[PDF] Bell inequality separability and entanglement distillation





Previous PDF Next PDF



Inadequacy of the CHSH Bell inequality for an application to its

10 juin 2022 Einstein and Bohr which led to the Bell inequalities and the concept of entanglement based on the observation that.





Bilocal Bell Inequalities Violated by the Quantum Elegant Joint

1 juin 2021 Network Bell experiments give rise to a form of quantum nonlocality that conceptually goes beyond. Bells theorem. We investigate here the ...



Near-Optimal and Explicit Bell Inequality Violations

For historical reasons such correlations are called “Bell inequality violations.” We give two new two-player games with Bell inequality violations that are 





Bells inequality test: more ideal than ever

18 mars 1999 (the celebrated Bell's inequality) that are contradicted by the quantum-mechanical predictions for an EPR gedanken experiment.



Violation of Bells Inequality and Classical Probability in a Two

4 juil. 1988 Bell inequality for two separated particles is violated by about 6 standard deviations and that classical probability for light waves is ...



BELL NONLOCALITY

GAME – BELL INEQUALITY. ALICE. BOB. Bell 64Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt 69 LOCAL CORRELATIONS SATISFY ALL BELL INEQUALITIES ? ? x a y b. BELL 64.



Bell inequalities Counterfactual Definiteness and Falsifiability

13 juin 2021 vading a widespread interpretation of the Bell inequality and ... theorem regarding local realism it brings back Bell theorem from the.



Bell inequality separability and entanglement distillation

In this section we recall several useful Bell inequalities in- cluding the CHSH inequality WWZB inequality (including the MABK inequality as a special case)



[PDF] Bells inequality

March 27 Quiz on Quantum Mechanics Today March 29 Term paper outline/ partial draft "Bell's theorem is the most profound discovery of science ”



[PDF] Bells Theorem

Bell's theorem considers a hypothetical hidden variable theory which satisfies certain In section 5 we try to strengthen Bell's theorem by showing that 



[PDF] Bells Inequalitiespdf

In 1935 Einstein Podolsky and Rosen put forward a seminal paper questioning the com- pleteness of the wavefunction description of quantum mechanics



[PDF] Bells Theorem and Inequalities with Experimental Considerations

20 mai 2013 · Bell's theorem is an important milestone in the development of quantum mechanics It draws a line between concepts such as realism and 



[PDF] ON THE EINSTEIN PODOLSKY ROSEN PARADOX*

S BELL Vol 1 No 3 A (l:i \) = ± 1 B (b \) = ± 1 (1) The vital assumption [2] is that the result B for particle 2 does not depend on the setting 



[PDF] THE NAIVE VIEW OF AN EXPERIMENTALIST† Alain Aspect Institut

The first part of the paper aims at explaining what are Bell's theorem and Bell's inequalities and why I find it so important It is followed by a rapid 



[PDF] The Bell inequality inviolable by data used consistently with its

It is not generally known that the inequality that Bell derived using three random variables must be identically satisfied by any three corresponding data 



[PDF] Bells inequalities and their uses

10 jui 2010 · Story starts with a famous paper by Einstein Podolsky and Rosen in 1935 • They claim quantum mechanics is incomplete as



[PDF] Experimental Violations of Bells Inequalities

Bell?s inequality theorem ? Violation shows “completeness” of quantum mechanics ? No hidden variables ? non-realistic non-local Sonntag 19



(PDF) Bell Inequality and Many-Worlds Interpretation - ResearchGate

3 fév 2015 · Abstract It is argued that the lesson we should learn from Bell's inequalities is not that quantum mechanics requires some kind of action at a 

:

QuantumInformationReview

April2011 Vol.56 No.10: 945-954

doi: 10.1007 s11434-011-4395-1 c

The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.comcsb.scichina.com www.springer.com/scpBell inequality, separability and entanglement distillation

LI Ming

1, FEI ShaoMing2,3*& LI-JOST XianQing3,4

1College of Mathematics and Computational Science, China University of Petroleum, Dongying 257061, China;

2School of Mathematical Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China;

3Max-Planck-Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig 04103, Germany;

4Department of Mathematics, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China

Received August 3, 2010; accepted October 10, 2010In

this review, we introduce well-known Bell inequalities, the relations between the Bell inequality and quantum separability, and the

entanglement distillation of quantum states. It is shown that any pure entangled quantum state violates one of Bell-like inequalities.

