[PDF] [PDF] SUSTAINABLE 17 sept 2014 · (LBiP+) methodology





Previous PDF Next PDF



ROBUST LAUNCH OF NEW AIRCRAFT PROGRAMMES

A specific methodology is crucial for improvement projects. As for any project a LBIP-Methodology for Robust Launch with Phases and Gates [3]. This paper ...



MANAGEMENT DES CONNAISSANCES

Thus this present document aims to describe the process performed to build this knowledge management within an aerospace company having not a such system in 



Global Workforce Forecast

methodology. Reinforce the target of Value creation and self-organized team in the LBIP methodology and now the Company Quality. Policy (A35) encompasses ...



Performance Measurement System for a Lean Production Strategy

using an LBIP process. LBIP stands for “lifecycle business improvement projects” and is tool used widely in Airbus for larger projects that are usually 



KTH – Aerospace Engineering

28 févr. 2013 The LBIP (Lifecycle for Business Improvement Project) is the usual ... methodology than for a trans-functional company-wide Improvement project.



Prozessstandardisierung für ein Outsourcing-Vorhaben in der

30 juil. 2012 Integration des LBIP-Standards ... Makigami Info (2012):. Lean Offices - TPM in Support Departments - Process Improvement.



QMS PROCESS JUSTIFICATION PURPOSE SCOPE

This QMS Process defines the global Airbus Canada methodology which Airbus Canada's internally defined milestones of the project management methodology LBIP.





Usefulness of Terrain Stability Mapping for Bioterrain Purposes – A

The PEM methodology requires that the input layer be described in the standardized field names and coding from Errata-2006-1-LBIP for additional.



Standard for Digital Terrain Data Capture in British Columbia

15 mars 2007 The Errata 2006-1.1 replaces Errata 2006-1-LBIP which was based on Addenda 2005-1 which ... Terrain Mapping Methodology. (RIC) for legend format ...



[PDF] AIRBUS DEFENCE & SPACE - Lean Analytics Association

They are driven under the lbiP methodology and represent a successful way to develop more agile processes reducing lead times and improving the right First 



[PDF] Performance Measurement System for a Lean Production Strategy

6 22 Airbus LBIP Process Chapter 4 considers the research methodology of this case study This chapter begins with the research question and objectives 



[PDF] SUSTAINABLE

17 sept 2014 · (LBiP+) methodology He is also the Head of the Airbus Group PM Academy FEATURE: AIRBUS Mark looks back on the past few years at Airbus



[PDF] QMS-09-06 A220 Transfer of Work for Suppliers

This QMS Process defines the global Airbus Canada methodology which must be internally defined milestones of the project management methodology LBIP



[PDF] Contract Tendering Rules - LBI

competitive process was not reasonable or cost effective and will be subject These tender notices are strongly encouraged to be posted on the LBIP Bid 



[PDF] The Management of Programmes at Airbus - HAW Hamburg

4 jui 2009 · Aircraft Integration FCO process Programme P&L's cash drivers Chief Engineering Integrated FAL Product development Programme 



[PDF] The Realization of Applying Lean-based IoT Platformto Achieve

Platform (LBIP) as the framework to achieve Industry 4 0 process of enterprise capability and transformation Rosendahl et al [14] proposed a building 



[PDF] Training Catalogue - AirBusiness Academy

Fleet planning methodologies Overview of aircraft financing process players and jargon • Airline financial statements and LBIP+Lean methodology



[PDF] Summary of External Input into the Ministry of Forests and Range

File: LBIP Project Report 1 ABOUT THIS REPORT Before FORREX designs any process the end result or outcome of the process must be clear



Localized Broadcast Incremental Power Protocol for Wireless

LOCALIZEDBROADCASTINCREMENTALPOWERPROTOCOLThisprotocol referred to as LBIP aims at incrementallyconstructing a broadcasting tree by taking advantage of theBIPalgorithm Roughly the principle is to have each nodeapplyingBIPin its2-hop neighborhood based on informationreceived with the broadcasting packet



