[PDF] The theory of Key Account Management





Previous PDF Next PDF



KEY ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT

Clé de voûte de cette stratégie fondée sur la durabilité de la relation entre le client et le fournisseur le Key Account Manager est davantage un conseiller 



Key account management

The identified aspects were relationship management key account management



9 Key account management

Perhaps the most significant change however



Focus on KAM Champions Championing Key Account Management

Championing Key Account. Management: The Pfizer Center of Excellence. The next few pages will focus on the role of KAM champions precisely.



Key Account Management

Assessing Performance of Key Accounts. KEY TOPICS: • Developing Customer Centric Organizations. • Customer Relationship Management (Introduction to Best 



Creating Value in Key Accounts

Key account management (KAM) is falling short of its potential because of four common mis- takes. One the right accounts—those with the highest upside—are 



The theory of Key Account Management

individual customers of strategic importance to the supplier. A process of growing managing and harvesting the supplier's strategic customer assets.



Key Account Management in the Financial Services Industry : Tools

Dec 1 2005 Foreword by IBM's Financial Services General Managers xi. Acknowledgements xiii. PART I DEFINING KEY ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT IN.



KEY ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT

This is where Key Account Management comes in focusing less on negotiating prices and more on consulting and expertise. Companies who look to innovate.



From Key Account Selling to Key Account Management

of marketing academics and managers towards Key Account Management (KAM) systems as a means of operationalising long-term buyer/seller relationships.

The theory of Key Account Management Professionalising Key Account Management | a4kam.org

The theory of Key

Account Management

For AKAM Diploma students

Dr Diana Woodburn

BSc, MSc, MBA, PhD, FCIM

Dr Diana Woodburn & KAM

Specialising in Key Account Management (KAM) since 1996/7 People and company development in KAM, research, writing, new concepts, teaching and consultancy Founded Cranfield KAM Best Practice Club in 1998, Warwick in 2005 Best-

Multi-sector and multi-country: taught over 2,500

key account managers and over 500 directors

What is KAM?

Is it worth it?

How does KAM work?

woodburn@marketingbp.com info@a4kam.org

Content of this session

1.Defining Key Account Management (KAM)

2.Key Account selection and categorisation

3.KAM relationships

4.Value creation and strategic account planning

5.Implementing KAM

6.The Key Account Manager job

1. Defining Key Account Management

KAM definitions

An integrated approach to the profitable development of individual customers of strategic importance to the supplier

A process of growing, managing

strategic customer assets.

Building close relationships

between the supplier and customer organisations that add businesses as well as to yours. Who gets KAM?

What do

they get?

Complete KAM definition

6

Woodburn & Wilson

Handbook of Strategic

Account Management, 2013

A supplier-led process of inter-organisationalcollaboration that creates value for both supplier and strategically important customers by offering individually tailored propositions designed to secure long-term profitable business through the co-ordinateddeployment of multi-functional capabilities.

Medium

accounts

Small accounts

By number of

accounts

Large accounts

Medium

accounts Small accounts

By volume,

contribution or potential

Who is a Key Account, who gets KAM?

Difference between AM and KAM

* not just personal plan/only sales & marketing aspects

Account ManagementKey Account Management

Business as usualManaged for growth and change

1 year supplier strategy-led action

plans

3-5 year complete strategic business plans unique to

customer, closely aligned with customer strategy* Works within normal organisationCorporate responsiveness, cross-boundary engagement and activity Good businessSubstantial potential, aligned with corporate strategy

No investment or not much Readiness to invest

Coordinated approach to accountHolistic, helicopter, longer-term approach to customer Necessary relationships Many, multi-level, multi-function and senior relationships

Opportunity-focused understanding

Requires Account ManagerRequires Key Account/ Business Manager and KAM team

Hi-tech company

Integrated/co-ordinated customer approach

SupplierCustomer

Strategic

Operational/transactional

Business

relationship

Scope of KAM

KAM

WHY? Core offer

Alternative use of capital

Help the businessProfit

HOW? Integrated offer

Total cost of ownershipValue

WHAT? How much?

Service levels.Price & performanceSelling

Strategies for key accounts

Business strategy

What will happen?

What value can we offer?