Moreover, quantum states that violate any one of these Bell-like inequalities are shown to be distillable. New Bell inequalities that

detect more entangled mixed states are also introduced. Bell inequality, entanglement, distillationCitation:Li

M, Fei S M, Li-Jost X Q. Bell inequality, separability and entanglement distillation. Chinese Sci Bull, 2011, 56: 945-954, doi: 10.1007

s11434-011-4395-1The contradiction between local realism and quantum me- chanics was first highlighted by the paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) [1]. Nonlocality can be deter- mined from violation of conditions, called Bell inequalities [2], that are satisfied by any local variable theory. In 1964, Bell formulated an inequality that is obeyed by any local hidden-variable theory. However, he showed that the EPR singlet statej +i=1p2 j 00 i+j11i) violates the inequality. In fact, the Bell inequality provided the first possibility to distin- guish experimentally between quantum-mechanical predic- tions and predictions of local realistic models. Bell inequal- ities are of great importance in understanding the concep- tual foundations of quantum theory and investigating quan- tum entanglement, as they can be violated by quantum entan- gled states.On the other hand, violation of the inequalities is closely related to the extraordinary power of realizing certain tasks in quantum information processing, which outperforms its classical counterpart, such as building quantum protocols to decrease communication complexity [3] and providing se- cure quantum communication [4, 5]. One of the most important Bell inequalities is the Clauser- Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality [6] for two-qubit*Corresponding author (email: feishm@mail.cnu.edu.cn) systems. It can be generalized to theN-qubit case, known as the Mermin-Ardehali-Belinskii-Klyshko (MABK) inequality [7-9]. A set of multipartite Bell inequalities has been ele- gantly derived in terms of two dichotomic observables per site [10, 11]. The set includes the MABK inequality as a spe- cial case [12] and can detect entangled states that the MABK inequality fails to detect. Ref. [13] introduced another fam- ily of Bell inequalities forN-qubit systems that are maxi- mally violated by all Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states. A method of extending Bell inequalities fromnto (n+1)-partite states is described in [14]. In the higher dimensional bipartite case, Collins et al. [15] constructed a CHSH-type inequal- ity for arbitraryd-dimensional (qudit) systems known as the Collins-Gisin-Linden-Masser-Popescu (CGLMP) inequality. Gisin [16] presented a theorem in 1991 that states that any pure entangled two-qubit state violates the CHSH inequal- ity. Specifically, the CHSH inequality is both su cient and necessary for the separability of two-qubit states. Soon af- ter, Gisin and Peres [17] provided an elegant proof of this theorem for the case of pure two-qudit systems. Chen et al. [18] showed that all pure entangled three-qubit states violate a Bell inequality. Nevertheless, it has remained an open prob- lem for a long time whether Gisin"s theorem can be general- ized to the multi-qudit case. In addition, Bell inequalities that

946LiM,et al. Chinese Sci BullApril (2011) Vol.56 No.10

can detect more (mixed) entangled quantum states are being searched for. Bell inequalities are also useful in verifying the security of quantum key distribution protocols [19, 20]. There is a simple relation between nonlocality and distillability: if any two-qubit [21] or three-qubit [22] pure or mixed state vio- lates a specific Bell inequality, then the state must be distill- able. D ¨ur showed that for the caseN>8, there existN-qubit bound entangled (non-distillable) states that violate Bell in- equalities [23]. However, Ac

´ın has demonstrated that for all

states violating an inequality, there exists at least one kind of bipartite decomposition of the system such that a pure entan- gled state can be distilled [24, 25]. However generally it is an open problem whether violation of a Bell inequality implies distillability. In this review, we first give a brief introduction of several important Bell inequalities in section 1. We introduce a set of su cient and necessary for the separability of general pure bipartite quantum states in arbitrary dimensions. We then show that pure entangled states can be distilled from quan- tum mixed states that violate one of these Bell inequalities. New Bell operators are constructed in section 3 and used to detect more entangled quantum states. We further derive the maximal violation of such Bell inequalities. We give conclu- sions and remarks in section 4.

1 Some well-known Bell inequalities

In this section we recall several useful Bell inequalities in- cluding the CHSH inequality, WWZB inequality (including the MABK inequality as a special case), CGLMP inequality and some other generalized inequalities.

1.1 Bell inequalities for two and three-qubit systems

The famous CHSH [6] inequality is a kind of improved Bell inequality that is more feasible for experimental verification. Suppose two observers, Alice and Bob, are separated spa- tially and share two qubits. Alice and Bob each measure a dichotomic observable with possible outcomes1 in one of two measurement settings:A1;A2andB1;B2respectively. The CHSH inequality is a constraint on correlations between Alice"s and Bob"s measurement outcomes if a local realistic description is assumed. The Bell function for the CHSH in- equality has been given as [26] B )=A1()(B1()+B2())+A2()(B1()B2());(1) whereis a collection of local hidden variables and the vari- ablesAi() andBj() take values1. According to the lo- cal hidden-variable theory, the statistical average of the Bell function must satisfy the inequality [6, 26],jhB()ij62, where the statistical averagehB()i=R()B()dwith ) the probability density distribution.Quantum mechanically the statistical average of the Bell function is replaced by a quantum average of the correspond- ing operator given by B=A1 B1+A1 B2+A2 B1A2

B2;(2)

whereAi=~ai~A=axixA+ay iy A+az iz

A,Bj=~bj~B=

b xjxB+by jy B+bz jz

B,~ai=(axi;ay

i;az i) and~bj=(bxj;by j;bz j) are real unit vectors satisfyingj~aij=j~bjj=1 withi;j=1;2, and x;y;z A =Bare Pauli matrices. The CHSH inequality says that if there exist local hidden-variable models to describe the sys- tem, the inequality jhBij62(3) must hold. For entangled states, it is always possible to find suitable observablesA1,A2,B1andB2such that inequality (3) is vio- lated. For instance, takingj +i=(j01i j10i)=p2,A1=x, A