2023 LBIP APPLICATION INFORMATION AND NBI SCORE For

2023 lbip application information and nbi score for structures eligible for the bro program region county bridge # fed id route feature functional class year built structure length (ft) fracture critical post ton status closed date detour length (mi) adt nbi score



Searches related to lbip methodology PDF

Site Index (SI) Methodology 3 7 Site index must be collected following the procedural guidelines outlined in Land Management Handbook 12 - Selecting a Method to Estimate Site Index 2006: Selecting a Method to Estimate Site Index 2006 3 8 The following is a site index hierarchy process applicable to Ministry treatment objectives and

What is lbip and how does it work?

LBIP is a mine life extension project which expands the current open pit within Los Bronces’ operating site and replaces future lower grade ore by accessing higher grade ore from a new underground section of the mine.

What is the life cycle of a project in lbip?

In the LBIP, the projects’ life cycle is represented through a group of sequential steps (ffrom creation to completion) and a group of milestones gates between phases to mark and control the execution of the project. In both, the steps and gates are inscribed into one of the DMAIC stages (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control).

How to improve the LPI methodology?

To improve the LPI methodology, it is proposed to compile an index and a subsequent rating based on statistical data. The index should be a method of qualitative and quantitative assessment of the logistics efficiency of a country that meets two important criteria:

What is the LBP model?

The model incorporates the best available scientific evidence to guide the treatment pathway of people with LBP from the moment they seek primary care. Management of all aspects of the condition, including its physical and psychosocial impact is essential to the model.

Mark Robinson

Biog:

Mark is an experienced

programme manager and chartered engineer of complex transnational projects in the aerospace and defence industry and graduated from the school of 'Pragmatic Programme

Management'. In

his current role he is accountable for leading the Airbus PM global governance,

PM standards, PM

categorisation, PM certification, resource management and

Leaner Business

Improvement plus

(LBiP+) methodology.

He is also the Head of

the Airbus Group

PM Academy.

FEATURE: AIRBUS

M ark looks back on the past few years at Airbus and recognises a significant change within his business environment. "Go back five or six years and we were benchmarking outside of Airbus," he explains. "We have gone through a real business transformation step by step and in some areas without even knowing it and that is best sometimes.

Companies are now coming to us as they

see what we are doing in project and programme management and using us as a benchmark."

But as Mark explains, it wasn't always

the case. "Go back in history at Airbus when we had share price impacting issues involving our new flagship aircraft, A380.

Developing a new aircraft means you are

betting the company as you are spending over 10bn - it's a huge complex project to manage. We realised we had to do things differently and so we did."

The real levers for change came after

the publication of two influential reports in

2007/8, one by Deloitte, the other by the

US government accountability office. They

assessed why their Aerospace and Defence contracts were late and over budget and analysed five root causes.

These included programme

management challenges, technical complexity issues, talent shortage, supply chain challenges and politics. "In Airbus we had many of these same issues," adds Mark. "The talent shortage

was a key driver for Airbus both in project management and systems engineering as were the supply chain challenges. As over 60 per cent of our work is in the supply chain and that is really key to making the project a success."

Mark found that there was no

supported PM or PMO development path. "In Airbus, PMO is both an organisation (project and programme office) and a role (project management officer). "It became clear that we needed to drive a dedicated development path for our PMOs and project leaders and also at the same time improve the integration of process methods and tools. The vision was to create a sustainable cultural change."

In 2009 a group-wide PM Improvement

Programme was launched. As part of this,

Airbus set up a Centre of Competence for

Project and Programme Management

with a vision to create a sustainable cultural change.

Mark explains: "We had tried to deliver

this before but it never got the right level of attention. This time around the vision was backed up with the attitude that we are going to ensure we deliver. "There was a budget and resource to support it and there was board-level sponsorship. It came from the very top. "It was essential that it was sponsored at board level. A lot of senior people thought that they should personally support and move it forward rather than treat it as another initiative and risk losing the momentum."

Airbus recognised that culture change

would take time but saw it as an integral way of working in the future.

