STABILITY ALGORITHMS FOR NEWTON-RAPHSON METHOD IN
ABSTRACT. This paper deals with possible algorithms which may ensure numerical stability of Newton-Raphson method in load flow analysis.
The Newton-Raphson Method
The Newton-Raphson method or Newton Method
Appendix A - The Newton-Raphson Algorithm
Algorithm. The Newton-Raphson algorithm is a commonly used technique for locating zeros of a function. Let H:IRn --+ IRn have a zero at x* that is
Parallel Hybrid Algorithm of Bisection and Newton-Raphson
It is organized as follows: section 2 establishment to root-finding Bisection
ITERATIVE SYNCHRONIZATION : EM ALGORITHM VERSUS
ITERATIVE SYNCHRONIZATION : EM ALGORITHM VERSUS. NEWTON-RAPHSON METHOD. C. Herzet X. Wautelet
An Improved Hybrid Algorithm to Bisection Method and Newton
09-Nov-2017 On the other hand the Newton-Raphson method using the derivative of a given nonlinear function is a root-finding algorithm which is more ...
Generalized Newton Raphsons method free from second derivative
In this section we will show that the convergence order of modified generalized Newton Raphson's method (Algorithm 3.1) is at least six and that of generalized
Appendix A - Solving Systems of Nonlinear Equations
A.1 Newton-Raphson Algorithm. The Newton-Raphson algorithm is described in this section. A.1 Algorithm flowchart for the Newton-Raphson method.
Newton-Raphson-Method.pdf
Index Terms – Homotopy method complex methods
Improvements in Newton-Rapshon Method for Nonlinear Equations
23-Jul-2015 Abstract. In this paper we present two new numerical algorithms for solv- ing nonlinear equations based on Newton-Raphson method. New al-.
The Newton-Raphson Method
1 Introduction
The Newton-Raphson method, or Newton Method, is a powerful technique for solving equations numerically. Like so much of the dierential calculus, it is based on the simple idea of linear approximation. The Newton Method, properly used, usually homes in on a root with devastating eciency. The essential part of these notes is Section 2.1, where the basic formula is derived, Section 2.2, where the procedure is interpreted geometrically, and|of course|Section 6, where the problems are. Peripheral but perhaps interesting is Section 3, where the birth of the Newton Method is described.2 Using Linear Approximations to Solve Equa-
tions Letf(x) be a well-behaved function, and letrbe a root of the equation f(x) = 0. We start with an estimatex 0 ofr.Fromx 0 , we produce an improved|we hope|estimatex 1 .Fromx 1 , we produce a new estimate x 2 .Fromx 2 , we produce a new estimatex 3 . We go on until we are `close enough' tor|or until it becomes clear that we are getting nowhere. The above general style of proceeding is callediterative.Of the many it- erative root-nding procedures, the Newton-Raphson method, with its com- bination of simplicity and power, is the most widely used. Section 2.4 de- scribes another iterative root-nding procedure, theSecant Method.Comment.The initial estimate is sometimes calledx
1 , but most mathe- maticians prefer to start counting at 0. Sometimes the initial estimate is called a \guess." The Newton Method is usually very very good ifx 0 is close tor,andcanbehorridifitisnot.The \guess"x
0 should be chosen with care. 12.1 The Newton-Raphson Iteration
Letx 0 be a good estimate ofrand letr=x 0 +h.Sincethetruerootisr, andh=r-x 0 ,thenumberhmeasures how far the estimatex 0 is from the truth. Sincehis `small,' we can use the linear (tangent line) approximation to conclude that0=f(r)=f(x
0 +h)f(x 0 )+hf 0 (x 0 and therefore, unlessf 0 (x 0 )iscloseto0, h-f(x 0 f 0 (x 0It follows that
r=x 0 +hx 0 -f(x 0 f 0 (x 0Our new improved (?) estimatex
1 ofris therefore given by x 1 =x 0 -f(x 0 f 0 (x 0The next estimatex
2 is obtained fromx 1 in exactly the same way asx 1 was obtained fromx 0 x 2 =x 1 -f(x 1 f 0 (x 1Continue in this way. Ifx
n is the current estimate, then the next estimate x n+1 is given by x n+1 =x n -f(x n f 0 (x n (1)2.2 A Geometric Interpretation of the Newton-Raphson It-
eration In the picture below, the curvey=f(x) meets thex-axis atr.Letabe the current estimate ofr. The tangent line toy=f(x)atthepoint(a;f(a)) has equation y=f(a)+(x-a)f 0 (a):Letbbe thex-intercept of the tangent line. Then
b=a-f(a) f 0 (a): 2 abrCompare with Equation 1:bis just the `next' Newton-Raphson estimate of r. The new estimatebis obtained by drawing the tangent line atx=a,and then sliding to thex-axis along this tangent line. Now draw the tangent line at (b;f(b)) and ride the new tangent line to thex-axis to get a new estimate c. Repeat. We can use the geometric interpretation to design functions and starting points for which the Newton Method runs into trouble. For example, by putting a little bump on the curve atx=awe can makebfly far away from r. When a Newton Method calculation is going badly, a picture can help us diagnose the problem and x it. It would be wrong to think of the Newton Method simply in terms of tangent lines. The Newton Method is used to nd complex roots of polynomials, and roots of systems of equations in several variables, wherethe geometry is far less clear, but linear approximation still makes sense.2.3 The Convergence of the Newton Method
