[PDF] and Second-Order Patterns in Human Visual Cortex Focus on





Previous PDF Next PDF



Arte óptico

Las obras más destacadas del arte óptico son: Zebra (Victor Vasarely 1937) Tigres (Victor Vasarely 1938)



Vasarely « Zebra » 1938

Page 1. Vasarely. « Zebra » 1938.



Untitled

1938 Vasarely creates The Zebras Vasarely Victor (1908-1997) CARS



and Second-Order Patterns in Human Visual Cortex Focus on

Zebras. Medicine .. Functional MRI. Psychology .. Visual System. Medicine .. Retina The zebra a 1938 optical art painting by Victor Vasarely



«Vasarely vous a à lœil »

Victor Vasarely est né à Pecs en Hongrie le 9 avril 1906. En 1925 il commence Il effectue son premier travail majeur



Full page photo

Vega-Kontosh is part of Vasarely's Vega series which was named after the brightest star in For instance



Op-art

Por ejemplo la obra de Victor Vasarely Zebras (1938) está formada completamente por rayas blancas y negras curvilíneas que no están.



VICTOR VASARELY

two dimensions such as The Zebras (1938) Chess Board (1935)



Ortho-Pictures: 3D Objects from Independent 2D Data Sets.

Figure 4 shows one result of [Sela and Elber 2007]. In 1938 Victor Vasarely drew his 'Zebra' picture. This drawing includes a set 



Vasarelys Work– Invitation to Mathematical and Combinatorial

Vasarely; (b) “Balcony” by M.C. Escher. Vasarely's black-white phase was initiated in the figurative Op-art graphics “Zebra” (1938). “ 



[PDF] Vasarely « Zebra » 1938

Page 1 Vasarely « Zebra » 1938



[PDF] ZEBRES » VASARELY 1938 - Eklablog

Cette œuvre est une peinture d'un artiste français : Victor Vasarely Cet artiste a beaucoup travaillé sur les effets d'optiques dans ces œuvres



[PDF] Vasarely

Zébra est le premier travail majeur de Victor Vasarely Il est considéré comme la première œuvre d'art optique Vasarely l'a peint en 1938



[PDF] Victor Vasarely Guide Hongrie

Zebra (1938) Portrait du président Georges Pompidou (1977) Compléments père de l'art optique Victor Vasarely Gy?z? Vásárhelyi dit Victor Vasarely 



A la manière de Victor Vasarely - le stylo de vero - Eklablog

18 jan 2015 · En prenant exemple sur les œuvres de Victor Vasarely et notamment à partir de la peinture : "Zebra" réalisée en 1938



Zèbres (Vasarely) - Vikidia lencyclopédie des 8-13 ans

Zèbres ou Zébra est le premier travail majeur de Victor Vasarely Il est considéré comme la première œuvre d'art optique Vasarely l'a peint en 1937-1938



[PDF] «Vasarely vous a à lœil » - Le Musée en Herbe

Victor Vasarely est né à Pecs en Hongrie le 9 avril 1906 En 1925 il commence Il effectue son premier travail majeur Zebra en 1938 considéré



[PDF] Les zèbres daprès Vasarely

Les oeuvres de Vasarely seraient des images retravaillées par la mémoire et ayant ainsi acquis une quatrième dimension le temps Vasarely travaille à partir de 



[PDF] Victor Vasarely - né le 9 avril 1906 à Pécs mort le 15 mars 1997 à

15 mar 1997 · Victor Vasarely né le 9 avril 1906 à Pécs Vasarely développe son propre modèle d'art abstrait géométrique Zebra (1938) 

:

95:591-592, 2006. doi:10.1152/jn.01039.2005 JN

Zoe Kourtzi

and Second-Order Patterns in Human Visual Cortex"Focus on "Orientation-Selective Adaptation to First- .Textures of Natural Images in the Human Brain

You might find this additional information useful...

15 articles, 2 of which you can access free at: This article cites

on the following topics:

http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/artbytopic.dtlcan be found at Medline items on this article's topics

Veterinary Science .. Humans

Veterinary Science .. Zebras Medicine .. Functional MRI Psychology .. Visual System Medicine .. Retina Veterinary Science .. Visual Cortex

including high-resolution figures, can be found at: Updated information and services can be found at: Journal of Neurophysiologyabout Additional material and information http://www.the-aps.org/publications/jn

This information is current as of May 21, 2006 .

http://www.the-aps.org/.American Physiological Society. ISSN: 0022-3077, ESSN: 1522-1598. Visit our website at (monthly) by the American Physiological Society, 9650 Rockville Pike,

Bethesda MD 20814-3991. Copyright © 2005 by the publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. It i

s published 12 times a yearJournal of Neurophysiology on May 21, 2006 jn.physiology.orgDownloaded from

Editorial Focus

Textures of Natural Images in the Human Brain. Focus on “Orientation- Selective Adaptation to First- and Second-Order Patterns in Human Visual