2=z,B1=(x+z)=p2,

andB2=(xz)=p2, we obtainjhBij=2p2, which gives the maximal violation [27]. For three-qubit states, the Mermin inequality states that [7-9] jhA2B1C1i+hA1B2C1i+hA1B1C2i hA2B2C2ij62;(4) where observablesAi;Bi;andCi,i=1;2, are associated with three qubits respectively. The maximal violation of the inequality (4) is 4. The quantum mechanical violation of the Bell inequalities has been demonstrated experimentally, e.g. [28].

1.2 Bell inequalities for multipartite qubit systems

The MABK inequality is a kind of Bell inequality for multi- partite qubits [7-9] whereas the WWZB inequality [10, 11] is a kind of generalization of the MABK inequality. Here we introduce the WWZB inequality and consider the MABK inequality as a special case of the WWZB inequality. Consider anN-qubit quantum system and allow each part to choose independently between two dichotomic observ- ablesAj;A0 jfor thejth observer, specified by local parame- ters. Each measurement has two possible outcomes 1 and1. The WWZB quantum mechanical Bell operator is defined by B N=12 NX s

1;s2;;sN=1S(s1;s2;

;sN) X k

1;k2;;kN=1sk11sk22skNN

N j

1Oj(kj);(5)

whereS(s1;s2;;sN) is an arbitrary function taking only values1 andOj(1)=AjandOj(2)=A0 jwithkj=1;2:It is shown in [10, 11] that local realism requiresjhBNij61: The MABK inequality is recovered by takingS(s1;s2;; s N)=p2 cos[(s1+s2++sNN+1)=(¼=4)] in (5). Employing an inductive method from the (N1)-partite WWZB Bell inequality to theN-partite inequality, a family LiM,et al. Chinese Sci BullApril (2011) Vol.56 No.10947 of Bell inequalities was presented in [13]. The new Bell op- erator is defined by B N=BN1 12 (AN+A0

N)+IN1

12 (ANA0

N);(6)

whereBN1represents the normal WWZB Bell operators defined in (5). Such new Bell operators yield violation of the Bell inequality for the generalized GHZ states,j i= cosj000i+sinj111i, in the whole parameter region ofand for any number of qubits, thus overcoming the draw- back of the WWZB inequality. In the three-qubit case, one can construct three di erent Bell operators fromB2by taking theapproachof(6). ThecorrespondingthreeBellinequalities can distinguish full separability, detailed partial separability and true entanglement [29].

1.3 Bell inequalities for high-dimensional systems

For bipartite high-dimensional quantum systems, we intro- duce the CGLMP inequality given in [15]. We consider the standard Bell-type experiment: two spatially separated ob- servers, Alice and Bob, share a copy of a pure two-qudit state j i 2Cd

Cdin the composite system. Suppose that Alice

and Bob both have the choice of performing one of two dif- ferent projective measurements, each of which hasdpossible outcomes. LetA1andA2denote observables measured by Alice andB1andB2the observables measured by Bob. Each measurement hasdpossible outcomes: 0;1;;d1. Any local variable theory must then obey the well-known CGLMP inequality [15]: I d[ d2 1X k=0(12kd1)f[P(A1=B1+k) +P(B1=A2+k+1)+P(A2=B2+k) +P(B2=A1+k)][P(A1=B1k1) +P(B1=A2k)+P(A2=B2k1) +P(B2=A1k1)]g62:(7) Here [x] denotes the integer part ofx. The joint probability P (Aa=Bb+m)=Pd1 j

0P(Aa=j;Bb=jm),a;b=1;2, in

which the measurementsAaandBbhave outcomes that dier bym(modd). Chen et al. show that all bipartite entangled states violate the CGLMP inequality [30], which gives a detailed proof of

Gisin"s Theorem for two-qudit quantum systems.

LetX[1]

jandX[2] j, wherej=1;2, denotes the two ob- servables for thejth party. Each hasdpossible outcomes: x [1] j;x[2] j=0;1;;d1. Fu introduced the correlation func- tionQij[31], Q ij=1S d1X mquotesdbs_dbs15.pdfusesText_21
[PDF] dieu ne joue pas aux dés einstein

[PDF] intrication quantique expérience

[PDF] décohérence quantique pdf

[PDF] paradoxe epr

[PDF] intrication quantique

[PDF] alain aspect prix nobel

[PDF] ens cachan

[PDF] non localité quantique

[PDF] bohm bijoux

[PDF] paradoxe epr pour les nuls

[PDF] mondialisation sur le plan politique

[PDF] la mondialisation politique pdf

[PDF] l'aspect politique de la mondialisation

[PDF] mondialisation politique définition

[PDF] éléments de philosophie alain résumé