Invasive infections due to Clavispora lusitaniae
Clavispora lusitaniae (named until 1996 Candida. (C.) lusitaniae) were emerging fungal organisms and the first cases of infection in humans were described.
Candida lusitaniae as an unusual cause of recurrent vaginitis and its
The patient reported no menopausal vasomotor symptoms and was not taking hormone replacement therapy. Evaluation of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and
Les endocardites fongiques : mise au point
1965 et 1995 la durée moyenne des symptômes avant prise en charge hospitalière était de 32 l'exception notable de Candida lusitaniae – mais la tolé-.
Identification des champignons dimportance médicale
Candida tropicalis C. krusei
Candida lusitaniae as an unusual cause of recurrent vaginitis and its
The patient reported no menopausal vasomotor symptoms and was not taking hormone replacement therapy. Evaluation of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and
MYCOSES
Candida lusitaniae. Les symptômes respiratoires vont de la pneumonie modérée à mortelle. Les infections du système nerveux central se traduisent par une ...
Chapitre 51 - Traitement des infections fongiques invasives et
9 août 2018 Candida lusitaniae Aspergillus terreus
Susceptibility of clinical isolates of Candida lusitaniae to five
Objectives: The aim of the present study was to expand the MIC database for Candida lusitaniae in order to further determine its antifungal susceptibility
Epidemiology of nosocomial acquisition of Candida lusitaniae
13 mai 1990 Candida lusitaniae an organism frequently resistant to amphotericin B. We ... species were isolated from a site without signs or symptoms.
Construction dune souche de Candida lusitaniae génétiquement
7 déc. 2016 5.1.1 Souches de Candida lusitaniae utilisées et conditions de culture . ... gitation une insu sance cardiaque ou des symptômes en relation ...
IMMUNOLOGY AND
MEDICAL
MICROBIOLOGY
FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 23 (1999) 75-78 ELSEVIERShort Communication
Invasive infections due to Clavispora lusitaniae
Vladimir Krcmery Jr. al*, Frantisek Mateicka a, Sylvia Grausova ', Alena Kunova b,Jan Hanzen '
a University oj' Trnava, School of Public Health and Postgraduate Medical School, 917 43 Tmava, Slovak Republic
" Department qf Oncology. Department of Microbiology, National Cancer Institute and St. Elisabeth's Cuncer Institute, Bratislava.
Slovak Republic
' Llepartment of Microbiology, HP Microbiology Centre. 841 01 Bratislava, Slovak RepublicReceived 22 May 1998; received in revised form
24 August 1998; accepted 6 October 1998
Abstract
Three cases of Cluvispora Zusitaniue invasive fungal infections are reported. All three infections appeared in cancer patients
presented with fungaemia, one additionally with meningitis. Two of them were breakthrough - they developed during therapy
with conventional amphotericin B with a dose of 0.5 mg kg-' day -I. All three were cured: two with intravenous fluconazol and
one with an increasing dose (1 mg kg-' day-') of amphotericin B. In one of two breakthrough cases the sensitivity of the strain
to antifungals was tested against antifungal agents and showed in vitro resistance to amphotericin B (MIC 2 qg ml-'). 0
1999 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Clavispora lusitaniae (named until 1996 Candida
(C.) lusitaniae) were emerging fungal organisms and the first cases of infection in humans were described in 1979 [1,2]. Since 1979, 5 cases and 1 review of fungaemias due to Clavispora lusitaniae have been published [3-71 which suggested that this yeast can cause systemic infection and even death. Before the introduction of antineoplastic therapy in cancer pa- tients, the incidence of Clavispora Iusitaniae among fungal isolates from blood cultures was very low [1,8]. Large studies on the epidemiology of fungal infections showed a 14% incidence of Clavispora * Corresponding author. Heydukova 10, Bratislava 812 50,Slovak Republic. Tel.: +4.21 (7) 324 308;
Fax: +421 (7) 5311278. lusitaniae among all isolates until 1990. After 1990 the incidence of this pathogen increased to 2-8% [10P13]. Since Clavispora lusitaniae is known to de- velop secondary resistance to AmB [1,2] and some strains may be primary resistant [7,8], extensive use of non-absorbable polyenes in the prophylaxis and the large use of amphotericin B (AmB) in therapy may play a role in selection of less susceptible or 'polyene-tolerant' yeasts (Clavispora lusitaniae, C. quillermondii, C. parapsilosis, C. rugosa, Trichosporon beigelli) [1,8]. There are no data on comparable vir- ulence of Clavispora lusitaniae to other non-candida spp. yeasts such as Trichosporon beigelli or Candida albicans. However, at least 6 reports document inva- sive Clavispora lusitaniae infection in immunocom- promised humans, mainly those with haematologic malignancies. Here we report another 3 cases of in- vasive infection (3 fungaemias, one with meningitis)0928-8244/99/$19.00 0 1999 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: SO928-8244(98)001 10-2 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femspd/article/23/1/75/491184 by guest on 24 October 2023
