Update of the 2015 Registration Document - Atos
Orange Cyberdefense and Atos through its technology brand Bull
Atos-2015-Registration-Document.pdf
Consulting Atos Worldgrid
SOURCES FATE AND EFFECTS OF MICROPLASTICS IN THE
10 items global assessment' published in April 2015 (GESAMP. 20151). The assessment included a ... nets
Pollutions du milieu littoral par les microplastiques: Méthodes d
22 juin 2018 années 2014-2015 (annexe XIV du règlement REACH de l'Union européenne). ... is composed of 93.7% of particles with sizes comprised between ...
Mise en œuvre et apports cliniques dun modèle Monte-Carlo dun
27 avr. 2021 La modélisation du linac est initiée par Luc Simon en 2015 et les ... Ceci permet d'économiser dans cet exemple 4 octets (1 float) par.
Etude du rôle des hôtes définitifs impliqués dans la contamination
7 juil. 2022 et al. 2015)
2015 Investment Company Fact Book
20 avr. 2015 Publication of the 2015 Investment Company Fact Book was directed by Chris ... on the Wilshire 5000 index (float-adjusted) an index of U S ...
Automated plankton image analysis using convolutional neural
21 oct. 2021 2015)] but even so
Seton Lake Resident Fish Habitat and Population
13 nov. 2019 Anderson Lake Bull Trout: 1.9 (2015); ... water column by two lines: one extended up to a submerged float and the other extended.
Sector Report
24th June 2015. Confluence of favourable factors in the optical sector! Optical & Eyewear Sector. ESSILOR. BUY. FV EUR124. Bloomberg.
REPORTS AND STUDIESREPORTS AND STUDIES
SOURCES, FATE AND EFFECTS OF
MICROPLASTICS IN THE
MARINE ENVIRONMENT:
PART 2 OF A GLOBAL ASSESSMENT
Science for Sustainable Oceans
ISSN 1020-4873
REPORTS AND STUDIES
93SOURCES, FATE AND EFFECTS OF
MICROPLASTICS IN THE MARINE
ENVIRONMENT: PART TWO OF
A GLOBAL ASSESSMENT
A report to inform the Second United Nations Environment AssemblyGESAMP Working Group 40
2nd phase
Published by the
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION
4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR
www.imo.orgPrinted by Micropress Printers Ltd.
ISSN: 1020-4873
Cover photo: Peter Kershaw
Notes:
GESAMP is an advisory body consisting of specialized experts nominated by the Sponsoring Agencies(IMO, FAO, UNESCO-IOC, UNIDO, WMO, IAEA, UN, UNEP, UNDP). Its principal task is to provide scientific
advice concerning the prevention, reduction and control of the degradation of the marine environment to the
Sponsoring Agencies.
The report contains views expressed or endorsed by members of GESAMP who act in their individual capacities; their views may not necessarily correspond with those of the Sponsoring Agencies. Permission may be granted by any of the Sponsoring Agencies for the report to be wholly or partiallyreproduced in publication by any individual who is not a staff member of a Sponsoring Agency of GESAMP,
provided that the source of the extract and the condition mentioned above are indicated. Information about GESAMP and its reports and studies can be found at: http://gesamp.orgISSN 1020-4873 (GESAMP Reports & Studies Series)
Copyright © IMO, FAO, UNESCO-IOC, UNIDO, WMO, IAEA, UN, UNEP, UNDP 2015 For bibliographic purposes this document should be cited as:GESAMP (2016). Sources, fate and effects of microplastics in the marine environment: part two of a global
assessment" (Kershaw, P.J., and Rochman, C.M., eds). (IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/UNIDO/WMO/IAEA/UN/ UNEP/UNDP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection). Rep.Stud. GESAMP No. 93, 220 p.
