access to history - The Witchcraze of the 16th and 17th Centuries
There was only one mass witch-hunt: that associated with Matthew. Hopkins in East Anglia between 1645 and 1647 (see pages 106–13). Witchcraft in England
Mark scheme Y312/01 Thematic study and historical interpretations
History A. Y312/01: Popular culture and the witchcraze of the 16th and. 17th centuries. Advanced GCE. Mark Scheme for June 2019
The Medical Origins of the European Witch Craze: A Hypothesis
EUROPEAN WITCH CRAZE: A HYPOTHESIS. It has usually been assumed by historians that the witch hunts of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were
Untitled
Adapted from: O. Bullock The Witch Craze in Britain
Y312/01 A Level History A - Question Paper June 2019
Y312/01 Popular Culture and the Witchcraze of the 16th and. 17th Centuries with religion history and law in seventeenth century Germany.
To what extent was the Protestant Reformation responsible for the
4 Sir Hugh Trevor-Roper The European Witch Craze of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. 5 Robin Briggs
The Great European Witch-Hunts: A Historical Perspective
Ben-Yehuda sought to discover (1) why the witch craze occurred in the "The European Witch-Craze of the 16th-17th Centuries: A So-.
Mark scheme Y312/01 Popular Culture and the Witchcraze of the
History A. Unit Y312/01: Popular Culture and the Witchcraze of the 16 th and. 17 th. Centuries. Advanced GCE. Mark Scheme for June 2018
A Level History A Exemplar Candidate Work - Popular Culture and
Witchcraze of the 16th and. 17th Centuries. Summer 2017 examination series. Version 1. H505. For first teaching in 2015. HISTORY A.
Bookmark File PDF The Scottish Witch Hunt In Context
3 days ago King James I and the. Witch Hunts of Scotland. For many years the Euro- pean witch craze of the. 16th and 17th centuries. Page 2. 2. 2. The ...
Oxford Cambridge and RSA
Qualification
Accredited
www.ocr.org.uk/historyY312/01 Popular Culture and the
Witchcraze of the 16th and
17th Centuries
Summer 2017 examination series
Version 1
H505For ?rst teaching in 2015
HISTORY A
A LEVEL
Exemplar Candidate Work
Exemplar Candidate Work
2A Level History A
© OCR 2018
Contents
Introduction 3
Question 1: Level 6 - 26 mark answer 5
Commentary
10Question 1: Level 5 - 23 mark answer 11
Commentary
13Question 1: Level 5 - 21 mark answer 14
Commentary
19Question 1: Level 4 - 18 mark answer 20
Commentary
23Question 1: Level 32 - 11 mark answer 24
Commentary
28Question 2: Level 5 - 20 mark answer 29
Commentary
35Question 2: Level 5 - 19 mark answer 36
Commentary
41Question 2: Level 4 - 15 mark answer 42
Commentary
45Question 2: Level 3 - 11 mark answer 46
Commentary
49Question 2: Level 3 - 9 mark answer 50
Commentary
55Question 3: Level 6 - 25 mark answer 56
Commentary
61Question 3: Level 6 - 21 mark answer 62
Commentary
66Question 3: Level 3 - 12 mark answer 67
Commentary
70Question 4: Level 3 - 10 mark answer 71
Commentary
75Question 4: Level 2 - 7 mark answer 76
Commentary
79Exemplar Candidate Work
3A Level History A
© OCR 2018
Introduction
These exemplar answers have been chosen from the
summer 2017 examination series. OCR is open to a wide variety of approaches and all answers are considered on their merits. These exemplars, therefore, should not be seen as the only way to answer questions but do illustrate how the mark scheme has been applied. Please always refer to the specification (http://www.ocr. gce-history-a-h505.pdf ) for full details of the assessment for this qualification. These exemplar answers should also be read in conjunction with the sample assessment materials and the June 2017 Examiners' Report to Centres available on the OCR website http://www.ocr.org.uk/ qualifications/.The question paper, mark scheme and any resource
booklet(s) will be available on the OCR website from summer 2018. Until then, they are available on OCR Interchange (school exams officers will have a login for this). It is important to note that approaches to question setting and marking will remain consistent. At the same time OCR reviews all its qualifications annually and may make small adjustments to improve the performance of its assessments. We will let you know of any substantive changes.Exemplar Candidate Work
4A Level History A
© OCR 2018
Question 1
Read the two passages and then answer Question 1.