Why should we get the business?

What do we need to do?

Relationship strategy

How will we make it happen?

How will the relationship help the

business strategy?

With whom do we need

relationships and why?

What will we say to them?

Why will they care?

Internal strategies

How can we align our KPIs with our key customer objectives? How can we maintain efficient processes that are flexible when needed? How can we measure progress and delivery to key customers specifically?

How are non-sales functions involved?

Deep understanding of the customer

The journey to KAM

Woodburn, 2006

Strategy

and planning

Organisation

and culture

Processes

2. Key Account selection and categorisation

14

Who gets what kind of KAM?

Low High High Low spend

Streamline

Manage for

cash Star

Selective

investment

Strategic

Strategic

investment

Status

Pro-active

maintenance

Key account

attractiveness

Account attractiveness criteria

Outcomes

Financial

outcomes/profit

Customer

needs

Opportunities for

product/service differentiation

Customer

attributes

Risk reduction:

working together

ͻSpend

ͻTurnover

ͻVolume

ͻCost to serve

ͻContribution

ͻPrice

ͻGrowth

ͻStrategically important purchase

ͻAppropriate decision-making structure

ͻRight attitude to relationships

ͻPrepared to pay for value

ͻPrepared to invest

ͻMember of targeted segment

ͻStrategic fit (e.g. platforms, global)

ͻWant non-standard solutions (what?)

ͻSpecifics (e.g. speed, compatible systems)

Potential for profit

Assessing account attractiveness

Account attractiveness

criteria

WeightAccount

A

Account

B

Account

C

Rating

0-10

ScoreRating

0-10

ScoreRating

0-10 Score

Total100

Score = weight x rating (0 10)

Example: DHL and manufacturers

Account attractiveness

criteria

WeightAccount

A

Account

B

Account

C

Rating

0-10

ScoreRating

0-10

ScoreRating

0-10 Score

Size of wallet2592255125

Moves small valuable items

(= need for new, valued added services)

2541008200

Central decision

making203609180

Global operator15690345

Industry growth rate153457105

Total100520655

Score = weight x rating (0 10)

Observation

ͻWhat have they talked about?

ͻWhat are they struggling with?

ͻWhat gets their attention?

Analysis

ͻWhat is happening in their marketplace?

ͻWhat is their competition doing?

ͻWhat do their customers want?

Customer critical success factors

Different for each key account

What does the customer really care about?

Enquiry

Ask them!

Customer's view of your business strength

factors (CSFs)

WeightYour

company Best competitor Other competitor

Rating

0-10

ScoreRating

0-10

ScoreRating

0-10 Score

Total100

Score = weight x rating (0 10)

Who gets KAM?

Low High High Low spend

Streamline

Star Strategic

Status

Key account

attractiveness

Relationship level:

Basic

Co-operative

Interdependent

Integrated ?

21

VERIFY with the customer

ͻTheir actualattractiveness

ͻTheir realcritical success factors for you

ͻTheirview on how they rate you currently

ͻTheir attitude to a close relationship with you You must not waste resources on the wrong accounts Low High High Low

StreamlineStreamline

Star Star StrategicStrategic

StatusStatus

Key account

attractiveness KAM GCR

Profitability

low KAM GCR

Profitability

possibly low KAM GCR

Profitability

high KAM GCR

Profitability

good

G=Growth

CR=Cost Reduction

KAM=KAM input/cost

Matching strategies and expectations

3. KAM relationships

Multi-layered relationships

Layers of

involvement

Activity links

Resource ties

People bonds

Gedde& Snehota, 1999

Co-ordination

Change

Facilitation

CustomerSupplier

Relationship stages

Integrated

Basic

Co-operative

Interdependent

Complex

Simple

Basicrelationships

Cranfield, 1996

ͻSingle/limited significant points of contact

ͻProbably one of several suppliers

ͻEasy to exit

ͻPrice and the reward structure are often the principal drivers

ͻMinimum information sharing

ͻReactive rather than proactive

ͻNot seen as business partner

ͻSmall chance of improving business

ͻCan be stable state or trial stage

ͻTransactional: emphasis on efficiency

Co-operativerelationships

Woodburn, 2000

ͻWider range of functions loosely involved but few consistently, relationship still mainly with buyer and order processing team visibility ͻOne of preferred few suppliers, but minor share of spend

ͻExit not particularly difficult

ͻLimited access especially to senior people

ͻLimited information sharing

ͻForecasting rather than joint strategic planning

ͻNot yet trusted by customer

ͻDanger of losing money!