Report editors: Peter J. Kershaw and Chelsea M. RochmanContributors to the report:
Linda Amaral-Zettler, Anthony Andrady, Sarah Dudas (Chapter 5 lead), Joan Fabres, Francois Galgani(Chapter 7 lead), Denise Hardesty (Chapter 3 lead), Valeria Hidalgo-Ruz, Sunny Hong, Peter Kershaw, Laurent
Lebreton (Chapter 2 lead), Amy Lusher, Ramani Narayan, Sabine Pahl, James Potemra, Chelsea Rochman,Sheck A. Sherif, Joni Seager, Won Joon Shim, Paula Sobral, Shige Takada, Patrick ten Brink (Chapter 6 lead),
Martin Thiel, Richard Thompson, Alexander Turra, Lisbeth Van Cauwenberghe, Erik van Sebille, Dick Vethaak
(Chapter 4 lead), Emma Watkins, Kayleigh Wyles, Chris Wilcox, Erik Zettler and Patrizia Ziveri. GESAMP REPORTS & STUDIES No. 93 - MICROPLASTICS IN THE OCEAN · 3GLOSSARY
Organizations, techniques and other terms
Short formFull name
ALDFGAbandoned, Lost and otherwise Discarded Fishing GearFAOFood and Agriculture Organization
FT-IRFourier transform infrared spectroscopy
UNEAUnited Nations Environment Assembly
Common polymers
Short formFull nameShort formFull name
ABSAcrylonitrile butadiene styrenePGAPoly(glycolic acid)ACAcrylicPLAPoly(lactide)
EPEpoxy resin (thermoset)PPPolypropylene
PAPolyamide 4,6, 11, 66PSPolystyrene
PCLPolycaprolactoneEPS (PSE)Expanded polystyrene
PEPolyethylenePU (PUR)Polyurethane
PE-LDPolyethylene low densityPVAPolyvinyl alcohol
PE-LLDPolyethylene linear low densityPVCPolyvinyl chloride PE-HDPolyethylene high densityPU (PUR)Polyurethane PETPolyethylene terephthalateSBRStyrene-butadiene rubberCommon chemical additives in plastics
Short formFull nameExamples of function
BPABisphenol Aa monomer used in the manufacture of polycarbonates and epoxy resins DBPdibutyl phthalateanti-cracking agents in nail varnish DEPdiethyl phthalateskin softeners, colour and fragrance fixersDEHPdi-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalateplasticizer in PVC
HBCDhexabromocyclododecaneflame retardant
NPnonylphenolstabilizer in food packaging and PVC
PBDEsPolybrominated diphenyl ethers
(penta, octa & deca forms)flame retardants nonylphenolstabilizer in PP, PS phthalatesPhthalate estersimprove flexibility and durabilityCommon organic contaminants absorbed by plastics
Short formFull nameOrigin
PAHsPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonscombustion products PCBspolychlorinated biphenylscooling and insulating fluids, e.g. in transformers GESAMP REPORTS & STUDIES No. 93 - MICROPLASTICS IN THE OCEAN · 5Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................... .. 11ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
. 131 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 15
1.1 Context ....................................................................... .. 15 1.2 GESAMP WG40 work programme and timeline .......................................... 15 1.3 Structure and scope of the report ..................................................... 162 SOURCES OF MICROPLASTICS ...................................................... 17
2.1 Lessons from the first assessment .................................................... 17 2.2 Primary and secondary sources of microplastics ........................................ 17 2.2.1 Overview of microplastic sources ............................................. 17 2.2.2 Fragmentation and degradation .............................................. 18 2.3 Sources by sector ................................................................. 20 2.3.1 Sources in brief ........................................................... 20 2.3.2 Producers and converters ................................................... 20 2.3.3 Land-based sectoral consumers .............................................. 21 2.3.4 Sea-based sectoral consumers ............................................... 22 2.3.5 Individual consumers ....................................................... 25 2.3.6 Waste management ........................................................ 25 2.4 Entry points to the ocean ........................................................... 26 2.4.1 Rivers ................................................................... 26 2.4.2 Coastline ................................................................ 30 2.4.3 Marine ................................................................... 31 2.4.4 Atmosphere .............................................................. 32 2.5 Scale variability ................................................................... 32 2.5.1 Time-scale-dependency .................................................... 32 2.5.2 Regional scale dependency .................................................. 33 2.6 Conclusions, knowledge gaps and priorities ............................................ 34 2.6.1 Conclusions .............................................................. 34 2.6.2 Knowledge gaps .......................................................... 34 2.6.3 Research priorities ......................................................... 343 DISTRIBUTION, FATE AND 'HOT-SPOTS' .............................................. 36
