[PDF] Transatlantic airline fuel efficiency ranking 2017





Previous PDF Next PDF



An analysis of the impact of larger aircraft (A-380) on flight frequency

26 janv. 2018 A380. 772R. Type of Aircraft. Fuel consumption kg. Route LAX?DXB



February 2022 The A380 the first new aircraft programme of the

1 févr. 2022 The A380 will continue flying with Airbus support



The most comprehensive product line The most comprehensive

A380 Family. A350 XWB. From 100 to 240 seats. From 250 to 300 seats. From 280 to 370 Fuel Efficiency per seat. 2012. Up to 4% fuel saving. 15% fuel.



CO2 emissions from commercial aviation: 2013 2018

https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/CO2-commercial-aviation-oct2020.pdf



Family Figures July 2021 (Smartphone format) - V2 Draft

largest aircraft in Airbus' product range the double-deck A380 has 25% lower fuel burn per seat compared to previous gen-.



Fuel efficiency of commercial aircraft Fuel efficiency of commercial

The declining annual improvement of fuel burn per seat-kilometre may be due to Airbus A380 – that non-technological and non-economic considerations also ...



Family Figures July 2021 (Smartphone format) - V2 Draft

largest aircraft in Airbus' product range the double-deck A380 has 25% lower fuel burn per seat compared to previous gen-.



Transatlantic airline fuel efficiency ranking 2017

9 sept. 2018 improves the fuel efficiency per unit of mass moved. ... Factors investigated include aircraft fuel burn seating density



A380-841 9H-MIP

Max cruise control. Max speed. Range with max pax. Fuel Consumption. 43.100'. MACH.89. 13.300 KM. 11.5 TONS PER HOUR. HI FLY. OVERVIEW. A380-841 9H-MIP.



A380 Standard Module – Draft V1

A380 BAW. 02 August. 5 year of A380. UAE Operation. 09 September A consistent order intake from leading airlines ... Average seats per flight.

SEPTEMBER 2018WHITE PAPER

Brandon Graver, Ph.D., and Daniel Rutherford, Ph.D. BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON The authors thank Tim Johnson, Andrew Murphy, Anastasia Kharina, and Amy Smorodin for their review and support. We also acknowledge Airline Data Inc. for providing processed BTS data, and FlightGlobal for Ascend Fleet data.

International Council on Clean Transportation

1225 I Street NW Suite 900

Washington, DC 20005 USA

communications@theicct.org www.theicct.org @TheICCT © 2018 International Council on Clean Transportation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

....................................iii 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 2. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................ 3. RESULTS ........................................................................ 4. CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS ........................................................................ ..........20 5. REFERENCES ........................................................................

APPENDIX A: MODEL VALIDATION

..............26 APPENDIX B: ADJUSTED 2014 TRANSATLANTIC FUEL EFFICIENCY ............................27

WHITE PAPER

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.

Table 2.

Table 3.

Table 4.

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure ES-1.

Figure ES-2.

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure A-1.

Figure B-1.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

27British Airways

30Lufthansa

31United

33AeroRot

33Alitalia

33Aer Lingus

33Austrian

33American

34Scandinavian

34Delta

34Iberia

34Icelandair

35Virgin Atlantic

35Thomas Cook

35Air France

35Turkish

36KLM

37SWISS

39WOW air

44Norwegian

Excess

Fuel/pax-km

+ 13% - + 19% + 22% + 26% + 26% + 26% + 26% + 29% + 29% + 29% + 29% + 33% + 33% + 33% + 33% + 33% + 42% + 47% + 63%

INDUSTRY AVERAGE

Average Fuel Economy [pax-km/L]

Figure ES-1.

WHITE PAPER

30%39%20%

33%

35%11%15%

17% 0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

20142017

Freight Shar

e

Passenger Load Factor

Seating Densit

y

Aircraft Fuel Burn

Figure ES-2.

WHITE PAPER

1.

INTRODUCTION

2.

METHODOLOGY

2.1

AIRLINE SELECTION

Table 1.

AirlineFlights

performedAverage ight length (km)Share of

ASKsShare of

ATKsMost prevalent

aircraft

Aer Lingus

Aeroot

Air France

Alitalia

American

Austrian

British Airways

Delta

Iberia

Icelandair

KLM

Lufthansa

Norwegian

Scandinavian

continued

WHITE PAPER

AirlineFlights

performedAverage ight length (km)Share of

ASKsShare of

ATKsMost prevalent

aircraft SWISS

Thomas Cook

Turkish

United

Virgin Atlantic

WOW air

Total280,4977,028100%100%Airbus A330-300

Note: ASK = Available seat kilometers. ATK = Available tonne kilometers. Source: Airline Data Inc. (2018)

Table 2.

AircraftMTOM

(tonnes)Typical seating capacityCargo capacity (m 3 )Number of engines, max. thrustRange (km)

Airbus A318

Boeing 737-700

Boeing 737-800

Boeing 737 MAX-8

Airbus A321

Boeing 767-300ER

Boeing 767-400ER

Boeing 787-8

Airbus A330-200

Airbus A330-300

Boeing 787-9

Boeing 757-200

Boeing 757-300

Airbus A340-300

Airbus A350-900

Boeing 777-200ER

Boeing 777-300ER

Airbus A340-600

Boeing 747-400

Boeing 747-8I

Airbus A380-800

Note: MTOM = maximum takeo mass. Sources: Airbus (2017); Airbus (2018); Boeing (1999); Boeing (2008);

Boeing (2010); Boeing (2011); Boeing (n.d.)

2.2

FUEL BURN MODELING

Table 3.

TypeVariableSources

Airline scheduled ights

Airline-specic aircraft

parameters

Aircraft weights

Aircraft fuel burn

Other operational variables

WHITE PAPER

payload kg seats departures load factor pax 100kg
pax freight kg departures

Operations Specication B043

2.3

FUEL EFFICIENCY CALCULATION

a i fuel L a flquotesdbs_dbs17.pdfusesText_23
[PDF] a380 fuel consumption per second

[PDF] a380 fuel consumption taxi

[PDF] a380 fuselage height

[PDF] a380 height of tail

[PDF] a380 landing cockpit view

[PDF] a380 landing cockpit view video

[PDF] a380 length

[PDF] a380 lufthansa

[PDF] a380 minimum runway length landing

[PDF] a380 mtow lbs

[PDF] a380 mtow mlw

[PDF] a380 passenger capacity

[PDF] a380 plane passenger capacity

[PDF] a380 plane seating capacity

[PDF] a380 pneumatic system