municipalities have repealed their breed-based laws and adopted breed-neutral approaches to animal management. The Humane

Society of the United States opposes breed-based laws and policies and works with policymakers around the country to implement

smarter, better policies for safer communities. This toolkit has been designed to empower you and other advo cates to repeal harmful BSL in your community and to transform your community into a safer place for both dogs and people. When using this toolkit, we encourage you to collaborate with local stakeholders, including HSUS state directors, local shelters, rescue groups and animal advocacy groups. By forming a uni ed coali tion, we can eliminate the destruction caused by breed-speci c legislation. Read on to learn the truth about BSL and to help your commu nity become a place where dogs aren"t judged by their looks, but by their behavior. BSL is not about one breed or type of dog; it is about all dogs and all people. It is a dying trend, and it"s time to leave this kind of bad policy where it belongs: in the past. OPPOSITE PAGE AMR IMAGE/ISTOCKCOM THIS PAGE MEREDITH LEE/THE HSUS Contrary to the media narrative, only a tiny subset of American pit bulls will ever have any contact with the world of illegal dog ght ing, which is a felony in all fty states. Only a handful of dogs from speci c bloodlines of one breed—the American pit bull terrier— are still selected and trained for that purpose. Cruelty investigators at the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) and the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) report that even within this highly specialized subset only one dog per litter may show the necessary temperament and stamina for the grim task of mortal combat, which is on par with historical es timates, which place the number of purpose-bred APBTs matched in pit contests somewhere between 1 and 10 percent. Therefore, comparing the temperaments and behaviors of elite ghting dogs with those of all pit bulls is a bit like using the U.S. Navy SEALs as a benchmark for all American men. Fortunately for the canine victims involved, law enforcement oficials are seeing the numbers of APBTs bred for ghting dwindle, thanks to increased awareness and tougher enforcement of cruelty laws. They insist that the overwhelming majority of pit bulls, like most dogs in America, live uneventful lives as family pets. You would not know this from reading, watching, or listening to the

news. Nor would you know that only about thirty- ve Americans are killed by any type of dog each year, as opposed to the thir

ty- ve thousand who die of accidental overdoses or the thirty-six thousand who perish in car accidents. Unlike overdoses and car accidents, however, exceedingly rare events like dog attacks terrify the most primitive, reptilian parts of our brains. And unlike falls or drownings, which also account for thousands of American deaths each year, dog bite deaths, especially when pit bulls are involved, allow the audience to choose sides when looking to place blame: Are pit bulls inherently dangerous, or is it all in how you raise them? Which is more important, human rights or animal rights? Which is stronger, nature or nurture?

Like the existence of God, a woman"s

right to choose, or the ethics of capital punishment, such reduc tions are good at creating conict (and conict drives narrative, which in turn draws viewers and clicks), but they foreclose the pos sibility of solving the complicated problems of cruelty and violence. Underneath America"s need to de ne a singular “truth" about pit bulls is a much more revealing division: that pit bulls are not for people like “us"— the respectable and morally upstanding mem bers of society; pit bulls belong to them -Bronwen Dickey,

Pit Bull:

The Battle over an American Icon

FOREWORD

Breed-speciffic Legislation Toolkit 5 4 Breed-speciffic Legislation Toolkit PUTTING DOG BITES IN PERSPECTIVE: MOST DOGS NEVER BITE

Despite widespread and often sensationalized media coverage on dog bites and attacks, there is no dog bite epidemic in this country.

The reality is that most dogs never bite, and reported dog bites have signi cantly decreased across the country since the 1970s (NCRC,

2016). The graph below, compiled by the National Canine Research Council, illustrates the decline in reported dog bites in various US cities:

OPPOSITE PAGE STRAY_CAT/ISTOCKCOM

Learn the facts about

breed-speciffic legislation

Total reported dog bites in selected cities

40,000

10,000

25,000

35,000

5,000

20,000

30,000

0

15,0001972

2011

Total reported

dog bites40,0008,36537,488 3,55711,9321,9318,5241,1096,8097193,4254382,7549691,459848