3.1 Lessons from the first assessment .................................................... 36 3.2 Microplastics in ocean compartments ................................................. 36 3.2.1 Compartments in brief ...................................................... 36 3.2.2Microplastics on the ocean surface. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 36 3.2.3 Microplastics in the water column ............................................. 37 3.2.4 Microplastics on the seafloor ................................................. 37 3.2.5 Shoreline/Coastal regions ................................................... 39 3.2.6 Biota .................................................................... 39 3.3 Transport within compartments ...................................................... 39 3.3.1 Upper ocean .............................................................. 39 3.3.2 Water column ............................................................. 40 Page6 · GESAMP REPORTS & STUDIES No. 93 - MICROPLASTICS IN THE OCEAN
3.3.3 De ep ocean .............................................................. 40
3.3.4 C oastlines 403.3.5 Bio ta 41
3.4 F luxes between compartments 41
3.5
Hot-spots" and scale-dependency
423.6 C onclusions, knowledge gaps and research priorities 43
3.6.1 C onclusions 43
3.6.2 K nowledge gaps 43
3.6.3 R esearch priorities 43
4 ECO LOGICAL IMPACTS OF MICROPLASTICS ......................................... 44
4.1 L essons from the rst assessment 444.2 O ccurrence of microplastics in biota 44
4.2.1 M icroplastics in the marine environment 44
4.2.2 E xposure pathways and concentrations of microplastics in marine organisms ......... 45 4 .2.3 L aboratory studies ......................................................... 45 4 .2.4 Fi eld studies 49
4.3 I mpacts of microplastics on marine organisms 52
4.3.1 I mpacts and the level of biological organization 52
4.3.2 I mpacts demonstrated in laboratory experiments 53
4.3.3 E vidence from the eld 55
4.3.4 S
ummary of taxa included in recent research. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
554.4 I mpact of plastic-related chemicals 56
4.4.1 C oncentration of chemicals associated with microplastic in the environment 56
4.4.2 T ransfer of chemicals from microplastic to marine organisms 57
4.4.3 I mpacts of chemicals from microplastics on organisms in the laboratory 60
4.4.4 C onclusion 60
4.5 N ano-sized plastic debris 60
4.5.1 D e nitions 60
4.5.2 E vidence of nano-sized plastic debris in the environment 61
4.5.3 P otential fate and impacts of nano-sized plastic to humans and other biota 61
4.6 T ransport of non-indigenous species 62
4.6.1 P rocesses 62
4.6.2 I mpacts 63
4.7 C onclusions, knowledge gaps and priorities 64
4.7.1 C onclusions 64
4.7.2 K nowledge gaps 64
5 CO MMERCIAL FISH AND SHELLFISH ................................................. 66
5.1 L essons from the rst assessment 665.2 G lobal sheries and aquaculture sectors 66
5.2.1 A n introduction to seafood 66
5.2.2 C apture sheries 67
5.2.3 A quaculture 67
5.3 M icroplastic contamination and impact on sheries and aquaculture products 70
5.3.1 M icroplastics in commercial n sh 70
5.3.2 M icroplastics in shell sh and other species 72
GESAMP REPORTS & STUDIES No. 93 - MICROPLASTICS IN THE OCEAN · 7
5.4 Impacts on food security ............................................................ 74
5.4.1 Food safety and security .................................................... 74 5.4.2 Global consumption patterns ................................................ 76 5.4.3 Human health implications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 5.5 Conclusions, knowledge gaps and research priorities ..................................... 78 5.5.1 Conclusions .............................................................. 78 5.5.2 Knowledge gaps .......................................................... 79 5.5.3 Research priorities ......................................................... 796 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS ........................................................ 80
6.1 Lessons from the first assessment .................................................... 80 6.2 Introducing the plastics economy ..................................................... 80 6.3 Producer responsibility ............................................................. 81 6.3.1 Initiatives and the cost of action to address microplastics .......................... 81 6.3.2quotesdbs_dbs46.pdfusesText_46[PDF] 2015 94.1 wild splash line up
[PDF] 2015 a la carte sparkling wine
[PDF] 2015 arab 2015 oran
[PDF] 2015 bac mono for sale
[PDF] bac 2015 mali
[PDF] 2015 bordeaux futures prices
[PDF] 2015 bordeaux release
[PDF] 2015 bordeaux reviews
[PDF] 2015 bordeaux vintage parker
[PDF] 2015 dijon clones chardonnay
[PDF] 2015 f-150 2.7 ecoboost
[PDF] 2015 f-150 5.0 problems
[PDF] 2015 f-150 recalls ford truck
[PDF] 2015 f-150 tow capacity chart