2016 Science and Technology Engineering Framework
Appendix I: Science and Engineering Practices Progression Matrix . 3. Acknowledgments. The 2016 Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering ...
! Next Generation Science Standards Progressions by Performance
! ! ! Page 3 ! 3! !“To!develop!a!thorough!understanding!of!scientific!explanations!of!the!world!students!need!sustained!
Progression des apprentissages sur le concept dénergie
SCIENCES ET TECHNOLOGIE. Inscrire son enseignement dans une logique de cycle. Informer et accompagner les professionnels de l'éducation. CyCles 2 3 4.
SCIENCES ET TECHNOLOGIE Place du cycle 3 dans la
CYCLES 2 3 4 eduscol.education.fr/ressources-2016 - Ministère de l'Éducation nationale de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche - Mars 2016.
SCIENCES ET TECHNOLOGIE
CYCLES 2 3 4. 1 eduscol.education.fr/ressources-2016 - Ministère de l'Éducation nationale - Mai 2017. Retrouvez Éduscol sur. Progression des apprentissages.
SCIENCE
August 2016. K to 12 Curriculum Guide. SCIENCE. (Grade 3 to Grade 10) complexity from one grade level to another in spiral progression thus paving the.
ScienceS et technologie Progression des apprentissages sur le
ScienceS et technologie informer et accompagner les professionnels de l'éducation. cycleS 2 3 4 eduscol.education.fr/ressources-2016 - Ministère de
Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2016 - 2017 16. Science with and
SwafS-03-2016-2017: Support to research organisations to implement gender As Open Science impacts the entire research cycle and its organisation ...
Pearson BTEC Level 3 National Extended Diploma in
Science. Specification. First teaching from January 2016. First certification from 2018 Addition of progression routes to BTEC Higher Nationals.
Exemple de progression pour le cycle 3 (programmes 2016)
? ??? ???? ?? Exemple de progression pour le cycle 3 (programmes 2016). - ELEMENTAIRE : Ressources pédagogiques. - Sciences et Technologie. - Outils.
[PDF] Aide à la construction dune progression en sciences et en
Outil d'aide à la planification sciences et technologie cycle 3 3 Pistes pour la construction d'une progression pour le thème 1 : MATIÈRE MOUVEMENT
[PDF] 7530-programme-sciences-et-technologie-cycle-3pdf - Eduscol
L'enseignement des sciences et de la technologie au cycle 3 a pour objectif de faire acquérir aux élèves une première culture scientifique et technique
[PDF] SCIENCES ET TECHNOLOGIE - Eduscol
La progression proposée est mise en lien avec d'autres thèmes du programme de sciences et technologie du cycle 3 Page 2 Outils pour concevoir la progressivité
[PDF] Sciences_et_Technologie_Cycle
Sciences et Technologie Cycle 3 •Progression annuelle commune à toutes les classes Projets sciences expérimentales et technologie au cycle 3
[PDF] [PDF] Sciences et Technologie au cycle 3
La construction d'un enseignement de sciences et technologie au cycle 3 - Des exemples de méthodes pour construire une progression au cycle 3
[PDF] PROGRAMMES CYCLE 3 – SCIENCES ET TECHNOLOGIE
Au cycle 3 les notions déjà abordées sont revisitées pour progresser vers plus de généralisation et d'abstraction en prenant toujours soin de partir du
[PDF] Thème 1- Matière mouvement énergie information - AC Nancy Metz
DOCUMENT D'AIDE POUR PROGRESSION SCIENCES ET TECHNOLOGIE CYCLE 3 – STAGE FIL CIRCONSCRIPTION DE VANDOEUVRE LES NANCY (5 ET 6 SEPTEMBRE 2016)- Programmes
[PDF] PROGRAMMES 2016 : RESISTANCE PEDAGOGIQUE - Snes-FSU
11 mai 2016 · Progression spiralaire et risques importants de répétition et de lassitude : chapitres du cycle 3 à peut- être ne pas développer en 6ème car
[PDF] Sciences et technologie cycle 3 Séminaire national – 24 mars 2016
Une progression pédagogique est établie pour le cycle partagée par les différents professeurs qui prendra en compte les compétences du socle
Repères sciences et technologie cycle 3 - Espace pédagogique
Ensemble de fiches repères rédigées en lien avec des attendus de fin de cycle du programme de sciences et technologie au cycle 3
Massachusetts
Curriculum
Framework
2016SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
ENGINEERING
Grades Pre
Kindergarten to 12
Massachusetts
Curriculum
Framework
2016This document was prepared by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Members
Mr. Paul Sagan, Chair, Cambridge
Mr. James Morton, Vice Chair, Boston
Ms. Katherine Craven, Brookline
Dr. Edward Doherty, Hyde Park
Ms. Amanda Fernandez, Belmont
Ms. Margaret McKenna, Boston Mr. Michael Moriarty, HolyokeMr. James Peyser, Secretary of Education, Milton
Ms. Mary Ann Stewart, Lexington
Dr. Martin West, Newton
Ms. Hannah Trimarchi, Chair, Student Advisory
Council, Marblehead
Mitchell D. Chester, Ed.D., Commissioner and Secretary to the BoardThe Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, an affirmative action employer, is
committed to ensuring that all of its programs and facilities are accessible to all members of the public. We do
not discriminate on the basis of age, color, disability, national origin, race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation.
