2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations
13 ???. 2017 ?. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:978–991. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210770. Recommendation. To cite: van der Heijde D. Ramiro S
?????????? ?????? ??? ?????: ???????????? ?????????
«????????? «???????» 2017. – 76 ?. ISBN 978-966-137-080-6. ????? ??????? ???????????? ???? ??????????? ????????? ????? ? ?????????? ??????. ????????? ??-.
??????????? ????????????? ????????? ????????? ? ????
?????????? ??????? ????????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ?? ????????? ?????????? ?????????? ??????????? ??????? ????? ?????? ? ????????? ?? «????'???????» ??????
??????? ????????? ?????????-???????????? ???? ? ?????????????
??????? ????????? ????????? – ?????????????? ???'? ?. ????????????? ??????. ? ?????? ????????????? ???? ?????????-?????????????? ????? ?? ??????? ???????.
Advance Edited Version
15 ???. 2018 ?. administrative custody without the possibility of administrative or judicial review or remedy. (category IV);. A/HRC/WGAD/2017/76.
ISSN 1026-9428. ???????? ????? ? ???????????? ????????
?? ????????? (??????? ???????
EULAR definition of arthralgia suspicious for progression to
6 ????. 2016 ?. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:491–496. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209846 copyright. on September 9 2022 at Google Indexer. Protected by.
Part III --- Administrative Miscellaneous
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-17-76.pdf
ISSN 1026-9428. ???????? ????? ? ???????????? ????????
?? ????????? (??????? ???????
2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of
27 ????. 2017 ?. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1955–1964. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211468. Criteria. 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/.
EXTENDED REPORT
EULAR de
finition ofarthr algiasuspiciousfor progressiontorheuma toidarthritisHanna Wvan Steenbergen,
1Daniel Aletaha,
2Liesbeth JJ Beaart-van deVoorde,
1Elisabeth Brouwer,
3CatalinC odreanu,
4Bernard Combe,
5João EF onseca,
6,7MereteL Hetland,
8,9FrancesHumby ,
10ToreKKvien,
11Karin Niedermann,
12LauraNuño,
13Sue Oliver,
14 15Karim Raza,
16,17Dirkjan vanSchaardenburg,
18Georg Schett,
19Liesbeth DeSmet,
1Gabriella Szücs,
20Jirí Vencovský,
21Piotr Wiland,
22Maarten deW it,
23RobertL Landewé,
24Annette HM vander Helm-vanMil
1,25ABSTRACT
BackgroundDuring thetr ansitiontorheumatoid
arthritis (RA)many patients passthrougha phase characterisedbythe presence ofs ymptomswithout clinically apparentsynovitis. Thesesymptomsarenot well-characterised.Thistaskforceaimed tode fine the clinical characteristicsofpatientswith arthralgia whoare considereda triskforRA bye xperts basedon their clinical experience.MethodsThe taskforceconsistedof 18
rheumatologists,1methodologis t,2 patients,3health professionalsand1 resear chfello w.Theprocesshad threephases .InphaseI, alis tof parameters considered characteristicforclinicallysusp ectarth ralgia (CSA)was derived;the most importantparametersw ere selectedby a three-phasedDelphiapproa ch.In phaseII,theexperts evaluated50 exis tingpatientsonpaper, classified them as CSA/no-CSAandindica tedtheir levelofcon fidence.A provisionalsetofpar ameters was derived.Thiswas
studiedfor validation inphaseIII, where all rheumatologistscollectedpatients withand withoutCSA fromtheir outpatient clinics.ResultsTheco mprehensivelistconsisted of55
parameters,ofwhich1 6w ereconside redmos timportant .A multivariablemodelbasedonth edatafromph aseII
identified sevenrelev antparameters:sym ptomduration <1y ear,symptom sofmetacarpophala ngea l(MCP)joints, morningstif fnessduration≥60 min,mos tsevere symptomsinearly morn ing,first-degreerelati vewithRA, difficultywi thmakingafistan dpositi vesqueezetestofMCPj oints.InphaseII I,th ecombinati onofthes e
parameterswasaccur ateinid entifyingpatients wit h arthralgiawhowere consider edatrisk ofdevelopingRA (areaunde rtherecei veroper atingcharacteris ticcurve0.92,95%CI 0.87to 0.9 6).Testc har acteristicsfo r
differentcut-off pointsweredete rmined. ConclusionsA setofc lini calcharacterist icsforpatients withart hralgiawhoareatrisk ofprogr essionto RAwas established.INTRODUCTION
The developmentofr heumatoid arthritis(RA)isa
multisteppr ocess.TheEuropean LeagueAgains tRheumatism(EULAR) study groupdifferentia tedthe followingphases:(1) presence ofgenetic andenvironmentalrisk factors forRA,(2) sy stemicautoimmunity associatedwithR A,(3) symptomswithout clinicalarthritis, (4)unclassi fied arthritis
andfinally (5)R A. 1The symptomaticphasepre-
ceding clinicalarthritis isthe firstopportunity to clinically recognisepatients whoarea trisk forpro- gressionto RA. Incontrast tothe otherphasesthat havebeens tudiede xtensively,this phaseislesswell studied.While afe ws tudiesreportedon symptoms experiencedby patients inthisphaseand ontheir impacton dailylife, 2-4 clinical characteristicsthat arespeci fic forthis phaseha ve notyetbeenidenti- fied bya consensus-basedappr oach. 156This situ-
ationhampers theconduct ofs tudiesand clinical trials inthis phaseof thedisease. Ithas beensho wn thatearly initiation ofdisease-modifyingantirheu- maticdrug (DMARD)tr eatment inRAismore effectivein modulating theerosive andpersis ting natureofR Acompar edwithdelay edinitiationofDMARD treatment.