Evaluate the interpretations in both of the two passages and explain which you think is more convincing
as an explanation for the Essex witch hunts of the seventeenth century. [30]Passage A:
The East Anglian witch hunt between 1645 and 1647 is usually associated with Matthew Hopkins. Inreality, however, Hopkins worked closely with John Stearne. The two men were to become England's most
notorious witch-finders. By 1642, Charles I and Parliament were at odds. Civil War convulsed England for
the next four years. Each side had a different religious perspective. The King's most aggressive opponents
were the Puritans - strict Calvinists who had urged further reformation of religion before the war. By the
1640s, many Puritan clerics feared that the Devil was everywhere: some even believed that Charles I was
Satan's agent. The Civil War saw the collapse of traditional authority and traditional institutions. Parliament
legislated without royal assent, excluded bishops from the House of Lords, executed William Laud, the
Archbishop of Canterbury, and dismantled the Church courts. In parliamentary-held areas religious images
in churches were destroyed. Some Puritan activists came to regard witches as they did devotional art: as
something that needed to be rooted out and destroyed. By early 1645, the eastern counties of England, the
heartland of the parliamentarian and Puritan cause, were in a state of crisis. The outcome of the Civil War
was far from certain. (It did not become so until parliamentary forces defeated the King's army at Naseby
in June 1645.) It seemed possible that royalist forces might advance into East Anglia. People were fearful
and overtaxed. Inflation had led to growing poverty. The principal concerns of the County Committees that
ruled parliamentary-controlled areas were money, order, resources and obedience. Communities fighting
for their lives also seemed threatened from within - by witches..Adapted from: Alan Farmer, The Witchcraze of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century, published in 2016.
Passage B:
Why Essex? Is it possible that Essex as a local society was peculiarly conscious of the threat of witchcraft?
But why should that be so? It's quite clear that people might feel threatened by maleficium in any part of
England. Why should they act against it so much more in the county of Essex? And the only suggestion I
can make on that issue is that the use of the criminal law against witches had had terrible publicity in Essex.
Essex was unusual in the sense that it saw three causes celebres, three group trials. They took place in 1566,
only three years after the passage of Elizabeth's statute; in 1582; and in 1589. In each of these cases an
initial accusation was vigorously pursued by local justices of the peace who happened to have a particular
personal concern about witchcraft. That meant that instead of just one person going on trial small groups
of women went on trial and these trials were well publicised in pamphlets which were written about them.
All of this, then, may have given peculiar publicity to witchcraft as a threat and what could be done about
it. One wonders, then, whether a number of particularly scandalous local cases occurring in this county
had the effect of heightening anxiety about witchcraft within Essex, enhancing the sense of threat which
people felt, making it more intense than elsewhere, and of course providing an object lesson in how to
deal with it. So are we dealing then with a moral panic breaking out within a particular local society, which
subsequently died down in the seventeenth century until it was artificially revived again by the activities of
Matthew Hopkins, the Witchfinder General, in 1645?. *causes celebres = cases which attracted widespread public interest and/or became notorious Adapted from: Keith Wrightson, Witchcraft and Magic, published in 2012.Exemplar Candidate Work
5A Level History A
© OCR 2018
Level 6 answer - 26 marks
Exemplar Candidate Work
6A Level History A
© OCR 2018
Exemplar Candidate Work
7A Level History A
© OCR 2018
Exemplar Candidate Work
8A Level History A
© OCR 2018
Exemplar Candidate Work
9A Level History A
© OCR 2018
Exemplar Candidate Work
10A Level History A
© OCR 2018
Examiner commentary
The views of the two interpretations are outlined in the opening paragraph and the response offers a supported view as to which is more convincing. The response explains Wrightson's view and uses knowledge to both support and challenge his interpretation. The analysis of the interpretation is strong, but it would benefit from further support in places. The response is stronger in dealing with Farmer's view; it is well explained and detailed knowledge is constantly used to evaluate it. The judgement is well supported and follows from the main body of the response. The analysis is strong and the evaluation of Farmer is of a particularly high level which takes it into Level 6. It does not reach the very top of the level as the treatment of Wrightson would benefit from the use of more contextual knowledge.Exemplar Candidate Work
11A Level History A
© OCR 2018
Level 5 answer - 23 marks
Question 1
Evaluate the interpretations in both of the two passages and explain which you think is more convincing
as an explanation for the Essex witch hunts of the seventeenth century. [30]quotesdbs_dbs7.pdfusesText_5[PDF] the fischer esterification mechanism
[PDF] the fork
[PDF] the fourier series of an odd
[PDF] the french revolution summary
[PDF] the future of education
[PDF] the future of online news video
[PDF] the gallaudet dictionary of american sign language pdf
[PDF] the green deal
[PDF] the life coaching handbook
[PDF] the london plan
[PDF] the ml test score: a rubric for ml production readiness and technical debt reduction
[PDF] the moses movie
[PDF] the number of initial clusters in the k means algorithm
[PDF] the plaza menu