Los Angeles

County, CABaltimore,

MDChicago,

ILMarion County,

INNew York,

NYDistrict of

ColumbiaPhiladelphia,

PAAlbuquerque,

NM Breed-speciffic Legislation Toolkit 7 6 Breed-speciffic Legislation Toolkit It is important to note that there is no federal, centralized re- porting agency for dog bite information and most states do not collect dog bite information by breed. Most dog bite informa tion is collected on a local level, by city and county hospitals or animal service agencies, and the methods used to collect said information vary widely and involve a great deal of subjectivi ty. Circumstances regarding the bites and important variables other than breed are left out, while subjective breed descriptors are used to conclude that some dogs are more dangerous than others. Because a breed"s population within any given locality is unknown, incident rates by breed cannot be reliably determined, even if visual breed identication was accurate. Proponents of BSL often refer to false statistics that are actually based on their own biased research, misleading people to believe that certain breeds or types of dogs are more likely to bite or at tack. This minority group of anti-dog advocates runs a fear-mon- gering campaign based on misinformation. They target vulner- able communities where serious dog attacks have happened, capitalizing on people"s grief and trauma. Rather than oering sustainable and humane solutions, they oer short-sighted, inhumane and wasteful ideas which oer nothing to prevent dog bites and attacks. The mere suggestion that it is possible to ban a breed of dog from a community is out of touch with reality. There were 40 veried dog bite-related fatalities (DBRFs) in the US in 2014; they occurred within a human population of 316

million and a canine population estimated at between 70 and 83 million (NCRC, 2014). It makes no sense to talk about dog

bites and behavior in the same context as DBRFs, yet anti-pit bull propagandists convolute the subjects all the time. So let"s talk about DBRFs.

A comprehensive study on DBRFs published by

The Journal of

the American Veterinary Medical Association in 2013 identied multiple, co-occurring factors in all cases, and breed was not one of them (Patronek, Sacks, Delise, Cleary, Marder 2013). In fact, that study says DBRFs are multifactorial and that there is no single factor responsible for these events. In cases where the breed(s) of dog(s) could be reliably identied, more than 20 breeds and at least two mixed breed dogs were identied. Based on this analysis of all DBRFs known to have occurred over a 10-year period, the researchers identied a co-occurrence of multiple, controllable factors of which breed was not included: No able-bodied person being present to intervene (87.1%). The victim having no familiar relationship with the dog(s) (85.2%). The dog(s)"s owner failing to neuter/spay the dog(s) (84.4%). A victim"s compromised ability, whether based on age or physical condition, to manage their interactions with the dog(s) (77.4%). The owner keeping dog(s) as resident dog(s), rather than as family pet(s) (76.2%). The owner"s prior mismanagement of the dog(s) (37.5%).

The owner"s abuse or neglect of dog(s) (21.1%).Four or more of these factors were present in 80.5% of the

cases. You can read more about the study at nationalcaninere searchcouncil.com. In addition to the ndings of this study, the HSUS has observed strong patterns in DBRFs and other serious attacks. Often, they occur in a household of lower income or an underserved community, indicating a lack of pet-related information and ser vices, which explains why so many of the dogs are not spayed or neutered. Pets for Life, a program of the HSUS, operates in more than 40 underserved communities across the country. It has produced a great deal of data demonstrating how access (or lack thereof) to veterinary and pet care services, information and re sources plays a role in the health and wellness of a community"s pet population. For example: The incidence rate of unaltered pets in underserved com munities is 87% overall, meaning that nearly 9 in 10 pets are unaltered at the time of the first meeting with PFL. A strong majority of pets in underserved communities have not seen a veterinarian before meeting the PFL outreach teams. This is due to the lack of access to affordable veteri nary services, not a lack of interest or care from the people. Two thirds of all unaltered pets healthy enough for surgery are spay/neutered through PFL, resulting in about seven in every 10 pets being altered if the clients are consistently engaged by the outreach teams (HSUS, 2014). When examining the causes of DBRFs, it"s important to consid er how these documented trends in underserved communities translate to a lack of access to veterinary services, healthy social ization and understanding about dog behavior and health. There are strong indicators in each of these cases that red ags were present and that intervention from an animal welfare or veter inary organization could have prevented these tragic incidents. In order to properly identify these types of situations, animal care and control organizations need to conduct more proactive, community-based outreach. In other words, when people have access to pet care services, dog-related injuries are less likely to occur.quotesdbs_dbs23.pdfusesText_29

[PDF] The Constitution of the United States [PDF] - National Constitution

[PDF] Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2017, American Diabetes

[PDF] GUIDE TO THE EDUCATION SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES

[PDF] An American dictionary of the English language - Republic Study

[PDF] Pathfinder: American Literary Movements - Keene High School

[PDF] A Brief History of American Literature

[PDF] American Staffordshire Terrier - Fédération Cynologique Internationale

[PDF] American and French Grade Level Comparison - Photos

[PDF] AMERICAN SLANG WORDS AND PHRASES

[PDF] Amérique du Nord, 9 juin 2016 - apmep

[PDF] sujet mathématiques amérique du nord bac es l 2016 obligatoire

[PDF] Corrigé du bac S SVT Obligatoire 2016 - Am du Nord - Sujet de bac

[PDF] Amérique du Nord, 7 juin 2017 - Apmep

[PDF] Baccalauréat S Amérique du Nord 31 mai 2012 Corrigé de A Saoud

[PDF] Amérique du sud 2015 Enseignement spécifique - Math France