Cortex"

Zoe Kourtzi

University of Birmingham, School of Psychology, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom Texture patterns—homogeneous regions of repeated struc- tures—are the predominant feature of natural visual scenes. The zebra, a 1938 optical art painting by Victor Vasarely, illustrates how different textures segregate and define figures from their background. Despite the ease with which we per- ceive the two zebras in a background of black and white stripes this is a challenging operation for the visual system. The edges that separate the two zebras from each other and their back- ground divide the image in homogeneous regions that differ in the orientation or the size of the black and white stripes but have similar average luminance (Fig. 1). Thus, a system based on linear filters that detect these first-order luminance changes, similar to neurons in the retina and the primary visual cortex cannot solve the figure-ground segmentation problem in this image. But how does the brain detect figures in cluttered backgrounds when their borders are defined by differences in the contrast, orientation or spatial frequency of their constitu- ent elements rather than simply their average luminance? Larsson et al. (2006) in this issue ofJournal of Neurophysiol- ogy(p. 862-881) provide novel evidence that the perception of these second-order texture patterns entails additional process- ing in ventral and dorsal extrastriate areas beyond the first stages of visual analysis in the primary visual cortex (V1). Recent psychophysical studies (Landy and Graham 2004 for a review) have proposed different processing mechanisms for patterns that differ in their luminance intensity (first-order patterns) and texture patterns that cannot be detected by linear filters based on average luminance changes (second-order pat- terns). In particular, second-order processing mechanisms are tuned for orientation, similar to first-order mechanisms but have greater bandwidth, and there are weak or incomplete interactions between first- and second-order patterns. Based on these findings, Larsson et al. sought to identify brain regions with differential orientation selectivity for second-order (ori- entation- or contrast-defined patterns) rather than first-order patterns (luminance-defined patterns) that may support selec- tive processing for second-order textures. Using an elegant orientation-selective adaptation paradigm in psychophysical and fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) measurements, Larsson et al. tested for1) sensitivity to orientation differences (vertical vs. horizontal) between an adapting and test stimulus and2) cross-modal adaptation when the adapting stimulus was a first-order pattern and the test stimulus a second-order pattern. Adaptation to first- or second- order stimuli increased the observers" sensitivity in detecting a

target pattern with different orientation than the adapted stim-ulus, consistent with classic behavioral adaptation effects.

Similarly, fMRI responses in primary and extrastriate visual areas increased for test stimuli that differed in their orientation from the adapting stimulus. Interestingly, these adaptation effects were of comparable magnitude across visual occipito- temporal areas for first-order patterns, whereas orientation- selective adaptation for second-order patterns was larger in several higher extrastriate areas than in V1. What are the implications of these fMRI adaptation effects for understand- ing the neural mechanisms that mediate selective processing of second-order stimuli in the human brain? fMRI adaptation capitalizes on neural adaptation after pro- longed or repeated exposure to a stimulus and has been used extensively as a sensitive tool for discerning neuronal subpopu- lations selective for different stimulus attributes but intermin- gled within the measured voxels (e.g., Grill-Spector and Mal- ach 2001). This method extends beyond the limited spatial resolution of the conventional fMRI paradigms that average across such populations. However, recent studies call for cau- tious interpretation of fMRI adaptation effects and their impli- cations for neural processing across visual areas (Boynton and Finney 2003; Tolias et al. 2005). Larsson et al. demonstrate that fMRI adaptation is a powerful tool for investigating selectivity to a visual attribute (i.e., orientation) across visual areas when the stimuli used elicit strong fMRI responses but Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Z. Kourtzi, Univer- sity of Birmingham, School of Psychology, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15

2TT, UK (E-mail: z.kourtzi@bham.ac.uk).

FIG. 1. The zebra (1938), an optical art painting by Victor Vasarely. The marked regions show texture boundaries that separate the two zebras from each other or their background.J Neurophysiol95: 591-592, 2006.

10.1152/jn.01039.2005.

5910022-3077/06 $8.00 Copyright © 2006 The American Physiological Societywww.jn.org