Interdependent KAM relationships

Woodburn, 2000

ͻWide range of functions and senior people consistently involved ͻRelationship manager positioned to manage entire relationship

ͻSole supplier or major share of two

ͻFully satisfactory access, including key people ͻHigh level of information exchange, including sensitivebusiness information ͻDeep understanding of customer and customer's business

ͻPro-active

ͻWider range of joint and innovative activity and projects

ͻStreamlined processes

ͻJoint strategic planning with a focus on the future ͻIncreasingly seen as business partnership, both invest in relationship ͻBoth acknowledge importance to each other, exit difficult

ͻTrust on both sides

ͻWide-ranging opportunities to improve and develop business

Cranfield, 1996

Integrated relationships

ͻRare

ͻHigh exit barriers, exit is traumatic

ͻDedicated, cross-boundary functional/project teams with individual organisationssubsidiary to team ͻOpen information sharing including sensitive subjects

ͻTransparent costing systems

ͻAssumption of mutual trustworthiness, at all levels

ͻAbstention from opportunistic behaviour

ͻLowered protection against opportunism

ͻJoint long-term strategic planning

ͻReal partnership: complementary, mutually dependent

ͻBetter profits for both

To what extent does this statement apply to your relationship with your customer? Score If our relationship ended, both parties would find it difficult and complicated to exit There is a real spirit of partnership and trust between our two companies Together we have produced long-term strategic plans for the development of our relationship and business together Any information at all relevant to our business together is passed straight on to the customer People at all levels in both organisations are in constant communication with each other We have both realised substantial benefits through working together

Total Score

RatingScore

Strongly agree3

Agree2

Disagree1

Strongly disagree0

Tool: quick relationship check

Low High High Low

Streamline

customers

Manage for

cash

Strategic

customers

Strategic

investment

Pro-active

maintenanceKey Account attractiveness Star customers

Selective

investment

Status

customers

Matching relationships with customer potential

Do you really understand the relationship?

Co-operative

Interdependent

Integrated

Basic

Selling company

Buying company

Selling

companyquotesdbs_dbs31.pdfusesText_37
[PDF] Aspects pratiques de la pédagogie Pikler

[PDF] INSPECTION ACADEMIQUE D EURE-ET-LOIR

[PDF] LEADER EUROPEEN DU CONSEIL EN INNOVATION

[PDF] Référentiel des compétences professionnelles des métiers du professorat et de léducation

[PDF] Mise à jour de la réglementation du cyclisme pour tous

[PDF] COMPTE RENDU DU CONSEIL MUNICIPAL SEANCE DU 25 SEPTEMBRE 2014

[PDF] ASSEMBLEE DE CORSE 18 ET 19 DECEMBRE RAPPORT DE MONSIEUR LE PRESIDENT DU CONSEIL EXECUTIF

[PDF] Politique de sélection des intermédiaires/contreparties et d exécution des ordres

[PDF] ASSOCIATION «CULTURE POUR TOUS»

[PDF] Plan Hôpital 2012 dossier-type IMMO à transmettre pour la validation nationale ANNEXE 2 DOSSIER TYPE IMMOBILIER

[PDF] UN «GUICHET UNIQUE» POUR TOUS LES COMMERCANTS AU SEIN DU SERVICE DU DEVELOPPEMENT ECONOMIQUE & DE L EMPLOI DE LA CALPE

[PDF] Mobilité et Programmes cadres (PC) de Recherche : Appels publiés/attendus 2007-2008. 2 ème édition

[PDF] OFFRE SPECIALE «PROFESSIONNELS DU BATIMENT»

[PDF] Statuts. «Centre d Enseignement Sur les Arts et la Musique» CESAM : l ouverture culturelle en Avant Pays Savoyard. Statuts

[PDF] Politique concernant l utilisation des médias sociaux. CPE Allô mon ami II