Inquiries regarding the Department"s compliance with Title IX and other civil rights laws may be directed to
the Human Resources Director,75 Pleasant
St., Malden, MA, 02148, 781
3386105.
© 2019 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Permission is hereby granted to copy any or all parts of this document for non-commercial educational
purposes. Please credit the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and SecondaryEducation."
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education75 Pleasant Street, Malden, MA 02148
4906Phone 781-338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 800-439-2370
www.doe.mass.eduMassachusetts Department of
Elementary and Secondary Education
75 Pleasant Street, Malden, Massachusetts 02148-4906
Dear Colleagues:
I am pleased to present to you the 2016 Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum
Framework. This Framework articulates statewide guidelines for STE learning, teaching, and assessment for the
Commonwealth's public schools.
To prepare students for success in college, career, and civic life, the 2016 STE standards emphasize the need for
student engagement, relevance, rigor, and coherence in curriculum and instruction. The standards: Focus on conceptual understanding and application of concepts. Integrate disciplinary core ideas and practices to reflect the discipline of science. Present coherent progressions of STE core ideas and practices from pre-K to high school. Include each discipline in grade-level standards pre-K to grade 8. Contribute to preparation for post-secondary success in college and careers. Coordinate with the English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics standards.The 2016 STE standards maintain much of the content of our prior STE standards with updates to reflect changes
identified by the field, changes in science and engineering over the past 15 years, and the addition of inquiry and
design skills that students need to successfully engage in this discipline in pre-K-12 classrooms, civic life, and
post-secondary opportunities. The 2016 STE standards strengthen the often-lauded standards Massachusetts has
relied on since 1996.I would like to thank all of the individuals and groups that provided input, reviewed comments, and suggested
edits to the standards, as well as those who contributed to the sections of theFramework. This effort included
many representatives from across the state. The Department of Early Education and Care (EEC) and theDepartment of Higher Education (DHE) were key collaborators to ensure a coherent perspective for all students.
I am grateful for the dedication and expertise of all the educators, professionals, scholars, and other participants
who engaged with the Department in this endeavor.I believe a strong understanding of science and technology/engineering is critical for every student in the
Commonwealth. Every student must understand the world around them and be abl e to apply analytical and innovative thinking to complex problems they will face in civic and career contexts. ThisFramework provides
guidance and resources intended to help educators and professionals prepare students for such success. Thank
you for your ongoing support for quality STE education and for your commitment to achievement of such
important goals for all students in the Commonwealth.Sincerely,
Mi tchell D. Chester, Ed.D. Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Curriculum Framework for Science and Technology/Engineering 1Table of Contents
Acknowledgments .................................................................................. 3 A Vision of Science and Technology/Engineering Education ................... 7 Science and Technology/Engineering Education for All Students: The Vision .................. 8Guiding Principles for
Effective Science and Technology/Engineering Education .......... 14 Science and Technology/Engineering Learning Standards .................... 23Overview of the Standards .................................................................................................. 24
Use of Selected Terms ......................................................................................................... 26
Grades Pre
-K-2: Overview of Science and Engineering Practices .......... 27Pre-Kindergarten ................................................................................................................ 29
Kindergarten
........................................................................................................................ 32
Grade 1 ................................................................................................................................. 34
Grade 2 ................................................................................................................................. 36
Grades 3-5: Overview of Science and Engineering Practices ................. 39Grade 3 ................................................................................................................................. 41