on May 21, 2006 jn.physiology.org

Downloaded from

prevent neural saturation in these areas, and the observers" attention is controlled across stimulus conditions. Consistent with previous physiological studies, their findings show orien- tation selective adaptation for both first-order and second-order stimuli in primary and extrastriate areas, suggesting that the processing of second-order textures is distributed across visual areas rather than specialized within a single cortical region. The similarity in the magnitude of fMRI adaptation across visual areas for first-order stimuli suggests that these effects could be accounted for by orientation selective adaptation in V1 neurons that is propagated to downstream extrastriate areas. In contrast, the stronger orientation selective adaptation in extrastriate areas than V1, for second order stimuli, suggest a second stage of processing beyond the linear filter analysis in the primary visual cortex. Furthermore, the lack of consistent adaptation effects for the cross-modal condition support the hypothesis that different mechanisms are involved in the pro- cessing of first-order and second-order textures. Based on these findings, Larsson et al. propose that the role of higher extrastriate areas in texture perception is to perform additional analysis (second stage filter) by pooling the output of the first-stage filters in primary visual cortex after rectifica- tion by the spiking threshold of V1 neurons, consistent with recent computational models for texture perception (Landy and Graham 2004 for a review). An alternative interpretation sug- gests that extrastriate areas contribute to texture perception by extracting salient surface regions (Stanley and Rubin 2003); that is, homogeneous regions of repeated structures in the case of texture patterns. This analysis is then evaluated by neurons in the primary visual cortex that may enhance texture bound- aries (first- or second-order) defining a figure that pops-out from the background (i.e., the zebras in Vasarely"s painting) compared with texture patterns that belong to the background (Fitzpatrick 2000; Lamme et al. 1998). This interpretation is consistent with the role of middle-level surface representations in the perception of textured figures and their surrounds (He and Nakayama 1994). In sum, Larsson et al. provide novel insights in understand- ing the neural mechanisms that mediate the analysis of texture patterns in natural images. This work provides the foundations for investigating the mechanisms that underlie the analysis of “the stuff (e.g., wood, metal, plastic) that objects are made of" (Bergen and Adelson 1988; Fleming et al. 2003; Heeger and

Bergen 1995; Portilla and Simoncelli 2000) and our perceptionof 3D objects defined by texture (Li and Zaidi 2000; Todd

2004) in combination with other depth cues (Knill 2003).

Finally, recent work on multimodal object perception (Amedi et al. 2001) raises novel questions in understanding the role of texture in our unified visual and haptic experiences of objects that is critical for successful actions and interactions in our complex environments.

REFERENCES

Amedi A, Malach R, Hendler T, Peled S, and Zohary E.Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway.Nat Neurosci4:

324-330, 2001.

Bergen JR and Adelson EH.Early vision and texture perception.Nature333:

363-364, 1988.

Boynton GM and Finney EM.Orientation-specific adaptation in human visual cortex.J Neurosci23: 8781-8787, 2003. Fitzpatrick D.Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex.

Curr Opin Neurobiol10: 438-443, 2000.

Fleming RW, Dror RO, and Adelson EH.Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties.J Vis3: 347-368, 2003. Grill-Spector K and Malach R.fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons.Acta Psychol (Amst) 107:

293-321, 2001.

He ZJ and Nakayama K.Perceiving textures: beyond filtering.Vision Res34:

151-162, 1994.

Heeger DJ and Bergen JR.Pyramid-based texture analysis/synthesis.Proc

SIGGRAPH: 229-238, 1995.

Knill DC.Mixture models and the probabilistic structure of depth cues.Vision

Res43: 831-854, 2003.

Lamme VA, Super H, and Spekreijse H.Feedforward, horizontal, and feedback processing in the visual cortex.Curr Opin Neurobiol8: 529-535, 1998.
Landy MS and Graham N.Visual perception of texture. In:The Visual Neurosciences, edited by Chalupa L.M. Werner JS Cambridge: MIT Press,

2004, p. 1106-1118.

Larsson J, Landy MS, and Heeger DJ.Orientation-selective adaptation to first- and second-order patterns in human visual cortex.J Neurophysiol95:

862-881, 2006.

Li A and Zaidi Q.Perception of three-dimensional shape from texture is based on patterns of oriented energy.Vision Res40: 217-242, 2000. Portilla J and Simoncelli EP.A Parametric Texture Model Based on Joint Statistics of Complex Wavelet Coefficients.Internat J Comp Vis40: 49-71, 2000.
Stanley DA and Rubin N.fMRI activation in response to illusory contours and salient regions in the human lateral occipital complex.Neuron37:

323-331, 2003.

Todd JT.The visual perception of 3D shape.Trends Cogn Sci8: 115-121, 2004.
Tolias AS, Keliris GA, Smirnakis SM, and Logothetis NK.Neurons in macaque area V4 acquire directional tuning after adaptation to motion stimuli.Nat Neurosci8: 591-593, 2005.

Editorial Focus

592

J Neurophysiol

VOL 95FEBRUARY 2006www.jn.org

on May 21, 2006 jn.physiology.org

Downloaded from

quotesdbs_dbs16.pdfusesText_22
[PDF] fondation vasarely

[PDF] un tableau ne vit que par celui qui le regarde

[PDF] pekin carte

[PDF] capital hong kong

[PDF] pékin lieux d'intérêt

[PDF] capitale japon

[PDF] capitale chine nationaliste

[PDF] beijing airport

[PDF] population shanghai

[PDF] capital de la russie

[PDF] rosace cm2

[PDF] capitale irak

[PDF] pékin synonyme

[PDF] carnet de chant animateur

[PDF] carnet chant musique et animations