Mark adds: "It was always a long-term vision. To support this we set up the Airbus Group PM Council and a Steering Board as well. The role of those was to sponsor the change but also to set the strategic direction and harmonise group policies on project and programme management which we hadn't really done before across the whole group.

"Two initial key drivers we then launched to support this were Project

Categorisation and PM Certification. This

was not just symbolic but a clear sign that we believed in what we were doing "

Project Categorisation is an agreed

Airbus Group policy, mandated across the

business. It assesses any project against

16 weighted criteria, looking at elements

like project complexity, risk and the overall project challenge. The priority is to assess the projects prior to launch because the result drives other processes including

PM Certification and Earned Value

Management implementation.

Mark says: "We did some outside

benchmarking with some companies such as Siemens and then put that into our own business context so it made sense for Airbus. "So we assess the different elements looking for objective evidence and enter the results into a model. From this we get a score which determines the Project

Category based on five levels - Iron,

Bronze, Silver, Gold and Platinum. Each

assessment is reviewed by an independent panel before the Category is formally assigned."

Mark believes that because of the

collaborative nature of the categorisation process, project leaders gain a better

Mark Robinson

is Head of PM People and Governance at Airbus. He tells

David Gale

how he has helped drive a sustainable change in PM culture across the business and improve the overall competencies of the PM population.

SUSTAINABLE

Finance

Organisation

Technology

Product

Customer

Project Environment

and Supply Chain Risk

Project Targets

Business Criticality

Customer Opinion

1,041-1,300

PLATINUM

801-1,040

GOLD

591-800

SILVER

411-590

BRONZE

260-410

IRON

UNCATEGORISED

IRONBRONZESILVERGOLDPLATINUMWEIGHTED CRITERIA (16)PROJECT ASSESSED CATEGORISATION SCORE RANGE

Projects not meeting

the entry threshold

Complexity

score

Risk score

Challenge

score

TOTAL SCORE

50%
30%
20%

What is Project Categorisation?

THE SCORE DIFFERENTIATES FIVE DIFFERENT LEVELS:

understanding of the project itself. "We don't just look at the budget but review the complexity of supply chain, maturity of the technology, etc, and it gives a really good view of the project from different angles and people do really learn a lot from the process. At first people saw it as a compliance thing - that they had to do it - but the feedback we get from project leaders and PMOs is that it really does add value. It identifies what we know but more importantly what we don't know and that is where we need to put our energies."

However, it was the introduction of

the PM Certification that proved to be the real enabler for cultural change across the business.

Mark explains: "We spent a huge effort

in benchmarking and developing our own model which is fully aligned with the project categorisation process. "We have five different levels of PM certification which look at the individual's experience in project management, product and technical management, multi-function and multi-cultural experience and also the finance and business-related experience. "What differentiates this is that we don't just look at project leaders and PMOs on our Aircraft Programmes but the wider population too. For example, we actively encourage engineers, IS/IT project leaders and business change project leaders to be involved."

Each applicant fills in a personal dossier

as part of the scheme. Airbus deals with about 50 dossiers a month and by September of this year should have 2,000 people who have gone through the process. "There is no pressure to complete a dossier in a given time period - it depends on the individual, their experience, training and career path to date," explains Mark.quotesdbs_dbs44.pdfusesText_44
[PDF] tamango parfum

[PDF] tamango film

[PDF] le petit prince chapitre 21 lecture analytique

[PDF] vendredi ou la vie sauvage pdf complet

[PDF] vendredi ou la vie sauvage texte intégral

[PDF] vendredi ou la vie sauvage texte intégral pdf

[PDF] les trois mousquetaires alexandre dumas

[PDF] les trois mousquetaires adaptations

[PDF] eldorado résumé chapitre 10

[PDF] eldorado laurent gaudé chapitre 10

[PDF] candide chapitre 28

[PDF] candide chapitre 26 commentaire

[PDF] candide chapitre 26 situation de passage

[PDF] résumé chapitre 26 candide

[PDF] résumé candide chapitre 30