Grade 4 ................................................................................................................................. 45
Grade 5 ................................................................................................................................. 48
Grades 6-8: Overview of Science and Engineering Practices .................. 52Grade 6 ................................................................................................................................. 54
Grade 7 ................................................................................................................................. 60
Grade 8 ................................................................................................................................. 66
High School: Overview of Science and Engineering Practices ................ 72High School Earth and Space Science ................................................................................ 74
High School Biology ............................................................................................................ 78
High School Chemistry ........................................................................................................ 84
High School Introductory Physics ..................................................................................... 89
High School Technology/Engineering
................................................................................ 94 M assachusetts Curriculum Framework for Science and Technology/Engineering 2 Standards-Related Appendices ............................................................. 97 Appendix I: Science and Engineering Practices Progression Matrix ................................ 98 Appendix II: Essential Role of Language, Literacy, and Mathematics for Science andTechnology/Engineering Learning for All Students ........................................................ 125
Appendix III: Disciplinary Core Idea Progression Matrix ................................................ 131
Appendix IV: Strand Maps of Science and Technology/Engineering Standards ............ 145 Curriculum-Related Appendices ......................................................... 147 Appendix V: The Case for an Integrated Approach in Grades Pre-K-8 .......................... 148 Appendix VI:Importance of Science and Engineering in Early Education ..................... 152Appendix VII: S
cience and Technology/Engineering Laboratories ................................ 154 Appendix VIII: Value of Crosscutting Concepts and Nature of Science in Curricula ..... 156 Appendix IX: Relevant Contexts for Teaching Science and Technology/Engineering ... 169Appendix X: The Value of Out of School Time Programming .......................................... 171
Appendix XI: Safety Practices and Legal Requirements ...................................................173
Appendix XII: Dissection and Dissection Alternatives in Science Courses: Policies andResources for Massachusetts Public Schools ................................................................... 185
The Development of Massachusetts' Science and Technology/Engineering Frameworks Since 1995 ...................................................................... 193 The full Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework is available online at the Department's website (www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/current.html). It is also available in separate sections at www.doe.mass.edu/stem. The downloadable files are the same as this p rinted v ersion. Feedback, c omments, o r q uestions a re welcome. Please c ontact t h eOffice of
Massachusetts Curriculum Framework for Science and Technology/Engineering 3Acknowledgments
The 2016
Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework is the result of thecontributions of many educators across the state. Because of the broad-based, participatory nature of
the revision process, this document cannot reflect all the views of every contributor; instead it reflects a
balanced synthesis of their suggestions. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education wishesto thank all of the groups and individuals that contributed to the development of these standards: the
Science and Technology/Engineering Revision Panel; the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Advisory Group; the Mathematics and Science Advisory Council, as well as the Technology/Engineering Advisory Council (later combined into the STEM Advisory Council); the curriculum and standardssubgroup of the Governor"s STEM Advisory Council; grade-span teacher groups; professional educational
associations and organizations; and all of the individual teachers, administrators, scientists, engineers,
science education faculty, informal education staff, parents, business and industry representatives, and
others who took the time to provide thoughtful comments and input during the development of the STE standards and theFramework.
