[PDF] Task 11 Deliverable 112 2016 Air Quality Report for the





Previous PDF Next PDF



Rock OzArènes

Les trois loges privatives sont à louer pour un groupe de 15 ou 30 personnes. IncLus dans L'offre des troIs Loges: • Parking ViP. • accès ViP entrée du 



Les arènes à lheure

2 juil. 2013 Rock Oz'Arènes met les petits plats dans ... gobelets estampillés Rock. Oz' et louons les autres. ... avec Groupe E. Du côté.



Les arènes à lheure

2 juil. 2013 GenèveDu 4 au 7 juillet la cité de Calvin accueille ... Rock Oz'Arènes met les petits plats dans ... avec Groupe E. Du côté.



Les arènes à lheure

2 juil. 2013 Rock Oz'Arènes met les petits plats dans ... gobelets estampillés Rock. Oz' et louons les autres. ... avec Groupe E. Du côté.



““ Good on them! ” “ Great Band! Love your drummer! ” —Brian

—Brian Johnson & Phil Rudd AC/DC 2012 Rock Oz'Arènes with ZZ Top



ELECTROZARÈNES 3.0

festival Rock'Oz Arènes à Avenches. La BCV propose des expériences inédites aux habitants du canton. 7 ... Nous avons créé une dynamique de groupe.



““ Good on them! ” “ Great Band! Love your drummer! ” —Brian

—Brian Johnson & Phil Rudd AC/DC 2012 Rock Oz'Arènes with ZZ Top



du campus

24 juin 2013 Rock Oz'Arène et le Festival du ... e B ric h et. Kill it Kid au Caribana ... digitales peuvent être encou- ragées à s'engager sur la place.



Retour sur linauguration de la nouvelle zone sportive dAvenches

28 juin 2019 Rock Oz'Arènes promet ... a pu être réadapté permettant aux enfants de découvrir différentes ... Le groupe était composé de deux membres de.



Nouvelles de lAssociation Pro Aventico

23 janv. 2013 7-11. Les Arènes d'Avenches un lieu de spectacles intemporel ... le festival «Rock Oz'Arènes»



PEROXONE (OZONE/HYDROGEN PEROXIDE) - SSWM

A key difference between the ozone and peroxone processes is that the ozone process relies heavily on the direct oxidation of aqueous ozone while peroxone relies primarily on oxidation with hydroxyl radical In the peroxone process the ozone residual is short lived because the added peroxide greatly accelerates the ozone decomposition



Ozone in Drinking Water Treatment - EOLSS

UNESCO – EOLSS SAMPLE CHAPTERS OZONE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY – Ozone in Drinking Water Treatment– M Kritsevskaja ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) and iodide ion Iron and manganese can be reduced to very low safe levels in water supplies through ozone oxidation



Lesson 2: How Does Ground-Level Ozone Form?

Ozone Formation Ground-level ozone is the result of chemical reactions that take place in the presence of sunlight and through the combination of specific man-made and/or natural constituents Aside from sunlight (solar radiation) the main ingredients for ground-level ozone formation are volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx)



Ozone generation by rock fracture: Earthquake early warning?

of ozone produced in the 260s grinding can be estimated from the integral of the peaks and the pumping speed and are (in micro moles): 0 12 (basalt) 0 1 (gneiss) 0 4 (granite)



Le Protocole de Montréal relatif à des substances qui

appauvrissent la couche d’ozone en tenant compte notamment des besoins des pays en développement SONT CONVENUES DE CE QUI SUIT: Article 1: Définitions Aux fins du présent Protocole: 1 Par "Convention" on entend la Convention de Vienne pour la protection de la couche d’ozone adoptée le 22 mars 1985 2



Task 11 Deliverable 112 2016 Air Quality Report for the

Table 2-5 2015/2016 Ozone Season Weekday Point Source NO X Emissions by County (tpd) 28 Table 2-6 2015 Ozone Season Day Point Source Emissions in the Austin-Round Rock MSA 28 Table 2-7 2016 Austin-Round Rock MSA Electric Generating Unit Ozone Season Day NO X Emissions by