7-9Hence, interventionsinthe
initial clinicalphase ofthe disease,which precedes the onsetof clinicalarthritis, may bemor eeffective in reducingtherisk ofdisease persistence andthe developmentof damage. 10However,studiesto
addressthis requir etheinclusionofhomogeneous sets ofpa tients.Clinical expertise,whichincludes pattern recog-
nition, guidesdecision sindailypr actice andhas also beenused asr eference forthedevelopmentof severaltoolsor criteriain thefield ofr heumato- logy. 11-14Patientswithclinically suspectarthr algia
(CSA)ha vearticularsymptoms withoutsignsof arthritisand are consideredtobe atincreased risk for progressiontoRA. 15Hence, theidenti fication
of thepr esenceofCSA isbased onclinicalexper - tise. Recentdata revealedtha tpatientswithCSA constituteonly asmall percentage ofall patients with arthralgiawhovisit ther heumatology out- patientclinic forthe firsttime (≂7%), andtha ta proportionofpa tientswith CSAdidindeed pro- gressto RA duringfollow-up( ≂20%). 16It wasalso
suggestedtha tclinicale xperiencewas accurateto distinguishpa tientswitharthralgia at riskofRA fromother patients witharthralgia(OR 55).In par- ticular,only aminori tyof patientswhopr esented van Steenbergen HW , et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;:491-496. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209846
To cite:
van Steenbergen HW,Aletaha D, Beaart-van de
Voorde LJJ
, et al . Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76
:491-496.
Handling editor
Hans WJ
Bijlsma
ŹAdditional material is
published online only. To view please visit the journal online (h t t p d x d o i o r g 1 0 1 1 3 6 a n n r h e u m d i s 2 0 1 6 2 0 9 8 4 6For numbered affiliations see
end of article.Correspondence to
Dr Annette H M van der
Helm-van Mil, Department of
Rheumatology, Leiden
University Medical Center,
P.O. Box 9600, Leiden
2300 RC, The Netherlands;
AvdHelm@lumc.nl
Received 5 May 2016
Revised 18 August 2016
Accepted 17 September 2016
Published Online First
6 October 2016
Clinical and epidemiological research
491van Steenbergen HW, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;:491-496. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209846
on October 23, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright.http://ard.bmj.com/Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209846 on 6 O
ctober 2016. Downloaded from with arthralgiaandsubseq uentlydev elopedRAw erenotr ecog- nised bythe rheuma tologist. 17 Although theconcept ofC SAis appropriatefor usein clinical practice,adr awba ckisitssubjectivity,whichmay result from differencesin pra cticeandexperience.Therefor e,the phenotype of CSAneedsto bede fined. Thistaskfor ceaimedtoidentify a combinationof clinicalfea tures thatbestchara cterisepatients with arthralgiawhoar ea triskofR Aaccordingto ane xpert multidisciplinary groupofEur opeanr heumatologists,other health professionalsandpa tients.This approachw assimilar to thatwhich ledto thede finition ofin flammatoryba ckpain,a definition whichw assubsequentlyintegra tedin theAssessment of SpondyloArthritisinterna tionalSocietyclassificationcri- teria. 18 19 The taskforceintendedto derive aset ofclinicalpara- meters toenable theinclusion ofhomogeneous setsof patients in subsequents tudies.Itwas considered inappropriateto usethe phrase'classificationcriteria 'for thepr oductas,basically, classi- ficationconcerns testing thepresenceor absenceof adisease. CSAis notin itselfa disease,but acombina tionof symptoms and signs.It was anticipatedthat clinicalcharacteris ticsalone areinsuf ficient predictiveforRA, that acombinationof clinical and otherfa ctors(eg,autoantibodies,imaging results) are neces- sary toidentify patients withimminentRA andtha tthe derived clinical definition canla terbecomepartof criteriafor imminent RA.Thus insum, thepr esenttaskfor ceaimed todefine arthral- gia atriskfor RA.METHODS
Expert committee
The expertcommitteecomprised 18rheum atologis ts,1 metho- dologist(RL, whow asalso oneoftherheum atologis ts),2 nurse specialists,1 physiother apist,2patientsand1r esearch fellow, originatingfr om15European countries.The targetpopulations wererheuma tologistsandhealthprofessionalsworkingin sec- ondary care.Three-phasedprocess
The processconsisted ofthreephases andtwo meetings.Expert opinion wasther eference. Perphaseconsensuswas obtained beforepr oceedingtothene xtphase.Phase I
quotesdbs_dbs47.pdfusesText_47[PDF] 2018 art calendars
[PDF] 2018 art competitions
[PDF] 2018 art prize grand rapids
[PDF] 2018 au convention race
[PDF] 2018 au pigeon bands
[PDF] 2018 calendrier
[PDF] 2018 ci
[PDF] 2018 ci il ne ilidi
[PDF] 2018 ci ilin don modelleri
[PDF] 2018 ci ilin qiw ayaqqabilari
[PDF] 2018 es
[PDF] 2018 es 300h
[PDF] 2018 es 350
[PDF] 2018 es 350 lexus