16 Table 1 V. Krcrnery Jr. et al. IFEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 23 (1999) 75-78 Three fungaemias due to Cl. lusitaniae - risk factors, therapy, complications and outcome Age Underlying Risk factors Breakthrough" Source of disease (thlprophld) fungaemia Therapy Compli- cations Out- come22 NHL Cathe- ter
29 Testicular +
cancer3 CNS +
tumour ATB Ster- ATB pro- Neutro- th. oids phylaxis penia + - _ + AmB 0.5 mg kg-' Unknown AmB+CR 10 days None Cured6 days 0.7 mg kgg' and
1 mg kg-' day-'
_ + AmB 0.5 mg kgg' Unknown FLU 5 mg kg-' None Cured5 days 20 days
_ _ AmB 0.5 mg kgg' VP-shunt FLU 6 mg kg-' Meningitis Cured11 days 28 days
"Drug, daily dose, length of therapy.VP: ventriculoperitoneal; CR: catheter removal; FLU: fluconazole; AmB: amphotericin B; NHL: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; CNS: central
nervous system. due to Cluvispora lusitaniae and briefly review the recent literature.2. Patients and methods
2.1. Ident$cation of isolates
Identification was carried out with Vitek Jr. Sys- tem (Bio Merieux, Hazelwood, USA) and confirmed either by API-32 ID (Bio Merieux) or Mycotube (Roche) rapid identification systems. Only in one case (number 3) the isolate was in vitro tested for antifungal susceptibility with E-test [7] as recom- mended by the manufacturer (AB BIODISK, Solna,Sweden) with RPM1 1640 agar. Zones were deter-
mined with automatic BIOMIC video. The strain showed MIC to AmB 2 ug ml-' and fluconazole1 yg ml-l which represents resistance to convention-
al AmB but sensitivity to fluconazole according to NCCLS standards [14]. Susceptibility to fluconazole was reconfirmed with disc diffusion method on Mill- er Hinton's agar with 2% glucose and 5 pg ml-' methylene blue, with inoculum adjusted to density0.5 MC Farland. Fluconazole discs 25 pg (Becton
Dickinson) were used. Inarbation was at 35°C for24 h.
2.2. Cases studied
All three cases appeared in 1995-1997 in our can- cer institute with 220 beds but were sporadic (6 months difference among case 1 and 2 and 8 months between case 2 and 3) (Table 1). From 3 fun- gaemias, two appeared in young adults, one in a child. The underlying diseases were malignancy in all 3 cases. Two out of the three received antineo- plastic chemotherapy, all received antibiotics (third generation cephalosporines all three, two aminogly- cosides, one vancomycin). In the first two cases, fun- gaemia developed during therapy with conventional amphotericin B (dose 0.5 mg kg-' day-l) on day 5 and day 6 of therapy, respectively, who received con- ventional AmB because of non-responding neutro- penic fever. In the first, the dose was increased to0.7 and 1 mg kg-' day-l later on, and the patient
was cured. In the second and third patient, AmB therapy was stopped and fluconazole was adminis- tered at 6 mg kg-l day-' for 20 and 28 days. All patients survived although one case of fungae- mia (number 3) was complicated with meningitis. In this case with meningitis both in vitro (MIC forAmB 2 mg ml-l) and clinical (absence of response
to therapy with conventional AmB 0.5 mg kg-' day-l after 11 days) resistance was observed. The third child with fungaemia and meningitis had ven- triculoperitoneal shunt insertion after removal of a neuroblastoma and was cured after 8 days therapy with 6 mg kg-l day-'. The first two strains isolated from case 1 and 2 were not tested in vitro because no standard method for susceptibility testing of yeastsin Slovakia was available until 1997. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femspd/article/23/1/75/491184 by guest on 24 October 2023
Table 2 V. Krcmery Jr. et al. I FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 23 (1999) 75-78 Review of invasive infections due to Clavispora IusitaniaeReferences
No. of cases Sensitivity to AmB Type of infection OutcomeGuinet et al. [5]
Hadfield et al. [6]
Christenson et al. [4]
Merz et al. [3]
Pappagianis et al. [2]
Favel et al. [7] 1 Resistant
2 ND 1 NDReview Various
1Resistant
1 Sensitive Fungaemia
Fungaemias
Fungaemia
Fungaemias
Fungaemia
Fungaemia Death Cured Cured
Review
Cured Cured3. Discussion and review of the literature
The incidence of Cluvispora lusitaniae before intro- duction of aggressive cytotoxic therapy (and empiric therapy with AmB or prophylaxis with oral polyenes during neutropenia) was minimal, and varied from0 to 1% [l-3,9]. After 1990, the majority of large