Region 6 Air Monitoring Network Assessments – Status Report

Based on the 1-hour/8-hour ozone trends analyses and on the current Monitoring Strategy Regulatory Review Workgroup proposal for 2-3 ozone NAMS in the Little Rock area the recommendation is to: (A) maintain the NLR Airport ozone site which has a 1999-2001 8-hour ozone design value of 87 ppb above the current standard of 84 ppb and (B)



Maximum Volume Music (UK) Andy Thorley - 17/07/2018

www ozonemama com Maximum Volume Music (UK) – Andy Thorley - 17/07/2018 „ Ozone Mama will launch a full-scale tour through nine European countries including Slovenia Romania Sweden (Ripple Fest Sweden 2018) Austria



Austin Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area Ozone Advance

The Austin-Round Rock MSA’s certified 2012 ozone design value (DV) was 74 parts per billion based on ambient ozone concentrations measured at the TEQ’s two regulatory ozone monitors for the region from 2010-2012 ased on preliminary data reported on TEQ’s website the 4thhighest daily eight-hour ozone average in 2013 for CAMS 3 (also known as



Searches related to groupe e rock oz+arène filetype:pdf

The City of White Rock purchased the water utility on October 30 2015 from EPCOR Utilities Inc The City of White Rock‘s water utility provides safe and clean drinking water to its residents The

PGA 582-16-60851-01, Amendment 2

Task 1.1, Deliverable 1.1.2

2016 Air Yuality Report for the Austin-Round

Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area Prepared by the Capital Area Council of Governments

August 23, 2017

PREPARED UNDER A GRANT FROM THE TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY The preparation of this report was financed through grants from the state of Texas through the Texas

Commission on Environmental Quality. The content, findings, opinions, and conclusions are the work of

the author(s) and do not necessarily represent findings, opinions, or conclusions of the TCEQ.

2016 Air Quality Report for the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area

Page 2 of 63

Executive Summary

This is the annual air quality report for the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) prepared by the Capital Area Council of Governments (CAPCOG) for the members of the Central Texas Clean Air Coalition (CAC), the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), and the U.S.

Enǀironmental Protection Agency (EPA). This report serǀes as the region's annual ͞check-in" with EPA as

part of the Clean Air Coalition's participation in the Ozone Advance Program (OAP) and also serves as a

deliverable to TCEQ under our 2016-2017 air quality planning grant. The report covers January 1, 2016,

through December 31, 2016. Under the most recent MSA definitions promulgated by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in 2015, the Austin-Round Rock MSA consists of Bastrop, Caldwell,

Hays, Travis, and Williamson Counties.

The report is intended to do the following:

Provide an update on the status of air quality in the Austin-Round Rock MSA through 2016 (Section 1); Proǀide an update on the latest understanding of the contribution of the region's emissions to high ozone levels when they occur (Section 2); The status of emission reduction measures implemented in the region in 2016 (Section 3); Ongoing planning activities in the region (Section 4); and

Planning for the future (Section 5).

Except for the following organizations, all Clean Air Coalition members provided a report on 2016 activities to CAPCOG:

Capital Metropolitan Transit Authority (CapMetro)

City of Bastrop

City of Luling

City of Taylor

Texas Nursery and Landscaping Association

Williamson County

CAPCOG will provide an update version of this report to EPA and TCEQ if these organizations provide

reports after this report has been submitted. A supplemental Excel spreadsheet provides details of each

organization's reported actiǀities.

2016 Air Quality Report for the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area

Page 3 of 63

Table of Contents

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 2

List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... 6

1 Air Quality Status ............................................................................................................................. 8

1.1 Compliance with the NAAQS .................................................................................................... 9

1.2 Maximum Daily 8-Hour Ozone Averages in the Region ........................................................... 12

1.3 Daily Pollution Leǀels Compared to EPA's AYI ........................................................................ 16

1.3.1 High Ozone AQI Days ...................................................................................................... 18

1.3.2 High PM2.5 AQI Days........................................................................................................ 18

1.3.3 Distribution of Moderate or Worse AQI Days by Month .................................................. 19

1.4 Seasonal Ozone Exposure ....................................................................................................... 20

1.5 Air Quality Forecasting ........................................................................................................... 21

1.5.1 Ozone Action Days.......................................................................................................... 21