The argument that led to Equation 1 used the informal and imprecise symbol . We probe this argument for weaknesses. No numerical procedure works forallequations. For example, letf(x)= x 2 +17ifx6=1,andletf(1) = 0. The behaviour off(x)near1givesno clue to the fact thatf(1) = 0. Thus no method of successive approximation can arrive at the solution off(x) = 0. To make progress in the analysis, we need to assume thatf(x) is in some sense smooth. We will suppose that f 00 (x) (exists and) is continuous nearr. The tangent line approximation is|an approximation.Let's try to get a handle on the error. Imagine a particle travelling in a straight line, and letf(x) be its position at timex.Thenf0(x) is the velocity at timex.If
the acceleration of the particle were always 0, then thechangein position from timex0 to timex 0 +hwould behf0(x 0 ). So the position at timex0 +h 3 would bef(x 0 )+hf 0 (x 0 )|note that this is the tangent line approximation, which we can also think of as the zero-acceleration approximation.If the velocityvariesin the time fromx
0 tox 0 +h, that is, if the ac- celeration is not 0, then in general the tangent line approximation will not correctly predict the displacement at timex 0 +h. And the bigger the accel- eration, the bigger the error. It can be shown that iffis twice dierentiable then the error in the tangent line approximation is (1=2)h 2 f 00 (c)forsome cbetweenx 0 andx 0 +h. In particular, ifjf 00 (x)jis large betweenx 0 and x 0 +h, then the error in the tangent line approximation is large. Thus we can expectlarge second derivativesto be bad for the Newton Method. This is what goes wrong in Problem 7(b).In the argument for Equation 1, from 0f(x
0 )+hf 0 (x 0 )weconcluded thath-f(x 0 )=f 0 (x 0 ). This can be quite wrong iff 0 (x 0 )iscloseto0: note that 3:01 is close to 3, but 3:01=10 -8 isnotatallcloseto3=10 -8 .Thus we can expectrst derivatives close to0 to be bad for the Newton Method.This is what goes wrong in Problems 7(a) and 8.
These informal considerations can be turned into positivetheoremsabout the behaviour of the error in the Newton Method. For example, ifjf 00 (x)=f 0 (x)j is not too large nearr,andwestartwithanx 0 close enough tor,theNew- ton Method converges very fast tor. (Naturally, the theorem gives \not too large," \close enough," and \very fast" precise meanings.) The study of the behaviour of the Newton Method is part of a large and important area of mathematics calledNumerical Analysis.2.4 The Secant Method
The Secant Method is the most popular of the many variants of the NewtonMethod. We start withtwoestimates of the root,x
0 andx 1 . The iterative formula, forn1is x n+1 =x n -f(x n Q(x n-1 ;x n );whereQ(x n-1 ;x n )=f(x n-1 )-f(x n x n-1 -x nNote that ifx
nis close tox n001,thenQ(x n-1 ;x n )isclosetof 0 (x n), and the two methods do not dier by much. We can also compare the methods geometrically. Instead of sliding along the tangent line, the Secant Method slides along a nearby secant line. The Secant Method has some advantages over the Newton Method. It is more stable, less subject to the wild gyrations that can aict the Newton Method. (The dierences are not great, since the geometry is nearly the same.) To use the Secant Method, we do not need the derivative, which 4 can be expensive to calculate. The Secant Method, when it is working well, which is most of the time, is fast. Usually we need about 45 percent more iterations than with the Newton Method to get the same accuracy, but each iteration is cheaper. Your mileage may vary.3 Newton's Newton Method
Nature and Nature's laws lay hid in night:
God said, Let Newton be! And all was light.
Alexander Pope, 1727
It didn't quite happen that way with the Newton Method. Newton had no great interest in the numerical solution of equations|his only numerical example is a cubic. And there was a long history of ecient numerical solution of cubics, going back at least to Leonardo of Pisa (\Fibonacci,"quotesdbs_dbs14.pdfusesText_20[PDF] newton raphson method formula
[PDF] newton raphson method graph
[PDF] newton raphson method khan academy
[PDF] newton raphson method proof
[PDF] newton raphson method questions
[PDF] newton's method for unconstrained optimization
[PDF] ngss mixtures and solutions
[PDF] nh4cl hydrolysis
[PDF] ni dp confirmation letter
[PDF] nice 10
[PDF] nice classification class 39
[PDF] nice france customs
[PDF] nicky hilton james rothschild net worth
[PDF] nicky hilton rothschild net worth 2019