epidemiologic studies [lo-13,161 showed a l-8% in- cidence of Clavisporu hktuniae, which was lower in general hospitals or ICUs (O-3%) than in cancer centres (3-S%) [8-131. In addition, in paediatric can- cer centres [19] the incidence was higher (337%) than in adults, probably because children with cancer are treated with more non-absorbable nystatin or oral amphotericin B than adults, who are exposed more to fluconazole (which was licensed in most European countries for paediatrics only after 1993). Clavispora lusituniue was not reported before 1979 to cause in- vasive infection in humans. After the first reported case in 1979 [2], one review [3] and 6 additional cases have been published [2-71 including 6 fungaemias (Table 2). Two of them were caused by AmB resist- ant Clavispora lusitaniae, one by organisms sensitive to AmB and in other cases susceptibility was not tested. However, antifungal susceptibility testing ac- cording to NCCLS [14] methods was only performed in one case [7]. Themfore, the clinical outcome of other cases where strains were either not tested [3,4,6] or were in vitro sensitive to AmB [7] may predict in the rest of lungaemias that strains of Cla- vispora lusitaniae in those cases (except 2 and 5) were probably AmB sensitive. However, correlation of in vitro susceptibility testing to clinical outcome in many non-Candida albicans spp. is not clear [ 15,17,18]. In addition, a paper published on antifun- gal susceptibility testing [7] showed that 35 tested strains were susceptible in vitro to AmB. However,at least two reports [2.,5] clearly showed emergence of AmB resistance during therapy with AmB. Wingard
[l] in his review suggested emergence of AmB resist- ance in cancer centres and in patients receiving anti- neoplastic chemotherapy and empiric AmB, but not in the non-cancer patient population. All three of our patiens had fungaemia which appeared during empirical therapy with AmB but the strain was tested only in one and was resistant in vitro (MIC2 ng ml-l). In two other cases of breakthrough fun-
gaemia, Clavispora lusitaniae was not tested against antifungals.All our 3 patients survived and were successfully
treated, two with fluconazole and one with increas- ing doses of amphotericin B from 0.5 to 0.7 mg kg-' day-i and later with 1 mg kg-l day-'. In 6 cases published in 5 clinical reports or letters and 1 review, only 1 case died. The data extracted from various epidemiologic studies on the incidence or prevalence of Clavispora lusitaniae among other yeasts or Can- dida spp. fungaemias do not present mortality sepa- rately for Clavispora lusitaniae [8-13,161. When add- ing 3 of our cases to 6 previously published cases, only one of 9 (11.1%) died despite the fact that all patients were immunocompromised. This may sug- gest that the outcome of patients infected by Cluvi- spora lusitaniae in comparison to C. albicans or Tri- chosporon spp. is better and that Clavispora lusitaniae is probably less virulent than C. albicans [l].References
[l] Wingard, J. (1995) Importance of Candida spp. other than C. albicnns as pathogens in oncology patients. Clin. Infect. Dis.20, 115-125.
[2] Pappagianis, D., Collins, MS.. Hector, R. and Remington, J. (1979) Development of resistance to amphotericin B in Can- dida hrsitaniae infections in human. Antimicrob. Agents Che-mother. 16, 1233126. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femspd/article/23/1/75/491184 by guest on 24 October 2023
78 V. Krcmery Jr. et al. IFEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 23 (1999) 75-78
[3] Merz. W.G. (1984) Candida hsitaniae, frequency of recovery colonisation. infection, and amphotericin B resistance. J. Clin.Microbial. 20. 11941195.
[4] Christenson. J.C., Guruswamy. A., Mukwaya. G. and Rettig, P.J. (1987) Candido lusitaniue, an emerging human pathogen.Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 6. 755-757.
[S] Guinet, R., Chanas. J., Goulier, A.. Bonnefoy, G. and Ambroise-Thomas. P. (1983) Fatal septicaemia due to ampho- tericin B resistant Candida lusitaniae. J. Clin. Microbial. 18.443444.
[6] Hadfield, T.L., Smith, M.B., Winn, RI?., Rinaldi, M.G. and Guerra. C. (1987) Mycoses caused by Candido lusitaniae. Rev.Infect. Dis. 9, 10061012.
quotesdbs_dbs50.pdfusesText_50[PDF] candidat libre bts 2017 cote d'ivoire
[PDF] candidature master 2 rattrapage
[PDF] candidature spontanée exemple
[PDF] candidature spontanée stage
[PDF] candide analyse chapitre 1
[PDF] candide chapitre 19 en approchant de la ville
[PDF] candide chapitre 19 figure de style
[PDF] candide chapitre 19 lecture analytique
[PDF] candide chapitre 19 question et reponse
[PDF] candide chapitre 19 résumé
[PDF] candide chapitre 19 situation de passage
[PDF] candide chapitre 30 morale
[PDF] candide de voltaire questions reponses
[PDF] candide de voltaire thèmes principaux