1.5.2 Daily Air Quality Forecasts .............................................................................................. 23

2 Regional Ozone-Forming Emissions ................................................................................................ 24

2.1 Impact of NOX Emissions v. VOC Emissions on Ozone Concentrations ..................................... 24

2.2 2016 Regional Ozone Season Weekday NOX Emissions Profile ................................................ 26

2.2.1 NOX Emissions by Source Type by County ....................................................................... 26

2.2.2 On-Road Sector .............................................................................................................. 27

2.2.3 Non-Road Sources .......................................................................................................... 27

2.2.4 Point Sources ................................................................................................................. 28

2.2.5 Area Sources .................................................................................................................. 30

3 Implementation of Ozone Advance Program Action Plan and Other Measures............................... 31

3.1 Regional and State-Supported Measures ................................................................................ 31

3.1.1 Vehicle Emissions Inspection and Maintenance Program ................................................ 31

3.1.2 Drive a Clean Machine Program ...................................................................................... 35

3.1.3 Texas Emission Reduction Plan Grants ............................................................................ 37

3.1.4 Commute Solutions Program .......................................................................................... 39

3.1.5 Clean Air Partners Program ............................................................................................ 40

3.1.6 Outreach and Education Measures ................................................................................. 41

3.1.7 Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program ........................................................... 42

3.1.8 CAPCOG Regional Air Quality Grants ............................................................................... 44

3.2 Organization-Specific Measures and Updates ......................................................................... 44

3.2.1 Texas Lehigh Cement Company ...................................................................................... 44

3.2.2 Austin Energy ................................................................................................................. 47

3.2.3 Commuter Programs ...................................................................................................... 48

3.2.4 Development Measures.................................................................................................. 48

3.2.5 Energy and Resource Conservation ................................................................................. 48

3.2.6 Fleet and Fuel Efficiency Measures ................................................................................. 49

3.2.7 Outreach and Awareness ................................................................................................ 49

3.2.8 Regulation and Enforcement .......................................................................................... 49

3.2.9 Sustainable Procurement and Design.............................................................................. 50

4 Ongoing Planning Activities ............................................................................................................ 50

4.1 Clean Air Coalition Meetings .................................................................................................. 50

4.2 CLEAN AIR Force Meetings ..................................................................................................... 52

4.3 Regional Air Quality Technical Research Activities .................................................................. 52

4.4 Statewide Collaborative Initiatives ......................................................................................... 52

2016 Air Quality Report for the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area

Page 4 of 63

4.4.1 Regional Air Quality Planning Group ............................................................................... 53

4.4.2 Texas Clean Air Working Group ...................................................................................... 53

5 Planning for the Future .................................................................................................................. 53

5.1 Implications of Veto of Regional Air Quality Planning Funding ................................................ 53

5.2 Implications of Veto of Drive a Clean Machine and Local Initiative Project Funding ................ 54

5.3 Texas Emission Reduction Plan ............................................................................................... 54

5.4 Commute Solutions Program.................................................................................................. 61

5.5 Postponement of Area Designations for 2015 Ozone NAAQS.................................................. 61

5.6 Updates to the Region's Adǀance Program Action Plan .......................................................... 62

6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 62

Table 1-1. Summary of Criteria Pollutant Measurement Periods at Federal Reference Method (FRM)

Monitors in the Austin-Round Rock MSA, 2014-2016 ............................................................................. 10

Table 1-2. Austin-Round Rock MSA Criteria Pollutant Design Values Compared to Primary NAAQS ........ 10

Table 1-3. Fourth-highest MDA8 Measurements at All Ozone Monitoring Stations in the CAPCOG Region,

2014-2016 (ppb) .................................................................................................................................... 13

Table 1-4. Summary of AQI for NO2, O3, and PM2.5 .............................................................................. 16

Table 1-5. OAD Dates and Dates when O3 Exceeded Level of NAAQS, 2014-2016 ................................... 22

Table 2-1. Average 2017 Ozone Concentration Contribution per TPD of NOX Emissions ......................... 26

Table 2-2. 2016 Ozone Season Weekday NOX Emissions by Source Type and County ............................. 27