2009-2016 Contributors
Science and Technology/Engineering Review Panel
* denotes those on both the Review Panel and the NGSS Advisory GroupDana Akins-Adeyemi, Teacher, Attleboro PS
Karen Blakeslee
, Teacher/Department Chair,Masconomet RSD
Amy Cannon, Executive Director, Beyond Benign
Mary Jo Carabatsos
, Science Department Head,Brooks School
Joe Clement,* HS Academic Division Leader,
Beverly PS
Martha Cohn,* Coordinator of Science and Social
Studies Pre
K-12, Lowell PS
Jennifer Craddock, K-8 Curriculum Coordinator,
Newton PS
Catherine Dignam, Assistant Professor,
Framingham State College
Suzy Drurey, HS Teacher, Newton PS
Jennifer Gresham,* Director of Education, Zoo
New England
Linda Grisham, Dean of STEM Division,
Massachusetts Bay Community College
Pat Harcourt, (Former) Instructor and
Coordinator of K-12 Programs and Teacher
Training, Waquoit Bay National Estuarine
Research Reserve
Joan Kadaras, MS Teacher, Chelmsford PS
Anastasia Karasoulos-Vekiarides,
Science/Technology/Engineering/Health
Curriculum Coordinator, Judge Baker Children"s
Center, Manville School Mark Kobel, MS Teacher, Marlborough PSRichard Larson, Professor, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology
Janet MacNeil, K-8 Science/Health Coordinator,
Brookline PS
Barbara Malkas, (Former) Deputy Superintendent
of Curriculum and Instruction, Pittsfield PSSandy Mayrand, Regional Resource Center
Director, University of Massachusetts Medical
School
Judy McClure,* ES Teacher, Boston PS
Kate McNeill
,* Associate Professor, BostonCollege
Peter Nassiff, Head of Science, Burlington PS
Shelly Pagnotta, MS Teacher, Dedham PS
Rosemary Rak, HS Teacher, Taunton PS; Museum
Institute for Teaching Science
Susan Reyes, Science Educator, Northeast
Sustainable Energy Association
Robert Richardson, (Former) Education Program
Manager, Intel Corporation
Bill Rigney, STEM Instructional Specialist,
Marlborough PS (Retired)
Karen Rose
, ES/HS Teacher, Dighton -Rehoboth RSDMette Schwartz, MS Teacher, Chelsea PS
Jonathan Shapiro, Science Department Head,
Brockton PS
Massachusetts Curriculum Framework for Science and Technology/Engineering 4 Yvonne Spicer, Vice President, National Center forTechnological Literacy, Museum of Science,
Boston
Jochem Struppe, Senior Applications Scientist,
Bruker-Biospin Corp
Deanna Suomala
, Principal, Springfield PSMary Taft, Science Specialist, Hampden-
Wilbraham RSD
Wayne Tanson
, HS Teacher, Uxbridge PSStephen Van Voorhis, MS Teacher, East
Bridgewater PS
Thomas Vaughn, Adjunct Professor, Northeastern UniversityTeegan von Burn,* ES Science Integration
Specialist, Salem PS
Bill Waller
, HS Teacher, Rockport PSBrian White
, Associate Professor, University ofMassachusetts, Boston
Kay Whitner, Teacher, Weymouth PS
Ben Woznick, Engineer (Retired)
Next Generation Science Standards Advisory Group
Betsey Clifford, Past President, MAST; K-12
Director of Science, Braintree PS
Marissa Cole
, (Former) Deputy Chief of Staff, MAExecutive Office of Education
Martha Cyr
, Executive Director, STEM EducationCenter, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Laura Dauphinais, Director, Systems Engineering,
Raytheon
Chad d'Entremont, Executive Director, Rennie
Center
Lance Hartford
, Executive Director, MassBioEDFoundation
Scott Jewell, President, MassTEC; MS Teacher,
Ipswich PS
Terry Kwan
, Board Member, MA School BuildingAuthority
Katie Magrane, (Former) Executive Director, MA
Afterschool Partnership
Joyce Malyn-Smith, Managing Project Director,
Pathways to College and Careers, EDC
Jim Megesey, President, MSELA; HS Science Chair,
Wilmington PS
Reinier Moquete, CEO and Managing Partner,
Advoqt; Co-Founder, Latino STEM Alliance Pam Pelletier, Director of Science andTechnology/Engineering, Boston PS
Sandra Ryack-Bell, Executive Director, Museum
Institute for Teaching Science
Susan Sanford
, President, TEAM; HS Teacher,Worcester PS
Allison Scheff, Executive Director, STEM, MA
Department of Higher Education
Hannah Sevian, Associate Professor, University of
Massachusetts, Boston
Ron St. Amand
, Director of Science, Springfield PSJim Stanton
quotesdbs_dbs45.pdfusesText_45[PDF] ville plan radioconcentrique
[PDF] plan orthogonal définition
[PDF] plan en damier new york
[PDF] incertitude relative exemple
[PDF] incertitude de mesure exercice corrigé
[PDF] incertitudes relatives
[PDF] progression 2012 mathématiques cycle 3
[PDF] plan radial
[PDF] incertitude absolue et relative
[PDF] plan linéaire
[PDF] incertitude type
[PDF] incertitude élargie
[PDF] incertitude de lecture
[PDF] l'air lutin bazar