Table 2-3. 2016 Austin-Round Rock Ozone Season Weekday NOX Emissions by Source Use Type ........... 27

Table 2-4. 2016 Ozone Season Weekday Non-Road NOX Emissions by County (tpd) ............................... 28

Table 2-5. 2015/2016 Ozone Season Weekday Point Source NOX Emissions by County (tpd) .................. 28

Table 2-6. 2015 Ozone Season Day Point Source Emissions in the Austin-Round Rock MSA ................... 28

Table 2-7. 2016 Austin-Round Rock MSA Electric Generating Unit Ozone Season Day NOX Emissions by

Facility ................................................................................................................................................... 30

Table 2-8. 2017 Area Source NOX Emissions by County and Type (tpd) ................................................... 30

Table 3-1. Estimated 2016 NOX and VOC Emission Reductions from I/M Program for Light-Duty Vehicles

(tpd) ...................................................................................................................................................... 32

Table 3-2. I-M Program Statistics for 2016 ............................................................................................. 33

Table 3-3. DACM Program Data for State FY 2016 .................................................................................. 36

Table 3-4. TERP Grants Awarded in the Austin Area in 2016 .................................................................. 38

Table 3-5. MyCommuteSolutions.com Data for 2016 ............................................................................. 39

Table 3-6. Days Texas Lehigh Highlighted on its 2016 Report ................................................................. 45

Table 3-7. Jurisdictions Implementing Idling Restrictions in the Austin-Round Rock MSA ....................... 50

Table 5-1. Changes in TERP "Use of Fund" Restrictions for FY 2018-2019 ............................................... 55

Table 5-2. Alternative Allocation Scenarios for FY 2018-2019 TERP Funding ........................................... 57

Table 5-3. TERP Grant Demand Summary as of April 21, 2017................................................................ 59

Figure 1-1. 2016 Air Quality Monitors in the Austin-Round Rock MSA and Nearby Counties .................... 9

Figure 1-2. Austin-Round Rock MSA Design Values as a percentage of NAAQS ....................................... 11

Figure 1-3. Austin-Round Rock MSA 8-Hour Ozone Design Value 1999-2016 .......................................... 12

2016 Air Quality Report for the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area

Page 5 of 63

Figure 1-4. Map of CAMS 1605 and vicinity ............................................................................................ 14

Figure 1-5. Map of locations of sampling equipment at CAMS 6602, 2011-2016 .................................... 15

Figure 1-6. Close-up aerial photography of the location of CAMS 6602 sampling equipment in October

2014 ...................................................................................................................................................... 16

Figure 1-7. Number of ΗModerateΗ or "Unhealthy for Sensitiǀe Groups" Air Pollution Days in the CAPCOG

Region in 2016 by Pollutant ................................................................................................................... 17

Figure 1-8. Number of Days when Ozone Pollution was "Moderate" or Worse by Monitoring Station and

County, 2016 ......................................................................................................................................... 18

Figure 1-9. Number of Days when PM2.5 Pollution was "Moderate" or Worse by Monitoring Station and

County, 2016 ......................................................................................................................................... 19

Figure 1-10. Number of Days when Air Pollution was "Moderate" or Worse in the CAPCOG Region by

Month, 2016 ......................................................................................................................................... 20

Figure 1-11. Weighted Seasonal Ozone Exposure by Monitoring Station and 3-month period, 2016

(W126 ppm-hrs) .................................................................................................................................... 21

Figure 1-12. Ozone Action Day Forecast Accuracy and Success, 2014-2016 ............................................ 23

Figure 1-13. Accuracy and Success of AQI Forecasts for 2016 ................................................................. 24

Figure 2-1. Modeled Impact of Anthropogenic NOX and VOC Emissions from the Austin-Round Rock MSA

on High O3 Days ..................................................................................................................................... 25

Figure 2-2. 2016 Ozone Season Weekday NOX Emissions for the Austin-Round Rock MSA (tpd) ............. 26

Figure 3-1. Trend in Emissions Inspections Compared to Population in Travis and Williamson Counties

2006-2016 ............................................................................................................................................. 34

Figure 3-2. Initial Emissions Inspection Failure Rate Trend 2006-2016.................................................... 34

Figure 3-3. Failure Rate by Model Year .................................................................................................. 35

Figure 3-4. DACM Repair and Replacement Voucher Trends 2009-2016................................................. 37

Figure 3-5. Emission Reductions from TERP Grants Active as of 8/31/2016, 2016-2019.......................... 39

Figure 3-6. Texas Lehigh NOX Emissions by Hour on NOX Reduction Days and Regular Days, 2016 .......... 47

2016 Air Quality Report for the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area

Page 6 of 63

List of Acronyms

AACOG: Alamo Area Council of Governments

AFFP: Alternative Fueling Facilities Program

AQI: Air Quality Index

CAC: Clean Air Coalition

CACAC: Clean Air Coalition Advisory Committee

CAMPO: Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

CAPCOG: Capital Area Council of Governments

CapMetro: Capital Metropolitan Transit Authority

CAMS: Continuous Air Monitoring Station

CAPP: Clean Air Partners Program

CO: Carbon Monoxide

CSB: Clean School Bus

CTRMA: Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority

CTT: Clean Transportation Triangle

DACM: Drive a Clean Machine

DERI: Diesel Emission Reduction Incentive

DFW: Dallas-Fort Worth

DTIP: Drayage Truck Incentive Program

EAC: Early Action Compact

EE/RE: Energy efficiency and renewable energy

EPA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

ERIG: Emission Reduction Incentive Grant Program

I/M: Inspection and maintenance

ILA: Inter-Local Agreement

LCRA: Lower Colorado River Authority

LSCFA: Lone Star Clean Fuels Alliance

LIP: Local Initiative Project

LIRAP: Low-Income Vehicle Repair, Retrofit, and Accelerated Vehicle Retirement Program

MDA8: Maximum Daily 8-Hour Average

µg/m3: Microgams per cubic meter

MOVES: Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator

MSA: Metropolitan Statistical Area

NAAQS: National Ambient Air Quality Standards

NOX: Nitrogen oxides

NO2: Nitrogen dioxide

NTIG: New Technology Implementation Grant

O3: Ozone

OAD: Ozone Action Day

OAP: Ozone Advance Program

PACE: Property-Assessed Clean Energy

2016 Air Quality Report for the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area

Page 7 of 63

Pb: Lead

PM2.5: Particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less PM10: Particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less

PPB: Parts per billion

PPM: Parts per million

SIP: State Implementation Plan

SO2: Sulfur dioxide

TCEQ: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

TERP: Texas Emission Reduction Plan

TCFP: Texas Clean Fleet Program

TMRS: Texas Municipal Retirement System

TNGVGP: Texas Natural Gas Vehicle Grant Program

TxDOT: Texas Department of Transportation

TexN: Texas NONROAD Model

VOC: Volatile Organic Compound

2016 Air Quality Report for the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area

Page 8 of 63

1 Air Quality Status

This section provides an update on the status of air quality in the Austin-Round Rock MSA through the

end of 2016. It includes:

A general overview of air quality in the region;

Information on the region's compliance with the NAAYS for all criteria pollutants; Information on the fourth-highest ozone measurements at all monitoring stations in the region for

2014-2016;

A comparison of daily air pollution leǀels compared to EPA's AYI for 2016; An estimate of peak seasonal ozone exposure at each monitoring station; and

An analysis of the predictability of regional air pollution levels based on comparisons of actual air

forecasts. Air quality data collected in the Austin-Round Rock MSA between 2014 and 2016 shows that the region

remains in compliance with all NAAQS, and TCEY's Todžicological Eǀaluation of ǀolatile organic

compounds (VOC) measurements collected in the region indicates that all concentrations were belowquotesdbs_dbs6.pdfusesText_11
[PDF] groupe e service client morat

[PDF] groupe e shop

[PDF] groupe esa angers

[PDF] groupe esa paris avis

[PDF] groupe fnac darty

[PDF] groupe hermes

[PDF] groupe hotelier definition

[PDF] groupe insa classement

[PDF] groupe intégré définition

[PDF] groupe kibio

[PDF] groupe la poste capital

[PDF] groupe la poste organigramme

[PDF] groupe la poste recrutement

[PDF] groupe la poste siège social

[PDF] groupe latent definition